The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Land of opportunity, but not for monoculturalists > Comments

Land of opportunity, but not for monoculturalists : Comments

By Rachel Woodlock, published 17/2/2010

While young Muslim Australians can positively appreciate Australia as a land of opportunity, Ms Pauline Hanson cannot.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 34
  7. 35
  8. 36
  9. Page 37
  10. 38
  11. 39
  12. 40
  13. 41
  14. All
Apologies David, it was not my intention to assign you an alias, or to mislead by misconstruction, that terminology of a first year graduate. For as it doesn’t affect me directly you may attribute it to the disaffection of my indifference.

Finally CJ, you confess your bigotry blatantly. It is significant to identify, the difference between latent and blatant, is the exceeding dishonesty of the former.

Cherful, during the 14th and 15th centuries, the wealth of China grew to such extent its population exploded realising it the most populous peoples in the world. I am aware this statistical phenomenon remains today.

Five centuries later China was invaded and occupied, not for its territory, but for its commodities, and advanced skills, which had been coveted by the west for that period.

Sweet dreams.
Posted by Ngarmada, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 1:36:36 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Personally, I am heartened to see that we have moved from Wikipedia to an encyclopedia. But I'm not sure what to make of your Civil War argument. I would think it possible to both "smash the South" and "free the slaves".

But at any rate I think this threads time may be up. So I wish you all well and will no doubt see you all in future threads!
Posted by David Jennings, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 7:39:49 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Please Dennis/David, I was hoping Ngmarda had his/her day on this thread and now you are encouraging him/her to post his/her comments on future threads.
Posted by blairbar, Wednesday, 17 March 2010 7:06:29 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
blairbar, I appreciate your innate, inane, fear of regular intellects which must fill you with the awe of dwarfs compared to giants. And I understand fear is the central and driving component of your dysfunction, however it may help to get your teddy from your mommy and go and have a good lie down.

Maybe your mate ossie will give you a cuddle, since his stalking has driven away Lucy from OLO. I know you and ossie believe your devious cunning is clever, that you may hide behind the anonymity of OLO, for you are right to fear the majority of reasonable people, they will never tolerate toxic parasites alike you.
Posted by Ngarmada, Wednesday, 17 March 2010 3:55:18 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Ngarmada,
I have not stalked anyone. I think if you look back at the posts you will find it was your poorly educated PC leftist frinend that started continually critisizing my posts first to which I responded. Anyway, I'm going to do you a big favour now and save you posting anything for the next year. Below I have made a summary of your previous and future posts. So please do not post again. I note you still have not explained how you lied about changing the words of my post to suit yourself.

Ngarmada wrote in 2010

waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle waffle, waffle, waffle,waffle, waffle, waffle,waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle waffle, waffle, waffle,waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle waffle, waffle, waffle,waffle, waffle, waffle,waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle waffle, waffle, waffle,waffle, waffle, waffle,waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle waffle, waffle, waffle,waffle, waffle, waffle,waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle waffle, waffle, waffle,waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle waffle, waffle, waffle,waffle, waffle, waffle,waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle waffle, waffle, waffle,waffle, waffle, waffle,
Posted by ozzie, Thursday, 18 March 2010 12:12:36 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"the difference between latent and blatant (racism), is the exceeding dishonesty of the former."

Correction - the difference is that the former is honest enough to recognize the capacity within themselves for racism and that they make an ongoing choice to overcome that capacity. The latter excuses the exercise of their racism as though in their case it is somehow justified.

R0bert
Posted by R0bert, Thursday, 18 March 2010 12:35:31 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 34
  7. 35
  8. 36
  9. Page 37
  10. 38
  11. 39
  12. 40
  13. 41
  14. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy