The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > How marriage equality was defeated in Tasmania > Comments

How marriage equality was defeated in Tasmania : Comments

By Rodney Croome, published 3/10/2012

Lessons from the failure to carry marriage equality in Tasmania.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All
G’day Kipp:

...I disagree (of course). Homosexuals must realise that “out there” are many other marginalized groups, some of which I mentioned in my post above, whose plight is more painful in the long term than two homosexuals with an inability to marry each other, and much more deserving of attention.

...I agree with Atman above, who also articulated a supporting point better than I could. Homosexuals are admirably supported in Australian communities by any comparison.
Posted by diver dan, Wednesday, 3 October 2012 8:06:08 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
@Diver Dan "Homosexuals must realise that “out there” are many other marginalized groups, some of which I mentioned in my post above,"

Oh, thanks for pointing that out Diver Dan - I never realised!

But tell us, as you apparently think only one issue can be dealt with at a time, which ONE of those marginalised groups should be helped while we let the others rot as you suggest the homosexuals should be?
Posted by Jimmy Jones, Wednesday, 3 October 2012 9:56:36 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Jimmy Jones, the issue has been dealt with quite admirably, & according to the majority of the population, the right decision has been reached.

Just because the ABC is a haven for homosexuality, greens & other ratbaggery, does not make it important or right.

Perhaps you should trot back down the garden path, & join the fairies, where you can all frolic together.
Posted by Hasbeen, Wednesday, 3 October 2012 10:22:03 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I thought that same sex couples could enter into civil unions that accorded them the same rights as married couples except that they could not use the word "marriage" to describe their relationship. If this is so, is it accurate to claim that homosexuals are, legally, "rotting" out there? And, again if my understanding is correct, how can same sex couples claim that they do not already have legal relationship equality with married couples?
Posted by GlenC, Wednesday, 3 October 2012 10:57:39 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"Herein lies a lesson for other states and territories moving toward marriage equality."

The term "marriage equality" is a misnomer, derived from the spin of the homosexual lobby. Arguing that the unnatural, dysfunctional, sterile homosexual act is equal to the pro-creative heterosexual act is illogical. Furthermore, a same-sex partnership requires an external agent such as surrogacy or sperm donor, for the generation of children.
Posted by Raycom, Thursday, 4 October 2012 12:09:07 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy