The Forum > Article Comments > Re-assessing men's magazines > Comments
Re-assessing men's magazines : Comments
By Matthew Holloway, published 23/12/2011Could girly magazines be moving average male attitudes to females closer to that of the rapist?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Page 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
-
- All
Posted by Lexi, Monday, 2 January 2012 9:39:41 AM
| |
[Deleted for abuse.]
Posted by Lexi, Monday, 2 January 2012 9:52:00 AM
| |
This article on OLO is based on so-called research conducted in the UK, but the actual research paper cannot be found, it is not known if the sampling was representative of men in the UK, and then the author of this article tries to infer it is representative of men in Australia.
As feminism, it is typical. A desire to gossip and make up stories about men, and it should probably should go into Jezebel or some other type of woman's magazine, under the category of unreliable, non-scientific “gossip”. Posted by vanna, Monday, 2 January 2012 10:06:35 AM
| |
Abuse and a citation of an undergrad essay. Good to see you're keeping up to your own standards, Lexi.
"This essay was written in autumn 2000, when Lucy Brown took the module 'Communications Theory' at the Institute of Communications Studies, University of Leeds, UK" Posted by Antiseptic, Monday, 2 January 2012 1:00:44 PM
| |
Just following the high bar that you've set
old chap. Afterall I don't have your knowledge of expertise in this field. Posted by Lexi, Monday, 2 January 2012 2:11:13 PM
| |
Dear vanna,
Here's a link that may give you another perspective on the subject: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/12/13/no-men-s-magazines-aren-t-written-by-rapists.html Posted by Lexi, Monday, 2 January 2012 4:42:50 PM
|
The following link may be of interest:
http://www.theory.org.uk/mensmags.htm