The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Union of sameness versus union of difference > Comments

Union of sameness versus union of difference : Comments

By David Palmer, published 8/2/2012

Same-sex marriage is not going to happen any time soon, if at all.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. ...
  9. 14
  10. 15
  11. 16
  12. All
Trav you missed out marrying your dog or your car, keep trying !!
Posted by Kipp, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 3:28:34 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
'The push for same-sex marriage is therefore largely ideological' and theologiacl according to Darwinism followers. Thanks for a sane article David exposing the agenda of the those rejecting God's plain plan for man and woman.
Posted by runner, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 3:53:00 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
would lobby government against equality for gay people.
Kipp,
I don't want to be equal to gays, I'm as straight as can be. To ask me to be equal to some queer is a gross insult.
I don't tell them to go along with how I feel so they should keep to themselves also. Do whatever you have to do but leave me out of it.
Posted by individual, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 4:03:41 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Gay couples already have the same recognition under the law as anyone else in a de-facto relationship. The need for marriage is not necessary for legal recognition therefore the argument for the need to enter into a marriage contract to be legally recognised is an invalid one. Let’s be clear on this THERE IS NO LEGAL DISCRIMINATION AGAINST GAY COUPLES!
Posted by JR49, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 4:40:01 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
In other words, progressive pat, Jesus never said a word about it, did he?

But, nice quote from Matthew - I take it, in that case, that you refrain from eating pork or shellfish, don't shave your beard, stone your kids if they mouth back at you, keep New Zealanders as slaves, and all the rest of the things the Law of the Prophets tells you to do.

Or are you just cherry-picking the bits that suit your prejudice?

The prejudice that Trav and individual nakedly display with their openly bigoted language. Better lock up your bums, guys, the gays are coming for you!

But, Trav, what part of only legally consenting adults being able to sign a legally binding contract don't you understand?
Posted by Clownfish, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 5:30:47 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Clownfish,
you'd better look up prejudice in the dictionary. Where does it say that not wishing to be the same as someone biologically challenged is prejudice ?
Did I not say do as you please but leave me out of it ? To me that means I don't give a hoot what you do. Is that prejudice ? I think you have a lot to learn. I'm not throwing heterosexual behaviour in your face but you're throwing pooftery into ours. That is prejudice.
Posted by individual, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 5:44:32 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. ...
  9. 14
  10. 15
  11. 16
  12. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy