The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > If freedom of religion is the question, secularism is the answer > Comments

If freedom of religion is the question, secularism is the answer : Comments

By Chrys Stevenson, published 1/4/2011

The HREOC report Freedom of Religion and Belief in the 21st Century subliminally accepts Christianity as the default position.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Page 7
  9. All
Very many of us agree with both i) secularism, as the preferred foundation of government, law, and national identity, and ii) the right of each individual to practice (or not practice) his or her chosen religion - as long as it is in a manner which does not impact or could not impact deleteriously on the rights and freedoms of others, or on the state.

That being said, the problem (or question) is HOW to convince the vast bulk of humanity to adopt similarly enlightened views and attitudes. By this I don't mean that anyone should try to convert others to any particular religion (or to no religion). No! Just to the proposition that the separation of religion and state is essential for the effective and harmonious conduct of national and international affairs, and that no religious, or irreligious, practices should act to interfere with that harmony.

Some would argue that no-religion is the best religion, and there are many sound reasons for such a viewpoint - the damage done by some convert-seeking enthusiasts, the radical world view held by some movements, the excessive zeal demonstrated by various fanatical, and not so fanatical, fringe (and not so fringe) elements.

However, though there are various conflicts of religious doctrine causing a variety of problems in the world today, there remain some valuable teachings in the mainstream religions for the harmonious and ethical conduct of interpersonal and business relations. Such teachings are worth building upon.

Additionally, it is unrealistic to think that somehow all humanity could experience some universal catharsis or revelation whereby all become committed to some universal and infinitely ethical, compassionate, tolerant and just set of teachings and truths.

Oh, for the achievement of humanitarian humanity!

I believe the focus should be on freedom and justice for all, whilst actively pursuing the preservation of the planet, AND that this can only be achieved by capable nations pursuing these objectives through exercising true brotherhood towards all humanity.
Posted by Saltpetre, Wednesday, 6 April 2011 4:09:18 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Saltpetre,
I totally agree with your opening paragraph. However values cannot be excluded from a secular Government. Different religions have different values, and if government does not accommodate them then the government does not govern for this person.

Examples, the blasphemy or honour laws of Islam,
The Government funding of abortion for convenience that violates the social conscience of "right to life" belief that taxes should not fund such. The Government funding of Catholic Youth Celebration, or the funding of Gay Mardi Graz.

All these are values that are held by some sections of the community that are based in moral religious values. They are not based purely upon secular decisions.
Posted by Philo, Wednesday, 6 April 2011 8:22:49 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Page 7
  9. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy