The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Cutting the slack and saving the budget > Comments

Cutting the slack and saving the budget : Comments

By Mikayla Novak, published 14/11/2011

Some say there are no budget savings to be had because the public service is working as hard as it can. They are wrong.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All
I cannot see the point of Online Opinion give space to these propaganda think tanks. Leave it to News Ltd and Fairfax; they have already swamped the market with them.
Posted by john kosci, Monday, 14 November 2011 7:52:22 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Nice article Julie. We might start by asking why we need a Department of the Environment and a Department of Climate Change. Surely, the climate is an environmental matter. Similarly, why have separate Departments for Human Services and Health and Ageing?

Talk to a public servant in any State government and the cost of duplication between State and Commonwealth programmes will become obvious. Many Commonwealth 'initiatives' replicate existing State programmes and do so without the flexibility necessary to merge the two into one. Frontline service providers are thereby driven mad by overlapping programmes with different reporting and accountability requirements, the more so because Commonwealth programmes are often short term, say three years, with the funding ending at the end of the third year. State governments are then criticised if they don't continue the funding for programmes they didn't want or need in the first place.

All this comes about because the Commonwealth increasingly uses its taxing powers to intervene in areas which are much better left to the States. Which party has the courage to do something about this situation? Not holding my breath on that one.
Posted by Senior Victorian, Monday, 14 November 2011 9:35:49 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
'Most economists agree that such microeconomic reforms were appropriate, enabling the more efficient private sector to innovatively deliver a range of additional services to customers at lower costs in real terms over time.'

Not a shred of reliable or independent evidence has ever been able to prove this. On the contrary, the rise of monopolistic capitalism has created huge, unwieldy , inefficient international corporations, whose capacity for innovation has been greatly compromised by their enslavement to the 'competition' (i.e. profit) factor. The larger these corportions become, swallowing up everything in their paths, the less they are able to meet the local needs of the international markets in which they operate. In addition, the corporate sector receives the greater bulk of real government welfare, in the form of tax breaks, incentives and funding cronyism.

Having succeeded in imposing their dominant global free trade ideology on international commerce, academia and politics, the neo-liberals of the West are now openly and brazenly gunning for the public sector. With thousands of think-tanks and governments directly or indirectly on their payroll, the bastards will almost certainly get their way. Welcome to the nineteenth century.
Posted by Killarney, Monday, 14 November 2011 10:15:49 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
no good lecturing to a party addicted to spending and big Government. It will take another 12 years of Conservatives to wind back the waste. And as for the climate change department well!. Just wait until we employ many more to collect the carbon tax, many more to give it away and many more studies to fool the public into thinking its legitimate.
Posted by runner, Monday, 14 November 2011 11:18:08 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Runner. Your type of cost cutting will cause unemployment. There's plenty of fat in the system that needs a trimming. The hysteria of the carbon tax makes employment and fully paid for. Make up your mind which way you want us to go. Wind back Tony is in a corner, it may well become a box.
Posted by 579, Monday, 14 November 2011 1:17:34 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
There is a very simple reform to the Public Service that would accomplish wonders. Traditionally, the status and salary of an official depend on the number of his subordinates. Change this by setting the base salary for an official based on the duties of his position, and then reduce it by a nominal amount for each subordinate. This would achieve a massive improvement in efficiency.
Posted by plerdsus, Monday, 14 November 2011 4:49:11 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy