The Forum > Article Comments > Don't blame Julia, blame Labor > Comments
Don't blame Julia, blame Labor : Comments
By Graham Young, published 11/3/2013Our qualitative polling shows it's not Julia Gillard on her own who is the problem, it is Labor.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
-
- All
While it may well be true that opinion started running against Rudd before the spill, the fact remains that there was a considerable amount of backstabbing under way before the dip. Multiple stories hit the press as to Mr Rudd's management style, driven by a bunch of people whose feelings had clearly been hurt by it.
Cause and effect quickly became intertwined and indistinguishable, leading to the inevitable steps-of-the-forum moment.
It was then that it became clear to the public that the Labor Party had reached a point where it consisted of absolutely nothing but power-blocs and influence-peddlers. Ms Gillard proceeded to ram that point home at every opportunity, by making decisions in a values-free zone, with no reference to Labor's traditional tenets or ethos.
For a while, I convinced myself that having to work with a coalition of rag-tag also-rans was a major factor in her inability to arrive at a single policy that was free from artifice and compromise. Sadly, recent weeks have demonstrated that the teeth-grinding clumsiness evident in her every move is in fact her very own.
My view is that blame cannot be ascribed to one more than the other. One way or another, Ms Gillard is a product of current Labor thinking, and therefore their responsibility. But her contribution to the problems that now face the Party is also substantial.
Mr Rudd is irrelevant in the current picture. He might well turn out to be Labor's very own twice-rising soufflé, but not for a good few years yet. Unless he is tripped up by his own ambition - which is of course always a contender - he will do well to sit on the sidelines and allow the well-poisoned chalice to be sipped by a few others, before attempting resurrection.