Don't worry about China too much in the future. The pollution Asia will cause will turn it into a new Arctic by 2030.

Individual,there is a much greater pollution ie of Fukushima far greater than Chernobyl that still spews out radiation we are ignoring.

A Japanese journalist has revealled that the Stuxnet Viris was responsible for the safety systems failing at Fukushima.Who created the Stuxnet Virus and who released it?

Who created the Stuxnet Virus and who released it?
Arjay,
This kind of crap hasn't even begun to do it's rounds. Much more exiting stuff is waiting for starting gun.

C'mon Arjay, you can do better than that.

>>A Japanese journalist has revealled that the Stuxnet Viris was responsible for the safety systems failing at Fukushima.Who created the Stuxnet Virus and who released it?<<

Here's the real story - proof that there wasn't even a major earthquake at Fukushima. It was... wait for it... a nuclear bomb attack. By... Israel!

"...the phony 9.0 story was used as seismic cover for a tsunami nuke, which produced the tsunami of a 9.0 when detonated in the Japan trench (where no earthquakes of significance happen) as punishment for Japan offering to enrich uranium for Iran. The rest of the story, the concealment, is black ops."

http://truedemocracyparty.net/2012/01/israel-nuked-fukushima-stuxnet/

And why would they do this, I hear you ask?

Well, it's obvious, innit? Japan offered to enrich uranium for Iran, like the man said.

Wrong!

It was Japan's support for Palestine.

"Jews sabotage Fukushima power plant as payback for Japan’s support of an independent Palestinian state"

http://firstlightforum.wordpress.com/2011/10/31/jews-sabotage-fukushima-power-plant-as-payback-for-japans-support-of-an-independent-palestinian-state/

I bet you wish you'd found that first, eh?

Sheesh. I guess it must be fiendishly difficult for you sometimes, Arjay, picking which particular wild-'n'-wacky conspiracy theory to adopt. But hang in there, it will be so gratifying when you are proved right, and you can say "I told you so".

Oh, wait...

Pericles,

Do the people who peddle this tripe about Fukushima really believe what they're saying?

Or are they just seeking to make a few bucks by catering to the predilections of people like Arjay?

I've never been able to make up my mind about it.

What do you think?

There was a fellow I knew in South Africa who worked as a salesman. He never completed school but he is an incredibly intelligent guy. For reasons which will become obvious I don't want to mention his real name so I'll call him "Bob."

In the mid 1970s Bob went to the USA. He returned with a diploma from an American bible college, rented some cheap premises and started what grew into a huge "megachurch." I attended a few "services" just to watch the show. He certainly gives a great performance. It helps that he is a handsome and well-built sort man. In fact he is something of physical fitness fanatic.

In the early 1980s we renewed our acquaintanceship – I wouldn't call it friendship. By then he had grown wealthy as head pastor of one of the largest churches in South Africa. We were able to get along because we enjoyed each other's company and he knew better than to invite me to join his church.

Prior to going to the US Bob had never to my knowledge displayed any interest in religion. I don't think he ever mentioned attending church.

Finally I succumbed to temptation and asked him the question that had been bugging me for years. Did he, I asked, believe what he was preaching?

After a pause he said (I am quoting as accurately as I can remember) "When I'm up there on the podium preaching I believe."

I never saw Bob again. Last I heard he and his wife had divorced and one of his three Rolls Royce cars was part of the settlement.

Regrettably Julie,your article is too superficial and only highlights the fact that as a potential FM,it is insufficient merely to rehash outside,old and obvious information.

With the advent of Bob "Abie" Carr,some new original insights are absolutely necessary. about the whole China question?

The inclusion of the last sentences are telling and indicate all the shallow,easy cliches which indicate the conventional thinking of the cliched classes.Not good enough,depth is required!