The Forum > Article Comments > Preaching to the diverted > Comments
Preaching to the diverted : Comments
By Craig Thompson, published 4/4/2012If God did not exist it might be necessary to invent him, or her.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Agnosticism is alive and...erm
Agnosticism is a knowledge position. This discussion is about belief or the lack thereof, which is a different matter. A person can believe with absolute certainty (gnostic theism) or believe with less than absolute certainty (agnostic theism).
I consider myself an agnostic atheist because I don't accept claims based on faith, but I can't be certain they aren't correct.
Atheist is easier to say and accurately describes my position regarding deities, so I tend to leave the agnostic bit out of the discussion because it can excite believers into thinking I am on the fence and that any slight breeze of evidence might hold sway in the 50/50 balancing act. This is not the case. It will take some pretty compelling evidence to get me to accept the faith claims of any religion, but I offer a level playing field to all comers. Show me compelling evidence for a claim and I will believe that claim.
Perhaps some day the religious meddling in my community will be insignificant, in which case the label atheist will no longer have utility for me and I will stop using it. Until that day, or until someone shows up with compelling evidence that their religion is on the money, atheist is apt.