The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The Forests Agreement to end all forestry disagreement? > Comments

The Forests Agreement to end all forestry disagreement? : Comments

By Simon Grove, published 16/12/2010

We have been conditioned by the forestry vilification campaign to reject any notion that native forestry and conservation might be good bedfellows.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All
The ENGO’s are only half of the problem – even if we had their support for native forest harvesting, imports would still outcompete the local product. The industry lost house framing to softwood plantations, and furniture has been lost to Ikea and others from Vietnam, Malaysia and China. Furniture, toilet paper, aluminium window frames, you name it – are all cheaper alternatives when imported. The real problem is the economic and ecological madness that passes for freemarket salvation in the minds of our political and academic establishment. They have made it easier for ENGOs to be lazy and argue that the local industry is already on its death bed due to market forces.

So, a central question is this: If foresters can and do maintain a sustainable resource in Australia - for who and for what?
Posted by jsa73, Thursday, 16 December 2010 11:21:01 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"for who and for what?"

For the planet mate.

Good article Simon.

David
Posted by VK3AUU, Thursday, 16 December 2010 11:42:29 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Some fair enough points in the article, but it would best be taken with a bex, a good lie down in company of David Lindenmayer’s Forest Pattern and Ecological Process (A synthesis of 25 years of research)
Posted by colinsett, Thursday, 16 December 2010 12:14:18 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
David Lindenmayer is nothing but an anti-logging green activist. He lacks any sense of perspective or proportionality.
Posted by Ben Cruachan, Thursday, 16 December 2010 12:24:35 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
This well argued article goes to the crux of the problem, which is the unsustainable campaign to end native forest timber harvesting resulting in perverse environmental outcomes. The minor amount of forest available for harvesting in Victoria and Tasmania poses little threat to conservation values. In return we receive a renewable forest product that lessens our impact on forests overseas that are not managed to worlds best practice.

The proposed forestry agreement will serve no useful purpose, given most Tasmanian forests are already protected, will cost a bucketload of taxpayer dollars and remove professional management from the forest.
Posted by Max Rheese, Thursday, 16 December 2010 1:58:12 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
About 20 years ago I belonged to a Bush Walking group which included a ranger from DSE who gave us some good instruction in how logging worked. Because I grew up in the bush, I already had a good idea how the ecology of the forest worked and I wrote a piece to be included in the Victorian Association of Bushwalking Clubs' Newsletter. The greenies of the association refused to publish it, so I sent it to the individual clubs. After that the article appeared in the Association's newsletter. I tried to explain to them that old growth forest doesn't last forever, ultimately is burnt in a forest wild fire, or else it dies, produces debris on the forest floor and rots away. If the forest is logged while the timber is still useful, good practice demands that the old hollow stags are left as a haven for the wildlife. After the logging coops are tidied up and the rubbish burnt, new plants grow and these produce vast amounts of food for the animals, so that we get a win, win situation, both for the foresters and the ecology. Greenies, bah - Humbug.

David
Posted by VK3AUU, Thursday, 16 December 2010 3:57:28 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy