The problem lies in the fact that most people,politicians, judges and magistrates included , do not have any idea of the dynamics of the power/control relationship that causes Domestic Violence and Abuse.

The laws are based on the "happy family" who somehow become unhappy.

To me the undisputed fact is that a man who has used abuse and violence of any kind against the mother of his children has already damaged his children. The Family Law Act enables him to continue his abuse after the relationship appears to be over.

That is why it needed to be changed.

The only thing that Briant is sticking up for is her own hide, and the socially destructive parasitic workings of her feminine infested family wrecking court! The main principle of family law! is to brake down the family unit and alienate individuals with in their own society> thus making them all more reliant on the government, so it can justify its every intrudance into our lives. They don't give a care about our children at all! The system has turned our children
into objects of financial value to be bar-ted with in this wicked court! The government encourages the brake down of the family unit! (the cut)then offers the only bandage:Family Court! A classic example of the law making business for it self! and in this case! yes the children are their victims! Open your eye's people! Government and law are hand in hand, behind close doors! The devours industry is the lowest of lowests!

All I here about! is what is in the best interest of the child! And if you have half a brain, you would say! two responsible parents to start with! It sickens me to see children being raised by morons! That is the true root of child abuse! Let's face it, all it takes is a fertile womb, a lie (I'm on the pill!)and a one night stand! and presto we have a little meal ticket. Sad! isn't it? And to top it off governments pay would-be-mothers to do this! We need to take a page out of Chine's book on social reform! And go one step further and only a lough healthy, licenced, responsible couples to have children! Too easy! Government's remind me of irresponsible single mother's on welfare, can't keep the one's it already has, in good nick! but it's going to bread more anyway! I say, quality! not quantity! And, how many ants do we really need on our ant hill?( planet Earth )People who bread off the social misery caused by the brake down of the family unit! are the lowest of lowest in my book! criminals!Time to wake up!

You're a raving fascist! Buy a dictionary!

Peterson: <"Government's remind me of irresponsible single mother's on welfare, can't keep the one's it already has, in good nick! but it's going to bread more anyway! I say, quality! not quantity! And, how many ants do we really need on our ant hill?( planet Earth )People who bread off the social misery caused by the brake down of the family unit! are the lowest of lowest in my book!">

Peterson, homosexuality would be a sensible solution. It's clearly the best path to keeping the number of ants down and reducing the number of system sucking single mothers as well.

(*wink* at CJ)

CJ Morgan, Gee! I must have hit a nerve sunshine! Say what you like, but you haven't come up with a better solution, or a solution at all! I'd live to help you pull your head out of your ass! Or do you prefer to play in the gutter with Pynchme? So sad! Too bad.