The Forum > Article Comments > Is a woman leader possible? > Comments
Is a woman leader possible? : Comments
By Jocelynne Scutt, published 11/5/2012Eleanor Roosevelt, Hilary Clinton and Australia's prime minister.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- ...
- 11
- 12
- 13
-
- All
The well documented tirade of sexist abuse directed towards women leaders in the world today is nothing more than a pimple on the arse of the demolition of male privilege in the achievement of equality at the source of the reproduction of culture currently sweeping the globe.
Australian women have already cast aside such infantile nonsense having gained experience in all the principle roles of governance, Governor-General, Prime Minister, High Court justice, Attorney-General, Speaker in the parliament, Premier and so forth.
Sexism is ultimately eliminated with balance.
The task at hand is to establish balance between women and men in the constitutional, bicameral, parliamentary method to which the populations of most modern democracies, Australia, the UK and the USA for instance, have become accustomed.
To consider otherwise is to ignore the tide of history.
Balance in leadership is achieved with conjoint women’s and men’s leaders, the male and female co-chairs of Australia’s First Peoples Assembly, for instance.
Balance in Cabinet, the boardroom of parliament, is achieved with the appointment of an equal number of women and men.
Balance in representation, the Houses of Parliament which appoint Cabinet members, is achieved with dedicated women’s and men’s legislatures, the women’s elected by women and the men’s by men.
Constitutional reform is all that’s required, a referendum one Saturday on the question “do you support equal rights between women and men in the Constitution”.
The way forward is perfectly clear, and with commentary of the quality Dr Scutt presents, self evident to any clear minded citizen, although obviously not to those who continue to engage in lateral violence against women.