The Forum > Article Comments > An Australian head of state is just part of the reason for an Australian Republic > Comments
An Australian head of state is just part of the reason for an Australian Republic : Comments
By Mike Keating and David Donovan, published 9/6/2011The reasons for an Australian Republic are manifold, and entwined in notions of sovereignty, equality, national identity and democracy.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
-
- All
My concern relates to the title of the article and the contention that the authors seem to skirt around. If an Australian head of state is just part of the reason for an Australian Republic, then what are the other reasons and why should we like them? The authors constantly hint at other benefits, but don't explain them in any real terms.
As for the opinions of the outside world, I'd suggest that:
a) most world leaders rarely, if ever, think about Australia
b) those who do don't really care about our retention of a constitutional monarchy, and
c) those outsiders who do care tend to be people (such as Robert Mugabe) whose opinions don't carry much weight.
Like I said: I'm happy for our nation to shed its monarchy any time. If that step is going to have implications beyond the installation of an Australian head of state, I'd like to know what those implications are. If it isn't, I think it would be in all of our interests to acknowledge that, rather than presenting a republic as some sort of glorious reawakening as the authors seem to do.