The Forum > Article Comments > Watergate is far from dead > Comments
Watergate is far from dead : Comments
By Krystle Gatt, published 21/4/2011Richard Nixon has left his mark, but not always in the way he, or others, would have anticipated.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
Perhaps the best explanation is found in Jim Hougan's book Secret Agenda which although written more than two decades ago is still better than most others. Another source is Robert Merritt's Watergate Exposed, the reprint update of which has just been published.
It now seems tolerably clear that Nixon was deposed in a CIA operation by elements of the military and intelligence organizations that were concerned that Nixon and Kissinger's moves with regard to China in particular posed a threat to their setting of the US foreign policy agenda that they had controlled since the 1963 coup d'etat that killed Kennedy.
One of the fascinating aspects of the Watergate story is how the same cast of characters, Hunt, Sturgis, Bush the elder etc crop up and play key roles just as they did in 1963. And for the same motives as James Douglass' seminal book JFK and the Unspeakable make abundantly clear. Australia's mainstream media has not even reviewed this latter book which demonstrates just how we have been captured by the same forces that control the American mainstream media. My local library (Brisbane) does not even carry a copy.
I agree therefore that Watergate is far from dead, just not for the same reasons as your correspondent. Until we confront the reality of modern day power politics and tolerate the blather about Nixon, the Kennedy assassination, 9/11 etal the more dangerous our democracy becomes.