The Forum > Article Comments > Unions must boycott Israel > Comments
Unions must boycott Israel : Comments
By John Passant, published 7/6/2010The ACTU should support the international boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign against Israel.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
-
- All
Posted by ponde, Monday, 7 June 2010 10:06:36 AM
| |
Ponde, you paint an ugly picture of yourself. Torpedo the convoy indeed. Obviously you are a racist and a religiously-deranged Israeli-apologist.
I support the letter. Strongly. I support any action which will stop the world's most dangerous rogue state before they drag the world into a nuclear war. Israel must be extinguished. Soon. Posted by David G, Monday, 7 June 2010 10:39:30 AM
| |
How can you call for a full and transparent inquiry on the one hand and a boycott on the other. Surely the latter must depend on the outcome of the first. It seems you feel fine playing judge and jury.
In terms of international law, Israel did nothing illegal. They perceived a threat to their security and acted upon it, despite the pressure of world opinion. Having journalists (who did not witness anything as they were on lower decks) was the human shield factor being exploited once again. Your naivety is shocking. Jack, Australia Posted by the naked eye, Monday, 7 June 2010 10:48:35 AM
| |
David G says Ponde paints an ugly picture of himself and yet then calls for the extinguishing of a state. The wiping out of the 6 million citizens of that state would bring an awful sense of deja vu wouldn't it?
Posted by the naked eye, Monday, 7 June 2010 10:51:19 AM
| |
David G
If it is racist to be anti terrorist then so be it. Religiously deranged - That is a laugh, I'm an atheist. It is however nice to see that you support the stopping of Iran before they start a nuclear war. "Israel must be extinguished" indicates both racism and bias. I was saying that Israel would have been justified in torpedoing the convoy but they are not terrorists so it was done with as little bloodshed as possible. If the passengers had surrendered there would have been no bloodshed any bloodshed must be on the passengers heads not the Israelis Posted by ponde, Monday, 7 June 2010 11:02:05 AM
| |
Extinguishing was meant in the sense of disbanding Israel and sending its citizens back to where they came from. This would stop Zionists from amassing another powerful army which they can use to carry out their brutal, racist imperialism.
It is Israel that is threatening to nuke Iran, and for this reason it is a danger to itself and the world! It must be stopped! http://www.dangerouscreation.com Posted by David G, Monday, 7 June 2010 11:03:23 AM
|
This blockade is in place because the Palestinians use this route for their weapon running. If you think this was an aid convoy you are deluding yourself. This is a confrontation in an attempt to get Israel to stop the blockade so that they can then use this to import weapons.
You seriously think that Israel is going to standby and let these convoys through carrying weapons that are going to be used by the Palestinians to kill Israelis.
You should be really grateful that Israel did not just torpedo the ships.