it is getting absurdly difficult to find info
i heard on bbc last night a sceme to create biogas in kenya
that is going to produce *6 times the carbondi-oxide
it is intended to 'fix'

dw tv reported on the same thing the day before
both searches have been prevented finding
[just trying to connect to bbc has taken 8 minutes so far]

entering search terms into the box only gives a waiting loopy circle

sio from memory the sceme has been given massive hectars of land
to grow a weed people cant eat..to burn it to make biogas to make electicity..the whole sceme is paid for with euro carbon credits

seems many vilage's have been seized
and that food crops even have been taken over[to grow non food]
add in the poor dont use electicity...and will be given 'jobs' perpetually harvesting a poisen weed in lue of growing their own food

if only you could hear what was said
i did find dorkins was born in kenya
and a lot of other useless info about other things

oh i got a search result

Search results for kenya biogas
Sorry, there are no results for your search.

For advice on how to use BBC Search
see our Frequently Asked Questions.

talk about fiddling while rome burns

its a scam people
to subsidise land clearing
[jobs for serfs and cash to the masters]

not only are the concept's based in fraud
so too is the fruits..[dont say you wernt told]

oh plenty of old 'good' stuff turned up
[from last year]
..ie pre publicity spin /pr

but not the latest
as was revealed while you slept

who cares*
go back to sleep

its worth a reading
http://www.openaustralia.org/debates/?id=2011-03-24.30.1

""The Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011 fulfils an election commitment to give farmers, forest growers and landholders access to carbon markets.""

note these are the big poluters getting bailed out

read on

""This will begin to unlock the abatement opportunities
in the land sector which currently..

*make up 23 per cent of Australia’s emissions.*

*Australia has amongst the highest agricultural emissions of the developed countries*""

mainly via their generating *nitrous oxide
[300 times worse than carbon dioxide]
from nitrogen[see previous posts]
and landline link

BUT THATS NOT BEING TAXED...
now you know why

we made a promise

thus we talk of greenhouse gasses
but only tax carbon..lol

under one god,you say "300 times worse than carbon dioxide". CO2 would have to be bad before something could be worse than it. Clearly, it is not.

Carbon dioxide is a beneficial trace gas, without which plant life, including the crops on which we and much animal life, live, would not survive.

This odourless colourless gas comprises only 388 parts per million of our atmosphere at present, which is, happily, well above the marginal 280 ppm at which we languished before.

The improvement in volume, although small has been beneficial to plant life generally and has played a large part in the greening of millions of acres, previously desert sands, in the Sahara.

The assertion that it would cause warming of the globe, by conflicted scientists backing the IPCC's AGW myth has been overtaken by reality, in that the increase in CO2 in the atmosphere has not been accompanied by the predicted warming. Like almost every prediction of the IPCC, in their pushing of the AGW myth, reality has proved to be otherwise than as the IPCC predict.

We need 500 ppm of CO2 in the atmosphere, to be comfortable in relation to the welfare of plant life.

If there is a remote chance that it causes warming, we have yet to see any detrimental effects of warming, or any evidence to support the IPCC's predicted ill effects of warming. On their past record we can be confident that they are wrong.

The greenhouse gas theory obviously needs a big overhaul, to align it with facts, and the real world.

Trusting that this assists your comprehension.