The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The Forests Agreement to end all forestry disagreement? > Comments

The Forests Agreement to end all forestry disagreement? : Comments

By Simon Grove, published 16/12/2010

We have been conditioned by the forestry vilification campaign to reject any notion that native forestry and conservation might be good bedfellows.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. All
Dear Phil

The author doesn't have the space in his original article to cover every conceivable question the activists might fire at him.
On page 3 of the Comments MW Poynter explains that 74% of Tasmania's forests ARE PERMANENTLY reserved.

Once again you have proved the authors assertion that nearly all complaints aimed against the native forestry industry are baseless and unfounded - stemming from bias and ignorance of the wilfully uniformed.
Posted by Ben Cruachan, Tuesday, 21 December 2010 12:51:40 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Tis true, tis pity, pity tis tis true: I cannot get the thought of those monumental piles of wood chips on the wharf at Burnie out of my mind. Perhaps the first(and last) sight of Burnie the passengers on those cruise ships enjoy are those impressive mounds of wood chips.
I used to think that the word" sustainable" when used in relation to forest 'managemen't of our publicly owned native forests meant forest practice geared to ensuring the ongoing viability of the forests, including recognition of their v alue as carbon sinks. Until I learned that sustainability is about preserving the management status quo.
Why is this Forest Agreement so scary a proposition to many of the above comment posters?
Posted by gran, Tuesday, 21 December 2010 10:08:32 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Gran, it might not have ocurred to you that the wood chips are going to be made into products which people are going to use. In most applications these will have a long life and the carbon contained therein will not be returned to the atmosphere.

On the other hand, if the material is left on the forest floor, even if it just rots and is not burnt, a lot of the decomposition products ultimately become CO2 and add to the amount in the atmosphere. Growing trees do not last forever, as has been pointed out on many ocassions, in the natural environment they ultimately die, rot away or are burned in wild forest fires.

David
Posted by VK3AUU, Wednesday, 22 December 2010 7:28:49 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
A family member was given the Anna Krien book Into the Woods for Christmas
After the recipient, normally a slow and carefully comprehending reader, finished the book inside a week I picked it up and consequently I would urge all contributing to this discussion to read it.
For anyone not familiar with how things are done in Tasmania, this is required reading.
Oh, and a happy 2011 to all.
gran
Posted by gran, Tuesday, 4 January 2011 12:55:23 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy