The Forum > Article Comments > Is ex-Premier David Bartlett the father of the future? > Comments
Is ex-Premier David Bartlett the father of the future? : Comments
By Kristin Natalier, published 8/2/2011Bartlett’s decision is a reminder of the possibilities of fathering but not a trigger for real change in the family-work nexus in politics and elsewhere.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
-
- All
You have a very poor view of women vanna, worse than most of the extreme feminists hold about men and yet you choose to emulate that which you clearly despise. You might think that women contribute nothing to society and you obviously have little respect for the role of mothering - also not an easy job. In a free society you can hold any personal prejudices you like but you are so wrong about the contributions of women, I hardly know where to begin.
ppp
The reason why it has been women discussing issues of work-life balance is that women generally have to juggle child care responsibiities, work and care of the home. Women don't have someone at home supporting them while they are at work, unless there is a nanny or housekeeper. The reason why men spend time with their kids on the weekends is to spend time with their kids - simple. Most of them still work fulltime during the week and that is exactly my argument for greater flexibility.
Raising kids does not get a guernsey from any politicians these days. I chose to stay at home because we considered it important, There is not much support for families where there is one parent (still usually the mother) at home. But that's life.
The ideal is for men and women to benefit from work-life balance. There is nothing evil about those goals.
Even if some of you blokes got your way and lived in a men-only 'utopia', you would still have to find someone to look after the children and the men would be sharing work and child care duties. It doesn't matter who does the jobs - is my main point - as long as the jobs (home/work/parenting) get done.