Danielle,Care to put money on the science on this site http://www.ae911truth.org/ Name the sum and I'll debate you in any forum.We have the absolute scientific proof that explosives were used in the towers and WTC Building 7 which few people know about.It is far,far more convincing than the CO2 lies.

My bet is that you lack the courage and the intellectual prowess.

Dear Arjay,

You are always good for a grin ... You have been debated on 9/11 over the last three years or so ...

Perhaps a new conspiracy theory would liven things up for you again ...

Danielle,I'm serious.$50,000 on the science of freefall or $10,000 on the science of nano thermite.

Dear Arjay,

With odds like that, submit an article online and have debate open to all? Such excitement!! A new first for The Forum.

Undoubtedly, Geoff of Perth and one (what) under god would be in your corner.

Now do submit an article.

You will agree, such a debate is not apropos to the topic in hand.

Danielle,Graham like you is sh!t scared to confront the truth and won't publish it.Let's do it now with my opponents. http://www.debunking911.com/

Here you will see as their lead picture the South Tower tilted at 23 deg.According to NIST the National Institute for Standards and Technology,the top third of this tower was the pile driver that crushed the lower floors.

This was impossible for many reasons.The top third pile driver should have continued on this vertor and fallen over.Hit a nail at this angle and it bends thus not driving it home.Further video footage of the South tower shows this pile driver evaporate mysteriously into dust.What force pulverised the floors above the plane collision into dust? This was concrete reinforced steel.It does not self destruct even under the influence of fire.

All 3 buildings collapsed in virtual freefall speeds which implies that all the structure below the plane impact for the towers had absolutely no structural integrity yet they stayed intact for over 40 yrs.

Care to enter a real debate Danielle?

Dear Arjay,

I'm sure Graham is not afraid of debate ... why should he be? After all, he let you publish here ...

But it needs a different forum from this one.

We are diverting from the topic at hand ...

Reply with a new article.