The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The High Court's decision on school chaplains > Comments

The High Court's decision on school chaplains : Comments

By William Isdale, published 25/6/2012

The court's decision was not based on a separation of church and state, but on the power of the executive as against the parliament and the states.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. All
Squeers,

I expected someone to miss the point of my posting. I did not express an opinion one way or the other on any of the matters I mentioned. I gave some factual information.
Posted by Chris C, Monday, 25 June 2012 8:24:08 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Chris C,
Sorry for presuming you were making a point; I didn't realise you were disinterestedly tabulating data/trivia.
Posted by Squeers, Tuesday, 26 June 2012 7:34:52 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Religion has no place in the life of children. They can make up their much more enlightened minds when they reach adulthood.
Religion must be forced back to the confinement of the home.
Posted by individual, Tuesday, 26 June 2012 8:02:39 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Come come Graham Young, of course it is not 'immaterial' what the plaintiff pleaded.

He won on what his legal team said he might win on, and not on what all the SLABs want to think his team was running the case on.

Talk about spin! Sounds like a twintub.

As for watching the 7.30 Report, hmm, are you aware of the editing suite? You know, stitching together snippets to show what the ditor thinks is wanted?

Besides, the decision last week did erect a wall of separation between the dollars and the chaplains.

That the entire parliament now is being directed by a small cabal of Christian lobbyists to tear that wall down again is another matter.

As for the future, the decision did contain warnings about going down the legislative route, for fear of a further challenge.

And it did not give a tick of approval as you suggest.

Hda a parent from a faith school with standing sought to challenge, the DOGS decision would have kicked in.
Posted by The Blue Cross, Tuesday, 26 June 2012 9:00:25 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Squeers,

Not sure what your point is in response to my comment. It seems the state is legislating because there are a number of other projects threatened by the High Court decision. The state is legislating otherwise funding for these other projects is jeopardised. Your last sentence is a mystery: "The people's will is compromised; that is to say liberated, at least in the long run".
Posted by Francis, Tuesday, 26 June 2012 9:55:22 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Squeers,

Given the frequent confusion over what is and is not, I don’t think it is trivia to point out the factual situation in Victoria re chaplains and religious education or re the kick-off point for political anger over chaplains in schools.
Posted by Chris C, Tuesday, 26 June 2012 2:57:01 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy