The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Land of opportunity, but not for monoculturalists > Comments

Land of opportunity, but not for monoculturalists : Comments

By Rachel Woodlock, published 17/2/2010

While young Muslim Australians can positively appreciate Australia as a land of opportunity, Ms Pauline Hanson cannot.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 24
  7. 25
  8. 26
  9. Page 27
  10. 28
  11. 29
  12. 30
  13. ...
  14. 39
  15. 40
  16. 41
  17. All
Ngarmada: The gender that carries the next generation does not engage in such behaviour for obvious reasons.

Oh yes they do, but a lot more subtely then men.

Kidnapping women by their hair against their will, and spiriting them off on horseback never to be seen again,

Historically the reason this happened was to spread genes around & prevent tribe becoming inbred.

Jayb, for by the irrational, dysfunctional characteristics they demonstrate, I doubt they would have any difficulty breathing heavily into a phone.

?Yes I can, but I charge 10c a breath. For you $5. ring me. ;-)
Posted by Jayb, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 1:09:35 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Ozzie, you are clearly just a sad little weirdo. I think Ngarmada actually saw you for what you are and very accurately described you in a previous post.

Using a toddler's death in the way that you did. Well clearly you're not married and you don't have children.

There's no way you are a doctor - I hope you are enjoying life on the MEDIAN wage.

Cherful FFS buy a history book.
Ngarmada, tone it down, please?
Posted by David Jennings, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 6:02:11 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
David you claim to be an academic yet you wrote...

"You've made a claim about being a "medical practitioner" but that is a very broad field covering doctors, nurses, radiographers and even general hospital workers."

That about sums up your general level of knowledge. Like I said before any 6th grader knows what a medical practitioner is.

Also, its interesting you seem to degrade people who you believe earn less than you. I find such an attitude repulsive and arrogant. To judge people by what they earn truely shows the type of low life you really are. For the record if you actually are an academic at an Australian Uni (and I find it hard to believe any Uni could employ someone with such a lack of general knowledge, except maybe UNSW Law school) then I will be earning at least 3 times what you do(and that's assuming you are a Professor).

Unfortunately these days Australian Uni's have been swamped by the Politically Correct Leftist idiots. And I'm sure even you David are smart enough to know that your one of them.
Posted by ozzie, Wednesday, 10 March 2010 10:21:45 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Given that a Prof makes $150K, then you should be earning $450K.

Can't somebody who earns $450K find something better to do?
Posted by Lucy Montgomery, Thursday, 11 March 2010 12:37:52 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Cherful,
management is a science, therefore predicated upon the pursuit of truth. Its practice is to accurately define what is, what was, what may be prospective, how to get there proficiently, and avoid deprecatory consequences. Therefore its application cannot be romantic or idealistic, for such denial of its principles would irrevocably defeat its purpose, as does occur. e.g. GFC

Current reliable projections of western macro economic fundamentals, demonstrate them reliant upon the multiplier expenditure rate. e.g. associated with ROI [return on investment], if you invest a dollar, you require at least a dollar return plus costs to break even.

Those current reliable projections determine the west is entering a period of gradual decline, realised from the rate of growth of the economic tigers, and their comparable, low production costs. The trigger for the onset of this period of western decline, is thanks very much to the redneck cowboys who gave us the GFC.

I included the correct definition of commodities, their markets and their relationship to the GFC meltdown, that you may have observed accurate perspective of the association of property to current general economic fundamentals. For the majority of the percentage of global wealth today, is on paper. A significant percentage of current economic pursuit is predicated upon futures, or credit if you like. This is not necessarily an accident looking for a place to happen if its managed astutely, although its flaw is observed as the human condition.

In the US, if foreclosure is realised on your mortgage, by law you may simply walk away owing nothing. The fact is these houses and properties became valueless, and are still traded at premium discount today. One case reported was a property traded for one dollar to discharge its continued costs liability.

The per capita value of Australian home properties is currently the most expensive in the world, exceeding London and New York. [Inside Business-ABC TV- 4/10/09]. Therefore in current economics, the historical correlation between assets and value, may be observed long since superceded.
Posted by Ngarmada, Thursday, 11 March 2010 1:14:02 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Gee Dennis,
I actually found this site when I was emailed to observe the article; The Ethics Council: some inconvenient truths. The attacks on my qualified comment by the parasites I continually identify, was not of my initiation. It is however observed consistent of their malevolent intent in pursuing that agenda on this site.

Therefore I observe your protestations of apparent reason as entirely colonial of their intent, as I wonder whether your enthusiasm for reason would prevail over potential double standard, if these pack animals were able to verbally savage me. For I am not your colonial ideal of a noble savage, and I am confident of my abilities to engage ‘weirdos’ on any level if required.

As you would be well aware also, ‘sad little weirdos’ retain the potential to be disturbed, psychotic, dangerous, weirdos, as the plethora of record of racism clearly attests. I may only assume from your attitude, if it doesn’t affect you, you couldn’t give a toss.

As Lucy indicated, this is a forum for intellectual debate, however, as is common, it does not take long for pseudo intellectual, redneck, bigots, to find and colonise the site, pursuing their dysfunctionally toxic and venal attitudes en masse.

It’s a known colonial tactic, repeated by those of such ilk for time immemorial. It is intended to intimidate those who would dare challenge it, by smothering the debate. Where have you been?

By enforcing them to engage the focus of the debate, the purpose of these sites, they readily compromise themselves by their own irrational constructs, and are exposed. As you acknowledge, it was I who identified the disturbed nature of ozzie, when you had obviously been sharing posts with him before I arrived. Blairbar, Jayb, Jon J, and others share the same malevolent intent.

Trust me on this, I’m an ethnic migrant. Unlike your privileged status, ethnic migrants are one demographic of their intended victims. You cant always be a straw man Dennis.
Posted by Ngarmada, Thursday, 11 March 2010 1:22:44 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 24
  7. 25
  8. 26
  9. Page 27
  10. 28
  11. 29
  12. 30
  13. ...
  14. 39
  15. 40
  16. 41
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy