The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Olympic torch should shine on athletes not nations > Comments

Olympic torch should shine on athletes not nations : Comments

By Michael Mullins, published 31/7/2012

What are we to make of the many nations that lack the wealth to host the Olympics? Are they not great?

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All
In this global age, why not let a lot of cities (say up to 6 in different countries) host different sports.

This would reduce cost and would enable less rich or influential nations to host events. For example, badminton is huge in Asia so why not Singapore or Indonesia hosting such events.
Posted by Chris Lewis, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 8:01:06 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"There are ways of curing the Olympics of nationalism."

Not voluntarily.

Especially since the 'Olympic Movement' is a collection of national Olympic Committees who certainly have no incentive to do themselves out of positions of authority and who will only begin to panic when cities around the world cease to bid for hosting rights to the Olympic Games.

"What are we to make of the many nations that lack the wealth to host the Olympics? Are they not great?"

Well, to be perfectly honest – many of them aren't. But at least they're represented by athletes, not politicians. Though it needs to be added that the athletes themselves are lauded and feted when 'successful'. So there's at least some focus on the athletes by their home nations – everything from million-dollar payments to national public holidays and naming rights for boulevards.

At least the International Olympic Committee has made provision for athletes like Marial and the trio from the previously Dutch Antilles' Curacao to attend and compete.
Posted by WmTrevor, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 8:58:46 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Wm Trevor:

...Shouldn’t we (in the name of raw honesty), simply change the name “Olympics” to the more applicable “Austen Tayshus" Games?
Posted by diver dan, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 10:03:10 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Was does the Author think the Games are about? the world champs are for individuals the Games are for countries. I my view the games shouldn't be funded at all. If your friend is worried about South Sudan perhaps he should not go to the games at all and use the the money he save to help out his fellow south sudanees contrymen.
Posted by Kenny, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 12:28:30 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Anyone who takes any aspect of the modern Olympic Games seriously, suffers from a fundamental lack of perspective. Sadly, the Olympics are merely the ultimate in commercialized sport, in competition with such equally irrelevant constructs as the Formula One Grand Prix.

The parallels between the antics of Jacques Rogge and Bernie Ecclestone - or for that matter, Sepp Blatter of FIFA - are instructive.
Posted by Pericles, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 1:27:38 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Please...Why can't we just have another "war" to replace the next olympics? The olympics is the closest obscenity to gay marriage IMO.
Posted by diver dan, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 1:42:35 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy