The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Putin's new vision of 'Eurasia' > Comments

Putin's new vision of 'Eurasia' : Comments

By John Daly, published 12/10/2011

Like it or not, the Russian public likes and endorses Vladimir problem, which is more our problem than theirs.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All
My advice to Vlad would be ; Become a Rent Collector ; Lease on a Permanent Basis the East to Japan the West to Germany and the South to Canada then Vlad & Co can sit back and watch the greatest surge the world has ever seen .
Posted by Garum Masala, Wednesday, 12 October 2011 10:10:29 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
the solution to this problem is really quite simple, a century ago before the communazi USSR, Russia was considered to be a part of Europe.

Why are they not offering Putin the opportunity to join both NATO & the EU?

China has already been publicly claiming for decades, ALL of the former Empire of Ghenghis Khan as historically, legitimately, a Chinese Empire.
Posted by Formersnag, Wednesday, 12 October 2011 11:29:18 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Both Russia and China are laughing at how the West has been destroyed by its' own imperialistic corruption.It is the debt based monetary creation system in which increases in productivity and inflation gets expressed as debt by the private banksters.Hence in the West,the more growth we have,the more debt we suffer.

China supplies 80% of new money via Govt banks either debt free via infrastructure or as a tax credit via profits,ie loaning it out to stupid Australians, who could have just got the RBA to create $40 billion in their computers,instead of Chinese computers.

How stupid are we?
Posted by Arjay, Wednesday, 12 October 2011 6:21:22 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
As stupid as you in persisting in the opinion that a government power to print money is necessary in line with productivity and population growth, when you cannot justify it, nor defend it from my refutation proving the idea is flatly incorrect?

As stupid as you in thinking that the economic crises caused by government delegating to private banks a power to print money or lower interest rates, would be any lesser or any different if instead they delegated the same power to government banks?
Posted by Peter Hume, Wednesday, 12 October 2011 10:08:55 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy