The Forum > Article Comments > The Age's reporting of Christian Religious Education > Comments
The Age's reporting of Christian Religious Education : Comments
By Nicholas Tuohy, published 17/5/2011Those scheming and secretive Christians are trying to get our children. Well, so The Age thinks.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- ...
- 22
- 23
- 24
-
- All
Posted by Nickosjt, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 9:38:28 AM
| |
"I know first-hand that CRE and chaplaincy goes to great lengths to offer no-strings services and does not attempt to ‘convert’ children."
From the Qld SU web site (referenced a couple of days ago on another thread as well) "Working with the churches, Scripture Union aims: a) to make God's Good News known to children, young people and families and b) to encourage people of all ages to meet God daily through the Bible and prayer so that they may come to personal faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, grow in Christian maturity and become both committed church members and servants of a world in need." SU certainly makes it clear that they are about converting children, their may be some spin in the language (they give the message, God converts etc) but it is abundantly clear from the Access ministries material and the SU website that they are about converting children. The author's contention that they don't attempt to convert children is either a deliberate misrepresentation or he is way out of step with a couple of the larger christain organisations in the chaplaincy and RE business. As a former christian and former sponsor of chaplaincy work I'm absolutely confident that for many the principle goal is conversion. Generally closing the deal may be done off site (at youth group's, youth camps, churches etc) but schools are used to lay the groundwork. R0bert Posted by R0bert, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 9:45:46 AM
| |
Oh Christ!
Here we go again. 1. There are more religions than just Christianity. 2. There are churches for teaching the kiddies about Jesus. 3. Tax dollars would be better spent on school infrastructure, more teachers, greater variety of subjects: road rules, overall understanding of Australian law, Indigenous history, Music, Art. Literature AND comparative religions anyone? The arrogance that some Christians have that their bronze age religion is superior to all other ideologies makes for the antipathy Mr Tuohy is whingeing about - Nicholas just try to think how you would feel if the program was Islamic Religious Education - you would be cheering the Age instead of deriding it. Posted by Ammonite, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 9:52:43 AM
| |
It is precisely the sort of attitude displayed by the author that I regard as being so dangerous to today's children.
Posted by philhart, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 10:01:08 AM
| |
One of the main problems the ant-chaplain/RE activists are facing is that they have not talked to schools about what they want.
In 2009, the study “The Effectiveness Of Chaplaincy” by Edith Cowan University and University of New England, found: that 98% of principals surveyed who currently have a Chaplain want government funding for School Chaplaincy to continue. The national study released in October 2009 also found that 92% of principals and 73% of students say School Chaplains are “highly important” in their school. According to the 688 principals who participated, Chaplains helped to: -build the sense of community in the school, -support the school ethos and -assist with the integration of potentially “at risk” students, including recent immigrants and Aboriginal students. 98% of principals surveyed said that Chaplaincy was making a major contribution to school morale; it was proactive, unique, effective and important. They urged that Government project funding should be continued when the three year cycle of project funding ended. The research also found that Chaplaincy in government schools was not only unique, proactive and effective, but also a neutral and non-judgmental service that added long term value to the wellbeing of Australian Communities. Source: http://www.suqld.org.au/_sys/_data/downloads/The_Effectiveness_of_Chaplainc_BRIEF.pdf Posted by Nickosjt, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 10:27:58 AM
| |
It never ends does it, these sort of articles pushing the line that separation of Church and State is worthy except for schools.
It is dishonest to insist that Chaplains are not using schools as recruitment grounds. That really is the bottom line. It is also dishonest to categorise and stigmatise those against school Chaplaincy or RI as villifying Christians. This is disingenuous. Who is saying ban religion? Those against indoctrination of children in schools are just pleading for common decency ie. spirituality is a personal choice and to leave religious teaching for the home and the Church. The fact that there are some silly books on the school book list is a whole other issue and probably worthy of attention but is irrelevant in this discussion Posted by pelican, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 10:29:01 AM
|
Christians are not alone in doing such things, but to suggest they just offer words is a bit rough.
Don’t be scared, skeptic, head on down to your local (church!).