The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The apostrophe joins the endangered list > Comments

The apostrophe joins the endangered list : Comments

By Michelle Smith, published 20/12/2010

Soon grocers' signs might be the only place you can see an apostrophe in the wild, and that would be all wrong.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All
I agree with Pelican, spelling and grammar have taken a nosedive, quality-wise, over recent years. One has only to look at postings on this very forum to see the evidence.

As for place names dropping their possessive apostrophe, it has been official policy for many years to do so. The creek named for Mr Cooper, Cooper's Creek, becomes Coopers Creek. I suspect it's (speaking of this last word, there is an incredible percentage of people who don't understand the usage difference with -its-) to make signage simpler and neater (maybe even a tad cheaper).

I suspect also that the egregious tendency to put apostrophes in every plural in sight comes from a British trend going back decades to put apostrophes in foreign words ending in a vowel- witness Suzuki's and Honda's. It has spread to all plurals, regardless of whether the last letter is a vowel or consonant. Unfortunately, as Michelle has pointed out, possessive apostrophes are often left out, so one sees countless written passages these days with "plural apostropes" plastered willy-nilly thoughout, with nary a possessive apostophe in sight. It's really hard on the eyes.

The butcher's cakes were a laugh. My silliest recent example of a wayward apostrophe came in the form of - it'self.
Posted by viking13, Tuesday, 21 December 2010 6:32:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I notice from Dr Smith's blog address (www.girlsliterature.com) that urls are also an apostrophe-unfriendly zone.

Between truncations, possessive and plural, apostrophes sure are fun and sort the players from the pretender's ;)

On misused grrrrammar, may I add endemic when epidemic or pandemic are intended, and decimate when annihilate was intended. Thank you
Posted by hugoagogo, Tuesday, 21 December 2010 1:34:55 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Apos.. U kid?
I fear texting spells 'doom' for literature in general; apostrophes are a mere footnote. I suspect spell checkers (checker's? checkers'?) do more harm than good in that respect. Lately I've noticed a remarkable number of people -including journalists, for Pete's sake- have trouble with loosing things. Let's hope they aren't trousers; although that works both ways, come to think on't.
Can I join Bernie's gang too?
Posted by Grim, Thursday, 23 December 2010 7:58:21 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy