The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Eclipsing the religious right > Comments

Eclipsing the religious right : Comments

By Rodney Croome, published 4/5/2012

Gay marriage will mark the beginning of the end of the religious right's disproportionate influence on Australian politics.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Page 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. ...
  12. 14
  13. 15
  14. 16
  15. All
Squeers, I'm sure Ibsen would have laughed at your Enema Of The People concept, as did I. Brilliant.
Posted by WmTrevor, Friday, 4 May 2012 4:52:26 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Long ago I concluded that freedom does not simply mean the freedom to do what Steven Meyer (or Archbishop Pell) approves. So from my perspective gays who want to marry should be permitted to "tie the knot."

But at the same time I would like someone to give me a rational reason for outlawing polygamy or polyandry. I have the impression that many woman may prefer to share an alpha male than to have to make do with a "beta." If that's what they want why should they be barred?

In any case, it seems to me that to legalise polygamy and polyandry would simply be to recognise a fact of twenty-first century society life.
Posted by stevenlmeyer, Friday, 4 May 2012 5:15:58 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Marriage equality, what a farce. Call it what it really is, Rodney, true marriage redefined and corrupted from something of simple purity into some androgynous mess all to appease an over represented group masquerading as a victimised minority within the community. You cannot have two definitions for the one thing. Once gay marriage is introduced, marriage the faithful union between one man and one woman will cease to exist.
And five minutes after SSM is forced on the population the gays will do their little victory dance in the streets (followed by the usual orgy and visit to the gynaecologist), and will stomp on the true intent of what real marriage is all about. And will they be satisfied? Why should they be.
Posted by Anthm1, Friday, 4 May 2012 5:22:58 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I'm gratified you enjoyed the metaphor, WmTrevor, though I should have laboured longer over it. To be honest scatology is an interest of mine and I have a slim volume called "The History of Sh!t", by Dominique Laporte. It's a scholarly work and the lay reader might find it it difficult to pass, but it makes up for that in texture and aesthetics. It's bound and black felt, with the title blocked in white, with the word sh!t rendered in gold leaf--I kid you not. I like to leave it lying around conspicuously when pious in-laws and sundry come visiting.

stevenlmeyer,
I agree entirely. Indeed I don't see why we should discriminate against other species. It's about time we demanded the right to marry our pets, Conjugal rights and all.
I have a 7 year old Shih Tzu I'm inordinately fond of and I think it's about time I made an honest bitch of her..
Posted by Squeers, Friday, 4 May 2012 5:38:59 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Squeers

What you and your pet do in the privacy of your home is none of my business.

I can think of no rational reason for outlawing bestiality either. The fact that I personally find it disgusting is not a rational reason.
Posted by stevenlmeyer, Friday, 4 May 2012 5:48:32 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Steven what I find more disgusting than Squeers attraction to bestiality, is the attempt to reinforce his obviously misplaced feelings of superiority with reference to his position of a scholarly work beyond the ken of the lay reader.

Such grandiose BS places him immediately in the "would be" class.
Posted by Hasbeen, Friday, 4 May 2012 6:08:51 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Page 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. ...
  12. 14
  13. 15
  14. 16
  15. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy