The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > How to resolve the Korean crisis > Comments

How to resolve the Korean crisis : Comments

By Keith Suter, published 25/11/2010

Having tried most things, what is left to resolve tension on the Korean Peninsula, at its worst for almost 60 years.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All
Interesting, I'm not sure China really needs North-South peace to achieve its global objectives. A constant state of fear and angst in the Korean peninsula seems to be a great way to distract international attention from its own internal affairs. George Orwell must be chuckling somewhere. They just need to keep it all within reasonable bounds - i.e. don't push the button Kim just keep threatening to! I wonder if all the (apparently largely pointless) diplomacy could just be put on hold for a day or 2 and a large 2-sided sign erected in the DMZ that says "Grow UP!".
Posted by bitey, Thursday, 25 November 2010 9:26:03 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The best resolution agenda for the Korean Peninsula is for the US to remove itself from the territory and then go home. It seems that Germany, now a unified country and a pillar of economic development and quality of life, was able to manage the amalgamation of the 'two' countries well enough.
Ask any Korean what they wish in life and they will say, from both sides of the US decreed border, that they want their country unified as it should be, before US intervention.

What we fail to realise is that it really suits the hegemony plans of the US to remain where they are. They like it there as they also like their 740 other bases in the world. It is part of their global strategy; if you can't economically control a region, control it militarily. Look at South America.

Then, as a possible cynical comment, while they have such 740 bases, the military can extract from the compromised Congress all the funds they require for their military / industrial activities.

So while the US is a self-styled superpower, now on the wane as China, given time becomes #1, they will constantly ensure that they create enough fomentation to justify to the natives that they are there for their protection. It works every time. It has been 50 years of 'occupation'. After all, that's why they have the CIA.

The US gave up on Vietnam to Vietnam's benefit, As with Germany. Soon they will have their bases in Australia with the submissive Gillard wanting to do anything to make her look like a statesmen, carrying on the sycophantic activities of the US-centric Howard, Bush's pal, 'the man of steel'.

How many years will it be before the US take the their bases to 750, the next 10 being in Australia.

Please someone, save us from ourselves!
Posted by rexw, Thursday, 25 November 2010 9:36:21 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I don't know what walking away from s korea would do. America has a big stake in korea, unfinished business and a military base.
Posted by 579, Thursday, 25 November 2010 10:32:58 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
This is a proxy war between China and the USA.
Posted by George Jetson, Thursday, 25 November 2010 1:07:26 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I don't know how you can read something like that into it.
The war has never ended, so who fires the first shot, wouldn't s korea have the right to respond.
N Korea has got to be sorted out, for the sake of their people.
Posted by 579, Thursday, 25 November 2010 3:23:22 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I have to ask the question Keith: Why does Israel get ignored when they have 200 illegal nukes and are a signitory to the nuclear non -proliferation treaty? North Korea just want to be left alone.

The USA and its bully leader Israel,have 14 times more weaponry than their nearest rival.It is the elites of USA and Israel who are looking for confrontation.They are more frightened of their own people than China or Russia.That is why they have the Patriot Act and Preventative Dentention.We have sedition laws.

You sat in the Prof Neils Harrit lecture in July 2010 and must by now have joined the dots.
Posted by Arjay, Saturday, 27 November 2010 9:31:31 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy