The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > History with a soft focus > Comments

History with a soft focus : Comments

By Graham Young, published 20/7/2012

George Megalogenis has reviewed the last 30 years of Australian history through an idiosyncratic lens.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All
Nothing wrong with criticism so long as it’s not radical, eh Graham?
If it’s not radical, I say what’s the good of it? In that case it’s not criticism but it’s opposite--reassurance.
I haven’t read the book so I can’t take you to task, though I find the paragraph you pedantically criticise as lucid and aporetic as prose is generally.
“George is definitely in the Labor cheer squad” you say. Well what’s wrong with that, except his nonsense doesn’t suit your nonsense? You’re in the conservative cheer squad. And isn’t your conclusion derivative: “so what could have been a good tour through the last 30 years of Australian economic history, becomes subtly slanted so that it isn't an accurate guide to what happened at all”. As if there is an accurate guide, or you’re a fair judge. There is of course for conservatives, albeit fatuous. There are myriad ways of reading history, but none of them “definitive”. Economic history is the most delusional of all. Real history is tumultuous, and the rest is just process.
Posted by Squeers, Saturday, 21 July 2012 7:35:38 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The world is replete with judges but, sadly, there are even more executioners.
David G,
you meant bad judges of course didn't you ?
Posted by individual, Saturday, 21 July 2012 4:46:05 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Individual,

Define "Bad."
Posted by Lexi, Sunday, 22 July 2012 4:19:47 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I usually watch the "Insiders," on a Sunday
morning and George Megalogenis has been a
commentator many times on the program. I have
found him to be a sane political journalist
who knew what he was talking about. His background
as a political journalist seems pretty solid,
still I guess it's not easy to sustain any book
of about 400 pages. There will always be critics,
of course. That's a given. And constructive
criticisms are helpful. I shall borrow the book from
my local library and judge for myself - I didn't
realise that it mattered though - which "camp" an author
belonged to or for whom they cheered politically.
But I guess it does matter to some.
Posted by Lexi, Sunday, 22 July 2012 4:49:59 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Define "Bad."
Lexi,
Those who persecute the victims, handle the crims with velvet gloves & reward damages to the insurance companies by way of not making the insurance companies pay. The perpetrators get opportunities to study for free & get assistance all the way whilst the victims struggle to deal with their loss. Those who are in the pockets of the lefties & those who are in the pockets of the guilt industry. Those who simply don't give a hoot about integrity. They Lexi, & those who support them are the bad, a number of the judiciary included.
Defence lawyers make up the cream on the effluent.
Posted by individual, Sunday, 22 July 2012 5:18:08 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Individual,

The law is the law. It doesn't guarantee justice
unfortunately. Perhaps that's why justice wears a
blindfold.

I watched the 60 Minutes program this
evening about the devastating effects of the
drug "Thalidomate," (not sure if I've spelled it
correctly). However, it caused birth defects in
babies a few decades ago and apparently the German
company that was responsible has never been brought
to account - or paid anything in compensation.
The company is still functioning today,
quite successfully. Finally, there is going to be
a class action brought against the company. It will
be interesting to see how successful the action is.
Posted by Lexi, Sunday, 22 July 2012 8:56:12 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy