CJ Morgan,
Just because truth becomes inconvenient for you I should not state my experiences ? Come on, this 2010 not 1972 Whitlam era. More & more people are waking up to the likes of you. You better think of something new to bleat about.

Ok CJ Morgan,
Sarcasm aside, tell us what you would suggest in a situation where babies are exposed to 30 hours plus of head thumping music & screaming & yelling. Tell us here on OLO so we all know how to react next week under such circumstances.

Oh ‘individual,’ you are such a caring racist bigot, I am in awe of its profundity. Although I do concur with CJ on this one, for unless you are extremely devious and duplicitous of your paternalism, I cannot fathom how, with your implied extent of malevolence to those you claim you are assisting, you would escape an outback community alive.

CJ, your paternalistic arrogance appears to have no bounds, for I am entitled, as proscribed by Australian law, according to the principles of Westminster justice, to defend myself from the malevolence of racists, with EQUAL force if required. Yes OLO is open to the views of everyone, even the most psychotically deranged and disturbed, but it is neither required, nor constructive, to tolerate such dysfunctional attitudes.

"CJ, your paternalistic arrogance appears to have no bounds, for I am entitled, as proscribed by Australian law, according to the principles of Westminster justice, to defend myself from the malevolence of racists, with EQUAL force if required."
Don't say I didn't warn you CJ and with Ngmarda being a founding member of the "Mongrel Mob" I would be trembling in my boots.

Ngarmada said

waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, your all racists, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffl, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, your all racists, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffl, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, your all racists, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffl, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, your all racists, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffl, waffle, waffle,

Hi Blairbar,
'So when we are discussing Stolen Generations in South Australia, the children were stolen illegally, but for the rest of the country they were stolen legally?'
Interesting point. What I can say is that the Supreme Court in South Australia found that the Aborigines Protection Board in SA had no authority to remove a child from their parents other than by using s.38 of the Act. And almost none of the removals and withholdings that did occur were done under this part of the Act.
I'm just presenting the facts as I find them. My work is extensively referenced; The Last Protector contains over 400 footnotes. Windschuttle's gotta have something to do in his retirement.
As to whether he reads my work or not, I'm sure he is studiously ignoring it. In fact, some reports suggest that he's studiously ignoring my work for up to one hour per day.
Cheers,
Cameron