The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Fukushima - local children unwitting (and unwilling) radioactive guinea pigs > Comments

Fukushima - local children unwitting (and unwilling) radioactive guinea pigs : Comments

By John Daly, published 31/7/2012

The National Institute of Radiological Sciences conclusions refute the government's assertion that Japanese children in effect received zero thyroid radiation doses from Fukushima.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Page 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. 11
  13. 12
  14. All
Tom Keen ,you have been given numerous references that you refuse to acknowledge or read.I think it is called cognitive dissonance.
Posted by Arjay, Thursday, 2 August 2012 5:22:04 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kd6ix6swkXsb This is a must see interview with Prof Chris Busby.He has found evidence in Falluja of a new nuke weapon the USA has been using.It was not Depleted Uraniuam as people thought.It was slightly enriched Uranium.

Here you will see the effects of this radiation on the people of Falluja.Not also the US soldiers suffer from Guld War syndrome also having children with birth defects.
Posted by Arjay, Thursday, 2 August 2012 5:41:13 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
My questions are from my point of view developed from understanding coastal alongshore current, whereas oceanographers tend to study the big open ocean currents.
For example, I deal with sewage nutrient pollution from southern Victoria reaching Cape York and the Arafura Sea, dissolved nutrient loads transported within alongshore current of the Australian sediment dispersal system.
So with Fukushima radiation leaked and dumped on the coast in alongshore current water, to me it is not what went OUT off the coast. It's what went up and down the coast where the estuaries are, and where seaweed and fish are grown, where the food web estuary nurseries are.
Northward in Japan there is the Hokkaido herring nurseries and migratory tuna feeding grounds, what's left of it all anyway.
As for radiation, I saw and heard a radiation professor explain how a single particle of Cesium can become lodged in the human body and cause cancer.
I have wondered how people could return to Hiroshima and Nagasaki and live there, but they do. I now understand it's the type of radiation that is the killer, such as a single micro/nano particle of Cesium.
But can a single particle of Cesium be detected, in say the food scanning process in use these days?
Posted by JF Aus, Thursday, 2 August 2012 6:15:09 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
JF Aust.Can a single atom of Caesium be detected? According to Arnie Gunderson from Fairewinds,not very easily.Contact him on http://fairewinds.com and also Prof Chris Busby who has an association with Dr Helen Caldicott.

I've seen video Prof Busby almost in tears as he laments the cover ups and the total lack of accountability by those in the nuke industry.

The way forward is better technology and nuclear fusion,but this greedy corporate mentality are clinging to old outdated technology to make money.

Private enetrprise that controls our Govts makes for an extremely dangerous partnership.The West lives in an Oligarchy in which voting gives us the illusion of democracy.The left /right paradigm is used to confuse the masses and protect a greedy elite.
Posted by Arjay, Thursday, 2 August 2012 6:43:10 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Arjay

"Tom Keen ,you have been given numerous references that you refuse to acknowledge or read.I think it is called cognitive dissonance."

If accepting reports by the UN and WHO over non-peer-reviewed books, a fraudulent quack (Chris Busby) and youtube videos is "cognitive dissonance", then yes, I have cognitive dissonance.
Posted by Tom Keen, Thursday, 2 August 2012 7:50:48 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Arjay, see this at the following link:
(copied and pasted)
If anybody is going to see radioactive transport outside of Japan, I would think at this point, we are going to see it in the marine environment, not in the air. We are going to see a lot more of it coming through the ocean, maybe through food coming from the ocean than we are going to see it in these airborne particles.
(end)
http://fairewinds.com/content/hot-particles-and-measurement-radioactivity
Posted by JF Aus, Thursday, 2 August 2012 8:52:55 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Page 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. 11
  13. 12
  14. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy