WOW!. Thank you so very much Antiseptic. "it's "Mr Chaz Pragnell". What a fantastic compliment.!. He is certainly eminently better informed and balanced in his views than you and your buddies on the Sharia Parenting Council, who use dear old grannies as their `Front(wo)men.'. Yes I certainly use and quote Mr. Pragnell's work frequently as it is always so accurately analytical and descriptive of what is occurring in the Family Courts and wider society. Thank you again Antiseptic. I'll now count you as a friend.
Nona Floral - "Alienation of fathers from their natural role as protectors of the family is gravely detrimental to women and children. Tony Abbott exercised this paternal role when he advised his daughters to maintain chastity before marriage.". Excuse me for rolling on the floor laughing uncontrollably. Wherever do you get these outdated and outmoded ideas?. These are throwbacks to Victorian times. Abbott was being an unashamed hypocrit in advising his daughters when he did not apply such old fashioned maxims to himself - Whats good for the Old Gander is good for the Goslings, especially when they are nubile young females.
What is it that women and their children need protecting from?. Sex abuse predators related by blood and marriage?. Its rather like setting the fox to guard the chicken coop, don't ya fink?.

i see the closet communist, corporate paedophiles are at it again, defending the indefencible.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZHKCbHGlS0&feature=related personality disorders in dangerous women, caused by fatherlessness.

http://motherandbaby.ninemsn.com.au/family/familytime/8292286/hands-on-dads-smarter-kids

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/8291815/sa-woman-guilty-of-pensioners-murder "girls are made of sugar & spice & all things nice"?

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/8264178/mum-arrested-after-baby-dies-in-microwave who said women are better at cooking than men?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvTGYiwXKZ0&feature=share PAS

No Australian child will be safe until all feMANazis are in Baxter rehabilitation resource.

Charles Pragnell:"Yes I certainly use and quote Mr. Pragnell's work frequently"

Yes you do...

I keep labouring this point: The reason why this legislation will hurt fathers is because 99% of the time when the breakdown in a family occurs the kids are with mummy. So it will now become a race between both parties and who cries “violence” first. So because the kids are with the mother, the father gets the dirty end of the deal having to cajole, beg, pay, litigate and sometimes go outside of the law to have contact with the kids before the big court day which can be years down the track for a good resolution if that. By this time he has made some fundamental errors because of the desperation of the situation and will be punished again with drawn out proceedings involving child psychologists and the like.
We all know why the system is like it is but we also know beforehand who will suffer the most – fatherless children.

Interesting program on the ABC radio today dealt with child neglect.

http://www.abc.net.au/rn/lifematters/stories/2011/3307783.htm

Interesting because in Australia the child welfare agencies actually carry out more interventions and prosecutions for child neglect than for child abuse, and according to the guests on this program, child neglect often has a greater effect on children than child abuse.

Odd how I have rarely heard someone from the Family Court speak about child neglect, and never have I heard a university harboured feminist talk about child neglect.

More than likely because child neglect is directly related to poverty in families, which is now so often associated with single parent families, de facto relationships, divorce and fatherless children.

The UK is an example, with about 50% of children born to de facto relationships and more than half of these children will become fatherless by the age of 5, about 30% of all children in the UK are now living in poverty, and about 10% of all children in the UK now suffering child neglect.

The feminist world is a world to fully embrace, if you are an anarchist.

Vanka <"Odd how I have rarely heard someone from the Family Court speak about child neglect, and never have I heard a university harboured feminist talk about child neglect."

Really?
Where are your stats on these outrageous claims?

Have you been privy to all Family Court transcripts?
How may 'university harboured feminists' have you listened to?

Look up this official website about both child neglect and child abuse and see for yourself all the stats that have been collected and collated by your dreaded university graduates:
http://www.aifs.gov.au/nch/pubs/sheets/rs1/rs1.html