The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Rethinking the White Australia Policy > Comments

Rethinking the White Australia Policy : Comments

By Andrew Fraser, published 28/9/2005

Andrew Fraser calls for the re-establishment of the White Australia Policy on racial groundsv.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 13
  7. 14
  8. 15
  9. Page 16
  10. 17
  11. 18
  12. 19
  13. ...
  14. 30
  15. 31
  16. 32
  17. All
Some of these Posts,quite Rambling,FULL of cleeshays poor,Spelling etc etc etc,Verry Hard to Read,dont rilly make much cents...

I was thinking of changing my name to "latte sipper", but now I'm considering "leftoid libiterian crapp-artist".
Posted by lisamaree, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 3:41:45 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Latté or Chardonnay sipping Socialist will do Lisamaree, but not to much you hear. You may not be able to comprehend what it is you are saying.
Dingbat will suffice.
Posted by All-, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 6:08:55 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Redneck- being well informed is one thing, but actually where you source your information from is another. The media are indeed a good source of information, but at the same time we must take it with a grain of salt so to speak.

If you wish to believe you have won so be it. However you haven't proved anything in particular except prove that 'well informed people' are versed extensively in the use of rhetoric, as was referred to in another post like Piers Akerman and his acolytes.

Where is Andrew Fraser's support in the academic circles then? Apart from Kathe Boehringer his 'long term girlfriend', are all our academics really the 'PC cowards'and race traitors you people think they are? I think the answer lies in the fact that Fraser is another 'crack pot' whose essay will 'go down the dustbin of history'
Posted by scooper9, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 7:43:40 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
It is a shame that Andrew Fraser has taken such a one sided view since he does raise important issues that the PC trendoid lefties have virtually stifled debate by screaming racist at anyone with an alternate view.This is a debate that should have been had thirty years ago.

It isn't just about intelligence but also whether or not we can achieve racial harmony in the long term for the good of all.By far the most single important issue is that of language.Your language is your culture.Language unifies countries and we can only have common understanding through it.Our Govts have really dropped the ball on this issue.

It is too late to wind back the immigration clock but recently we have experienced racial and religious intolerance coming from certain Muslim groups.Now some have alluded to protesting in the streets about terrorism.Well it's been 3 yrs since 9/11 and we've had two attacks in Bali on our citizens and still there is no solidarity shown by Muslim groups for Australia or outrage shown against terrorism.Silence only condones the atrocities and if you want to enjoy all that this great country has to offer,you can't have an each way bet.

We all dicriminate in terms of social status,monetary levels,personality,intelligence,looks etc.We prejudge people in a lot more areas than race that can have equally devestating consequences.To be called stupid or a moron has the same effect.Perhaps the PC brigade could have these words banned from our language.

Yes, we should be having a debate about the compatability of races,cultures and belief systems,since our security and future depends upon it.
Posted by Arjay, Wednesday, 5 October 2005 1:23:06 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
To Mr Mahatma Duck. I would agree with your first premise but disagree with your second premise about who the fools are around here.

I have avoided responding to your question because it was not directed at me, and I am fed up of responding to generally directed questions from people who throw out challenges and then slink away when answered. If you wish to challenge me, please direct your questions directly at me so that I can be sure that you really wish to cross swords with me.

The second reason why I did not respond to your question is because I dislike arguing with fools. I can anticipate your premise. It will be something nonsensical like “There is only one race, the human race, therefore racism is illogical.” While such logic may be semantically correct in one sense, it ignores the fact that there are four definitions (according to my Collins) to the word “race”.

But I will chuck the gauntlet in your face, if only to display to any reasonable reader who are the silly ones around here.

One definition of race is. “A group of animals or plants having common distinguishing characteristics that distinguish them from other members of the same species.”

En guarde.
Posted by redneck, Wednesday, 5 October 2005 4:54:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
So redneck what are common traits of each "race" in humans?
Posted by Kenny, Wednesday, 5 October 2005 8:30:45 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 13
  7. 14
  8. 15
  9. Page 16
  10. 17
  11. 18
  12. 19
  13. ...
  14. 30
  15. 31
  16. 32
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy