The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Judging Howard > Comments

Judging Howard : Comments

By Chris Lewis, published 7/9/2009

Are the negative judgments from academics about the Howard government fair?

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All
Yep!
Posted by JamesH, Monday, 7 September 2009 8:40:32 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
JameH

That is the most insightful comment ever
Posted by dovif2, Monday, 7 September 2009 10:05:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Chris Lewis is right to point out that the Howard government had support on many of its policies. In fact, many of them were supported by the Labour Party (or not directly opposed).

Lewis omits to mention two things which might affect academics' views.

First is that some of the electoral support was achieved dishonestly - think 'non-core promises', the Tampa affair, the flirting with Hansonism while claiming to dismiss it. Even his own party president said he was seen as 'mean and tricky'. We can't know how he would have gone if Labour had had even minimally effective leadership. It's hard to avoid the conclusion that people finally woke up to this and tossed out not only his government but him as well.

The second point more directly affects academics. During his tenure, Howard oversaw an appalling failure to fund university education. It is likely that some of this was ideological. If academics were less than sympathetic, what else would you expect?
Posted by Godo, Monday, 7 September 2009 10:41:00 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Howard was correct on morals and family small 'c' social conservative issues. He was however completely wrong on social and economic issues just like the ALP who not only ape him but who joined the Liberal Party neo economic policy agenda from the 1980s era onwards.

The media too are THE problem in that they support the destruction of the family unit, support the privatisations and takeovers of our companies and the sell offs of all our public assets. The media do all of these things and support the big political parties in all of this. The media pose as a social conscience yet just belwo the surgace they support unnatural unions, abortion, are against the superiority of protectionism and all that working class Australians rightly cherish.

There is a way out of this mess. It is to support the DLP.
Visit us today and make a difference.
http://www.dlpnsw.com/
Posted by JCurtin, Monday, 7 September 2009 11:04:41 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
You seem to be saying that since there is an underworld of racism, meanness and bigotry in Australian society, a leader that exploits it shouldnt be condemned as a divisive, dog whistling scumbag.
Beg to differ there mate.
Posted by mikk, Monday, 7 September 2009 2:17:28 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
OZYMANDIAS
Posted by ocm, Monday, 7 September 2009 2:18:58 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy