Peter

Psychological mechanism of denial:

Accuse others of what you engage in yourself.

"Accuse others of what you engage in yourself."

Tell Lewandowsky.

csteele, having been comprehensively scuttled and revealed as nothing but a pedantic empty vessel you resort to, rather enemic, insults. So, I'm a nutter.

My view on AGW is here:

http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com.au/2012/10/has-man-made-global-warming-been.html

http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com.au/2012/10/has-global-warming-been-disproved-part-2.html

My concern is that AGW science has now become propoganda and in being such real insight into climate and how it affects humanity is stymied by the ideological preoccupation with CO2.

In respect of CO2 I have posed questions about its effects on climate above; you have ignored them; they are cogent and go to the heart of why AGW is a lie.

In my opinion those who support AGW fall into a few categories; the ignorant and gullible, the ideological, the spivs and those who know better but who lie.

Now, address the questions csteele or state which category of AGW supporter you fall into.

Peter,

So you're exiting, having produced exactly nil scientific exposition on your assertion than AGW is false.

What you did perform was your usual rhetorical smoke and mirrors act, whereby your only ambition is to set yourself up as "the winner", almost completely disregarding the issue at hand.

You know that there have been plenty of links in these debates to peer-reviewed material on AGW - but that's where your conspiracy theory kicks in. You can't lose with your type of customised debate, can you. If someone does produce the goods, you can immediately cast the author as a fraud.

That's if anyone can catch up to you as you move the goalposts around the field.

What a joke : )

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

Dear Anthony,

Here you are in a post a couple of years back.

“Even if you accept AGW is real, which it isn't...if AGW is real, which it isn't...Clearly therefore, if AGW is real, which it isn't...”

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=13019#224612

AGW is an acronym for Anthropogenic Global Warming – global warming caused by human activity.

I repeat Graham Young, the owner of this site, writes "If someone tells you that human activity isn’t contributing to global warming they are a nutter, not a skeptic."

So the questions I put to you are perfectly valid.

Do you believe that “human activity is contributing to global warming”?

If you do then when approximately did you come to this conclusion?

If you don't then how do you feel being referred to as a nutter?

Sad and pathetic; how old are you csteele, 10? Look everyone, I caught the big bad man in a contradiction; aren't I clever. Only there isn't a contradiction csteele which would be apparent to even your blinkered understanding if you read the links previously provided to you:

http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com.au/2012/10/has-man-made-global-warming-been.html

http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com.au/2012/10/has-global-warming-been-disproved-part-2.html

Dear Anthony,

LOL.

Yet you have the hide to condemn me for not directly answering questions.

But hey mate, I understand your reluctance. I would be defensive in your position too but when the ground becomes unsteady it is time to check the lance and hop off the high horse.