The Forum > Article Comments > Competing foreign policy doctrines > Comments
Competing foreign policy doctrines : Comments
By Cameron Riley, published 8/6/2006We should advance Australian interests by engaging nations culturally and socially.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
Certainly future historians will be using the deputy sheriff syndrome more than quite a bit.
It is not as if the US hasn’t made historical mistakes. Immanuel Kant who first spoke of the need for a Federation of Nations to preserve world peace, took a lesson of how Napoleon haughtily declared himself emperor even while still carrying the Enlightenment ensign of liberty equality and farternity. Thus Kant declared that from now on not one person nor one nation alone can ever be trusted to rule this world.
As Napoleon broke the code of liberty and freedom, so has George W Bush by not necessarily calling himself emperor, but to let the US have the right to move in near enough alone with the pre-emptive strike on Iraq.
It was and still is a sorry state of affairs for Australia that the Labor opposition has shown so little argument against Howard’s lamb-like trailing after America. Also our public appear to be cheerfully dumbed down about it all, no doubt feeling that following the strength or the big league is the best option, which undoubtly America has whether it be justifieed or not. Again, we could wonder what our future historians will write about our foreign policies, especially if things keep deterioting the way they have been in Iraq, and also, incidently in Afghanistan