The Forum > Article Comments > Gillard's legacy > Comments
Gillard's legacy : Comments
By Patrick Baume, published 3/7/2013We are only seven days from her political demise, but many pundits seem to already agree that the achievements of Prime Minister Julia Gillard will seem more impressive with greater distance.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
-
- All
Posted by Bren, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 10:04:36 AM
| |
Although I see the author is not exactly praising Gillard, but he is taking an unnecessarily upbeat view.
I searched the the article to find the significant tax reform he refers to.. tripling of the tax-free threshold does not count as significant.. a useful reform that could be instituted at minimal political cost, perhaps. The Gillard and Rudd government shied away from any significant tax reform, essentially leaving the system alone.. Posted by Curmudgeon, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 10:33:06 AM
| |
Bren,
"Both governments were left wing dominated and associated with financial mismanagement, particularly high budget deficits that they promised to reduce but did not." So all the parrots say. Australia's budget deficits are neither high by international standards nor necessarily a sign of economic mismanagement. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-05-07/alberici-economic-comparisons/4672166 Posted by mac, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 10:34:11 AM
| |
Obviously Patrick must be referring to left handed pundits only.
As bren says, most of the things the author is claiming as achievements are just pipe dreams, which in what appears to be the future economic conditions, are very unlikely to become so much as smoke, let alone fire. They will most likely end up like the L A W law promise of another labor PM. Gillard will be remembered as perhaps the worst ever PM, but only the future & the full discovery of her stuff ups will tell if she has achieved even that. Whitlam may still hold the crown. Of course, if given much more time Rudd should be able to beat both of them, so Gillard might be nothing more than a sorry incident. Posted by Hasbeen, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 10:38:31 AM
| |
Julia tried to fly too close to the sun and got burned. Severely.
The lesson for all of us is: don't accept any promotion which is beyond your level of competence. Julia unraveled bit by bit over three years and she has the rest of her life to reflect upon this. Few would envy her! Posted by David G, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 11:11:27 AM
| |
Political commentators have stated that:
"From day one after the 2010 election Julia Gillard has had the blow torch applied. Her position as Prime Minister has been described as "tainted" because she tapped Rudd on the shoulder or as the Opposition keeps telling us "stabbed" him in the back. This suggests she came to power illegitimately. It ignores the fact that there was widespread dissatisfaction over Rudd's leadership with the Labor Party as polls began to slide. Gillard spoke to Rudd face-to-face about her intention to challenge after being approached by several concerned members of caucus. Rudd resigned and Julia Gillard was elected unopposed by the Parliamentary caucus. There was nothing illegitimate about the process. She became leader because she gained the support of the Labor Party caucus." "The Coalition has had a campaign of destruction, involving lies, fear mongering and unproven allegations. We could all respect an Opposition leader who played a clean game. Who challenged a government's policies and pointed out their flaws, who provided alternative policies that won broad support. Mr Abbott has not played that kind of game. And of course he's been aided by the MSM (Main-Stream-Media), shock jocks, and even comedy shows." We're now being told that - "Nasty, negative, nay saying, Abbott, has become "nice" Abbott in the dark blue suit, white shirt, blue tie. This should be a WTF moment. Can this chameleon be trusted?" In the meantime the former PM has soldiered on, introducing some world first legislation and social reforms - including disability care, carbon pricing, and a Royal Commission into Institutional abuse, to name just a few. History will judge Julia Gillard well. Mr Abbott has to do more than just keep breathing to become the next Prime Minister. If Mr Abbott believes he leads the next government-in-waiting then it is incumbent on him to enunciate the policies and the vision that drives them. Clearly, as many have pointed out, there has been huge advantages while in Opposition in offering a small target to Labor, but to carry that strategy any further now is to treat voters with contempt. Posted by Lexi, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 11:29:06 AM
| |
Lexi, <Leave Julia alooonnne. She did everything right. It wasn't her fault. It was the fault of the 'mens' and MSM (that's a newie! LOL) and Rudd and everyone. Can't you see she is a womyn and womyn are wonderful? It's all THEM, THEIR fault. Why can't they just leave Julia alooonnne?' Blub, blub, red eyes, wrings hands>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHmvkRoEowc Posted by onthebeach, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 12:03:16 PM
| |
I agree with Patrick that Julia, viewed from a distance, will have a great legacy.
Viewed from Mars, this will be so. Viewed from the extreme edge of the universe, perhaps it will look even better! Patrick, give up on those funny cigarettes. Posted by David G, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 12:10:46 PM
| |
...Julia who? ? ?
Posted by diver dan, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 12:36:31 PM
| |
David G is right.
Julia Gillard is typical of the educated career feminists who have taken on politics for their daily bread. She just didn't have what it takes, the ability and skills. The skill sets are completely different. As well, despite her years she always lacked broad life experience. True, she has made a killing out of politics what with retiring in middle age and copping the beaut $$super and $$benefits of PM. That is not a bad outcome for her and she should get a helping hand into speaking roles and a guvvy job from the Grrls network, Emily's List. Julia helped herself and careerist educated middle class women like her. But she always denied the common transitions that women choose and go through in life and consequently if she ever helped the ordinary women in the street it was definitely more by accident than by design. Of course Julia and feminists like her never intend to share what they regard as the mundane lives of women who are not inclined to put career and material things first in life. Parliament has always had too many lawyers. Julia was one of them. Posted by onthebeach, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 12:47:14 PM
| |
onthebeach,
This from a man whose posts continue with factual errors and misrepresentation. Take a course in "Lateral Thinking 101." It may help. So may the following link in setting the record straight on Julia Gillard: http://www.theage.com.au/comment/how-the-pms-gender-took-over-the-agenda-20130624-2oson.html Posted by Lexi, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 2:20:30 PM
| |
About the Author states:
"Patrick Baume is a Media Analyst who blogs on politics and sport..." Patrick can I suggest you stick to sport Geoff Posted by Geoff of Perth, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 3:41:31 PM
| |
It would be as well to suspend judgment until the results of the Victorian police investigation into the AWU scandal is completed. Should the lady in question be charged as solicitor to both Bruce Wilson and the AWU, then we must wait further for the decision of the courts.
Posted by anti-green, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 3:47:30 PM
| |
The history writtten by labour barnacles in the leftist dominated media will rate Julia a better PM than Chifley.
Real historians will be objective and will colour their history with the written and oral contemperatenous commentaries of her peers. And that won't be at all flattering. Posted by imajulianutter, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 4:11:47 PM
| |
It will indeed be interesting to see how history
will judge Julia Gillard. The historian can establish that an act took place on a certain day, but this, by historical standards constitutes only chronology. The moment that the historian begins to look critically at circumstances, context, or any other considerations, the product becomes unacceptable for one or another camp of readers. Interesting times ahead. http://www.theage.com.au/comment/how-the-pms-gender-took-over-the-agenda-20130624-2oson.html http://voicelessvictim.wordpress.com/2013/06/27/julia-gillards-legacy-lives-on-in-historic-royal-commission/ One can only wonder whether Mr Abbott would have had the courage to initiate the Royal Commission into child sexual abuse in institutional settings due to his close religious affiliations, especially with Cardinal Pell? The former PM did take this responsibility - and that's quite a legacy in itself. Posted by Lexi, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 4:34:18 PM
| |
The real question is whether Gillard did anything that couldn't or wouldn't have been done by any halfway competent person in the same position. You don't get points for doing the obvious. But you DO lose points for NOT doing the obvious -- like holding a Republic referendum, legalising gay marriage and holding off on a carbon tax until there was actual evidence that it would do anyone any good whatsoever.
Posted by Jon J, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 5:41:41 PM
| |
The irony is that Gillard actually did govern well - good cabinet process and consultation, and a well managed minority government that delivered on important reforms: but lousy communications and let down by her media advisers. Rudd is an egomaniac, can't govern for nuts but somehow connects with the community. Go figure. Hopefully history will teat Julia Gillard kindly and fairly.
Posted by Beejayel, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 9:50:32 PM
| |
her legacy was being stabbed by the sisterhood after serving less than a term. Says more about the sisterhood than anything else. Very few principles but much rhetoric about their superiority. Hopefully the Liberals will promote on ability rather than the failed quota system.
Posted by runner, Wednesday, 3 July 2013 10:58:28 PM
| |
Gillard's legacy
Patrick Baume, What's the idea of reminding us of that dreadful period in the history of Australia ? Do you get some perverse sense of satisfaction out of it ? Posted by individual, Thursday, 4 July 2013 7:41:45 AM
| |
runner,
Gender equality is not guaranteed simply by the presence of women in parliament. It also depends on a parliament's policies and infrastructure. Posted by Lexi, Thursday, 4 July 2013 11:18:27 AM
| |
"gender equality" will be real when we have a female muslim in parliament; without a burqa!
Posted by cohenite, Thursday, 4 July 2013 1:18:21 PM
| |
Dear cohenite,
Australia has a secular government and no official or state religion. However you do raise a valid point. Our governments should treat all citizens as equal regardless of religion (or lack of it). http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/1754532/First-Muslim-woman-to-enter-Parliament Posted by Lexi, Thursday, 4 July 2013 2:52:00 PM
| |
You miss the point Lexi; the 'election', actually replacement, of the muslim lady is a measure of the tolerance and strength of the Western democratic model. It reflects nothing on the nature and character of islam or its adherents.
One needs to look at islam nations and consider how their idea of democracy measures up. Start with Turkey which, despite the brilliance of Ataturk, is now descending down the Islamic black hole. Posted by cohenite, Thursday, 4 July 2013 6:05:40 PM
| |
Dear cohenite,
We're not discussing religion on this thread. I responded to runner's post about women in the Australian Parliament and his reference to the Liberal Party. I was surprised by your response and reference specifically to Muslim women - but conceded that you had raised a valid point. However lets stick to the topic of this article and not divert it. If you want to discuss the topic of Islamic fundamentalism - why don't you start your own discussion on the topic in the General Discussion Section of this forum. I'm sure it will prove popular. Posted by Lexi, Thursday, 4 July 2013 6:39:14 PM
| |
Don't be obtuse Lexi; Gillard's heritage was a faux discussion about misogyny.
it was faux because it did not cover islam What's more misogynistic than islam? You see, I thought Gillard was flat-track bully, like all feminists; they can rail against the evil men in the West because there are no consequences. Go to Saudi Arabia and rattle a few placards and liberate your breasts there and see how your anti-misogynistic crusade goes. If you go, take Gillard with you. Posted by cohenite, Thursday, 4 July 2013 6:44:32 PM
| |
Posted by onthebeach, Thursday, 4 July 2013 7:47:27 PM
| |
Dear cohenite,
I thought that we were discussing the former PM's legacy. If you want to discuss gender though - the following link may be of interest: http://www.theage.com.au/comment/how-the-pms-gender-took-over-the-agenda-20130624-2oson.html Posted by Lexi, Thursday, 4 July 2013 8:57:38 PM
| |
the former
PM's legacy. Lexi, That is her legacy ! Posted by individual, Friday, 5 July 2013 8:02:19 AM
| |
I wonder what our children and grandchildren will think of Gillard's legacy in 20 years when they are still paying off the debt she has saddled Australia with ?.
Posted by eyeinthesky, Saturday, 6 July 2013 2:28:33 PM
| |
Dear eyeinthesky,
They'll hopefully be educated thanks to her legacy, and have jobs, again thanks to her legacy, and their future will be looking exceptionally bright - thanks to her legacy. BTW: - our deficit is the smallest in the industrialised world - and its thanks to that our economy survived and is the envy of the world. AAA gold rating and all that. However, they may have quite a lot to say should the Coalition get in - and we go down the path of severe cuts and neglect of education, health, and our infrastructure and asset base - as we did under Mr Howard. It then will take decades to again fix the problems. But hopefully your youngsters will be intelligent enough to know who's really to blame for the neglect and these woes. Posted by Lexi, Saturday, 6 July 2013 3:37:27 PM
| |
We are approved dealers and recognized distributors of various consumer electronics, we sell latest brands and new original products from there manufacturer with the minimum of 1 full year international warranty.
We sell in bulk purchase and sample order in manufacturer prices, kindly get back to us if you're interested in purchasing from us, delivery are made before payment. We accept payment on delivery. CONTACT EMAILS & SALES INQUIRY: v2bcomltd@gmail.com V2bcommunicationslimited@hotmail.co.uk SIGNED Mgt © 2013 V2B COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED® All Rights Reserved. Products carry 1 year international warranty . Posted by aneale, Thursday, 11 July 2013 2:51:33 AM
|
Gillard's term to be seems to have a lot in common with that of Joan Kirner in Victoria.
Both governments were left wing dominated and associated with financial mismanagement, particularly high budget deficits that they promised to reduce but did not. Gillard's departing present to the people was a further unfunded spending spree (on disability support and Gonski education funding).
Kirner ended up being thumped in a big election defeat. Gillard was destined for the same but was overthrown by Rudd before that could happen.