The Forum > Article Comments > Good tidings of great joy > Comments
Good tidings of great joy : Comments
By Roy Williams, published 24/12/2011Deconstructing the Christmas story.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Trav is right to refer to
"1. Massive distortions and implausible interpretations of the [little] historical evidence we do have for Jesus, plus
"2. Improbable inferences based on ..." those implausible interpretations.
Arguments from reference to an 'authority' of "mainstream scholars" infused with confirmation bias does not negate arguments against a historical Jesus, especially when there are no verified primary sources, or some viewed as primary are contradictory
eg. the "Pauline" 1 Cor.15
3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4 And that he was buried, and that *he rose again the third day according to the scriptures*:
5 And that he was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve:
6 After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once.......
7 After that, he was seen of James; then of all the apostles.
8 And last of all *he was seen of me also*, as of one born out of due time.
yet, the "Pauline" Galatians 1 says
11 I want you to know, brothers and sisters, that *the gospel I preached is not of human origin.*
12 **I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it**; rather, I received it by revelation from Jesus Christ.
.. and ...
16 ... *my immediate response was not to consult any human being.*
.. and
19 *I saw none of the other apostles* — only James, the Lord’s brother. 20 I assure you before God that what I am writing you is no lie.