The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > A Clever Country? > Comments

A Clever Country? : Comments

By John Turner, published 20/4/2012

Maybe, but not the way we are heading.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All
Before you write that I've violated someone's rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules.. Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self esteem," consider that it wasn't that long ago that taking someone else's money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self esteem.

If we are expected to pay for other people's mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.

AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest.....You will vote for a ‘welfare’ Govt. only. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job.

.
Posted by individual, Saturday, 21 April 2012 1:40:22 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
>>John might call the evolution religion smart but it does not allow for thinking or questioning of its unproven dogmas.<<

Epic fail. All science including evolutionary theory allows for questioning of its unproven dogmas. That's how science works and it's why scientific theories develop over time: scientists are constantly questioning their unproven dogmas and weeding out the ones which don't match the evidence. You might not like it when those unproven dogmas conflict with yours: nevertheless that's how it works.

Cheers,

Tony
Posted by Tony Lavis, Saturday, 21 April 2012 3:57:50 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
'scientists are constantly questioning their unproven dogmas and weeding out the ones which don't match the evidence. '

Sure Tony that is why so many evolutionary frauds stayed in text books for so long. Dream on man, those that want to deny the obvious will continue to convince themselves that the farytale of evolution is true and even more deceiving that somehow it has contributed to the betterment of society. Keep up the faith for many more have lost it.
Posted by runner, Saturday, 21 April 2012 4:36:37 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
runner,
Please provide details of one evolutionary fraud which you consider is still in the current Theory of Evolution.

As Tony has said, if the evidence shows that some aspect is suspect that aspect is re-examined and if necessary dumped, just as scientists using newly developed dating methods allowed the Piltdown hoax (in reality a well planned practical joke) to be was shown for what it was.

I offered evidence in my last comment and as usual you ignored it. At least I read or have read the literature of those I think are on the wrong track.
Posted by Foyle, Saturday, 21 April 2012 9:09:05 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Foyle I read your last post as a joke. Surely you would not fall for such foolishness.

'Human beings only arrived on the scene when that light had completed 99.99% of its journey.
A typo escaped me in the above. It should read 13.7 billion.'

You must of been laughing when you wrote this nonsense.
Posted by runner, Saturday, 21 April 2012 10:24:49 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
>>Foyle I read your last post as a joke<<

I don't get it. Modern humans appear in the fossil record just under 200,000 years ago. I crunched the numbers with the 17.7 billion and corrected 13.7 billion figure and got the same result: 99.99% for both of them - you need more decimal places to see the difference in the two figures. There's nothing wrong with Foyle's maths: so what's the big joke?

>>Sure Tony that is why so many evolutionary frauds stayed in text books for so long. Dream on man, those that want to deny the obvious will continue to convince themselves that the farytale of evolution is true<<

Damn it Runner: you're onto us. The truth is that the theory of evolution is a just big conspiracy cooked up in 1947 between the CIA, the KGB, the Freemasons and a secret order of Catholic warrior-monks who drink the blood of their enemies when they celebrate the Eucharist. I know some poor deluded fools will protest that history records that Sir Charles Darwin popularised evolutionary theory somewhat prior to 1947: this just serves to demonstrate Henry Ford's adage that history is more or less bunk. The theory was invented to obfuscate a shocking truth: that man is not the product of natural evolution. We are the genetic engineering project of an advanced race of alien beings. To them we are little more than laboratory mice. They continue to observe us from their home on Venus and occasionally they visit us to build some pyramids or to abduct and anally probe drunk rednecks.

TBC
Posted by Tony Lavis, Sunday, 22 April 2012 1:42:49 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy