The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > SpongeBob SquarePants and the brave new world of comparative genomics > Comments

SpongeBob SquarePants and the brave new world of comparative genomics : Comments

By Roger Kalla, published 11/1/2012

Why does a sponge have most of the genes it needs to make a brain? And why has it not developed a brain in 600 million years?

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All
...Looked at this way; if human sperm could drift through the air and impregnate the female, that particular feature of procreation would eliminate one of the two fundamental requirements for mobility, “Love and War”. If humans were capable of self-defence by application of poison or sting for example, that aspect would eliminate another essential need for mobility, defence. This of course, is a crude and shaky argument for the need of a brain, but it’s more a question of how much brain is required for the organism to survive and function successfully.

...We appear to be using metaphors from the sea as an example of the need for a brain. Over many years of being immersed in the ocean, I haven’t noticed an obvious oversupply of intelligence roaming around down there. I can offer some anecdotal evidence from personal experience only yesterday, when I was pinned to the sea-bed by a 4m wobbegong shark that mistook me for one of its own. (I don’t wish to be implicated by OLO posters, with some sort of “bestiality” perversion, or the response may not be all good), it really did happen!

...An interesting and thought provoking article, worthy of the intriguing heading
Posted by diver dan, Wednesday, 11 January 2012 9:49:35 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
While it may not appear obvious, you answered your own question within the piece, within another question.

" And why has it not developed a brain in 600 million years? "

"How did we evolve from a brain less sponge you might wonder?"

See? It DID evolve a brain. One just has to think of evolution as branching through time, not linear.
Posted by Bugsy, Wednesday, 11 January 2012 10:11:52 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Roger, you ask, “Why does a sponge have most of the genes it needs to make a brain? And why has it not developed a brain in 600 million years?”

If there is no intelligent designer/God, then there is only one possible answer to what are essentially pointless questions.

Everything, including sponge genes, is the way it is because that is simply the way it happens to have happened. End of story.

If materialism is correct then nothing happens intentionally or with any purpose. Things just simply happen and all ‘why’ questions are meaningless.
Posted by JP, Wednesday, 11 January 2012 10:34:10 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Are all 'why' questions an inquiry into 'purpose' in a religious world?

Son: "Daddy, why is the sky blue? Why are rainbows different colours?"
Dad: "We live in a materialist universe son, nothing happens intentionally or with any purpose. Things just simply happen and all ‘why’ questions are meaningless."
Son: "Oh, ok"

Christian Dad response: "Because we live in a non-materialist universe son, things happen intentionally and with purpose. The rainbow is there as God's way of reminding us of his promise that He will never send a flood again."
Son: "It was God what done it?"
C Dad: "Yes son, no matter what the scientists say"

Try harder JP.
Posted by Bugsy, Wednesday, 11 January 2012 1:08:35 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Very interesting! Invokes a complete re-think on species' relationship, and on the merits and mystery of the so-called 'junk' DNA.

It appears that unravelling the full story of the human genome may be an impossibility, and rightly so. (And with any luck, will put an end to ambitions of human cloning or genetic modification or 'enhancement'.)
Posted by Saltpetre, Wednesday, 11 January 2012 1:15:31 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Bugsy you seem to be inappropriately substituting the word ‘why’ for the word ‘how’.

Yes, we can investigate how things work, but science can tell us nothing about why things are the way they are. In a materialistic universe, things just ‘are’.
Posted by JP, Wednesday, 11 January 2012 3:00:51 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy