The Forum > Article Comments > The left-wing bias of Australia’s media elite > Comments
The left-wing bias of Australia’s media elite : Comments
By David Flint, published 1/4/2005David Flint raises concerns over the bias of Australia’s media elite.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
-
- All
Where is the evidence of this? If this were so, wouldn't people stop watching/reading or start up their own media outlets? (A form of accountability.) What relevance is their not being elected? I thought Mr Flint was against government control of the media.
"...under firm editorial direction, ... freer than ever before from editorial and managerial control."
Riiight. And giving them greater scope for abuse will magically fix this. I'm for increased freedom of communication, but that won't promote responsibile journalism. Nor will it lead to "A clear distinction [] between the objective search for the truth, the news and opinion." That's up to the editors/managers - unless the left-wing elites who enjoy advancing their agenda get their wish and are legally prevented from advancing their agenda.
"The villain in this has above all been the unelected and unaccountable US Supreme Court, which in this and other fields has unashamedly usurped for itself a legislative role."
Wha??
Mr Flint considers LGF and Powerline to be "humble" bloggers, which makes it very hard to take him seriously. It was one fraudulent memo btw, the attack itself was otherwise well supported -- but that was lost in the scandal.
Talkback is good for raising issues and differing viewpoints, but it is not a replacement for proper news coverage and the nature of it often prevents proper evaluation of opinions. I also get the distinct impression from the lack of a full quote that Flint is misrepresenting David Marr.
On another note, how does the moderation work around here?