Jon, all you need to do is to click on the 'temple' icon at the bottom of my comment and read a few of my latest posts. That should satisfy you regarding my bona fides.

"Jon, all you need to do is to click on the 'temple' icon at the bottom of my comment and read a few of my latest posts. That should satisfy you regarding my bona fides."

David, I see one comment to the effect that children should be protected from their parents' religion, which is true, of course. But I don't see you objecting to fathers bringing up children alone -- of which there are far more cases than there are gay male couples wanting to have children -- or to liberalised no-fault heterosexual divorces depriving children of a 'proper' upbringing with two parents of different genders. Since there are probably a hundred heterosexual divorces and a dozen cases of motherless families for every one case of gay parents, one would expect you to be proportionally far more worked up about them. After all, it's all about 'the children' and their 'role models', isn't it?

Have I missed something?

Yes, Jon!

What?