i note..all other comment..is re the science lie
cooling/warming/change...[its all just climate variables
as more cool grasslands..or swamps..or turned into heat sinks

changing local temp readings

we got the science
when ozone chewed holes
ooops[was said to make holes in the poles]

yep
ozone
going to make deserts

then we got carbon...thats going to make deserts/no snow...melting poles..drowing polar bears...ie science based lies

but let get back to the law
via the bad science

recall that evolution trial
that...*WASNT JUDGING EVOLUTION/creation
it judged simply...is creation science..[and found
NO creation should not be taught..as science[not in science class]

se juries..get the complicated fact
to solve a simple question

did..."X"..do this
was.."X"..doing this..lawfull

when the first question that should be asked
is who injured who...or who violated the terms of their contract

contracts bind both parties
but all you inteligent people
talking re climate...proves even you dont..*get 'law'
is about controling others freedoms..to smoke/drink/whatever
AS LONG AS THEY HURT NO_ONE..

or are not likely
to injure a party..and there by loose their standing[over the law]
and be bought before the law,..to stand under it

but again...standing*
is as miss understood..as those claiming..to UNDER stand

they dont realise..by applying..[to be on the sherrifs list]
they proove they are ignorant..of the rule of standing
thus led away..from the simple facts..

much like the lies
the govt judge and jury swallowed
for this big new capitalist bonus instrument..[the carbon tax credit]

its lies upon lies
keep them dumb

lord it over them..all

#1 - THE LAW OF THE CASE

The law of the case..is usually very simple!

No matter what kind/of case yours is,

This stuff is really easy
once you see how the separate parts fit together!

You have tremendous power
...once you know how the game is played

lack of knowing..how the game of litigation..is played to win!

Not knowing creates fear.

Knowledge displaces fear
with the confidence you need to overcome your opponent!

Take any apparently complicated thing apart to examine its component parts and you quickly see how they fit together.

When you first begin,
it seems impossible.

But!

If someone shows you how each separate part works..with each of the other parts,..even the most complicated things..are suddenly easy-to-understand.

The mystery my profession has woven disappears!

#1-All lawsuits turn on the law*..of the case.

#2- All lawsuits..are won(or lost)..by clever (or clumsy)
use of the rules of court..to cite the law of the case
and prove the facts.

That's all there is to lawsuits
every one of them!

Sadly,..too many good people..never discover
the power to win that's theirs.

Therefore,..evil people who know..how to find
the law of the case..and use the rules of court
take advantage..of them!

Jurisdictionary..wants to turn the tables
on crooked lawyers and biased judges

and protect the "little guys and gals"..that are being taken advantage of..simply because no one before has ever offered
a..self-help course.

No one ever made it this easy-to-understand!

www.Jurisdictionary.com

if you'll trust me for just a moment (and check me on this) you'll find that every lawsuit turns on what we lawyers call "the law of the case". Every last one of them. Every single one!

It's really simple
once you see

For example,..every foreclosure case turns
(win or lose)..on a very few legal principles..that control the outcome of foreclosure

the rights..of the lender versus the rights of the borrower.

We..call these principles.."the law of the case".of foreclosure.

It doesn't matter..how big the bank or lender is.
It doesn't matter..how little the borrower is.

The law of the case
is the law of the case PERIOD!

[eg...only origonal documernt/contract
the blueink origonal..is proof of contract

PHOTO-copies arnt proof..!
no blue ink contract..NO CONTRACT

The law of the case..controls the outcome
for those who know*..how to use the rules of court..(evidence and procedure)..to prove what the law requires...is or isnt present.

Automobile negligence,/contract disputes,
malpractice,..slander,..false imprisonment... whatever a case is about,

you'll find "the law of the case"..is simple and usually easy to find...[was what was done..done via crimibnal..or contract

allelse is criminal;

use online legal research..to find the law of your case!

You don't need to know..every law there is to win..a simple contract dispute....is..that what you signed[agreed to?]..

The law of the case..in a contract dispute
is usually no more..than a few appellate court opinions
and perhaps a statute..or two at most.

Once you know how to find..and can cite the official authorities that state the law..of the case of contracts,..you're halfway home!

The rest of the business..of winning
is simply using the rules to.(1) allege
what the law of the case..*requires,

and (2) prove..what you've alleged...
whether you're a plaintiff..bringing the case..or a defendant trying to avoid the line of fire!

#2/THE RULES OF EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE
http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=183&t=12701

You also now know..what you must allege
in affirmative defenses..and what you need to do
with discovery*..and motions*..to prove the plaintiff
*cannot meet,..the burden of the law.

Guinea pig symptom wattle...garrison piano
register manuscript everyone sold magnificent

underlying global balloons! inefficieny
programmed pero culo aha... sadness infects
ready underneath..make intense enograms

glory underpinned transparency..haikus make for
good ego but fgyk argument..poo being optimal
for rigourous wnker...i love oppossums

telepathic mindlaundering of idiot on web
you no..speky...wot did you actually..try
unsuccessfully to badly ... communicate

We are indeed privileged to have one amongst us who is willing to demonstrate the schizophrenia of moral relativism.

One who on the one hand not only exemplifies the modus operandi of the “narratives” behind the socialization of sciences, but also provides their “prism” of ideology, social, political, racism, gender and environment, through which we are invited to view his personal issues.

The main issues would seem to be that the opposition is not willing to support DAGW. It is not willing (at this stage) to give the ALP any policy target to shoot at. It is not willing to get rid of our enemy, Mr. Abbott and replace him with Mr. Turnbull. There are far too many Australian’s willing to support Abbott and we will get wiped out. That those damned moral absolutists (realists), are guilty of adding their “empirical observations that moral conclusions cannot be deducted from non-moral premises”. Oh my dear God, heaven preserve us.

Who may we thank for this frank, honest, open and pragmatically based perspective?

Thanks bonmot, you are such a gem. Dysfunctional and predictable, but still a gem. We map out the model and you follow it. We already know your response to this however; please submit it as we value the entertainment.

The Simpsons still have the edge over you but keep on “tugging” away.

Another day and no questions about economy. The whole coalition is in damage control not allowing any discussion on the economy.
Mr Abbott today pledged to reverse the means testing of med; ins;
He has that many pledges now it is impossible to keep track of them all.
The coalition want an early election, but will not give any policy. the only slip up was from Joe Hockey and his 70 billion black hole. Which he admits was a mistake.