It seems to me that Ali Kazak protests too much. There is nothing wrong with stating the truth as one sees it. To say the Islamic religion favours violent resolution of conflicts is not racist. Mr Kazak's may disagree, but that is his perogative. Similarly, Mr wilders has a not racist message that he believes is important for Australia. I agree with him and find the evidence he quotes from The Netherlands/Holland, France and the UK compelling. It is a disgrace that he could not be heard in peace and quiet - but the problems he faced simply proves the truth of some of his allegations. It should be a major wake up call for this nation.

Yes Pliny, you are correct.
Wilders made the point of the difference between moslems and islam.
As he said he has known many fine moslems, but they are prisoners of their own religion.

Ali Kazak is surely not denying the accusation;
describing the Arabs as having a "culture of violence", saying "aggression and war are nearly inevitable in the Arab world"

Virtually every day there are reports of bombings inside and outside mosques.
In Iraq the Americans were blamed but now they have left they are
blowing up each other. The religion itself demands the death sentence
for those that leave islam, or insult the prophet etc etc.
Death for the Infidel is one cry from the pages of the Koran.
It is not universally practiced but there are enough occurrences of it
to not make any difference.
Fatwas on Simon Rushtie and the Murder of the film maker in Holland.
Isn't that enough.

What I have always wondered about is how much of this violence can
be traced back to the practise of cousin marriage.
It is about time they consulted with geneticists.