Chaplain victory is well earned and deserved.

As a CONSTITUTIONALIST I have my concerns about what is reported about the case. Without having as yet read the judgment, it should be clear that s116 of the constitution actually prohibit speding any monies to religious issues! it is not just about a religious test.
When I comprehensively defeated the Commonwealth, on 19 July 2006, I relied also upon s116 as part of my unchallenged submissions.
Was it not the risk of cost I would be lodging numerous cases in the High Court of Australia against unconstitutional fundings as I have extensively canvassed in my past published books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series on certain constitutional and other legal issues.
It should be understood that any monies spend on religious matters is unconstitutional because of s116! This post doesn't permit me to set it all out but on my blog htttp://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati you can locate set outs about this also.