The Forum > Article Comments > Truth and falsehood the new divide? > Comments
Truth and falsehood the new divide? : Comments
By Alan Austin, published 3/9/2012Would it be a positive move in public life if truth vs falsehood did replace the old dichotomies?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
-
- All
We wont be side tracked by little red hearings like:
*What about John Howard...*
*What about Tony Abbot...*
*What about the Tooth Fairy...*
The question here is did Julia lie?
That others *might* have lied too does not excuse her.
You turn things inside out in your endeavour to write an apologia for her : <<promises stymied by factors beyond the control of the promisor>>
This might have been true if she had a carbon tax on the table but had not been able to get it through.
But in reality it was the reverse, there was no carbon tax on the table and she decided to invent it.
It was a question of integrity –she had a clear choice
i) Whether she held foremost a commitment made to the Australian electorate , or
ii) Whether she held foremost her status as PM.
Guess what she chose?
Marcus Junius Brutus might have said: “ not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more”
Marcus Brutus Gillard demonstrated she loved playing Caesar
(forgive me noble Caesar for associating you with Gillard) more than she loved Rome.