Aah Peterson, so you think I should not respond when I am attacked with vitriol and vindictive, insulting, comments (read several previous postings) but simply cower in a corner. No chance ~ I will not play victim to any such tactics, much as these bullying males would prefer when I post opinions and issues which they'd prefer not to hear. Please don't be so condescending and patronising ~ I don't need it and will never succumb to.

No, chazP,

You are simply unaware of Facts.

It is a fact that some females abuse children and on average and in specific cases do not suffer the consequences that males do.

As a result, children suffer.

The request is that courts judge cases on the merits, rather than on the sex of the plaintiff.

If this does not suit you, suck it. Females already have the best of it in the family court and this can only reduce as sanity is imposed.

Rusty

Rusty Catheter ~ Where have I said that females do not abuse children?. Simply because I do not mention something (and there's lots of things I haven't mentioned) that does not mean I lack awareness or knowledge of what occurs. I simply choose not to comment and that is my right, as this is a subject introduced by FR Supremacists to suit their agenda. So no debate on the issue. So don't jump to ill-founded assumptions.
My primary arguments concern the manner in which Family Courts are breaching and violating the rights of children by ordering them into residency and contact with toxic and dangerous parents, especially when such Courts represent the people and are doing so in the name of the people of Australia.
I can see that your opinions are based on the propaganda and distorted misinformation of Barry Williams and John Abbott so are notably lacking in merit, validity, and utility.