The Forum > Article Comments > I hate Nicole Kidman > Comments
I hate Nicole Kidman : Comments
By Adriana Maxwell, published 10/1/2005Adrianna Maxwell explains why she hates Nicole Kidman
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 118
- 119
- 120
-
- All
Posted by aussie2, Monday, 10 January 2005 2:45:05 PM
| |
I feel exactly the same way about Hugh Jackman, Mel Gibson and other men of the same ilk! How dare they exploit their good looks and (alleged) talent to make millions of dollars, hoity-toitying around the world dispensing their little pearls of wisdom onto an adoring female public whilst I, chubby, wallflowerish and economically challenged, have to make do in dreary suburbia, desperate for any kind words or acknowledgment of my existence. My heroes of the stage and screen and life in general are the men us ordinary guys can look up to and emulate - Danny DeVito, Woody Allen, John Howard. Men that make us think, "My God! He's even shorter, fatter, more neurotic and duller than I am! If he can do it, so can I". They are inspirations to ordinary men.
Now having said that you couldn't be more wrong about Nicole and Kylie. They are both beautiful. Who cares if they can act? Who cares if they give to charity? There's enough ugly girls around to do that! Who would you rather have played Nic's part in "Eyes Wide Shut", Margaret Whitlam!? I think not. And if Kylie doesn't radiate self confidence and self love, then who does?! I'm sure if you asked the lucky bloke who gets to have sex with Kylie he would tell you that there IS nothing else in life! I'd much rather be brainwashed by Kylie's arse than ABC political commentary. Posted by bozzie, Monday, 10 January 2005 4:16:57 PM
| |
I can see where Bozzie is coming from (on Kylie, at least ;-), but my empathy lies with Adriana.
I hate Nicole almost as much, but have no idea why. I think I probably hated her all along, and Adriana’s vilification is no causation whatsoever. Posted by Seeker, Monday, 10 January 2005 9:35:01 PM
| |
Very amusing! Good to see some decent humour in On Line Opinion. I have never understood the Nicole phenomenon either and it is about time we allowed detractors from the Kidman Corporation some press space.
I also believe that if Margaret Whitlam had been cast in "Eyes Wide Shut" it certainly would have made for an interesting interpretation of that role! Posted by SKE, Monday, 10 January 2005 11:31:36 PM
| |
Bravo Adriana Maxwell - an excellent piece which gave me a good laugh - I loved it, especially the "Nic Off" campaign buttons!
But, the really interesting thing is, that although Adriana's tome was written in a "tongue-in-cheek" style, it is actually quite true. Kidman's fame is so totally out of proportion - afterall, she is just one of many, "so called" good looking actors, who married and divorced well, and has made the grade in popular Hollywood movies. With all due respect, this is hardly the stuff of legends! But, it seems some Australians are determined to make her one. Is this infatuation because she is an Australian who has made it into a few Hollywood movies? That didn't do it for me. Is it because she married Tom Cruise? That, also, didn't do it for me. So what is all the fuss about I wonder? Is it all to do with our need for cultural identity? I hope not, as making legends out of 30-something, very ordinary, divorced actors is a rather desperate act, and something we don't need to do. Posted by Jenanne, Tuesday, 11 January 2005 6:27:21 AM
| |
Bravo Adianna???????!! For promoting hate??
While a discussion of the machinations of celebrity is something to visit, to try to make your point by singling out Nicole Kidman with hate is a reflection upon yourself. Nicole Kidman is not the only celebrity in the Australian weeklies. We have Paris Hilton (non-Australian), Brad and Jen (sadly split), etc etc etc. I am not a fan of such stories myself. Magazines publish these stories without the permission of the celebs involved. Many of these articles are untrue and many reflect badly on the celeb. The celeb is used to sell the magazine. Why turn on the star? Who knows why one celeb is singled out more than another. Something about the person and their life intrigues others. Why that is so is an interesting subject for discussion and I could name some possible reasons for Nicole but they would be wasted here. So what if some people here in Ausrtalia and across the world admire 'Our Nic'? The opinion expressed by the author of this topic is bitchy and uncalled for. Worse, the author could be possibly exploiting Nicole Kidman's fame to big note herself. You used the word "Miaow". How appropriate to you (PS. check your facts before implying Nicole Kidman does not donate). Posted by PoohBah, Tuesday, 11 January 2005 11:46:33 AM
| |
hee hee
bozzie, depsite the obvious that they are good looking and great tossing material for you blokes, the point wasn't that. The point was all these celebrities are hailed as super poeple for doing next to nothing. Posted by aussie2, Tuesday, 11 January 2005 8:25:48 PM
| |
Aussie2, it is unfair to say that Nicole is “doing next to nothing”. She is closer to “doing it all” than people give her credit for (maybe that’s what we don’t like about her).
Here’s Nicole doing an interview with DeGeneres in today’s SMH. http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2005/01/11/1105423481989.html This article may well provide more reason to hate Nicole, but not so for her fans. DeGeneres says, "We'll make bumper stickers up that says 'Honk if you love Nicole'." Posted by Seeker, Wednesday, 12 January 2005 7:52:57 AM
| |
Adrianna,s comments highlight the fawning, feebleminded press writers adulation for this mindless "Oz" interlectual nobody.
Well done Adrianna. Posted by Zeus, Wednesday, 12 January 2005 12:15:13 PM
| |
Very amusing Adrianna! It is about time celebrity hype was put into perspective. I also saw the making of the perfume documentry and as usual was left cold by our Nic. Where do I collect my "Nic off" badge from?
RPC Posted by RPC, Wednesday, 12 January 2005 8:56:36 PM
| |
This is absolutely rediculous. Nicole is a wonderful actress, and has accomplished so much, that I just don't understand why you hate her. Is it because she's talented and maybe more beautiful than you??? What you've said about "Our Nic" is completely obnoxious and rude, and you should be ashamed of yourself. Plus, this is completely immature of you. Hope you're proud of yourself. You look and sound like a total idiot!
Posted by CourtneyLuvsNicole, Thursday, 13 January 2005 11:33:57 AM
| |
Courtney is living proof that the Nicole phenomenon is totally out of control. Anyone with any doubts should check out her website (CourtneyLuvsNicole) where she reveals her love for the two most important people in her life - Nicole Kidman and Ricky Martin. She has my sympathy and I rest my case.
P.S. My therapist says that I am a total spunk! Posted by AM, Thursday, 13 January 2005 3:07:00 PM
| |
I haven't seen the perfume commercial, but have seen the pictorial ads. The expression on her face makes me think that Nicole's just realised that it's a perfume ad and not a film. I simply couldn't sit through a 'making of' of a perfume ad...is it as annoying as Moulin Rouge in cinematic style?
Whether or not 'everyone' loves 'our Nic' because she embodies some relatively universal desire in western society to be all that a glam movie star is, she is a carefully manufactured product. The person that Nicole Kidman is - unless one is part of a no-doubt treasured inner sanctum of confidantes - remains completely open to debate if one really wants to spend one's time on the subject. Clearly a lot of people like the product, but I'm just as happy not to buy it in the same way that I'm aware of their split but am not interested in why 'Brad and Jen' have gone their separate ways. Might be interested in one of those 'nic off' buttons, though... Posted by Goblin Princess, Thursday, 13 January 2005 7:28:08 PM
| |
The Google results now number 292, with your article being number ONE. I guess if you keep this up, you might end up in the 'most influential' list yourself.
But seriously, I don't think this is the right forum for this sort of article... Posted by onebackpack, Friday, 14 January 2005 3:14:17 PM
| |
Couldn't agree more. I don't know ANYBODY, who knows ANYBODY who can stand her. Who are these people that are claiming she is a legend? And why? For being vacuous? For selling some tedious story to the tabloid to promote her latest overrated film.
Anybody who saw "The Hours" will know that Julianne Moore was far more deserving of accolades that "our nic". All this "omigod, she's got a fake nose, quick give her an award" stuff makes me sick. Awards should be based on performance, not who's kept themselves in the headlines with meaningless promotional photoshoots. As for "NSW Person of the Year", or whatever it is called.. Does she even live in Australia? Let alone spend much time in NSW? Last I heard, she lives in the states. I haven't seen her doing much for NSW lately. Have you? Posted by Beren, Saturday, 15 January 2005 11:56:09 AM
| |
Does anyone else feel the buttoned down persona of "our nic' is a mask to hide an ambitious aggresive grasper. It didn't take her long to latch onto tom cruise and use him to further her career, and as soon as she had made inroads into hollywood and milked him for all he was worth (promotion wise) she split. I suspect the "darling" she puts across hides a right harridan (look at the eyes "windows to the soul"). But we all know the gullible public feast on comic book characters, having to deal with a real person Re: emotional, confused, tired, angry, happy etc would mean having to extend them selves beyond the narrow consumer diktat so prevelant today.
Posted by kramit, Sunday, 16 January 2005 10:24:41 AM
| |
I thinks it's disgusting how she smokes in public.
Posted by Sammy B, Monday, 17 January 2005 12:11:42 PM
| |
Adrianna I couldn't agree more, geez you have even completely insulted a die hard fan (I suggest changing your address, you really can't get through to those people and I think there's talk of a lynching) But seriously folks how can any sane person defend Nicole Kidman, I know it's hard to pin point exactly why we don't like her but let me give you a hand. Cast your mind to last week, in a 3rd page big picture article of a Sydney tabloid, we see Nic and her two kids, now I haven't seen them pedalled out since Nic and Tom were together and a completely devoted couple (ha!). Now I don't usually read those articles but there was something alluring about Nicole talking about parenting, by the end of the article I was almost nauseous and sad for those kids, the comments she made sounded like someone who hadn't even changed a daiper, let alone trying to understand her children's emotions, it sounded like oh these kids are great they are such a novelty. I won't go on except to say she ain't good looking (bag o bones) she can act but she ain't fantastic (her only ever believable role was Deadcalm), she has the depth of a birdbath, and she comes off as a condescending twit without a clue.
Posted by ziggy, Monday, 17 January 2005 1:06:21 PM
| |
Thank God,
I no longer realise I am alone, now if I can just find some people who also have knee jerk vomit reactions to Tom Hanks and Meryl Streep, my life will be complete Posted by about time, Monday, 17 January 2005 3:28:34 PM
| |
Ahhhhh! Our Nic!! Yup...I agree with Adriana et al.....This surgically enhanced, nutritionally challenged, overpaid excuse for an artiste is definitely on my hate list...and I don't even know why! Perhaps it is the mindless fodder she provides for the so-called women's magazines (what an insult to women), or is it her sex life? Why is it so interesting to so many people? I personally think mine is a lot more interesting...even if it doesn't make worldwide headlines...or warrant me being nominated for a prestigious award for contributions to humanity and the arts. Oh dear...where is my valium?????
Posted by Jayne Elizabeth, Monday, 17 January 2005 5:06:17 PM
| |
I AGREE WITH EVERYONE WHO HATES NICOLE KIDMAN...in fact the only thing worse than nicole kidman is baz luhman (sic) he and nicole kidman together single handedly have relegated a 20th century perfume icon to somekind of giveaway you receive after you sit through the matrix trilogy...the tragedy of kidman apart from having no personality to speak of is that she is held in such reverence in australia...I think her being made special n.s.w. person has something to do with her drinking coffee at bondi whenever she comes out here to dry out.
Posted by dean moriarty, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 12:04:32 AM
| |
Thanks Dean. No more Bondi for me.
Posted by Seeker, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 12:48:06 AM
| |
Movies stars are nothing but a bunch of very good looking very lucky people who were not only born with great enough self esteem to beleive they could be movie stars, but actually got to BE movie stars. So now they have all that and multi million dollar paychecks to go with it. None of them are really that terrific at acting. It really dosen't take that much skill to remember lines and cry on cue. (They are given cream to make their eyes water anyway) Even Jack Nicholson who always delights, pretty much plays the same character in every movie He does. It's quite rare that someone actually really blows me away with their acting. So why do we love these people so much? What have they done for US? On another wavelength, why does every female movie star have to at some stage bare her naked self? Why does She have to be gorgeous? Why do the men get away with being unattractive. Look at the channel ten news. The women are all stunning the men, balding and aged. Especially the financial guy paul ? Somebody? He is positively revolting. imagine a woman on that same level of attractiveness trying to get a job in tv. fat chance!!
Posted by aussie2, Thursday, 20 January 2005 3:10:39 PM
| |
I HAVE ASSOSIATES AND FRIENDS WHO ARE ACTORS/MUSICIANS/SMALL BUSINESS PEOPLE AND ARTISTS,ALL LIVING ON THE FRINGES, NONE ARE DOING VERY WELL AT PRESENT,IN FACT ALL ARE SUFFERING FAR WORSE THAN THEY EVER HAVE, YET THE MEDIA TELLS US CONSTANTLY THAT WE ARE IN A BOOM PERIOD...WHILE THOSE SUFFERING CLING TO THEIR BELIEFS AND IDEALS, THE MEDIA RAISES PEOPLE LIKE NICOLE KIDMAN and the like to unobtainable heights . JUST AS SHOPPING MALLS ARE DESTROYING SMALL BUSINESSES (along with that old chestnut the gst, an artist cannot receive any money from a work unless they have an abn no.) AUSTRALIA IS IN DANGER OF BECOMING A NON STATE...only really rewarding its creatives unless they are heavily featured in dumbed down tabloids...you only have to look at the social pages of sundays newspapers to know what a tragic state...blame John Howard and big business for this.. not nicole kidman she is only continuing a tradition that has rewarded people like jackie onnassis and others for centuries... But while a forum like this may exist in cyberspace...there is still no real voice of australia's cretive community in the regular media...
Posted by dean moriarty, Friday, 21 January 2005 3:23:40 PM
| |
Ben, I disagree. I don't think it's got anything to do with the government of big business. (And no, I didn't vote for howard.)
The reason we have hear about "our nic" ALL THE TIME, is that people keep buying rubbish like Who Weekly. This has nothing to do with big business - they'll print what sells. It's the consumer that keeps buying this rubbish. Take the example of Princess Diana - tens of thousands of people lining the streets saying "oh, isn't it terrible, she was hounded by those bad, bad press people", when the vast majority of them continually buy "News of the World", "Who Weekly", "Women's Weekly", and any other tabloid stuff. (by the way, I'm not a journalist, nor a politician, nor a supporter of big business, as such). I'm not interested in the personal lives of celebrities in australia or anywhere else, whether or not they've "made it" - it's irrelevent and boring. The current practice of celebrities to "create" some drama in their lives - "I was unloved as a child", etc - to "up" their profile come awards time is a disgrace, but so is the public's demand for any little trivial detail. Surely there's more important news out there than whether or not some has-been is dating some other has-been.. And yes, I'm aware of the irony of writing this on a forum about celebrities.. ;-) Posted by Beren, Friday, 21 January 2005 3:42:01 PM
| |
Artists and people like Nicole Kidman fall into two very different categories - sole traders and corporations. Big name film film stars are rewarded financially disproportionatly to their ability based on the perception that punters are more interested in seeing a film with them in it than with some unknown. Their appeal on film is a combination of their natural looks and the skill of the director and cinematographer. Fair enough - good luck to them.
It becomes irritating when these people start to believe that they are superman (or woman). Surely incredibly lucky (and socially manipulative) stars like Nicole Kidman should look at returning some of their illogically high salaries back into the community to help other actors who are still out there working in theatre and the arts but who will never ever see a six figure salary. A $10,000 donation by Nicole to her alma mater, Australian Theatre for Young People, aint cutting it with me! Posted by AM, Friday, 21 January 2005 4:05:48 PM
| |
Ms Kidman's most convincing performance thus far has been her role as a scheming reporter in Gus Van Sant's 'To Die For', which no doubt reflects that "the buttoned down persona of "our nic' is a mask to hide an ambitious aggresive grasper' (thanks kramit). I also second the opinion by Beren that Julianne Moore absolutely acts The Hour(s) Nic off the screen in the stated film. Nicole Kidman definitely has an amazing publicist who trumpets her every inconsequential move; there was a period a year or so ago where she appeared every day for what seemed like months in the Sydney Morning Herald. I have a fantasy room in which certain celebrities are kept under lock and key (move over Meg Ryan and Jamie Oliver!) and Nicole has a seat reserved at all times.
Posted by speckle, Friday, 21 January 2005 11:14:13 PM
| |
Another reason to bemoan 'Our Nic' would have to be her performance back on Oprah and the like when she was Mrs Cruise, or whatever she called herself back then. Her affected yank accent was pure yuck-vomit-spew value.
Though now that she's grown up and realised that her 'brand' is more marketable with a neutral Australian accent, we hear ad nauseum (a bit like Latham's ladders of opportunity) that she's just a Sydney girl trying to make a go of things. A poor little Aussie lass than ponses about in $40 million perfume commercials and gets voted Australian of the Year (NSW only so far). For my part it's not Nic the person that is worthy of our collective derision. Rather it is the bland Australian suck-hole media that dishes up the same encrusted muck and gravy about Aussie 'stars' day in day out, year in year out. Reruns of reruns of banal orthodoxies to which we're all supposed to stand up to attention to and let out gasps of 'ooohhh-ahhh'. Australia you're still standing in it. Posted by Instant Ramen, Tuesday, 25 January 2005 5:53:55 PM
| |
At last, an oasis of sanity. I think Kerry Armstrong put it correctly about two of Australia's treasured embarrassments when she commented on Nic and Kylie. I quote Ms Armstrong; “She can’t act and she can’t sing!” Truer words have never been spoken. How the hell these two managed to get a career in their chosen fields, and then not only retain them, but keep them flourishing, is one of the world’s great modern mysteries. Oh no. That’s right! They were manufactured. They are creations of modern day Frankensteins. Mad scientists who no longer wear white coats, have hunchedback assistants and delve into creationism, but who now manupulate mass entertainment in search of the mighty dollar. How appropriate then that “Nic Off” should have a starring role in The Stepford Wives remake disaster. Another travesty in a long line of cinematic travesties. What the hell was Stanley Kubrick thinking?? I think people like Kerry Armstrong and Adriana Maxwell should be applauded for not allowing themselves to be a part of the brainwashed masses, and for getting up and striking a blow for the real people. Nicole Kidman Australian of the Year – not in my universe!!! I will be pointing out Adriana's post to all the friends I know who are a part of the We Love Nicky Club. Oh, hold on! I don't know anyone who is in that club! If it wasn't for rags like New Idea, Woman's Monthly and Who Weekly we wouldn't have to hold back the bile when we walk into a newsagent and see Nic, Delta, Tom, Kylie, Gwyneth, Guy and all the other monstrosities that are being paid highly to destroy a once truely creative and enjoyable movie, television and music industry
Posted by snoggett, Thursday, 27 January 2005 1:33:00 AM
| |
Onya Adrianna - I have longed to read these opinions - and agree with Speckle too. BMX Bandits is always mentioned, but please everybody, her film after that, THE BIT PART, absolutely cast her to type. Look for it in the $2 rentals - a good film with Chris Hayward and an hysterical cameo by Ian McFadyen (one of the writers).
Nicole plays herself and it is not pretty. and also she was born in Hawaii, not Australia. I loved the divorce story 'our work kept us apart' - the woman is making 3 films a year, year after year. those poor little trophy children. The UN giving her their gong just shows what a useless bunch they are too. Posted by Brownie, Friday, 28 January 2005 10:02:31 PM
| |
Thanks Adriana. It was such a relief to find out there are other people out there who 'hate' Nicole Kidman, have done for years, but don't understand why.
I recently mentioned this hatred to my mother in England, and she replied, writing, 'Yes, what is it with Nicole Kidman? She seems to be completly looney'. And that is it, I think. She is scary. (Renee Zwellwegger is disturbingly similar, but she is not 'Ours' so who cares?) Nicole looks like she is going to break. Someone I know said she looks like a geisha. Someone who knows her and her family says she is desperately competing for Daddy's love. As my Mum went on to write "It has just occurred to me that she may indeed be losing her mind, in which case it is really sad, and I hope she gets some help' And when she wrote that I knew where my irrational hatred sprang from ( Can't speak for anyone else's). But I agree with whoever wrote in this forum, that when we react like this, it is to something in ourselves we fear. In my case, all I know is I too was a competitive female in a female family, who adored my Daddy, and I went onto to be a big success in the world, admired and feted by many....and then I broke, and spent 5 years in and out of psych hospitals. But, take heart, Nicole - if you are lucky enough to break, you just might find your soul. And then everyone really will love you. Posted by dogtired, Wednesday, 2 February 2005 11:48:23 AM
| |
I am going to instantly lose all credibility on this board by stating right out that I am a Nicole Kidman fan and that I also don't even live in Australia but only even read about this piece through my yahoo nicole kidman news alert. now that no one cares what i have to say, i'll get on. my main peeve with nicole-haters is that they don't even know nicole...it's not nicole who nominates herself for australian of the year or casts herself as the face of chanel no. 5 or signs the 20 million dollar paycheck. she doesn't send in stories and pictures to tabloids. the closest you can get to knowing her is seeing her on a talkshow where she is probably having a panic attack. but then i remembered that i don't know her either. if i may paraphrase... I love Nicole Kidman. It started a very long time ago and I love how much I now love her because so many people seem to hate her and I just don’t get it. it seems to nicole-haters that everyone loves her and it seems to nicole-lovers that everyone hates her and i guess that's just because we are all pessimists. it is a fine line between love and hate and by feeling either we are recognizing her celebrity. something about her has turned her into more than just an actress- and whether you not you find her talented is beside the point- and it's something that none of us seem able to explain except that it has worked up some kind of emotion in it. but you know what? that's what makes legends.
Posted by kerry, Wednesday, 2 February 2005 1:15:05 PM
| |
From Adrianna's original comment: "Why can I not jump on board the global admiration bandwagon and learn to love that giggle, the demure baby doe eyes and the millions of dollars she gives to charity (oh sorry - I made that bit up). Miaow!"
There is an obligation of the Blessed to help those not so lucky. Dolly Parton runs a foundation which provides schoolbooks for every poor child in Tennessee, Lady Diana Spencer knew that just by turning up somewhere, a benefit would flow, so, where is the Kidman Home for Battered Women? This is why we resent her, we know she has more cash than Croesus, enough to do a Good Work. Even Mel Gibson flung some cash at NIDA. and with regard to a previous poster worrying about Nic's sanity - her dad is a psychiatrist so she will get help without queueing at public hospital. Posted by Brownie, Wednesday, 2 February 2005 1:48:01 PM
| |
To anyone who is about to say "well, you're all just jealous because you don't know her.."...
How about this for a thought. There are many fine Australian actors that get great roles in TV and film, but don't carry on half as much as "our nic" - when was the last time you saw Anthony LaPaglia complaining to Who Weekly about "his latest heartbreak", or some other rubbish?? The same goes for Rachel Griffiths, Geoffrey Rush, Russell Crow (if you ignore the bad poetry and that woeful "band" of his), Naomi Watts, Toni Collette, Cate Blanchett (ok, she is getting dangerously close to tabloid saturation), Rachel Blake - to name but a few. And yes, it is "our nic"'s fault that she's the face of some overpriced perfume. She's clearly never heard of integrity, or saying no. She doesn't have to give some tedious story to the tabloids. How about laying low for about, oh, I don't know - 5 years.. Then again, given that's she's barely scraping by, she probably has to say yes to every opportunity that comes her way. Posted by Beren, Wednesday, 2 February 2005 2:06:06 PM
| |
I have worked with Nicole Kidman. She is a total fake. It is a shock to see her for real as she is so painfully thin and unnaturally white skinned. When the cameras are on her she is transformed into a giggling, smiling, happy even over-the-top friendly person. Once the cameras are off she reverts to a scowling, insecure and angry person. I once observed a publicist on her knees talking to a scowling seated Nicole - when Nicole changed her gaze to the opposite side of the chair, this woman crawled over (on her knees) to the other side of the chair to continue the conversation. We wouldn't want poor Nicole to have to adjust her head now would we?
These are not the actions of a charming role model that we should admire. Posted by Corianda, Wednesday, 2 February 2005 2:42:55 PM
| |
Oh Corianda please tell me did you see her eat a meal? I always wonder what really slim people do when they get HUNGRY (like I [not slim] do).
Once again I urge everybody to find that 2nd movie of Nic's THE BIT PART. Why does she keep signing on for films when she must have enough money to last forever? Why does she have a publicist? That full-time hairdresser guy! The thing I know I will resent her for the most is ruining my image of dear sweet witchy Samantha in Bewitched. Posted by Brownie, Wednesday, 2 February 2005 6:12:24 PM
| |
Nicole Kidmon’s movies have become totally stale. It’s a different movie, different costumes, different scenery, but the same Nicole. She should take a break for a while. Join a commune....get a tan....go for a swim in the sea....let her hair get dirty....stop looking at so many pictures of herself...anything.
Posted by Timkins, Wednesday, 2 February 2005 8:54:52 PM
| |
I have been one of the few privvy to witnessing the unbounded depths of Nicole's charitable actions, a few years ago i was involved in a charity event ran by Nicole's father to raise money for children suffering suicidal depression.
A large amount of money was raised,famous entertainers performed at the event. People donated works of art. Our heroine donated a Moulin Rouge script. Dean Moriarty Posted by dean moriarty, Thursday, 3 February 2005 10:49:13 AM
| |
Oh Dean thanks for the laugh! am so glad I have not been a customer at any screenings of M Rouge, the Nose movie, or Eyes Shut etc. I saw TV ads for that child depression campaign that said 'we desperately need $4m' and I thought, gee Nicole could give all of that out of her divorce settlement. what a sacrifice to give that script she must have paid so much for. Keep the stories coming dear readers.
Posted by Brownie, Thursday, 3 February 2005 11:23:01 AM
| |
The Nicole phenomenon IS NOT out of control. We're out of control because we support her???Because we love her??? Oh, and another thing. Don't you EVER tell me who are the people that most important to me! DON'T YOU EVER TELL ME WHO'S IMPORTANT TO ME! GOT IT?! I sympathize all of you who hate Nicole. She's a wonderful actress, and an amazing human being. Myself and MILLIONS of others love Nicole. You're just a few people who are jealous of her beauty and fame. Your opinions don't make a difference. You're a bunch of idiots who are running your mouths. My advice to you is: SHUT UP!!!
Posted by CourtneyLuvsNicole, Thursday, 3 February 2005 2:06:49 PM
| |
Courtney,
I think the issue with Nicole, is that she has become like a “manufactured product” (or like a human fashion statement). The question is whether or not she is manufacturing herself, or whether she is being used or manufactured by other people. I think both, but eventually it would not be very healthy for her, or for her children. Posted by Timkins, Thursday, 3 February 2005 2:58:44 PM
| |
I don't like Tom Cruise either.
Posted by dean moriarty, Thursday, 3 February 2005 3:20:14 PM
| |
What a RELIEF to read that others feel as I do... I have always hated Nicole Kidman, can't stand her and just do not get the whole 'Nicole Kidman' thing. I hate being told how much we're supposed to love 'our nic' (???) WHO loves her? I certainly don't and nobody I know loves her and WHY is she 'ours'???
I know people who have known and worked with Nicole and I can say that no-one, absolutely no-one, has ever spoken of her in glowing terms, rather, they describe her as rude, heartless, cold and calculating, Corinda's story (earlier) is very similar to the stories I've heard. I'm so sick of seeing her on the cover of every magazine, in every newspaper, on the news (??? why is she on the news???), on every 2nd DVD cover. Nicole works the media and publicity machine relentlessly. An example, her phone is being bugged... what does Nicole do? She notifies the 5.00 news of course... this is big news, her father appears on the news asking for privacy for poor 'nic' ???? You're asking for privacy by broadcasting it on the news? I cannot tell you when I have ever seen Cate Blanchett on the 5.00 news. Oh and with regards to 'our Kylie', if you haven't seen this, please do take a look: http://www.heavy.com/index.php?videoPath=/content/contagious/flash_video/kylieMmm&partner=aff36 It's Kylie doing ...well, um, a mechanical bull. Posted by Peta, Monday, 7 February 2005 3:08:32 AM
| |
i think the reason, that the subject of nicole kidman fascinates me so much, is the fact that it's sociological, and many theories can be hung on the phenomenon.
For example; Australia as a simulcra of a 70's Carry On movie ...Mark Latham was Sid James. John Howard the headmaster who doesn't quite get it...Kim Beazley (guest starring) as Tony Hancock. Kylie Minogue of course is Barbra Windsor...Geoffery Rush becomes Frankie Howard,rather than Peter Sellers, Rupert Murdoch as the evil mayor / real estate agent / councilor / millionaire whatever,who wants to control the plot and eat all the scenery...Steve Erwin... the hero who saves the nation ...Nicole as the person that opens Public Buildings by cutting ribbons, launches ships with bottles of champagne but gets caught in a compromising situation towards the end of the film with the mayor / real estate millionaire etc; and is exposed and ruined but he because of his wealth, returns in the sequel, Yes Peta, I viewed Kylie riding a mechanical bull...which somehow prompted this posting Posted by dean moriarty, Tuesday, 8 February 2005 12:06:50 PM
| |
Just to put things in perspective with the 167 results for "i hate nicole kidman", which is 184 now, the search for leonardo dicaprio 154, recameron diaz 183, tom hanks 254, julia roberts 681, tom cruise 859. searching for "i love X" instead, nicole returned 1760 results, the same as Julia Roberts. Tom returned less, only 1016. Leonardo returned 1150 and Cameron a paltry 345. This doesn't really prove anything other than i have too much time on my hands, but still i found it interesting.
Posted by kerry, Wednesday, 9 February 2005 1:11:54 PM
| |
Obviously 'our nic' is popular. But surely there is room for dissent.. And what's beauty got to do with it?? Should we praise everyone just because they are allegedly beautiful? I'm a man, so I'm hardly jealous. And frankly, a plastic-surgery enhanced nose doesn't do it for me anyway (just compare BMX Bandits to now if you don't believe me...). Then there's the thorny issue of 'popularity'. Millions of people like reality TV, but it doesn't necessarily follow that it's good for you, or worth watching. So just because lots of people like 'our nic', it doesn't mean we all should. Maybe it means that some of us are more discerning.
Posted by Beren, Wednesday, 9 February 2005 1:38:35 PM
| |
Beren - have never seen BMX film But I am intrigued to think Nic had the schnoz reshaped, and then got that Nod for The Hours with the fake one! Without the surgery, would she have had earlier Oscars recognition? quel horreur.
Posted by Brownie, Wednesday, 9 February 2005 2:32:28 PM
| |
Real ugly is ignored by Hollywood. Fake ugly can win you an Oscar.
Posted by AM, Wednesday, 9 February 2005 2:41:00 PM
| |
AM, I agree totally! Just look at Cameron Diaz cast in "Being John Malkovich". What a bizarre piece of casting THAT was!
Posted by Beren, Wednesday, 9 February 2005 3:22:06 PM
| |
AHH, Those spidery, fragile and weak hands make me sick.
Nic's the idol of all those weak do nothing and look pretty women. She may have accomplished but she looks weak and sick. Her attempts to protray sophistocation in alot of her films is just her north shore elitist squinty eyed view down her pointy nose and that completely discusting natural laugh. Her jaw looks like it belongs to a five year old! Barf. I've got more freedom than Nic's little life. People please see beyond this little person the media loves to $$! Keep it up Nic, It's better for me to hate you more than anybody I know! Posted by Roger, Sunday, 13 February 2005 6:20:23 AM
| |
A great article, Adriana. I don't know anyone who buys those trashy women's mags with articles where about Our Nic. The question I'd like answered is, are the journos who write those articles, writing in a response to public interest or are they generating public interest by writing about her all the time. Would anyone care if we never see another picture of her at the supermarket checkout magazine racks? Ditto for Kylie who has done an enormous amount with a minimum of talent.
Posted by mtb, Sunday, 13 February 2005 5:50:33 PM
| |
Dear mtb - One does not PAY for that trash, one reads it while waiting in the queue! I always get behind someone with a heaped trolley in order to achieve this. Why? the silly pictures are good therapy for we normal women - one look at those famous chicks who still look dreadful despite all the cash in the world, is Very Reassuring. Why is it there? It is the PR Agents who cause it all. I was very pleased the magistrate threw out the Nic Parapazzi case - a person who pays a fulltime PR should not be wasting the courts time with that one.
Posted by Brownie, Monday, 14 February 2005 12:31:43 PM
| |
No person is worth the millions of dollars that actors are paid to be essentially themselves.Jennifer Aniston & Brad gave $1 Million dollars to the Tsunami appeal but their combined annual income is/was way over $250 million. $1 million is pocket money to them. Also,here is the simple way to win/be nominated for an Oscar
(1) Agree to play a character that is either Psycotic/disabled/ugly/socially challenged. (2) Agree to be made up to look as plain and ugly as possible/put on weight/wear false appendages (3) Agree to play a character that looks nothing like your red carpet character. (4)Do very little else but appear and let the fawning members of the Academy vote for your stunning transformation and amazing "performance" Don't believe me? Here are the nominees.... Nicole Kidman-wearing a fake nose.Charlize Theron-wearing bad makeup,fake teeth and gaining weight.Halle Berry-Appearing without makeup as the wretched trailer trash mother.Tom Hanks- playing the insultingly embarassing idiot that was Forrest Gump.Daniel Day Lewis- playing Christy Brown with Cerebral Palsy.Renee Zellweger-fattening up for Bridget Jone's Diary.Hilary Swank-Boys Don't cry ( One winner who actually was really really good)Nicholas Cage-playing hopeless drunk.Geoffrey Rush-playing David Helfgott(Noah Taylor carried the movie).Dustin Hoffman-playing an autistic in Rain Man.Angelina Jolie-sociopath in Girl Interrupted...... SEE EASY.... No talent needed.Just a script & a makeup artist.Just turn up! So,get your agent looking for them down & out transformation roles & start preparing your thank you speech...... Posted by Miss Vegemite, Wednesday, 23 February 2005 6:55:13 PM
| |
You people make me sick. Nicole's amazing. You're jealous. Plus, stupid, and you have no life. She's got millions of dollars, you don't. She has talent, you don't. She's beautiful, you're not. Your attitude alone makes you hideous. See my point? Never mind! You're too dumb to see my point! I'm sorry! I'll let your ignorance live.
Posted by CourtneyLuvsNicole, Saturday, 26 February 2005 2:08:54 PM
| |
For someone who is railed about parading or known for her love life, it is quite something not to have actually heard her name any of her lovers in public, yet, people yak on about who she sleeps with and this is meant to reflect on her? So, she hates Kidman, who cares. Kidman is entitled to date just like any other woman, her relationships can end just like any other person but I guess Adriana's life is so perfect that she can wake up one day and try to dismiss another person.
Kidman is not a role model? Kidman has worked with the UN for the better part of a decade, she is active in getting funds for Cancer research, she uses her connections to promote Australia, she works for children's charities, she may not be a care giver, doctor but it doesn't stop her charitable efforts from being given the credit they deserve and it is more than most people who put her down have done in their lives. She is one of the personal sponsors for Tropfest, a primary shareholder for the Belvoir St Theatre, a patron of the AYTP, a primary supporter for young filmmakers, this is more than most people putting her down are able to do. Kidman's work speaks for itself, especially in the last couple of years but if you are hung up on her failures then newsflash everybody fails sometimes. Considering the directors she works with, I don't believe celebrity will win her any roles, LVT, Glazer and now Wong Kar Wai aren't directors bowled over by celebrity, they look for a muse and they find it in her. Adriana's personal attack on Kidman actually reflects on the kind of person Adriana is, it doesn't make you look good, darling. That's all I will say. Tom Cruise was 4 years ago, get over it. Tom Burlinson was more than a decade ago, get over it. If she is sleeping with anybody else, that's her business, stop being so preoccupied about it, she is not rubbing in it your face. Shame Adriana. Posted by fearless, Saturday, 26 February 2005 4:12:53 PM
| |
Hi 'fearless' - you have NO PREVIOUS COMMENTS history so I assume you are NEW to onlineopinion. Did you hear from some Luvvie you know that there was a bit of Nic slagging going on? Don't go on the defensive, it is just a bit of fun because we all wish we had a hairdresser with us every day, were filthy rich, tall and slender, did 2 films a year without having to worry about picking up the kids after work, and had Armani boutiques begging us to sweat-up their frocks without paying for them, and we wish we could simply instruct our accountants to forward regular cheques to a list of charities. We hate her because she is living our dream. Now you, seem to know exactly which charities Nic supports. But you did not tell us how large is her largesse?.
Posted by Brownie, Saturday, 26 February 2005 7:51:23 PM
| |
Well,"fearless" you seem to have made a dramatic entrance to this curious forum...unfortunately most of the things you say seem to sound like a channel
7 press release, or perhaps you are a relative or press agent of the consort in question...most of the things you have said are arguable...I have seen no indication of any charity eminating from Nicole...as for the United Nations, do you mean that she is a representative say, like Shirley Temple or perhaps Bianca Jagger,or maybe its just like the Chanel No.5 thing. A fashionable face to brand some areas of concern. Anyway, your comments are great they've woken a few of us from our confident sleep...actually the ricky martin fan "courtney loves nicole" on the other hand, i think really articulates perfectly the danger of people like nicole...you should check out her website...i will be surprised if you are not frightened. Posted by dean moriarty, Saturday, 26 February 2005 11:52:41 PM
| |
Thank you, fearless. Glad you finally decided to join me. Just to let ALL of you know, my Nicole Kidman army is coming. Be prepared, you will be outnumbered. It's time for the Nicole lovers to take over. Oh, and by the way, fearless is just one piece of my army. Take what she said and multiply that by 1000, and there you go. You did a bad thing Adrianna. Nicole fans are PISSED at you! Sleep with one eye open, hon. They're coming to get you.
Posted by CourtneyLuvsNicole, Sunday, 27 February 2005 1:54:31 AM
| |
I don't hate you for hating Nicole. But to say, you don't like someone because of what is seen in the tabloids or because they married a star, doesn't make sense. (By the way, I am nooo teenager, so you can not put it off as a teen thing from me) So, do I wish I could have access to the resources she has access to? Sure. But I feel that way about most people with that access. If you want to make a point about celebrities being put on a pedestal (which I am all for), then there are a whole crew of other much less talented "celebs" for that from around the world, especially my United States. I don't get the whole Paris Hilton thing.
Kidman is tall, beautiful, shy, adventurous (in her career and her life), smart, caring and many other things. I know from my own experience that being shy can come across as being cold or thinking more of yourself than you really do. Ms. Kidman can act and has been working at her craft for a long time. People try to say that having been married to Tom Cruise did so much, but think about it. She spent most of that marriage being the wife and mom she wanted to be. Being married to a celebrity does almost more harm than good to a career. People thinking you have gotten where you did because of that, being one of them. I tend to suspect that people who marry and have a similar passion, tend to be similar in their desire to do well at it. The fact that much of her acclaim has come post Cruise, tells the story. As far as the legend thing that was mentioned. Ms. Kidman was behind Lauren Bacall. She doesn't see herself as a legend either. The truth is, none of us know Ms. Kidman. And in truth, she probably falls somewhere in between the good and the negative that is said. But I suspect that it is probably a whole lot closer to the good. Posted by Mom, Sunday, 27 February 2005 4:55:52 AM
| |
I may be new here but I don't find it fun to slag someone off or show my hatred for them in such a blatant manner because I believe I have the right to, being an old member of a board is not a reason or entitlement to find the putting of someone else down amusing and a call to arms. A lot of all these people that slag people off won't be able to take it in their real lives. To be so wrapped up in someone and then boot up your PC, type more than a 1000 words of personal attack just to show how much you hate them doesn't seem like fun to me, it is unhealthy and shows more of the kind of woman Adriana Maxwell is. Kidman with all her "flaws", stated blatantly by Adriana and her ilk, hasn't at one time or another put another person down, perhaps, this is why she is well liked.
I don't have to open the magazines to able to put my thoughts together, if I had posted something to insult or put down Kidman, it would have been more acceptable, I guess. BTW, Kidman was already on her way to visit the Tsunami-hit region as a UN rep. but was told to hold off by the UN until things settle down and it is noone's business what she does to help the Tsunami region money-wise, is anyone asking how much you gave or what you did or do you think your charitable acts are more righteous than hers that you have the right to snigger at what she or other celebs have done? If Adriana is seen as a smart woman then I am afraid I don't see the evidence here. Next time, ask yourself if the people who know you will be proud of your outbursts or ashamed, for some reason I believe it will be the latter. You have no idea what she does for charity but you slag her off for it? smart. Posted by fearless, Sunday, 27 February 2005 6:03:10 AM
| |
Courtney is now advocating and encouraging violence towards Adriana - I can't believe that "our Nic" would support such action. If Courtney is typical, I can see now why Nicole has to take out AVO's to protect herself from these over-zealous fans. Courtney calm down. You have some serious anger management issues. Nicole is fine and she is laughing all the way to the bank as the more we all discuss her good and bad attributes it maintains her media profile and therefore her bankability.
While Fearless is not so fearless as to write under her own name, she is most comfortable in personally attacking Adriana for (what she sees as) personally attacking Nicole. Go figure. Get a life people. You wouldn't be getting all hot and bothered if this satire wasn't ringing true. Posted by AM, Sunday, 27 February 2005 11:35:41 AM
| |
Welcome to the Online National Forum - we all look forward to your opinion of the other essays here - on the Kyoto Protocol by Alexander Downer for instance. Although I suggest that if you want to gain any respect for your opinion, that you do not begin your second post here with an expletive. Another suggestion - you will have a better life if you choose idols who have a shorter list of EX-BOYFRIENDS than Ms Minogue. In kindness, Brownie (female age 56)
Posted by Brownie, Monday, 28 February 2005 7:48:41 AM
| |
Go Brownie!
I bet you never expected Online Opinion to be your gateway into the trash magazines! It is always interesting to be across the mindset of crazed celebrity fans although you may now need to sleep with one eye open! I don't believe Queen Nicole would approve of bad language - most unseemly for a fan of someone with such a sweet caring image. UNICEF may have to drop her if this continues. Posted by SKE, Monday, 28 February 2005 10:25:00 AM
| |
My comment was directed at the now deleted post from NicoleFan - which began with a synonym of swive, and which was composed in SMS-type text, with foul language. My riposte looks pretty silly without it's inspiration. Perhaps someone could contribute an essay addressing the affect of trash mags on developing minds.
Posted by Brownie, Monday, 28 February 2005 2:33:16 PM
| |
AM, I am not personally attacking Adrianna, I don't know her personally so I have no idea what kind of person she is but from her article, what it shows of her is not nice. What I disagree with is her article and opinion and of course, her lack of basic civility, which however you cut it, is seriously/evidently lacking in her article. I haven't insinuated about the strengths of her relationships or dismissed them, or dismiss her status as a role model. I don't know her enough to vehemently state my hatred for her. Disagreeing with what she has written, calling her on her behaviour as written in her article are not personal attacks, if my saying what she wrote about Kidman reveals more about Adrianna than Kidman then if the shoe fits, she should be able to wear it.
I guess it isn't much fun when the tables are turned and support isn't coming from all corners. It seems that these days insolence is something to be congratulated and taken as fun, go figure. Posted by fearless, Monday, 28 February 2005 2:58:30 PM
| |
Well now we have some hilarious comments.. Courtney says "she's got millions of dollars".. err.. so what? Does that mean we should all bow down and praise her..
As for the various comments about her (ahem) charity work... please stop. My sides are splitting. Folks, wake up! It's called promoting yourself around awards time.. "Our Nic" (and many others), still see fit to insist of multi-million dollar pay packets. Hmm... sounds hypocritical to me. The point I'm trying to make is that I can't see there's is really great personal sacrifice on the part of these people. I certainly haven't seen many celebs saying "i'll donate 90% of my $15million to charity x". Sure, when little people like us donate, we don't give 90% of our wage, but we don't have hoards of disposable income lying around. And blue collar works work just as hard for their measly income as over-paid hollywood actors.. Someone (I think fearless) also suggested "our nic" uses her connections to promote australia. Hmm.. she uses her connections to promote Nicole Kidman. Now that she's left Tom, why not move back to australia, insist on films being done here to increase tourism and jobs. If she's so great, and demand so much power in hollywood, she should be able to bring them out here. Having a full-time publicist keeping her on the cover of who weekly is hardly supporting australia. The thing that frustrates me, and many others is the ridiculous amount of attention and press coverage that she gets (yes, her publicist ensures it's on-going - it's not just an accident). I certainly wouldn't rate her as a great actress. Stealing an oscar from Julianne Moore in the Hours was as close as she ever got. As stated already, there are plenty of good australian actors who don't carry on half as much as her. Posted by Beren, Monday, 28 February 2005 3:27:14 PM
| |
I wonder whatever happened to the 1000 strong Nicole Kidman Army? Maybe they're on make-up and hair maneuvers under the leadership of Major Baz Luhrmann? Or maybe they are out on special tactical operations collecting all the back issues of New Ideas, Woman's Weeklys and Who magazines "our Nic" has appeared in? Or maybe, with any luck, they've all watched The Stepford Wives!
Snoggett Posted by snoggett, Thursday, 10 March 2005 12:54:58 AM
| |
at least Mary Denmark and the Pitts reconciliation have kept her off the covers lately.
Posted by Brownie, Thursday, 10 March 2005 11:40:41 AM
| |
She's ba-a-a-ck. 'Breaking News' just announced by The Australian Online - (Not) Our Nic returns to promo The Interpreter. This is NOT 'news'. Their headline is probably the result of Wendy Day PR push.
Now we will see on the next covers of New Who Woman's Idea what her hairdresser can do to THAT HAIR next. IF ONLY she would spend some of her mega money establishing a boarding house for country kids who get into NIDA, or a home for bashed babies, or anything but endless skintight frocks, I would sing her praises. She certainly is churning out movie after movie. When! does she ever sees those children?. Posted by Brownie, Monday, 14 March 2005 10:06:27 PM
| |
I 13 and before i found out about her i was heading for a bad life.too
Yes, Ms.Kidman is pretty and gurl drool over her, whats wrong with that? Ur just jelous.U asked who does she infuence, well just go to www.teamnicole.com and ask all those people who they look up too when they r down, young and old she gives us, gives me hope for myself, i always wanted to be an actress and she made me relieze its possible.Maybe she looks so skinny beause people like u r stessing her ouyt by saying bad things about her, and shes trying to protect her family.She is not an ice queen, ask anyone who as met her. In one interview shes agrees that she is not a legend and doesnt want to be called one. She has done alot of charity work, examples:since 1995 she has woked with the UCLA, Womens Reproductive Cancer program she has served as a goodwill ambassador for the United Nations Childrens Fund (UNICEF) in her homeland of AustraliaIt was her concern for children that led her to UNICEF. During the crisis in Rwanda, she joined the international relief organization after seeing images of children ravaged by war. Since then she has raised public awarness about UNICEF's programs, doing public service announcements, and speaking out against land mines.just to name a few. the comment on her being with 2 men and that makes her a "role model" it dies, its like saying you dont need to be with a guy to feel good about urself.I know ur problem and it does take a doctor to figure it out, u r jelous, and r holding a grudge for some reason and taking it out on Ms.Kidman. My name is Beth and when i become an actress, maybe you will take a kids fit out on me, thats fine, but dont do it on Ms.Kidman, shes worked hard to get were is is and deserves to be reconized.i had, bad grades, bad adittude ,drugs, With everything she has been through, she makes me love life more. Posted by NicoleKidman#1, Thursday, 17 March 2005 8:45:09 AM
| |
put her name into Google Images search and get thousands of results, NONE of which show her in jeans in the dirt with starving babies like an Audrey Hepburn search will get you. Nicoles 'charity' work consists entirely of attending premieres of her OWN films.
The commentors in favour of her on this forum, all seem to be illiterate. Beth dear 'when you become an actress' you will need to read a script - generally they are written in correct english - even if you gain the role of a moron, the instructions will be in english. you have a lot of work to do. I do not enjoy being so frank with you, but to do you a favour, I suggest you aquire a more worthy role model for your life. Posted by Brownie, Thursday, 17 March 2005 10:25:57 AM
| |
I realise it is now April at the time of this post and I am astounded at the 'angry' posts from the 'nic lovers'. Boy, these people sound as spiteful and vain as their beloved Nic looks with her thin lipped, botox ridden fake smile (I'm always amazed at how she gets roles given that she can barely move her facial muscles).
Anyway, I wanted to relay a little story from a friend of mine who has just returned from the US. When they were over there, they met up with some Americans who on finding out my friends were from Australia, started listing a few celebrities from here. They said "Russell Crowe is an Australian... and so is Steve Irwin the croc guy". My Australian friends then told them that Nicole Kidman was also Australian to which they replied "No no no, Nicole Kidman's NOT Australian, she's an American!". I think that says it all. And by the way her PR is a slag... I know, I've met her... yuck. Nicole relies heavily on PR to build her profile to increase her bankability... good actresses just get busy and act. Posted by Peta, Wednesday, 13 April 2005 5:50:23 PM
| |
Onya Peta - of course Mrs EXCruisiating would hardly matter in the scheme of the universe except that she keeps getting rewarded for nothing, and when she was divorcing for 800million dollars I got sick of hearing about it, and if she does ANY REAL charity work aside from turning up at her own premieres, then I wish her slaggy PR would let us all know - A$3m would endow a chair at any university in australia. Sacha Horler is a far better actress and Nic was born in Honolulu so maybe your septic aquaintances are right, I just wish the australian media would do some fact checking.
Posted by Brownie, Wednesday, 13 April 2005 6:53:49 PM
| |
Isn't it about time our wonderful Nicole went to Indonesia to help out the Tsunami victims? There was a lot of publicity hype about her and her sister going there earlier and then it was mysteriously postphoned to a later time. How much later can it get? Are they waiting for the next tsunami?
Surely with "Eucalyptus" falling over our Nic has plenty of time to help UNICEF and the tsunami victims. What's that you say? - oh she's washing her hair - fair enough. She does need to concentrate on looking good for all those stalking camera men. Posted by Corianda, Thursday, 14 April 2005 11:10:44 AM
| |
Sure, visit Indonesia - but don't make a tedious TV special about it. Celebrities who make nicely packaged TV specials are doing nothing more than promoting themselves. She should turnup and do something (I don't know - donate money, shovel debris) - but to stand there with her makeup on surrounded by orphaned children who neither know nor care who she is - well, it's as bad as turning up to premiers of your own films, or making that huge personal sacrifice of donating a script.. And that goes for all celebrities who want to get in on the act and show how much they care by making a special/publicity shoot..
Posted by Beren, Thursday, 14 April 2005 11:39:35 AM
| |
My friend Gianna drew my attention to a review by Helen Garner of the Nicole Kidman flick Birth:
"But two things are wrong. One is Kidman herself. When such a blatantly manufactured force as the Nicole Phenomenon keeps coming at you every time you open your front door, it is a point of honour to put up resistance. I long for her to wriggle out through the bars of her stardom, to persuade me she's not made of cardboard. But I can't get past that thin, nasal little voice with its high-school intonations; those melodramatic brows; the awful girly thing that happens when she laughs." Posted by Brownie, Monday, 16 May 2005 6:05:48 PM
| |
I've obviously come late to this theme (stumbling in via an irrelevant google). However, I feel compelled to add my two cents. As a bald, grey-haired, old coot (definitely a GOM), who has worked and taught in live theatre for some 30 years, I have to confess to finding this all a little amusing.
For my money, I find Ms Kidman (how shall I put this without being on the receiving end of one of Courtney's diatribes? - ah, what the hell!) - borrrring. There, I've said it. Others have called her "ice maiden". I can't regard her as an "actress", (or as a rather pretentious past paramour of mine would put it "actrine" - I believe this was supposed to be french on her part, and having been a latin, german and japanese student, I wouldn't know), - but back to the plot. Though young and fresh in "Dead Calm", even then, her displays of emotion just didn't ring true. I've never seen "BMX Bandits" and only "Batman Forever" and "Bangkok Hilton" of her later work (work??). I have however, seen plenty of promos, previews, shorts, etc of her other efforts, and she has never yet impressed me (not even as a woman). Regardless of her dialogue, her gestures, or any other aspect of her "performance", her eyes never show any expression. They don't sparkle, they don't glower, they don't love, they don't hate, they don't ... , well, they just don't anything, and in film where the closeup is so prevalent, this is even more important than on stage. The photo on poor deluded Courtney's webpage is a public appearance (Oscars? GoldenGlobe? don't know, don't care!) so she could be expected to be natural and show some vivacity, enjoyment, or excitement, but even there the eyes are lifeless and dull, making the mouth appear a grimace. Anyway, I've said my piece, and while I can't go as far as saying I hate her, she certainly leaves me cold! So now (if anyone is still following this thread), it's over to the fan club to bite my head off. Posted by nomad48au, Tuesday, 17 May 2005 2:31:37 AM
| |
I have just keyed "I hate Nicole Kidman" into Google and got a new record of 835 listings. Looks like it may be time to update this article.
Posted by SKE, Monday, 26 September 2005 6:05:46 PM
| |
Isn't that sad for her. I suppose the name is interchangeable and it is the media, magazines and the PR people who are behind this torturing of US. Those of us who do not have Full Time Personal trainers, chefs, hairdressers and cosmeticians to produce the gleaming magazine cover image. Those of us who do not have Chanel supplying expensive wardrobes. Oscar-win aside, she is a pedestrian actress. Sacha Horler is much better at the craft - I wonder what she thinks of Ms Skinny's bank account? Just when we might have mellowed toward Our Nic, she 'stepped out' with that vulpine creep Steve Bing - only a fellow creep could possibly enjoy his company after the miserable way he treated Liz Hurley. The thing about ALL the slim gorgeous RICH chicks ( Kylie Elle Nic etc) is that they are DRIVEN by some weird thing WE don't have, to ATTAIN That Thing - me me me, and sacrifice children sisters and partners to be it.
Posted by Brownie, Monday, 26 September 2005 6:45:30 PM
| |
So the Ice Queen finally gets her gong for being a bonza Aussie. Let's not take into account she was born overseas, lives overseas, makes her living overseas, married a yank, joined a weird cult, has gone out with every bloke in LA who stupidly looked twice at her, and is now engaged to a drugged out whore mongering country music singer who probably doesn't even know what day it is. She's a real Aussie treasure (hero).
I dare say the Bali 9 will be on next years honours list for making people more aware of our country. Snoggett Posted by snoggett, Thursday, 26 January 2006 8:57:19 AM
| |
Absolutely, Snoggett. She is off to WA to make her zillionth movie when she already has more money than anybody could possibly need. How is she drawing attention to the UN aid efforts? (actually, the UN is useless too, is there a forum here for that?)
Nic, b Hawaii, has every right to be up there with the big Aussies - Mel b USA, Russell b NZ,etc; but what has she done to deserve any kind of award? There are selfless people devoted to helping others, eg Les Twentyman in Melbourne, who have no glamour in their own lives and who have never been helped by Kidman. I will concede that she did pop into a hospital once and visit a sick kiddie - but did she leave a cheque? an old frock for the suffering mum? This award is a crock. Posted by Brownie, Thursday, 26 January 2006 2:06:31 PM
| |
Celebrity nanny Suzanne Hansen has called into question Nicole Kidman's mothering skills in her controversial new book. Hansen claims she never saw the Moulin Rouge actress around her adopted kids when she worked in Hollywood for celebrity couples. In tell-all book You'll Never Nanny In This Town Again, Hansen alleges Kidman played only a small part in raising her children Conor and Isabella. Hansen tells PageSix.com, "I never saw her (with her children)." Hansen also alleges Tom Cruise drew up strict confidentiality guidelines for the child minders he hired, so they would never be able to contradict claims he made about his own fathering skills. She adds, "Tom would make his nannies sign confidentiality agreements that were so strict, they couldn't even say for whom they were working. So basically, if (Cruise) went on camera and said how he didn't have any help raising his children, they couldn't say anything.
Posted by snoggett, Thursday, 26 January 2006 3:50:11 PM
| |
so it is obvious that the Australian Awards committee has not read the book.
There are plenty of nasty moments described in the posts above too. I feel sorry for all celebrity children and am amazed that any come out of it 'well adjusted'. THIS forum HAS to be the longest running on all of Online Opinion. Congratulations everybody - and look - it's topic has just got another award for her smug smile. Posted by Brownie, Thursday, 26 January 2006 4:57:39 PM
| |
The longevity of this subject matter, particularly in the context of Online Opinion, highlights the thin line between apparent social frivolity and the hardline politics that shape this and other Western countries. This is the real pulse of a nation - ignore it at your peril.
Posted by AM, Friday, 27 January 2006 8:31:13 AM
| |
NICOLE, WHY HAS THOU FORSAKEN ME?
wHEN I WAS LAYING ON THE HOSPITAL GURNEY, TOM TOOK THAT LITTLE PAPER OUT OF MY CLENTCHED FIST. HE FINALLY STOPPED CALLING ME WITH THAT SMUG TAUNTING LAUGH BUT YOU LEFT THE HOSPITAL AND NEVER CONTACTED ME. WHY? WAS IT THE RAVING ON I DID TO GET MEDICAL TREATMENT IN A CITY WHEN AT A TIME AS YOU SAW THERE WAS NONE ? yOU PREMIERED YOUR FIRST INDI HERE AND DID NOT HAVE YOUR PEOPLE EVEN TRY TO CONTACT ME THEN . I HAD TO WATCH IT ON THE NEWS MEANWHILE ROY THOMPSON HALL IS ONLY A FEW STEPS FROM WHERE I LIVE .DID YOU FORGET ME ALL TOGETHER OR ARE WE STILL PLAYING HIDE AND SEEK? PAIN ,YES.YOU DID SO MUCH FOR ME AND WHEN YOU DIVORCED I NEVER HEARD FROM YOU AGAIN. JUST TOM AND I HAD TO TELL HIM THREE PHONE CALLS LATER TO F-OFF.CANADA HOUSE, CONTACT, OCA,CAR CRASH THEN....NOTHING. WHY? Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 27 January 2006 5:00:07 PM
| |
Wow...this would be a good place to set a cat trap! Did the writer of this article have a bad night on the tiles? Seems there was plenty of company though! All that energy on hating Nic would possibly be better expended on something worthwhile!
Posted by Coraliz, Saturday, 28 January 2006 7:42:00 PM
| |
I never said i hated Nicole. She was a total angel. Rode in the same
ambulance I was in to the hospital. She and Tom were behind my cab in their car and saw the collision. If it wasn't for them I would not have had the medical attention I needed. It was a terrible crash.Dead of night .First showing of my last film.A real trauma to have this happen after a first screening. Understand? A night on the tiles ? Don't talk about people you do not know. Including me . Your snickering tells me you are not capable of understanding why I wrote this letter.Go away !I will not be checking this site again so... .whatever. Lack of judgment on my part. Posted by tonyintoronto, Saturday, 28 January 2006 8:19:09 PM
| |
tonyintoronto = Nicolefan = complete tossers! What can one say? The Ice Queen seams to attruct the cumplete ded und lusers of sociatey! Nun o thum seam ta now haw ta spul or yus tha grummer that 1 neads tu use 4 every day use. And thay tell rally good sturies abut hur. Wee luv hur! So whaat dus thet tel us? Hur fulms atruct puple of ur own suciul staunding. Wee luv ya Nichole!
Posted by snoggett, Saturday, 28 January 2006 9:57:27 PM
| |
Whether she does charity work is irrelevant to me. How many Hollywood celebrity's headed out to Aceh to cuddle Tsunami victims? her no-show in Indonesia really doesn't make her any worse than the rest.
I really don't care about her hair,and what she contributes as a Australian citizen. Quite frankly, not many people do contribute much to the abused, poor, or indigenous, so I'm not going to judge her. It is interesting that people insist if someone is a celebrity, that means they have signed up to be the face of charity, I dont think its in a actors (use the term lightly for her) job description. She's just joined UN for women and I think its great to use her to raise awareness. Does she really care about a woman in Allepo Syria who has had her clitoris removed and repeatedly beaten by her father, then her husband? so long as its raising awareness for this cause, I'm glad the UN is wheeling her out to do it. If she gets something out of it, I dont care. I have only ever pondered on with this hungry woman for any time when I think about her kids. They always seem to be with Tom, whilst she's talking about making pancakes for them. She seems to be away filming something, so how can you bare to be a mother away from your children for 3 months at a time several times a year? I couldn't be away from my kids for more than 3 nights. She said once she speaks to Isabella everyday on the phone...whoopie, I speak to my clients everyday on the phone, this doesn't make me their parent. The nanny even declared it in a book, and yet no Australian media have reported it that I've seen. I just cant stand the 'mother of the year' delusions that come out her mouth. If she doesnt raise them equally, OK, but dont make out you do. Parenting is 365 days a year, not squeezed in between affairs and making a film. Posted by zazz, Friday, 3 February 2006 4:42:43 PM
| |
ive just come to realize this hatred of kidman comes after an over- abundance of symphathy given to her after she was dumped by cruise. In the 10 years they were married, her career was no less than mediocre. after the divorce, overnight she was transformed into this generations greatest screen "legend". Mainly through critical praise i might add, her movies are unintersting and pretensious box office money losers. Those who would say its because shes come out from under Cruises shadow, then how would you explain the very simular and unimaginative movies shes made, pre divorce and post divorce: before, Practical magic, and after, Bewitched? The Peacemaker, and after, The Interpeter. Before, Birthday Girl, and later, Birth. What i resent is her playing for sympathy, even as late as her last movie, to try and sell her movies ,with tales of how she was so depressed by the divorce, that she wouldnt get out of her pajamas, for days on end! Well if your so dull and boring, keeping yourself associated with once being married to Tom Cruise may be the only way to she can stay newsworthy.
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 9 February 2006 6:25:08 PM
| |
Nicole asked Tom for a Christmas present. She asked him for divorce papers to be gifted to her on Christmas Eve. No-one knows why she asked for a divorce. Not even Tom. That was her gift from him, as she asked . Tom did not dump Nicole. No-one got dumped.
Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 10 February 2006 8:24:37 AM
| |
Dear Snoggett. You sound like you are very hurt and lonely . There are better ways to feel good about yourself other than putting anyone down. You know that.
Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 10 February 2006 8:29:48 AM
| |
hey T in T, i thought i read a few posts ago you werent going to be checking back on this forum? But since you have, lets try to keep the debate based in reality ok?
Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 10 February 2006 11:04:54 AM
| |
Hello Maclen. You think this is real ? What debate? There is little to say about what you may have heard on your television .Read a news clipping from a major science or political paper or a book.It will relieve you of the burden of being stepped on by the boots you so adhere to.
Dear Snoggett; English is my fourth language and I am still not used to writing it as well as you. Difficult language to learn. What is a "night on the tiles"? Please define a "tosser'. I do not know what that is.What is a "cat-trap"? I do not understand Provincial slang. Noticed the habitual haters pummle me with indignation are so few , so loud and easily ryled while the intelligent people favor to be listening closely before making a comment on some one they do not know and people they have not met .Have also noticed Snoggert holds his outdated post-colonial British classist beliefs high , even though he has never been with the higher classes, less he is servicing them in a restuarant or buttling for them in a clothing store. Mes Oui ? Posted by tonyintoronto, Saturday, 11 February 2006 1:30:39 PM
| |
Hey T in T, well i guess you are right about one thing, there is no debate here... Since i find your postings to be rather incoherant and bizzare, perhaps you should get your nose out of those science and political papers you seem so impressed by, and what was that other word you used... a book?.. . and got out more and associated with people, you might be able to actually express yourself a little clearer.
Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 11 February 2006 6:36:38 PM
| |
I agree with maclen. tonyintoronto is not making sense.
Posted by Brownie, Saturday, 11 February 2006 8:28:59 PM
| |
The is the Nicole and Tom I know. Asked them to visit my school the next day to speakers morning for the kids. They did.The kids, many in dire straits , living in housing and trying so hard to get through highschool, getting away from under were not ever impressed easily. They (Tom and Nic.)spent 2 weeks at my school,putting production of Days of Thunder in postponement.They went to every class, sitting next to students and became students themselves.Tom read aloud for us in English class and Nicole dove into and math. They told us their story.Tom took a few students flying. He taught them how to fly hands on as he co-piloted. 3 of these students are now in the Armed Forces flying F-14 jets and 2 are airplane mechanics. The last day with us, Tom and Nic rented 14 stretch limos and took the kids to the first private screening of Days of Thunder.They did send 8 kids to commercial shoots.Just needed a break. They are all now fully employed actors.
Tom and Nicole knew I was depressed after my sister had a momemnt with Capital records.I invited T and N. over and we, Tom, Nicole, my sis and I played tag and hide-and-seek in the large building I lived in. Laughter and love.My sis is now with a better label and I had the strength again to make another film. Both Tom and Nicole did show for the premier of my film and uplifted me even more with their spirits.The next day they came to the world premier of my film (nameless) and followed me and my crew to the wrap party .They witnessed a porche slam into my cab and carry it into the corner of a building. They did ride with me in the ambulance and stayed all night while I was on critical.They live life. Their bottom line was never money. Fame was unexpected. They love and give , not take and stab.I just wanted to put the above information out to the world.They are born stars in what ever field they go into. Posted by tonyintoronto, Saturday, 11 February 2006 10:52:59 PM
| |
"Tom read aloud for us in English class " ?
He is famously and self-admittedly DYSLEXIC. Posted by Brownie, Sunday, 12 February 2006 3:34:56 PM
| |
Hi Brownie. I thought he was too! I admitidley put him on the spot and asked him to read a page from Orson Wells' 1984 at random.It was not class material yet. I did not believe he was cured of DYSLEXYA ,especially by the Christian Science
(religion ?) but he read without a problem.I was beside myself. Some things really are stranger than fiction.I will never put his beliefs down again, though Scientology does give me the shivers. Posted by tonyintoronto, Sunday, 12 February 2006 5:39:15 PM
| |
Last time I looked, George Orwell wrote 1984 but when you have a school system that encourages cheesy, dyslexic movie stars to hang around schools and address English students in class, it is probably churlish to point out such minor details.
When such admittedly poor students like Tom and Nicole are welcomed into a school environment for such a long period of time you have to question the rationale as surely the only lesson learnt is that poor student discipline could be the passport to fame and riches. Posted by SKE, Monday, 13 February 2006 10:23:17 AM
| |
Has it ever dawned on the Habitual Haters and nit pickers on this blog that they only look for the few unimportant flaws in people, no matter how small ? You must have a magnifying glass on your person at every given moment as if you were constantly looking for lice infestation.What have you done to make this world a better place? Have you taught 5 teenagers how to fly so they would have a career flying for the Armed Forces ? When is the last time you sent 8 teenagers to commercial shoots to get their careers started ? When have you taken time to go into an inner city school surrounded by guns, drugs and all things dangerous and creepy to sit in a small class of very brave teens and read with them , no matter how your reading skills may be ,even for medical reasons beyond your control before your birth?
I gave you a snap-shot of something beautiful and you can only find fault in silly things as an error in who wrote 1984. Like my mother says; The Devil Loves His Children So Very Much, He Gouges Out Their Eyes So They Do Not Have To See The Misery Of The World. How well would you stand the stress of being under a microscope? Where is your Certificate Of Achievement ? (use your magnifying glass) Tony-in-Toronto. Published Author, Film Maker,Designer and more than just a fan of Nicole and Tom. Feel free to nit-pick all you like. Seemingly that is where you are. Must be a well paying proffession if you are that good at it.We all have to do something. I guess some one has to sniff the carpet for bad smells .We all have our talents. Posted by tonyintoronto, Monday, 13 February 2006 8:11:31 PM
| |
To Snoggett, Maclen and Brownie.
Nicole lives in Vancouver, British Columbia. She is American born, grew up in Australia but she can live anywhere she wants, anytime she wants to. Her children are well taken care of by their mother. The family is nothing for you to worry about. She is a World Actress, not confined to one country or city. Much like the world needs more light, Nicole has the Sunshine follow her wherever she goes. Sounds like the three of you live in a basement in some god forsaken city no-one cares to live in unless they absolutely have too ! Need not worry about Nicole and her career and travels.Her many homes around the world. Her friends where ever she goes. Her great wealth and simple beauty. She does just fine on her own . Always has and always will. Even with admittedly "ugly" people like yourselves (you said so )bottom feeding is not something you can do without eventually getting very sick.Sewers are not to drink from. O.K? Am off to work. You know ? W-O-R-K ? Posted by tonyintoronto, Monday, 13 February 2006 9:51:47 PM
| |
Back on topic: Adriana wrote - 'Her latest elevation to be named NSW Australian of the Year beggars belief...I hate the way that the media seem to assume that everyone loves her ...
Listing a "thirty something" actor as a living national treasure is bizarre. Among her snowballing list of fawning accolades, Kidman was named by Time magazine as one of the 100 most influential people in the world, .. to buy magazines (to find out whether she is sleeping with Keith Urban, Steve Bing or starving herself to death) count? Getting dressed must take her forever, I mean for a curly haired redhead, how long must she spend transforming her hair? After seeing the documentary about the making of her two and a half minute perfume advertisement ...If you key “I hate Nicole Kidman” into Google you get an astonishing 167 results ... When film veteran Lauren Bacall, who sees Nicole as a relative beginner, had the temerity to correct a sycophant reporter who described Nicole as a “Legend”, she was pilloried around the world. But why do I not recognise her hard work and effort to make it to the top. All those toiling years as an unknown - two as a teenager with Tom Burlinson and then ten years with Tom Cruise. This woman is such a role model! Why can I not jump on board the global admiration bandwagon and learn to love that giggle, the demure baby doe eyes and the millions of dollars she gives to charity (oh sorry - I made that bit up). Miaow! If I could just learn to love Nicole like "everybody" else does then the doctors say that I might just be able to get out of this padded cell and the straight jacket and fit back into society like a good girl". NB: Tony - I worked for more decades than you have lived, and gave my country 3 taxpaying children. I am not ugly nor did I say so here. Posted by Brownie, Tuesday, 14 February 2006 7:26:33 AM
| |
Sorry BROWNIE.
Spoke with T and N as far back as 1989 and asked them what charities they give to. They told me they did not want to be affiliated with any orginizations. They have been pushed into giving to charities openly as a media ploy to stop being harrassed. They have always given privately. When I pay someones rent or buy fresh fruit and veg. for seniors I do not tell anyone.When orginizations want to shake me down for money I tell them I do not give to Charity through public/orginized means .Remember the famine 50's in Africa ?Why does the Humane Society not spay /nuetre animals before going back out into the system? It is a scam as far as i am concerned with so many people making a good living off the donated dollar. There is always get a tax reciept and award for posturing. As a Christian I was raised never to tell anyone what I have given b-c it takes away from the whole spirit of Charity. The movie stars and all-so-important people in the media talking constantly about what they give and how much are the ones i can't stand.Nicole looked so uncomfortable trying to sit in the chair at the U.N to be a spokes woman for three Charities. It hurts when you know you have given so much out, quietly and personally, being such a beautiful thing and heart warming to then be told by a mass of people you are cheap , do not care about the less fortunate and should give, soley because they have not seen you do your personal charitable work.Bill Gates was here last year and gave a school 6 computers. For that he was on the front cover of two daily papers and a fancy lunch with politicians and charities committee people. He is where we should be concentrating our focus on. But he is not a pretty woman with a glamorous career, so why bother? Posted by tonyintoronto, Tuesday, 14 February 2006 9:36:44 PM
| |
News Flash! Apparently Tom Cruise has split up with Katie - they are just pretending to stay together until after the birth of the child. Obviously all that charity work has taken its toll on the poor man - either than our Katie has woken up to the fact she was living with a control freak with only a tenuous grasp on reality.
Now I know that TIT (rather unfortunate anagram there Tony) will be mortified by this and feel obliged to pontificate further on the godly stature of Tom some more - please don't. You seem to have missed the point of this forum - an opportunity to rant about our irritating Nicole in a clever, sarcastic manner. You would be better to scroll through these comments until you locate CourtneyluvsNicole and bond with her instead. Meanwhile the rest of us can wax lyrical about this new Tom development and how Nicole must be ecstatic! I guess I am strangely pleased as well - how shallow of me. Posted by SKE, Wednesday, 15 February 2006 3:06:20 PM
| |
SKE; you found me out! TIT is actually the name of the planet I am from. Nicole,Tom ,God and I are from a planet you Earthlings have not discovered yet. We cloak it with a LOVE device.As I put on my green Alpha-ray goggles I can now see this is really a HATE site.
I met Nicole and Tom through the same pre-used U.F.O dealership I rent my flying saucer from. Rent-a-Space near Sky-Lab Elleven, across the Glixx Donut Hut .Just look up from the Hollywood sign but be careful not to incinerate yourself if you are on the landing path, not visible to the human eye. O.K then. It's time to go back to TIT . Been interesting learning your ways of HATE. We will examine it closley and learn to use this most presciuos skill of yours to develope a New Order. Posted by tonyintoronto, Wednesday, 15 February 2006 8:40:30 PM
| |
We are trying to eliminate the word HATE from our vocabularies in all languages, along with the 'n' word, the C' word describing women and the f' word that used to describe a bundle of sticks tied together.
Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 17 February 2006 12:09:23 PM
| |
I just don't get it....I haven't been here, but you all still feel the need to attack me. Time has passed by since my comments defending Nicole were posted. I'm at the point where I say "WHO CARES". If you hate her, fine. If you like her, fine. Are you proving anything by coming here and attacking an innocent woman? Absolutely not. Adrianna can think however she wants to. Hate is a strong word, and if she "hates" her, well....like it's supposed to matter what she thinks. Her views don't make an impression on mine, so she can rant and rave all she wants. I've grown up since then, and you all need to do some growing up yourselves. Think about it this way: She's just an actress trying live her life day by day. Let her be guys, and move on. If you dislike her, OKAY OKAY. We got it. No biggie. Let's respect each other's opinions, and try to get along. That's the best way to handle this. I'm not here to personally attack anyone anymore, I'm here to make peace with you. Don't be so angry about something so minor. Let's ALL just move on.
Posted by CourtneyLuvsNicole, Monday, 20 February 2006 3:26:16 AM
| |
Hi Courtney. They can not move on. They dispise themselves and are fear based. They cling to each other as they all drown in a very leaky boat. If you throw them a life line, they would only pull you in to drown with them.
Posted by tonyintoronto, Monday, 20 February 2006 5:36:44 AM
| |
yo geniuses, just to bring it to your attention, the topic title of this forum is "I hate Nicole Kidman". It is not "I like to grovel and ramble delusionally about Nicole Kidman". If it troubles you so much, maybe you need to go out and find THAT forum... but i doubt you will. You want to be here... you need to be here... the feeling of persecution just feeds your need for a reason to be alive, doesn't it? Yes, and some people are just so busy with "WORK" yet they can still find the time to post comments.... EVERY 5 MINUTES!.. (yeah i mean you, Mr T) I pity the fool. I check back after a few months only to find this? I'll be checking in
in another few months.... because you see, i can move on. Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 9 April 2006 6:10:15 PM
| |
For Maclean;
You're not getting it ! H A T E is a very strong word and we are trying to abolish it from languages around the world. Try ..........dis-like. Ok ? Genious ? LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE NICOLE or Dislike her. I think you want to be he Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 21 April 2006 10:54:28 PM
| |
Adriana's essay says nothing for me to disagree with.
Nicole Kidman is not even slightly like-able. The one thing which proves Adriana correct is that Not 'Our Nic' actually married a complete idiot like Tom Cruise. Now poor little Conor and Isabella have Catholic Daddy and his Catholic child Mistress's Ex-Nuptual baby to play with. Little Conor and Isabella have had Catholic Mommy and Lenny Kravitz, Mommy and Steve Bing and now Mommy and drug addled womaniser Keith Urban as well as her making 3 movies per year. I wonder if all this was explained in the Adoption Applications? Can't help thinking that Kid Urbman may announce a scene stealing wedding though. (and I don't want to hear any ravings from any delusional Canadians who claim to be teachers, in response to this comment) Posted by Brownie, Saturday, 22 April 2006 6:33:37 PM
| |
Oh, goodie goodie gum drops!
Bait ! Tee-hee ! As a Canadian teacher I must tell you ....... ............STOP sending us your hair-care products and Kangaroo Spokes-animals. You are putting our animated Beavers out of work and aside from Nic. being our number one export to Australia, that is all we have ! O.K? Please. We are a good and simple people. Leave our Nic be .We need our Monarch reign supreme else the French will embargo their perfumes and we will be forced to shop in Quebec !AAAAAAAAHHHHHHGGGGGGG Posted by tonyintoronto, Saturday, 22 April 2006 10:29:21 PM
| |
Ahahaha!
This little article is really funny! :oP Posted by eXpoliarium, Saturday, 20 May 2006 9:46:40 AM
| |
Ha anyone other than myself been pushed onto the ground by Nicoles sister ? She came up behind me as I was leaving a pavillion Nic. and Tom were at and she ( Nicoles sister )in Onraio Place and pushed me so hard onto the pavement I could not get up , having a bad back.
She is a very bitter , hateful person with a dirty filthy mouth and a huge chip on her shoulders. I don't think I am the only person to have been assaulted by Nicoles sister, what ever her name may be, i do not know.She pushed my onto the pavement twice. Earlier I met her and she commented " Nicole hates you. I am her sister !" Why so evil ? I have a famous sibling too and am always referred to as my siblings brother. Doesn't bother me. I guess Nicoles sister has a problem with being a famous siblings sister who no-one knows the name of and a great tendancy towards un-prevoked violence. Posted by tonyintoronto, Wednesday, 31 May 2006 2:15:32 PM
| |
Hi, Nicole & Keith Urban, Its great to see them getting married this weekend, I will have many photographs available to everyone Free of charge !
my website is www.actionmasterphoto.com.au all the best Pete Local Photographer in Manly Posted by Pete local manly photographer, Friday, 23 June 2006 7:55:10 PM
| |
Yea ! I am so glad she's found someone. She had been looking a bit lonely and lost the last few years. He better treat her right. Nicole is a fine Lady.
Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 23 June 2006 11:14:48 PM
| |
It has been a relief to read the honest comments made in this thread. The fact that Nicole Kidman has chosen to live in Texas when her 10 and 13 year old children live in and are schooled in LA is enough to illustrate her lack of interest in them. To not bother spending Christmas with them last year bolsters this pathetic Portrait of a Lady. Not.
She has stripped herself of emotional expression through overdosing on botox and plastic surgery too, which must be a huge handicap for an actor who needs to express emotion subtly.And let's face it, she has major handicaps in that area as it is. Until recently I could not understand why the media always painted such a holy picture of the Ice Maiden. Readers aren't fooled. Who do the media think they are actually catering to? As someone else said in an earlier post, I know nobody who likes her. She is a disgraceful example of motherhood and a greedy example of focussed narcissism. I now realise why the media refuses to tell the truth (because the media does KNOW the truth). It is because of her close friendships with the Murdoch and Packer families who own all the newspapers and magazines here in Australia. The journalists' hands are tied.As a result, I guess the truth about her marriage break-up with Tom will never be revealed. Tom said at the time, "Nic knows" but he didn't elaborate, to protect the name of the mother of his children. It will be interesting to see if, in time, the truth will out. Posted by morgan, Sunday, 25 June 2006 4:16:29 PM
| |
Well I have to Agree with Morgan. You sure do know a lot about someone elses life. The rest of us will just have to sit back and hang on your every word.You Pontificate so well. Calling some one a bad mother! Does she use wire coat hangers?
I like Nicole. She's so pretty , generous and kind. Love her films. Nicole is just an actress. Get over yourself. What's in your closet? Posted by tonyintoronto, Tuesday, 27 June 2006 3:01:09 AM
| |
You asked me what's in my closet. Nothing interesting.Just a few old dusty memories of working on crews in the Australian Film Industry in the 1980s and early 1990s. The incident mentioned by another crew member in an earlier post about Nicole's rudeness and arrogance towards the film's publicity person is similar to experiences I have had in working on set with said Diva.The public mask of Nicole Kidman is the total opposite to the real person behind it. (Think The Portrait of Dorian Gray.)
Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 27 June 2006 8:35:41 AM
| |
Ok. Thing is I never worked with her or Tom. They are sweet people. My mom loves them and she is not easy to get along with, but they stole her heart. That's a big accomplishment. They are good to her. They were good to me throughout my knowing them. Some people in Toronto have said about them exactly what you have. They are arrogant and Icy on the set and dis-spect much of the crew. I have never been to any of their filmings .,so I wouldn't know but so many people truly Hate them , it is just difficult for me too see them like that. Am a bit beside myself when people are attacked on the entertainment news circuit who have not seen the inner light of the people they are crucifying.Sorry to hear film crews are treated so badly by a couple of actors. Maybe they get easily stressed when everyone wants something from them , except their company as just plain humans like everyone else.Am beginning to understand the articles in this blog. You do however sound like a bitter old Queen who knows she will never be more than a boom operator.
Posted by tonyintoronto, Tuesday, 27 June 2006 8:49:19 AM
| |
Yes, Toniintoronto, all my life I have strived to become a boom operator but I just never made it. Being a lowly runner has probably made it that much easier for those with big heads and big feet to walk all over me.I'm hoping that in my next incarnation I will be a grip.
Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 27 June 2006 9:03:48 AM
| |
Unfortunately Morgan you have entered into correspondance with the TIT from Canada who has devalued this exchange of dark mutterings about Ms Kidman that the majority of us has so enjoyed. Adriana's article was reprinted in part in Melbourne's Age newspaper on the weekend and this forum of comments was even refered to as evidence of the groundswell of public disquiet as to Kidman's so-called "loved" status.
If Nicole is so loved why did none of her many famous co-stars turn up for the wedding? Not even Tom Cruise who she claims she will always love? The truth is that Nicole is quite simply not a nice person and anyone who has ever worked with her or for her will attest to this. Her most blantant act of self-promotion must have been immediately before the wedding when she showed up at Sydney Children's Hospital for a photo-op with sick kids - pleeese! Posted by SKE, Tuesday, 27 June 2006 11:48:31 AM
| |
This thread 2912 has run longer than any other on this site.
What an achievement, and much of it due to our film director friend Tony In Toronto. His close friendship with Mr & Mrs T Cruise began when they witnessed his injury in a vehicle collision after showing his 'last film' and Nic rode to the hospital in the ambulance with him. He was teaching at a high school and The Cruises 'put Days Of Thunder on hold' to spend 2 weeks teaching his class to fly planes. Tony knows 'Christian Science cured Tom's dyslexia' sufficiently for Tom to read to this high school class, possibly from 'Orson Welles novel 1984' which Tony alluded to in one of his posts. Tony - your posts here have been most informative and amusing and I thank you for it, maybe you should write a book about them (in any one of your 'four languages'). I commend Keith Urban for allowing (unlike all other celeb weddings) the people of Sydney to photograph them going to their marriage, and I look forward to him being a positive influence on Nicole from now on. Posted by Brownie, Tuesday, 27 June 2006 11:54:55 AM
| |
well guys, my free pictures of Nicole & Keith are on my site,
www.actionmasterphoto.com.au/fun.html I have a few more including Russell Crowe & wendy Day. let me know if your interested. All the best ! Regards Pete Posted by Pete local manly photographer, Tuesday, 27 June 2006 8:09:18 PM
| |
So none of Nicoles co-stars showed up at her wedding. How sad is that?. Even ex-hubby who said he would attend , did not.
Nicole, you are in for a very long and lonely life. At 40, Hollywood does not take well to female actors. They just fall off the map. We reap what we sow, eh darling .I am very sad for you. I know more hollywood people who would show up for my sisters wedding, and she is not where you are in the industry, money wise, but every one loves her. Guess it's time for analysys. Too bad Nic. I was rooting for you but you just played too many head games. Mabey I'll see you when you're back on Earth.-T It's a big mabey.You just seem so lost.lol. Posted by tonyintoronto, Wednesday, 28 June 2006 10:54:47 AM
| |
That last article was NOT written by me, TonyinToronto ! Someone has been on my computer without my knowledge.
I will never give up on Nicole. Bad house guest. Very, very bad house guest ! I woke up this morning and found a knife plunged into the back of my favorite gaint stuffed toy Kangaroo, and the head of my Quala is missing. All there is left fluff where the head used to be. How can anyone hate so much. OOOOOO! I am so upset. I bet my Kiwi fruit salad has been tampered with too. Don't you just hate that ? Stupid house guest . Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 30 June 2006 3:37:00 AM
| |
Tonyintoronto, it was probably Nicole's sister...you know, the one who pushed you in the street and told you that Nicole hated you.
Thrusting a knife into a toy kangaroo is not nice but mis-spelling 'koala' is a tragedy indeed. Posted by morgan, Friday, 30 June 2006 7:44:26 AM
| |
Ya.Eh?
I thought so after I posted my article.Sorry. It's like a foreighner mis-spelling Meese, (as in many Moosses).Hate it when foreighners mis-spell our Canadiana. So ...........the stuffed Kangaroo is alright now, but shame about the Quala. I had to sew on the head of a Beaver onto it. Looks kinda' strange but I will just have to try and pass it off as a Platapus-like animal of some kind. I should say Nicole herself is quite an interesting discovery of your Natural Wonders. The things you Aussies come up with. Too much,eH ? And we fall for it all the time. You guys are a hoot. Don't you get nose bleeds from being on the Earth upside -down all the time ? Just curious. LOL-t PS. It's gun season in To., so if you don't hear from me again it's because I have fled or got shot. It's downtown Bahgdad here in the summer.Would love to live in Australia. Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 30 June 2006 8:10:34 AM
| |
Happy, happy Canada Day ,eh !
Does anuone want a summer dress Nic. left in my home . Just found it in the costume dept. Posted by tonyintoronto, Sunday, 2 July 2006 8:51:08 PM
| |
Couldn't it be true that the reason for your hatred is jealousy?? It sounds more to me that that's what your problem is.... actually all of you. I hate her.. I hate them. Hate is a word that is usually associated when someone personally does something to you. Why do you hate them so much? Because they managed to make a great career and name for themselves?? I just don't understand.. Dislike... yeah.. but hate? But hey, each to their own. Just curious
Posted by Jetkat, Sunday, 16 July 2006 12:31:54 PM
| |
Hi Jetka.
Thankyou. I wrote the same aricle on this blog about the use of the word hate and how powerful it is.The word Hate should be sticken from ours and our childrens language in every country on Earth. Dislike or dis-agree is better. Non ?-gb-Tonyintoronto Posted by tonyintoronto, Sunday, 16 July 2006 1:13:10 PM
| |
What a sick, twisted and bitter person. It goes to show that your very much into the "theatrics" How sad it must be to be you Ms Maxwell. The amount of "hate" that you exude from your forked and bitter tongue is astounding. You sit there and criticise Ms Kidman for actually working hard and making something of her life. You Ms Maxwell are in desparate need of some therapy, take a long hard look at yourself. Did you get rejected from acting school or is your bitterness purely because you never got to play the fairy in your primary school play. Grow up Ms Maxwell, wake up to yourelf before your self loathing turns cancerous, it's really you that you hate, not Ms Kidman or anyone else. Oh yeah, and by the way.....surley you must see how ugly and unattractive your unfounded attitudes would be to everyone around you.
Posted by Yourjust jealous, Friday, 1 September 2006 11:15:27 AM
| |
Hiya Morgan...........well it sure is a relief to me to know that your hot on the tale of Nicole Kidman in Texas, because if you were sledging the Nicole Kidman that lives in Nashville TN that is now happily married to Keith Urban, well I'd just have to tell you that it really is time to change the bucket under chin sweety, it's lookin alittle full of b/s. Oh yeah, and by the way, while your telling the www of just how bad a mother Nicole is, what were your children doing, why wern't you looking after them (that's if you have any) Why don't you get a life you pathetic little creature. Your so full of crap, you can't even get the town right that she lives in yet sit their on your fat arse making unqualified "statement's" which are just reflections of how you are about yourself. Do the world a favour and stop reading all the hollywood hype in your magazines, better still, use the pages to wipe the foul dribble that is oozing so profusely out of that orafice just under your nose. Actually, I think your oozing orafice is at the nape of your neck, I mean, after all of your plastic surgery. Your just another jealous old hag wanna be but never was that's got to pick pick pick. Every second word from your post is b/s. Grow up and get a life. She acts, she's pretty (but not over the top) she farts, poops, burps, has good days, bad days and inbetween days......who the hell are you to make such statements like you know her personally....I'd love to see people like you sued, might just shut your yap trap. But aint ya relieved that your bagging Nicole Kidman from Texas.
Posted by Yourjust jealous, Friday, 1 September 2006 12:26:54 PM
| |
You are a funny little thing, aren't you "JustJealous" ? Calm down. It'll be alright on the night.
Posted by morgan, Friday, 1 September 2006 12:32:15 PM
| |
Mabey the Dingo Hate yo baybee ?
I said, Mabey the Dingo Hates you, Bay-Bee. Posted by tonyintoronto, Saturday, 2 September 2006 12:33:00 AM
| |
Ever heard of satire? The real problem is that, by your own admission, you're just jealous.
Posted by RPC, Monday, 4 September 2006 12:30:48 PM
| |
RPC has got you there mate !
"calm down? Tee-hee. Would take a 200 pound chocolate covered valium with Zoloft sprinkles to calm that one down. You all live in Australia.A paradise I am sure, and all you can write about is hate. Have the nuns not beaten you enough ? Jealous Moo cows. The Toronto Zoo needs more Australian odditties for the Aussie Pavillion. Would you like a fascinating new fast paced career as live-in crock keeper? The last just seemes to have vanished. Posted by tonyintoronto, Monday, 4 September 2006 9:25:01 PM
| |
Thanks for writing this.I'm happy to find people who hate her just as much as I do.I don't understand how she keeps getting movie roles almost everything she's in bombs big time at the box office.She has so much botox in her face she can't even change experssion and as someone else said her eyes are dead looking.Actually all of her looks dead,she looks like a corpse with her dead white skin,skeleton body,beige hair and souless eyes.We were calling her the corpse bride when she married Keith Urban.The only reason she even has a career is because she married Tom Cruise not because she can act.She couldn't act her way out of a wet paper bag.She only got her Oscar because they felt sorry for her because Tom dumped her.
Posted by CRICKET, Friday, 13 October 2006 12:25:29 PM
| |
Hi Criket.
Actually Tom did not "dump" her. She asked for a divorce to be given to her on Christmas Eve 2000 from Tom and he complied as a good husband does.That's how much he loved her. Only three people in this world knows why the divorce . Not even Tom knoes. He simply complied with her wishes. as a best friend and loving husband would do. If it gives you any pleasure, Nicole is 40. Ypou know what happens to females at 40. They seem to dis-appear, Wish you would look into your heart before spouting out your obvios ignorance about a divorce you know nothing about. Tony - in - Toronto. I will have my mama to give you a personal call and set you people straight about a human collective reality as opposed to your spitefull, hatefull thoughts. RAISE YOUR CONSCIOUNESS Please! Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 13 October 2006 12:42:31 PM
| |
Maybe they divorced because of something she did.
As Tom said, when asked why the marriage broke up, "Nic knows." Maybe he is protecting his children from adverse publicity re their mother. Maybe it was something she did while filming Moulin Rouge. Maybe it was the runner. Posted by morgan, Friday, 13 October 2006 1:13:59 PM
| |
I couldn't agree more with you Cricket. Finally a post of reason. So I notice Kidmans back with another movie... its been what since her last one? A year and a half? Well at least a year and a half free from her usual pretentious, moody and self indulgant dribble. Do you think it'll be another dismal failure? About as sure as her personality is as bland as her complexion. But it'll make a perfect trilogy to sit along side Dogville and Birth, just a few of her long list of duds.
..and by the way, just to keep the facts on this thread straight, Kidman is 39 yrs. old. All you have to do is a little research on facts... you know Google it , its that simple. Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 14 October 2006 8:35:57 AM
| |
Don't you just hate it when your boyfriend comes home with his face smelling of pussy, and you just know it's not family, but some kind of Chanel similarity ?
Posted by tonyintoronto, Saturday, 14 October 2006 8:46:24 AM
| |
Philosophising does not become you Tonyintoronto.
Posted by morgan, Saturday, 14 October 2006 8:55:07 AM
| |
Well you know Morgan, I've always believed there was something more behind the break up of Cruise and Kidman, than the usual they've grown apart, or disagreements over careers or Scientology, or whatever. Cruise was pretty adament and determined to divorce Kidman, that not even her claim of being pregnant and losing his baby would change his mind. I dont think its an accident theres never any pics or sightings of them together in public since they split, and it's pretty clear it pisses him off when hes asked too often about their marriage today. Also, morgan, what do you mean by that runner statement in your last post?
Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 14 October 2006 1:24:40 PM
| |
Ya-da-ya-da-ya-da-boom !
You people are so ignorant I just wonder if any of you have the common sense to be more than a boo boo god made when he /she created Tom and Nicole. Jealous snipes.Get your heads out of the toilet and if you want to have any education at all, you would kinow that my friends divorces are none of your bleeding business, stupid drips. You will never be one of us, and you can't play with us, so leave us......alone! Do not even mention our names. We are too good for you. Az-wipz.Jealous moo cows and flamers that cannot make it in the cinema. You're no good. Stay home and have children like all the other losers.At least when my friends have children, they are all over the world magazines. Your ugly baby's pictures are probably from the mall. Posted by tonyintoronto, Saturday, 14 October 2006 1:50:31 PM
| |
I just wonder about this....TC wanted his own natural child more than anything else in the world so I wonder if they split because the child she was pregnant with was not his. And in fact, that could have been part of the very reason for the break-up. It all happened at the same time, although the public were not aware of the pregnancy when the break-up was announced.
Rumours that simply won't go away are that she had a fling on the set of Moulin Rouge.The cast and crew all signed confidentiality statements so there would be no official leak of this. But crew and cast have friends they talk to in the privacy of their own homes. Rumours aren't always 'rumours'.And everyne to a man/woman, says it was the runner. Posted by morgan, Saturday, 14 October 2006 3:16:31 PM
| |
Yeah, that would be a very strong reason for the split, for sure...but i never actually bought her claim of being pregnant, it just seemed the timing was a little too convienent, also that she lost the baby. Seemed like a ploy to get Cruise to reconsider the break, or just part of her pathological need for sympathy. (I also wonder when the morons who write for the tabloid rags are gonna get it through their thick heads that she is not capable of having a kid, and stop writing stories wondering if shes pregnant?)
and also wondering if the worshippers noticed Kidmans brand new "trout pout" she just unveiled yesterday at the Rome film festival...worst collagen lip injections ive seen. Guess she is terrified of turning 40.... Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 15 October 2006 9:25:44 AM
| |
Look at me
I'm Sandra Dee. I'm as plain as plain can be. Least I did much with my life, instead of causing others strife, Hey every body ! Look at me . I'm Sandra Dee! Posted by tonyintoronto, Sunday, 15 October 2006 10:34:47 AM
| |
Her fish lips do look badly done.She gets scarier looking by the day.Maybe Keith Urban could put a bag over her head to nake her look better. With all her money you think she could hire a good plastic surgeon.Every procedure she has done makes her look a little older,instead of younger.
Posted by CRICKET, Tuesday, 17 October 2006 5:06:35 AM
| |
You are so shallow.
It is her work attire and it is most appropriate for film. You don't pay her rent, so shut it. Posted by tonyintoronto, Tuesday, 17 October 2006 5:14:42 AM
| |
You're not paying her rent either so why don't you shut it
Posted by CRICKET, Tuesday, 17 October 2006 7:06:46 AM
| |
When my sisters and I stay at her summer cottage and she is away, I give a substantial amount of money to
her favorite Chatiry as my family does wherever we go.We do so as not to insult the host/hostess by paying for our groceries, staff, racing boats etc. We take the equivalent of what we believe a five star hotel would be, and give the money to Charity. Posted by tonyintoronto, Tuesday, 17 October 2006 11:20:43 AM
| |
That's interesting. I often do exactly the same thing when I stay at Buckingham Palace.
Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 17 October 2006 11:42:56 AM
| |
The only question is how long will Urban stand to be married to her, huh? Ah, these Jolie wannabes... first madonna flies to Africa to buy herself an african baby, now kidman wants to became an international ambassador for the downtrodden and needy of the world. So what happened to breast cancer awareness she was so into just a few years ago? I guess it didnt help her box office appeal enough, so shes trying to upgrade. Well I'm willing to bet being johnny come latelys... or in this case, joannie come latelys, wont help cd sales or box office numbers very much, it will only make them look desperate in their attempt to stay relevent. What do you think?
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 17 October 2006 12:09:01 PM
| |
I agree Maclen. I think her public personal 'theatrical' performances such as the 3o -second visit to the children's hospital before her wedding day running in then running out again(after ringing the press to let her know she was going to be doing it),,...are as obvious as the botox on her face.Not genuine. Transparent do-gooding attention-seeking that does not fool people. The fact that she lives nowhere near her teenage kids, doesn't take them on tour with her or have then stay with her for holidays.... and even had them sitting in the row behind her on the night she won an oscar for her nose job.... reveals the truth of her mother- love.The night she won the oscar for her nose, you'd truly expect her two kids to be seated on either side of her. But no, they were
relegated to the row behind. She is now on an extensive tour with her country and western singer. At least it must be a surprise for her, after every long absence from her kids, to see how much they have grown and developed.People maligne Tom Cruise but at least he is providing a warm, caring home for the two teeneagers, that is secure and always there. Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 18 October 2006 7:12:47 AM
| |
Maclen and Morgan:
Two gossipping Scully Maids who are about to look in the mirror one day soon and see how brown their noses have become, because of all the years of sticking them where they do not belong. EUW! Nicole should donate some Kibble 'n Bits to both of you. You can be her new Charity, Ok? You are both so UGLY ! Posted by tonyintoronto, Wednesday, 18 October 2006 7:44:47 AM
| |
Well morgan, you're probably right about her as a mother, as apposed to Cruise as a father... (you can find video of him every week at his kids soccer and football games.) So I guess we can rule out the possiblity of her adopting a poor 3rd world child, as it would take time away from the 20 movies she does every year, or from the fundraising dinners she hosts for the fatcats and bigwigs...
Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 18 October 2006 8:19:46 AM
| |
I would love to put some of you HATERS under a microscope, but I am afraid I would die of boredom within a day.
Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 20 October 2006 6:45:41 AM
| |
Well, looks like Keith Urban is jack of being married to the celluloid giraffe already, after only 2 months. He's just been admitted into a live-in rehab.
Bang goes his big tour.Bang goes their marital bliss. Maybe she'll use her spare time to pay a visit to her teenage kids.And pigs might fly. Posted by morgan, Saturday, 21 October 2006 8:51:29 AM
| |
I can not believe how pathetic you people are! Oh-my-god! Have you nothing else to give this world but your spite for people who actually LIVE their lives ?
You make me sick. We all have issues. Not too curious about what yours would be. It is a bit too obvoius, as are you. Don't ever try to cross the street when I am in the drivers seat. You never know were I will be driving next. perhaps drive you devils from this good Earth. Some shine, others rot and YOU are Rotten within. Shame on you.Shame ! Posted by tonyintoronto, Saturday, 21 October 2006 9:49:37 AM
| |
Yeah just picked that up on the news ticker... oh what a shame, isnt it morgan? Well shame on Urban for not knowing that being married to kidman was going to be nothing but rainbows and lolipops...NOT! but he made it to 4 months actually... (according to google news by the way) So the next question is, to use a country expession, how long will kidman "stand by her man?" Thats only assuming if urban can still stand himself... So honestly now, who couldn't see this coming?... oh right...
Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 21 October 2006 12:52:39 PM
| |
My prediction is that she will stand by her man for a while but after he does it a few more times, she will desert him in the same way she deserted her kids. Novelty over.
For the moment however, there are some wonderful opportunities for art to imitate life. Instead of attaching a nose for her next role, she could don a habit (not one of Keith's of course) and re-hash that film about the nun who cared for drug addicts on the streets of New York. Or swap roles completely and see if she can re-hash the Billie Holliday role in that brilliant film 'Lady Sings The Blues', about alcohol addiction. (Mind you, she did drink an enormous amount of absinthe off set whilst filming 'Moulin Rouge' so she's actually done a bit of 'hands-on' in that area herself.) Anyway, I feel sorry for Keith Urban. Needing to numb the pain only 4 months after the wedding means life behind closed doors must have been pretty tough. Posted by morgan, Saturday, 21 October 2006 5:00:32 PM
| |
yeah i agree totally that she will try and use this as "Artistic Inspiration" since she considers herself such an "ARTISTE", and with this new "tragedy that has befallen her", milk it for all its worth. Of course she wont speak of it directly, but in general " i will try to prevail above all the hardship that has befallen me" nonsense... Well you know people dont usually enter rehab until they'v e hit rock bottom or something occurs.. and i can just imagine the scene... kidman, having been away for a couple of days at the rome fesitval and playing make believe ambassador to the world, returns to their home in Nashville, and entering the front door, knocks over the empty bottles of Jack Daniels littering the floor, goes upstairs to the bedroom only to find Urban past out on the bed, still wearing the same clothes he had on when she left, and then getting a whiff of vomit coming from the bathroom... something had to be done...
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 22 October 2006 4:31:04 AM
| |
WOW! Maclean. Sounds like you were really there.Like you are a part of it all. You're a movie stars friend. So impressed.
I am so impressed by your pretentious foppy insights into some one elses life. Someone you wish would put you in the "in crowd", but you are just a snippy fop and wanna -be dandy. That makes you undesirable in the company of people you would love to be, and could never be with,so you sit by the sidelines and snippity-snip-snip-snip, bitter old Queen. The community frowns on old Doily-dearest old farts like you and yours. Get a life and .....................oh, this is your life. Liza, Babs and "Liz" as you would believe to call them are not attending your next big party ? Posted by tonyintoronto, Sunday, 22 October 2006 6:23:40 AM
| |
I thought it would take her 6 months to drive him back to drinking,but it only took her 4 months.Guess she's even more of a bitch than I thought. I hope Keith gets better and dumps her as soon as possible.She is going to ruin his career and his life if he doesn't get rid of her soon.Having to look at that botox spill first thing in the morning would drive anyone to drink even if they didn't already have a weakness for it.She looked like a drag queen at the Happy Feet opening in London.As for standing by her man she's not even standing in the same country as him let alone by him.She'll milk this for all the sympathy she can then drop him like a hot potato unless he wakes up and kicks her to the curb first.
Posted by CRICKET, Wednesday, 29 November 2006 1:17:47 PM
| |
Yo Cricket, your a godsend.... well my prediction was correct, her new film is a miserable failure. It's a perfect match to Dogville and Birth, where it seems she plays the exact same character, a bland wide eyed, uninteresting, empty headed wax figure. and of course the idiotic "I want to have a baby" nonsense is back...well i guess she'll be off to Africa to pick herself up one. but I doubt that, Urban's going to be problem enough for her to handle. She picked a new husband as well as she picks movie roles
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 30 November 2006 2:32:14 PM
| |
Girls, girls really! Didn't your mothers tell you if you can't say something nice then say nothing at all. You would have to agree that Nicole is good at.........................? Mmmmm ........................................ I think I better just leave this section blank.
Posted by SKE, Thursday, 30 November 2006 2:56:33 PM
| |
Well she has you all, doesn't she ?
What a mezmerizing woman Nicole is to have such a power over you evil little gossip Queens. She's laughing all the way around the world, being adored and admired while you beaches sit on your fat asses and breathe out hot air and spite. She may be on her knees, but she's got you by the balls. HA ! Tony-in-Toronto. I love you Nicole. We all do. You are a real girl. Not so butch as the fatties , nags, fops and queens who dream of being you. Posted by tonyintoronto, Thursday, 30 November 2006 11:26:13 PM
| |
With deep regret I have to inform you Tonyintoronto, that Nicole Kidman is currently unable to laugh all the way to the bank....oops, I mean.....'all the way around the world' as you state, because of an annoying build-up of botox in her facial cells. When she attempts to initiate a smile in Kansas, it doesn't even begin to crack the celluloid (that is, her face)until she reaches New York, finally presenting itself fully in frozen relief when she steps off the plane in Tallahassie. Her children never get to see the full smile these days because she is never anywhere near them long enough.
Posted by morgan, Friday, 1 December 2006 6:36:06 AM
| |
So what if she has issues. You don't ? I bet you are not able to stand being alone with your self for a minute and have to run out to a clique in a Pub somewhere , hanging onto fake friends, just because they're there. At least she can afford botox .
Would not want to look inside your closet, or underneath your bed-room floor boards. HONK HONK! What do you care any ways, about someone elses life. Someone whom you do not know.Obviously malice and spite are what fill your void .There's a rubber hose for situations like that. Go- Nic.- go. Go - go- - go ! You're a winner bay-bee. As if she reads these tabloids any how. Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 1 December 2006 8:38:12 AM
| |
Tonyintoronto, they're currently auditioning for farmyard animals for BABE 3.
Posted by morgan, Friday, 1 December 2006 9:13:02 AM
| |
Oh Tony, Tony, Tony, you just don't get it do you?
(Although sometimes I do wonder if you're just baiting us all? Have I blown your cover?). Posted by nomad48au, Friday, 1 December 2006 11:07:30 AM
| |
It all reminds me of the days of Olivia Newton John and Carrol Whatsername. Why do Aussies take such awful digs at their own performers?
Are you similar to the Danish, who do not like bling-bling showy-show people too ? I think it may be cultural. Getting away from the Fops and Formalities of Classist English "society" types, I tottally understand. Canadians view their actors and recording artists , film makers etc. as not even on the same level as American artists, until they sign American, go huge and then we lose them to the States. Then we admire them and want to call them our own, but we are never there for them when they are "just Canadian actors", because we do not throw tinsel around easily. and I am assuming that any Aussie artist who does well over seas then becomes Americanized and they get tinsel glued to them so very much, they seem to lose their inner selves. Am I right ? If Nicole was laid back in Australia and just another Australian girl, she would not have so many Aussies throwing barf at her, right ? I don't like Bling-bling people iether , but I can see underneath all that. When I 1st. met Nicole she was a nice, simple country girl. Now I do not recognize her. She has been eaten up by the Tacky Hollywood Machine. I warned her about that, as it happened to my sister too. I wish she would have listened a little more closely. Still, I love Nicole. She will come back to herself one day. Until then we stand by and suffer , knowing we have lost yet another freckled faced country style girl to the Hollywood Monster. Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 1 December 2006 11:58:02 PM
| |
Reviews of Fur: an Imaginery... whatever...
-You develop an eye on the exit sign and a new urgency to stop wasting your time on a unsatisfying film. Phil Villarreal Arizona Daily Star -A shaggy dog story for adults, but one that takes itself much to seriously. So pretentiously and turidly dramitized, it borders on the risable. Frank Sweiteck One guys Opinion -A whiff of the ridiculous taints every scene. Maitland Macdonagh TV guide Movie Guide -Frieghted with a risible air of pretention and gloom. Jan Stuart Newsday -I found it to be a heavy handed, pretentious dreck. Richard Roeper Ebert and Roeper ...you can read these, and the rest of the other 53 lousy reviews for this film at Rottentomatoes.com... thank you for your cooperation... Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 2 December 2006 4:35:07 AM
| |
It is clearly obvious that you have never met Nicole Kidman, T.I.T. Never, EVER has she been a 'country girl' type. You have imagined that because she once had red hair and freckles. Even as a child actor, she was ruthless and trod all over her young co-actors to claw her way to the top.
We in Australia, DO applaud, support and love our successful actresses. We have plenty of them. Cate Blanchett, Judy Davis, Toni Colette, Naomi Watts, Gia Carides, Deborah Lee Furness and back home on the small screen, there are plenty more. They are all far superior actors to the celluloid giraffe, who only got her break in the first place by becoming Mrs. Cruise.Our other actors have done it the hard way and that is why we applaud them, as well as the fact that they have REAL talent. The girl 'Caroll' that you mentioned along with Olivia, is not 'Carol' at all. You need to bone up on your facts, mate. Her name is Pat.....Pat Carroll. And every Australian adores Olivia Newton John. Like I said, get your facts straight and stop trying to pretend you have met the Ice Queen. Posted by morgan, Saturday, 2 December 2006 7:41:03 AM
| |
You are so right morgan.
I have never met Nicole and am just pretending. I also have never had her and Tom to my home for tea. I have never had the following people to my home, my mothers home or even the Country Club. They are ; King Juan Carlos and Queen Sophia,Yoko Ono and John Lennon, Prime Minister Pierre Trudeuand Maggie T, Cheryl Ladd, Elizabeth Taylor,Carrol Burnett,Carol Pope and Dusty Springfield, Ty Banks,Maria Del Mar and Kirsty Ally,Prince Edward and Prince Phillippe, Donald Trump , The Artist Formally Known As Prince,Sir Conrad Black, Sam Shopsowitz,Ed Mirvish,Brian Eno, Beatrice Lily and Viscount Pool, Marvin Gaye, Loreena McKennit,Sissy Spacek, Madonna, Richard Styne, Ben Harris,Contessa Xamal, Prince Olaff, Charlie Sheen, Wesley Snipes,Donald and Kiefer Sutherland,Ben Afleck,Christina Applegate,the Shaw of Iran's Nanny, Mellissa Gilbert, Rita LaRocca ,Mark Storm, Nazi Dog,Johnny Lydon( Rotten) ,Tobey Maguire, YO YO MA ,Val Kilmer, Russell Crowe, Kid Rock and Pamela Anderson,Oprah Winfrey, Susan Platt,Ivory Wayans, Beyonce,Ozzy Osbourne and Family,Owen Wilson, Kevin Costner, Ethan Hawkes,Naomi Campbell, Tom Cruise and my mom, Bill Clinton and Amy,Macy Grey,Liza Minelli,Owen Wilson,and Jesus Posted by tonyintoronto, Saturday, 2 December 2006 11:51:34 AM
| |
OKEY-DOKEY
Posted by morgan, Saturday, 2 December 2006 1:09:07 PM
| |
Thanks for the reviews Maclen,I didn't waste money on seeing it but I was wondering what other people thought of it. I think this one just might turn out to be her biggest flop yet.Maybe she'll get another Razzie award for worst actress like she did last year when she mutilated Bewitched.That was the first award she ever got that she really deserved.
Posted by CRICKET, Saturday, 2 December 2006 4:30:12 PM
| |
Theres no doubt about that Cricket. The point of my posting the reviews is to show that the few years of sympathy she received after Cruise dumped her is over. No more award noms for every role she does, shes right back to her regular mediocre career. The fact is she pocesses no warmth, can't emote compassion, has no likability on screen. She simply has a few acting tricks she relies on... you know, opens her eyes wider to show surprise, chain smokes cigarrettes like a train's smoke stack to show anxiety and etc... now what I'm trying to figure out is, do the movies she decides to do suck from the very beginning, or do her demands to fit them to her preference or limited acting range turn them into junk?
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 3 December 2006 10:41:59 AM
| |
Maclen and Cricket, to weigh into this debate, I truly believe that NK, and the people who are reponsible for employing her, all appear to be suffering from some type of delusion. An hallucinatory idea that she can act. A fantasy that she can 'get into the skin' of the characters she is meant to portray. She is totally unable to do that, even when adopting false noses, black wigs and feverish smoking habits. She is unable to 'feel' compassion or love for anyone apart from herself(not even for her two kids), so how can anyone expect her to be able to feel those emotions, and even stronger ones, for a character in a film? Nicole Kidman is an hallucination. She is like a mirage in a desert. Something people flock to but find on arrival, is actually non-existent. She's such a faker that she's even fooled herself. When asked in an interview last night what Daniel Craig was like, she simpered in a silly way and said "He's a good egg." Gaining little response from reporters, she repeated it. Then tried to explain in detail, what a 'good egg' means.Then she laughed and laughed at herself, leaving a bewildered bevy of journalists with mouths agape. Trying be funny or witty or clever just doesn't work with Nicole because she isn't. And she can't even 'act' it. Pitiful really.
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 3 December 2006 11:10:50 AM
| |
It is called Signature Acting. A stiff upper lip is what you are describing and is actually one of her most famous signatures .
In person, she is the opposite of what she portrays on film.If you had met her on a one to one basis, I am sure your experience with her would have left you with a great deal warmth for Nicole, as I and others have known her. You may have felt hurt or felt she passed you by as an ice queen as you descibe her, but she was in character.Many people in crews have. An artist can not be turned off and on like a light switch because crew members want to be friends with an actor. Remember she too was working when you were on set doing whatever you do. Many actors cannot take time to be side tracked by crew wanting to warm up to them.Cheryl Ladd gave my extras a 10 minute meet and great whirl wind while we were on break. I have been on many sets and my intuition at first was to leave them alone and not even look at them as they passed by. All that is left for the wrap-party. Even then actors will only put in a 10-20 minute showing and have to leave. Much like Tony Curtis.It is not personal.It's a job.get over it. It has nothing to do with you. Posted by tonyintoronto, Sunday, 3 December 2006 11:25:06 AM
| |
You make some very good points there, Morgan. It is one of the biggest handicaps she has as a public person. You are so right, she is so painfully awkward, and inarticulate. Your description of her interview here reminds me of when she was given her oscar. Do you remember earlier that night, Adrian Brody won for best actor, presented to him by Halle Berry, and when he ran on stage, he grabbed Berry and kissed her on the lips and wouldn't let her go? Very funny, and original... well later when kidman won she walked up on stage and she was met by Denzel Washington, Kidman tried to kiss him on the lips, just like Brody had, but Denzel stepped away and just led her to the podium, where she then stood a few feet away from the podium, with her back to the audience, holding the oscar to her cheek? Trying to "act " in a real situation. It really was so blatantly phoney.
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 3 December 2006 1:54:45 PM
| |
The one thing I remember more clearly than anything else on that Oscar night was that her children were seated in the row BEHIND her. What message does that convey? ANYbody else would sit next to their kids.
T.I.T. it's best you stop making things up about your comic- cuts experience on film sets and mixing with 'stars'. Your idea of what it's like on a film set is so far from the truth you sound ridiculous. Posted by morgan, Sunday, 3 December 2006 7:37:16 PM
| |
She has no character or personality of her own.If she doesn't have a script in front of her she sounds like a total idiot when she speaks.And her horrible fake breathy voice makes me just want to smack her anytime I hear it.She got all flustered and disoriented at the premire of Happy Feet when a reporter asked her how Keith was doing.She probably had no idea how he was since he wasn't around to provide photo-ops for her she's forgotten all about him.If they really wanted to throw her they should have asked her how her kids were.Or better yet asked her when their birthdays are I bet she has no idea.She would have had to call Tom and ask him.
Posted by CRICKET, Monday, 4 December 2006 1:39:32 PM
| |
RESPONSE TO MORGAN.
I am not in the film industry. My experience with what I call "Brand Name " people is strictly from my parents involvement in film and fashion. I just happen to be there.It is waht I grew up with and what I know. It does not impress me,( but highly irritates you ). The company my parents keep and have done so since the early 1950's through today and spill into my home are just friends. I am a teacher and part-time short documentary film maker as well as a designer with my own line, much of which my "Star " people purchase from me and that keeps me in a failry nice life. I work.They work.What yopu do other than complain is beyond me. You sound shallow, selfish and quite petty. Posted by tonyintoronto, Monday, 4 December 2006 2:51:17 PM
| |
Whatever.
Posted by morgan, Monday, 4 December 2006 5:53:08 PM
| |
Morgan, Cricket, another trait that really annoys me about her is she also has a need to make patently false statements...obviously she has to make things up in an attempt to appear more interesting than she is. First, take the whole baby thing... it all started a while ago when she said in an interview she wanted to give birth to a child of her own. Its pretty obvious she is unable to, so why say it? Also in a usual movie p.r. revelation, she stated that she would give up her movie career to be happily married again, and she also stated she didnt believe a woman can have a successful marriage and a successful career. Or she says she believes she cannnot, but she has a couple of movies already set up to film. So what does that tell you about what she really feels about Urban? Well who knows...but one thing it says is, it wont turn out pretty.
Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 4 December 2006 6:08:27 PM
| |
Oh.and, did you hear...........and then I heard she.....and Oh, My ........................did she really say that? Well if I were her.........and Oh tisk, tisk,tisk. Did you read the article which firmly stated..........a blah, blah, blah...and Oh dear me....I heard .....and have it from a good source that she ......and did you know......what toilet paper she uses..........Oh, My. I could never.....tisk,tisk,tisk.......
WHAT EVER . Posted by tonyintoronto, Monday, 4 December 2006 11:45:32 PM
| |
Yes, Maclen. I wonder when the first journo will write a true in-depth story about her. Maybe it would only need one to start and the rest will copy and attempt to outdo the one before, and then there will be a more balanced picture of the truth. But SURELY others can see through the filmy veneer and hyprocisy, especially to do with her lack of mothering. I know some publicists and journos who know the truth and in fact despise her, but they continue to keep the farce alive for whatever reason. It doesn't make sense.
Incidentally, an Australian actress Kerry Armstrong, went to the US a few years ago and looked up NK who had been a friend, but NK did what she's done to all her old friends from 'home' and gave her the cold shoulder. On returning, Kerry Armstrong commented on what had happened to a newspaper reporter. Told the truth...a truth that held for several other of NK's oldest and dearest friends who were also discarded once she turned into the celluloid queen...and although her words were printed, there was a rash of response accusing Kerry Armstrong of sour grapes. The 'sour grapes' syndrome couldn't be further from the truth in this case, as Armstrong is a strong, confident character who doesn't 'need' NK. She's a far superior actress and perfectly happy in her own skin. She'd just been friendly, as they'd always been. (Don't bother commenting T.I.T. Your inane waffling about yourself doesn't come under the banner of the title of this thread.) Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 5 December 2006 8:13:21 AM
| |
This is she pregnant or is she not crap is really old.Can't she come up with any other way to get her fugly ass in the news besides sticking her stomach out one day and sucking it in the next one.That dried up old stick is never going to get pregnant.It would take too much time out of her career.If Keith wants kids he'll need to look somewhere else.Her eggs have been hard boiled forever just like the rest of her.
Posted by CRICKET, Tuesday, 5 December 2006 12:44:10 PM
| |
Well MORGAN,
I really believe that whateverfla THE END OF FILM CAREER INVESTMENTS IN THE WAKE OF SEVERAL FORGOTTEN SALES EVENTS AND THE JOBS MOST RECENTLYLY REVIEWED that in stead of what sge does is so jfnfw0BECause that's exactly what you sound like. and now for someone completely different I hand you over to a fine and fun guest. __________________________________________________________________ Hello from Jamie Lee Curtis.( hi guys) having fun , are we? Keep well. Tony tells me this blog is quite visciuos. Hope I don't get hate mail. LOL J.L.C. Posted by tonyintoronto, Tuesday, 5 December 2006 10:29:17 PM
| |
Pardon?
Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 6 December 2006 6:19:24 AM
| |
Morgan, I'm sure your not surprised at the blabbering idiocy and the emotional imbalance of the Kidman sychophants. Your better off ignoring them, i know i do...
well so where were we.. oh yeah, well her latest movie has come out, and is flopping around like a fish out of water, gasping for breath, much like kidmans career. And according to Rottentomatoes.com her next movie, called The Visiting, is due out in January. Well, coming out in January? The month studios release movies to send them out to there early graves. Its SciFi, not a summer movie? Well you all rememeber how her last summer movies did. The visiting... sounds like a second rate TV movie, based on a third rate steven king novel he cranked out in a week and a half. I wonder how it will do? Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 6 December 2006 5:31:52 PM
| |
you mis-spelled sychophant.That's alright though. We all make mistakes.
Anyhow, I will be in Australia for the winter. Am helping with a massive Nicole Kidman World Fan Club Rally . We are expecting over 250,000. Nicole Kidman fans from around the world.Two glorious weeks of Nicole Kidman Films and the launching of her biographical book, "Nicole, the Queen of Australian Film Stars." and much more. Did get the Good Year blimp to have Nicoles face light up the Australian skies, and we are liscenced to plaster her posters all over Sydney and Melbourne.Will be announcing Nicole Kidman Week as an Official Australian Holiday from the Capital Steps with the Prime Minister. He's a huge Nic. fan. Hope to see you all there. Posted by tonyintoronto, Thursday, 7 December 2006 3:49:28 AM
| |
You mis-spelled licenced. That's alright though. We all make mistakes.
Posted by morgan, Thursday, 7 December 2006 6:07:54 AM
| |
Morgan, you can't take seriously the spelling criticism from someone who also misspelled "you" on a previous post, can you? It takes a very weak and fragile mind to rely on very mundane arguments.
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 7 December 2006 6:30:41 AM
| |
You're a sick person, McLn. Sick and evil to the core.AND you KNOW IT ! I know you do. I just know b-c you are too easy to figure out.
Did I mention our Nicole Kidman Fan Club has donated $100,000 USD to erect a full scale Bronze Statue of Nicole at Darling Point, overlooking the harbour ? We have. On private land too, so you can all pay to see and kiss her feet , or if you are on welfare, which I assume you may be, you may look at it all you want free of charge from the harbour as it will be well lit for miles to be seen for hundreds of years. Your childrens children will admire it as it will quickly become part of Australia's beautiful and diverse Cultural History.I love a country that gave the finger to oppression so all of its' citizens may rise to their greatest heights without being imprisonned or ex-communicated from the land because they rose through the ranks of Imperialist , Classist societies,supposedly posing a threat to its weakest bottom feeding idle gossips and Fops. Posted by tonyintoronto, Thursday, 7 December 2006 7:01:42 AM
| |
That's great Tony! A bronze statue of Kidman would be the perfect thing for the pigeons to crap on.
Posted by CRICKET, Thursday, 7 December 2006 9:22:27 AM
| |
And the many kangaroos that abound in the city of Sydney to hop over.
Posted by morgan, Thursday, 7 December 2006 9:26:08 AM
| |
I am practising my Australian for when I come over, but every time I say "I hate Nicole ", it sounds like I am saying "I ate Nicole".
Great way to get into trouble.I won't speak Spanish anymore. Made a faux pas once too many times.Did you know Bandeja and Bandages are two entirely diffrent words in Spanish? Guess I'll watch some early Mad Maxx films and pick up the language like that there , Eh! Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 8 December 2006 10:48:05 AM
| |
Frankly, I think you might have to get your English right before you attempt to tackle Strine.
Posted by morgan, Friday, 8 December 2006 11:59:41 AM
| |
Strine ? I never have heard of it. Please explain.Thankyou.
I am going back to Heaven for a while to visit some relatives who passed on a while ago.Need the energy and re-juvination. Will be back in a short while. my visits are limited since I am not dead yet, as they keep reminding me. LOL - Tony Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 8 December 2006 2:19:06 PM
| |
In today's "Letters from Readers" page in The Age Newspaper there is a contribution from a reader re the bushfires, which I think is very funny.
"Volunteer firefighters are risking thir lives. Does this mean Nicole Kidman will receive an Australia Day award?" Posted by morgan, Saturday, 9 December 2006 8:46:47 AM
| |
I hear Nicole has bought a house in London now.I wonder if that has anything to do with the fact that Tom Cruise bought a house in London last week.Still trying to outdo Tom I see.She might have beat him to the altar but his wedding got 10 times the attention hers did.All she got was a corner of the covers on People and Us but Tom and Katie got special editions devoted just to them.No matter how hard she tries she just can't steal the attention away from him.Maybe Nicole should buy the magazines so she can look at the pictures and remind herself what her 2 kids look like,since Tom and Katie included them in the wedding and reception.
Posted by CRICKET, Saturday, 9 December 2006 5:10:09 PM
| |
funny.. that comment, morgan, pretty much says it the way it is, doesn't it? I wouldn't be surprised if Kidman ended up based in Australia, reduced to local tv movies or an Australian soap opera, seeing she'll have no future success in La La land, what with her movies being ignored even before there released. Also Cricket, I see what you mean, i was annoyed when I caught a little of the Cruise/Holmes wedding coverage, and the mention of kidman "reportedly" sending them a gift and well wishes, which, of course, was leaked to People mag. by a kidman "insider". Whatever it takes to keep her name attached to Cruise... so pathetic...
Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 9 December 2006 7:19:58 PM
| |
Next step 'Neighbours' on Channel 10......then her kids will write a Mommie Dearest expose book...then she'll sue her kids.....until finally it'll be "Nicole who?"
Posted by morgan, Saturday, 9 December 2006 8:08:36 PM
| |
Funny how channel 10 is the same here as it is Down-Under.
Still, she is the richest woman in Australia. She must have done something right. I wonder if you mouth monkeys would have done as well as she has if given the tools and resources to do it . Posted by tonyintoronto, Sunday, 10 December 2006 12:21:52 AM
| |
Given the same tools and resources? Is that what you call Tom Cruise?
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 10 December 2006 9:35:28 AM
| |
Oh you PIG. You actually have the time to spare ? That's disgust-teen
Nicole nicole nicole NICOLE NICOLE NICOLE NICOLE NICOLE NICOLE NICOLE NICOLE NICOLE NICOLE NICOLE ..... Posted by tonyintoronto, Sunday, 10 December 2006 2:18:59 PM
| |
You know Morgan, sociopathic behavior is a sign of deep emotional problems, and they really need to see a doctor about it, dont you think?
For any rational mind could see the simple facts that kidman was lifted from mediocrity by Cruise. Just for one instance, take the whole Oscar awards. In the 10 yrs Cruise and kidman were married, Cruise received 2 oscar noms, kidman got none... and in the 5 years after Cruise dumped her, she's already received 2, plus an actual win, while Cruise has not received another nom...Kidman is a mediocre person, let alone a "serious actress". Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 10 December 2006 3:49:07 PM
| |
I think one of the reasons she still gets roles even though her movies are almost straight to video these days,is because she will take her clothes off at the drop of a hat.Some actresses won't do nude scenes,but Kidman is more than happy to be naked no matter what the story line is.
Posted by CRICKET, Sunday, 10 December 2006 4:49:33 PM
| |
As I said once before – as a woman NK leaves me cold (and I've discovered that I'm not the only red-blooded Aussie male who responds, or perhaps I should say, fails to respond to her in this respect). Her going naked isn't going to change that either. She must be getting desperate.
Helen Morse, Rebecca Gilling, Wendy Hughes, and diminutive Noni Hazlehurst, are all (still) beautiful and gorgeous Australian actresses, as are many of the younger set such as Rachel Griffiths, Toni Collette, Miranda Otto, and the versatile Claudia Karvan. They are also actresses – not blow-up dolls! You see, they all HAVE personality, rather than BEING A personality. Oops, hush mah mouth, am I being “shallow, selfish and quite petty” a “snippy fop and wanna -be dandy” etc. etc.? No, unfortunately, just honest. Posted by nomad48au, Sunday, 10 December 2006 9:34:32 PM
| |
T.I.T. this is for your perusal. I am attempting to communicate in a manner that you may understand, since plain English doesn't seem to do it for you. It has a title.....THE CURSE OF DA MUMMY MEETS DA KIDMAN CODE. Herein lies the text.....
Some religious academics refute the existence of the devil but I can assure you, that according to da KIDMAN code, OLE NIC is still alive and well.And creating hell for those closest to her... her children and her husband. This mummy has buried herself well away from her children,never seeing them, nor knowing what they look like any more. The curse of this mummy also affects her husband, having caused him to imbibe in alcohol and drugs to numb the reality of being sucked into Da Kidman Code only weeks following their nuptials. Even their canary died. T.I.T....accept these facts before the curse of this neglective mummy reaches Toronto. Posted by morgan, Monday, 11 December 2006 6:07:36 AM
| |
This last posting made me laugh. It was funny and evil at the same time.
You are very wise . Perhaps too wise! I am the Devils Advocate, am sure you have caught on by now. Cheers. Posted by tonyintoronto, Monday, 11 December 2006 12:26:36 PM
| |
Excellent tale, Morgan, but i'm sure its still to coherent and lucid for the simple mind... now back to that other horror, its no secret that going back about 6 yrs, the kidman movies that have grossed the least at the box office, are the ones in which she insists on baring her boney behind. They grossed,ridiculously, only between 1 to 5 million dollars each. I guess the sight of her pale, sickenly cadaverous like, skeletal remains of a body is too repulsive to movie goers, not many would pay the money to watch them.
Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 11 December 2006 12:28:36 PM
| |
"Neglective" meaning a compilation of 'negligent', 'neglectful' and 'negative'.
(Yeah, right. It was actually a 'typo'. Sorry.) Posted by morgan, Monday, 11 December 2006 8:16:55 PM
| |
“Devils Advocate”?
“Bad house guest. Very, very bad house guest!”? C'mon Tony, 'fess up – in all your “I love Nicole” posts, you are just taking the mickey, aren't you. Posted by nomad48au, Monday, 11 December 2006 9:25:38 PM
| |
huh ?
Can you talk in slower like ?......I,m Canadian Eh ? I ain't able to process no information too quick like ,yous all Eh ? Can you write , like ,in smaller words , Eh ? Posted by tonyintoronto, Monday, 11 December 2006 9:41:23 PM
| |
I'll try to talk in smaller words T.I.T. Here is a question(sorry, that one's a bit long) for you.
Are. You. A. Boy. Or. A. Girl? Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 12 December 2006 6:16:29 AM
| |
MORGAN ? EHWYUK!
Just what kind of PREVERT are you ? EEAW! "Are you a boy or a girl ?" - Morgan "Tit?".- Morgan "It's a long one for you ?" - Morgan Augh! Prevert! I should report this to the Internet Police. That's disgusting. I am am an 87 year old Grandmother of 17 children. OH, MY GOD ! _____________________________________________________________ Anyhow, ..." Failure is not a word in my vocabulary." - Nicole Kidman. Posted by tonyintoronto, Tuesday, 12 December 2006 1:17:24 PM
| |
Given how stupid she sounds when she trys to talk with out a script I think there are lots of words that aren't in her vocabulary.Words like compassion,love,concern all those kind of things she doesn't seem to have for anyone but herself. She sure doesn't seem to have any concern for her husband or children.At least the kids have Tom and Katie,poor Keith is left with nothing.
Posted by CRICKET, Wednesday, 13 December 2006 8:16:58 AM
| |
Cricket, you are spot on. I doubt the marriage will last much longer because of her inablilty to exercise compassion. She doesn't have what it takes to support her husband through to a full recovery. Well, how could she anyway, since she would be the reason for him falling off the wagon in the first place?
Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 13 December 2006 8:22:56 AM
| |
Poor Keith ?
He lucked out marrying a Lady like Nicole. Class meets trash. A drunk ! Agh. Long after his career is over, and it is, all he will talk about will be he was once married to a Movie Star Nicole Kidman, but couldn't keep her b-c he was a drunk , pill popping loser. You all sound like you live in Trailer Parks.It's just too clear.Rooting for a drunk and blaming educated people for the end of his Hick-Billy career. Posted by tonyintoronto, Wednesday, 13 December 2006 12:50:08 PM
| |
His career was going great until he hooked up with her.If anybody's career is over it's Botoxia's.All she is known for anymore is her plastic surgery,botox injections,ignoring her children,and ruining a wonderful talented man's life and career.Her movies are flops,she can't get pregnant and she's looking older by the minute.Her quest to try to look young is turning her into a giant joke,almost as big as her forehead.If Keith dumps her soon enough he can still recover his career.He has more talent in his little finger than Botoxia has in her entire freakishly tall skelatal corpse like body.If Kidman is the example of class then give me trash anytime.
Posted by CRICKET, Wednesday, 13 December 2006 2:05:31 PM
| |
Whoa Cricket, your last post was just too funny, and like they say, its funny because its true. Botoxia? thats comical genius... your'e right about her forehead, pilots could use it to make emergency landings on. It must be caused by all the plastic surgury shes had done, that would explain why her eyebrows point so freakishly upwards now. Well i see they've rolled out the Chanel commercial here in the states again, the one she made about a few years ago. Its as pretensious as any of her other movies. Its funny I seem to remember it playing at the end of last year as well. This being the beginning of the awards season, I'd gather she hopes they mistake it for an actual movie performance, and nominate her for an award, any award,seeing that her latest movie tanked.
Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 13 December 2006 3:00:23 PM
| |
Hey, guess what T.I.T. Botaxia Le Giraffe is not 'class'. And guess what, KU is not 'trash'. She comes from a middle class family here in Sydney and he comes from a middle class family in Queensland. Neither trash nor class describes either of their families. He remained a normal human being while she morphed into a skeletal praying mantis stick insect that preys on the vulnerability of anybody who is sensitive, compassionate or is a child..... or any person (such as Tom Cruise) who can give her a leg-up the ladder of self-obsessed ambition. Before there was Tom Cruise, there was a highly successful actor here called Marcus Graham. And before him, another big star in Australia called Tom Burlinson. (all rungs up the ladder.)
Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 13 December 2006 3:51:07 PM
| |
Are you telling me Nicole Kidman used men to get ahead in the Film Industry ? (They used her ). That's never been done before.
Too much plastic surgery ? It's her body. Stop staring at her on magazine covers and then complain. Her Chanel commercial is out again and you watch it but don't like it?That's what commercials do. They re-peat themselves.If you don't like it, STOP STARING AT IT! You are all obsessed with Nicole. She seems to be the focus of your lives. If you don't like her, STOP STARING AT HER! You can't, can you ? What is wrong with you people ? She is not any less or more human than you. Just wealthier, greatly popular, wordly, feminine, and I could go on but that would just be more grist for the mill. I love Nicole. As for Urban, - Total Loser. Is she supposed to be by his bed side while he undergoes detox? Barfing , stinking , sweating out all the poison he injested ?She can not make anyone do anything. He chose to be that way when he was 12. You can not blame Nicole for his failure. Heck No. He has had his 3-5 year Music Star career. That's how long they last if they are avarage,pill-popping drunkards. She keeps him in the limelight.He is fortunate to not have the divorce papers delivered to him along time ago. Nasty drunken pig. Self centered egoist. EHW-Yuk ! Botoxia ? What about Detoxio ? Now that's funny . Posted by tonyintoronto, Thursday, 14 December 2006 12:40:59 AM
| |
Nicole Kidman will be Starring in Baz Luhrmanns' EPIC
AUSTRALIA. ( THE EPIC. ) With Hugh Jackman. Filming begins this April. In Queensland. Hitch up your trailers and syphen out your neighbors gas . Fill up your Gremlins and get your trailers to the site. You just might get a part as an extra ! Posted by tonyintoronto, Thursday, 14 December 2006 2:04:36 PM
| |
How do you know one of us has not already been hired to work on it?
Posted by morgan, Thursday, 14 December 2006 2:24:38 PM
| |
Poor Hugh Jackman! There goes his career.Being in one of Nicole's flops can't be good for anyone's career
Posted by CRICKET, Friday, 15 December 2006 5:26:05 AM
| |
Cricket, he'll rise above it. Everyone in the cast will outshine the celluloid giraffe. She is totally miscast in the role, on top of having the handicap of no talent. It will end up being a great vehicle to showcase everyone else's talent, with the flip side of that coin emphasising her lack of it.
On a personal level, she is now not only making sure she's constantly placing large distances between herself and her kids, she's also placing them between herself and her new husband, who will need her support in his recovery. With NK it's all about 'me, me, me, me, me'. It's never been any different......that and the ABBA song "Money Money Money'. Posted by morgan, Friday, 15 December 2006 5:44:03 AM
| |
You[re so right.It is all me,me,me with her.I think Keith will actually do better without her "support".The pressure of trying to please her is what drove him back to the bottle in the first place.The farther away she is the better off he'll be.I hope you're right about Hugh Jackman rising above her miserable attempt at acting,he seems like a pretty nice guy.
Posted by CRICKET, Friday, 15 December 2006 7:34:46 AM
| |
What makes you think I have not already Faxed Nicole this entire blog. Oh-man ! Are you ever at the unemployment line. Losers.
Bye-the bye, I will be there. You don't know what I look like. Ah-ha. Leave her children out of this, a-huloes. That's off the plate.Comprendes ? Idiotas ? Palettas y Palettos ? You pathetic no-bodies just took ps%sy to a whole new level. ....and no, you will not ever have work in Australian Film ever again ,(serving coffee to me and my crew). Too cool for you. Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 15 December 2006 7:42:54 AM
| |
Well Morgan and Cricket, Urban it seems just had the bad luck of being at the right place at the wrong time. He met her just as Cruise and Holmes got engaged and then had a kid, so in desperation she clamped onto the Urban in a sad attempt to keep up. And i also can't believe why any up and coming director or screenwriter, for that matter, would want to work with kidman... i mean Botoxia... their once promising careers fizzle once she drains all life from the stories they try to tell. Be on the look out for what happens to Daniel Craigs career in the coming months... he might have gotten lucky landing Bond, but hes in two upcoming movies with her.
Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 15 December 2006 9:14:33 AM
| |
Well Maclan,I guess Daniel Craig can kiss his career goodbye after those 2 flops come out.I see all the magazines are picking up the story about Keith's night out with Amanda Wyatt.I normally don't like cheating but in this case it was probably for health reasons.Keith needed to be with a warm blooded woman for a change to keep his wee-wee from falling off due to frost-bite after being with Mrs Freeze.SO now Nicold can play her heartbroken victim role again like she did after Tom got smart and dropped her on her bony butt.Maybe she can play this up enough to get some kind of award nomination.God knows she'll never actually get one for her acting.
Posted by CRICKET, Saturday, 16 December 2006 6:19:17 AM
| |
Talk about FREEZING.
You two gossips have a heart of ice and an Ego so big you've bumped your heads too many times going through doors. The doors, by the way, are now closed to you both. Nicoles people are aware of who you are. Real names, locations etc. Have a nice time at the Welfare Office. : ) Posted by tonyintoronto, Saturday, 16 December 2006 6:39:48 AM
| |
You said TIT, that Nicole's people are aware of who we are..locations etc.? Well that explains it. Dragging that horse's head off my pillow this morning was a disgusting experience. I wondered whose 'people' might have been behind it.Thanks for the inside info.
Posted by morgan, Saturday, 16 December 2006 7:33:46 AM
| |
I cant disagree with anything you said Cricket. Only a moron could not see that they are a train wreck ready to happen. In the highly competitive world of Hollywood, they really look sad. Have you seen the pictures floating around of them out together in public? They look like a couple of homeless people wandering the street. Botoxia reminds me of a starving, rail thin bag lady, bundled up in ill fitting clothes, with the only thing missing is a shopping cart filled with bags of aluminum cans. Glam they are not. Its not surprising she'll never allow Urban anywhere near a movie premiere, together they look very pathetic.
Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 16 December 2006 8:10:09 AM
| |
It's called Urban Chic.
Posted by tonyintoronto, Saturday, 16 December 2006 2:06:20 PM
| |
I would be thrilled to watch her train wreck if keith Urban wasn't on board.I really like him alot.He's very talented and a really nice guy.She only married him because his career was headed up and hers was headed down.So she latched on to him for pr reasons.It didn't help her crap furry movie anyway.All she did was drive him into rehab so now his career is as stalled as hers is.I saw pictures of her out with the niece and nephew too bad she doesn't want to bother with her own.Maybe because they aren't related to her by DNA they are'nt good enough to be seen with her.That sounds like something that conceited witch would think.
Posted by CRICKET, Sunday, 17 December 2006 6:10:19 AM
| |
What gives you the right to criticize some ones family ?
It's not your business what Nicole does within her family circle. Let alone talk about it. As for Urban, his career was over 6 months ago. He married Nicole to ride her coat tails.He could not keep up , so back to the booze and drugs he went. That means he put his Ego and drugs/booze before Nicole , as addicts do, before everyone and every thing else. .Typical selfishness of alcoholics/drug abusers. You pity Detoxio for being a drunk/addict , as he lay in a detox-Spa , and not his first time, while Nicole travels the world working and keeping her career as lively as ever so she can support him.He makes me sick.What a luxury Urban has given himself. Nicole does not even drink, so she does not have the luxury to be in a Detox-Spa for months at a time while being taken care of by a wealthy and famous spouse. Posted by tonyintoronto, Sunday, 17 December 2006 12:36:07 PM
| |
Sorry T.I.T., but NK DOES drink. She downed gallons of absinthe during the filming of Moulin Rouge. Her normal drink is white wine.
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 17 December 2006 12:41:50 PM
| |
She does send me her favorite white wine for Christmas.She does not drink to get drunk.A few giggles ,and she is very funny.
As for the absinthe injestion during the filming of Moulin Rouge, It was a great choice. I would have done the same. After all, the film was about the Acid of the times. Do like Absinthe once in a while when in Europe. Posted by tonyintoronto, Sunday, 17 December 2006 2:32:36 PM
| |
News Flash ! She's home here in Australia for Christmas being filmed for all the news programmes visiting sick children in hospital....while her own children have been left behind in the States for Christmas....and her husband left behind in a rehab centre. Is that compassion or is that compassion? How can people be sucked in by the images of her with the sick children (she must have notified the press to get this footage on every TV channel) when they know her own kids and husband have been deserted for Christmas?
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 17 December 2006 4:09:20 PM
| |
I would imagine that her kids would chose not to go to Australia with her, and be ignored by her, when they can stay in L.A... and be ignored by her. Cruise's daughter looks like she'd rather go out shopping with Katie Holmes, than to be seen out with her anyhow. Her every statement is so blatantly disingenuous, her every move so obviously calculated, it's not hard to figure out how it will all end, doesn't it?
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 17 December 2006 4:38:31 PM
| |
MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE !
LOVE, TONY-IN-TORONTO Posted by tonyintoronto, Sunday, 24 December 2006 10:49:46 AM
| |
Thank you Tony In Toronto. I hope you have a very happy Christmas too. Lots of love, peace, joy..........
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 24 December 2006 11:00:07 AM
| |
Keith's publicised affair must be Nicole's 'karmic comeuppance' for having the fling with the runner while she was filming Moulin Rouge.I hope people don't waste too much sympathy on the hypocritial ice queen. Sooner or later her affair, that ended her marriage to Tom and also culminated in a pregnancy, will come to light and everyone will discover that she is not as pure as driven snow after all.There was a two-line mention of it in a Sydney paper over the recent holiday period. Also a mention of her use of cocaine on board a private boat Tom had hired on Sydney harbour for a party just weeks before their marriage break-up. Apparently he didn't use any drugs but she snorted cocaine. In the end, The Truth Always Outs.
Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 26 December 2006 11:54:50 AM
| |
Tom and Nicoles divorce was not because of what you have read about .
Nicole asked Tom for divorce papers for her Christmas gift, to be gifted to her on Christmas Eve. Only She knows why she wanted the divorce. Not even Tom knows.He was just being a good husband. He gave his love what she asked for, in a warm and charming way. I know this because Tom and Nicole told me that was going to be the case, and sure enough it was. It was sad to hear, but nothing is for ever. Put an end to the suspiscious gossip of misinformation and half-clues. Can you not put your mind around something so sweet ? Posted by tonyintoronto, Tuesday, 26 December 2006 4:24:56 PM
| |
Tony,if Nicold asked for that divorce then why did she spend 5 years whining about how much she loved Tom,and would still be with him if he hadn't divorced her.According to her,Tom was the love of her life and she still loves him.Could it be your Ice Queen is lying.She needs to pick a story and stick to it.She give this big speech about how she's moving to Nashville for Keith,then buys a house in London,strangly close to Tom's new house.She says she wants to have a baby and take time off to be a family but she signs on for 3 more movies that will flop like the rest of her duds.She says she wants privacy,but manages to have a group of photographers every where she goes.And don't tell me she doesn't have her pr person call and tell them every place she is going to be.She even managed to get in her photo-ops at The Betty Ford Clinic,which is supposed to be private to protect the patients,but of course she just happend to get her picture taken there.She is so full of crap it's a wonder she doesn't expolde.
Posted by CRICKET, Sunday, 31 December 2006 5:02:41 PM
| |
She was at a bush fair today with her husband, eating fairy floss . Keith did some archery and won her a toy kangaroo.Where were her kids? On the other side of the world of course. She is looking more and more like that dracula woman who had the disaster with plastic surgery.
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 31 December 2006 5:25:15 PM
| |
well so where are we now? well i saw a story about how her next movie bombed with a preview audience, so there doing reshoots, although the studio denies that. Though I dont need this specific story to be true to know its doomed. I can see how it does at the box office, it'll be a sci-fi movie with no aliens, or special effects, just the usual monotony of her psychological over -indulgence. Still more opportunities for her to get 10 minute close-ups, as she struggles to emote emotional feeling with her eyebrows. Now this movie answers the question I posted a while back- do the movies she does suck from the beginning, or does she ruin them once she signs up to do them? When i first heard about this movie, it was announced as a remake of the semi classic sci-fi "Invasion of the Body Snatchers". Then she signed on, and then the title changed to just "Invasion" and it would be "inspired " by the original move,(sound familar?) and not a remake. Now its something called The Visiting.. The influence of botoxika has doomed this movie to box office obscurity
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 31 December 2006 5:56:37 PM
| |
When they do the biopic of her life, it will be impossible to cast a flesh and blood actress to play her because the effects of over-botoxification will have turned her into a celluloid cupie doll. So it will end up having to be an animated film with somebody mimicking her voice to lip-synch her cartoon characterisation.
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 31 December 2006 6:49:25 PM
| |
I don't know about the no aliens part Maclen,she looks like an alien with her skinny body,scrawny neck and huge forehead.God she looks awful in the pictures of her and Keith on the day after Christmas.She looks like Bette Davis in Whatever Happend To Baby Jane.The little girl hairstyle and the flowers just make her look more pathetic.No matter what she does she's not going to look like a 23 year old model.She might want to try blotting that oil slick she has going on,she look like sh stuck her face in a vat of cooking oil. Happy New Year to you and Morgan! Hope you both have a great 2007.
Posted by CRICKET, Sunday, 31 December 2006 8:20:51 PM
| |
yeah, I understand what you mean, Morgan, her face has been so altered, they even have to alter her photos on the movie posters to look normal... have you seen the poster for cold mountain? She looks like a wax figure, it needs so much digital manipulation. Cricket your also right about the alien! I stand corrected. When i saw the picture of their "reunion' at the airport... they both looked like death row inmates on their way to the gallows. yeah Happy New Year to you too, Cricket and Morgan. and morgan, please keep the updates from down under coming eh?
Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 1 January 2007 5:48:48 AM
| |
Happy New Year everyone.Hope this year is better to all of you.
Just got back from my planet and saw new postings on the computing machines eye. Is it true Australians know the future because they are 24 hours ahead of the rest of your planet? My planet is flat and we don't quite understand these psychic-future spherical planets as of yet. This Ice Queen you speak of in the future tense, is she a goddess you envision ,or is she one of your people ? She seems to replicate herself on celluloid . Yet another mysterious technology to us.Your Ice Queen seems to have many copies of herself. We have begun to emmulate her on our planet, but are still in the primitive stages of cloning technology.We do however, have over 300 flavors of ice-cream we would like to trade you for your Ice Queens Duplication Technology? Does your religion allow for this ? Posted by tonyintoronto, Monday, 1 January 2007 11:47:28 PM
| |
Her Majesty pulled a tantrum at the paparazzi yesterday, particularly at Jamie Fawcett. She then demanded a police escort, which she got (!), to continue with her holidaying, before boarding her private jet to return to the US.I wonder when her children will have an appointment squeezed in to see their "mother" ?
Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 2 January 2007 7:37:47 AM
| |
You are fotunate to have an Ice Queen Goddess on your land, as we understand your temperatures are rising due to climate change.
Do find your worshipping practices a bit odd though.You pay to enter her Temples and pay homage to her, yet you speak ill of your Goddess at the same time. We do not understand this form of worship. Your Goddess demands much worship from her people. She must have much power over you. Posted by tonyintoronto, Tuesday, 2 January 2007 8:02:26 AM
| |
It sounds like she must be frazzled that she hasn't been able to get her botox fix, Morgan, and she was beginning to look very haggard. That would also explain her rush to get on the jet ,to quickly visit her plastic surgeon. Well as for the kids, I doubt Cruise would want his kids exposed to the drug and alcohol addled drama that her life has become anyways. Her life now is just a series of PR stunts to try and cover-up the embarrasment of a sham marriage.
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 2 January 2007 9:05:51 AM
| |
Maclen, I think you have nailed it. This bushfair they went to, is the type of fair that nobody outside of the country local community would even know about. Yet TV and print media were all there, in this tiny out-of-the-way township watching them eat hot dogs and fairy floss and Keith shoot arrows to get her a stuffed kangaroo. How come the media knew? It could ONLY be because she had her PR people ring and inform them. The image of a little bush fair and 'togetherness' with hubby was just a stunt to appear old fashioned/normal/cute. That was the contrived image she wanted projected. But as soon as the very same paparazzi she notified to turn up at the bushwackers 'do' tried to photograph her away from said scene, she called the police to keep them at bay.A prime example of celebrity manipulating the media. She actually wound down the window of her car to address one of them (Jamie Fawcett) and said , for everybody to hear, "F... off Jamie!" So there's your cute little innocen kangaroo for you.
Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 2 January 2007 9:25:10 AM
| |
Hanging out the car window screaming F###-off Jamie. Yep that sure is one classy lady there.
Posted by CRICKET, Tuesday, 2 January 2007 10:43:06 AM
| |
Morgan, I think i noticed the PR blitz back during Cruise's wedding, how it was leaked to People mag. that she had sent a gift and well wishes. We may be seeing the beginning of the cracks from "Botoxique", Cricket...and I dont just mean on her face. What with her main occupation, movies, flopping at the box office, then trying to get her "charity work" established so she can try to stay publicly relevant, she now has Urban's problems she has to try and juggle. Having to take that extra time to schedule in rehab visits, because you know that will be an ongoing situation, seeing as he not only has a drinking problem, but also a drug problem, if its not one, it'll be the other, she's not going to have much "me" time any longer. And I'll bet that will get too unbearable for her.
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 2 January 2007 1:08:29 PM
| |
Dear Tony In Toronto
"Still, she is the richest woman in Australia. She must have done something right ... Posted by tonyintoronto, Sunday, 10 December 2006 12:21:52 AM" Gina Reinhart the WA mining woman, is far and away ahead of Nicole in the cash department. Posted by Brownie, Wednesday, 3 January 2007 9:23:11 PM
| |
Dear Brownie; Thankyou for not addressing me as [T.i.T].
I have the entire S. Hussain Hanging Video sent to me by a friend. Would you like to see it.? It's not for the squeemish. TonyinToronto@rogers.com Cheers. Posted by tonyintoronto, Thursday, 4 January 2007 5:37:10 AM
| |
DON'T tell me Kidman was present at that show as well!
Posted by morgan, Thursday, 4 January 2007 7:19:08 AM
| |
LOL! And I was just thinking today, Morgan, when the pix with her posing with the prize hogs or cows as the next photo ops appear, once urban gets back to playing at a local County Fair near you! Just caught the pic of them posing on that carnival ride...Now those photos would be priceless.
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 4 January 2007 9:50:13 AM
| |
Maclen, I wonder what her next move will be? She has put on a united front re the model affair story, although indulged in a nasty release of pressure when she yelled F. off Jamie in front of all the media, but it can't last. If the stories re the model had been untrue, there'd have been talk of suing and all types of righteous denial by now. So I am assuming the stories are correct. If so, there is no way NK will take it lying down even though she is giving that impression for the moment.She must be racking her brains (what pitiful little there are) on how to deal with the next step. What do you think she will do?
Posted by morgan, Thursday, 4 January 2007 10:37:03 AM
| |
Well, i agree the whole aussie airport reunion and photo ops was in response to this models claims, coming only days after she made them. and i agree with you that they are probably worried about taking her to court, (remember she took a UK gossip paper to court for saying that she had an affair with Jude Law when they made a movie together a few years ago?) I doubt if she wants this model to come out pubicly with other Urban personal behavior/ habits info. I hear urban has to report back to rehab. in LA, so she'll try to stay low and let this blow over. She'll bury herself in another movie set, line up a huge list of movies she'll sign to do, despite the quality or story cohesion. Anything to keep her mind off this marriage.
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 4 January 2007 11:54:54 AM
| |
I have nothing to say today.
Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 5 January 2007 2:34:42 AM
| |
Ha Ha Ha Mr Toronto causes great mirth to start my day.
At first I thought his keyboard would be frozen over but Toronto is 10 degrees today which isn't too bad. Where I am right now at 10am it is already 30 degrees with winds about the same as Toronto ie 30 kms ph; now where NICOLE is there are High Temperatures High Winds and Huge FROSTS. I am almost starting to feel sorry for her. I hope she is reading about Angelina Jolie, who has far less money, yet has founded schools health clinics and animal rescue organisations in Cambodia fully funded by herself. She was inspired to start this when in Cambodia filming Lara Croft. If Nicole had done anything even resembling that, she would be more warmly regarded by Adrian Maxwell, myself, and possibly the rest of you. Posted by Brownie, Friday, 5 January 2007 8:54:48 AM
| |
It's very standard in celebritydom, that once you become established, to get a pet charity you try and cultivate. And it becomes pretty clear who's truly dedicated and who's not. Take Paul Newman, for instance. Decades ago he started his Hole in the Wall Gang Camp, that aids terminally ill children, and he even developed a long term business that funds it. Now lately Jolie has made the global 3rd world charity work chic in hollywood, so you get the likes of Madonna going to Africa adopting African babies, and the like of kidman, who up to a few years ago was into Breast Cancer awareness, now switching over to UN ambassadorship and signing autographs for the kids in Kosovo. What ever you may think of Jolie, at least shes shown a dedication to at least appear dedicated to her cause, and not switching over to the next latest fad.
Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 5 January 2007 1:38:07 PM
| |
I believe any-one who must absolutely Act all their lives, from one role to another, and needs the limelight to survive or have something to live for has some serious issues.I would assume they do not know who they are, or want to be someone other than themselves. As with all addictions, running away from ones' self is no answer to ones' issues. The Ego eventually becomes so big it overwhelms the person like an octopus sitting on ones head and strangles them.Both Hussein and Bush have hung themselves. They are each others reflections.
Who is Nicoles reflection ? Could it be us ? Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 5 January 2007 8:18:53 PM
| |
This is not so of NK, T.I.T. She made a decision she wanted to act and become a world famous movie star when she was about 12. She was ruthless even then, the way she went about it. She was low on the ladder re talent amongst the child actors here. There were about a dozen way ahead of her, getting the roles, better than her and so on. They were all friends and supportive of each other and as they merged into their teen years. Sure, there was natural competition to get roles etc. but these kids, once they didn't get a role, would immediately say 'good on you' to those who didn't. All except NK. Her ambition was ruthless, she was nasty and cold to her so-called friends even back then, maintaining only three of them into adulthood. Her was a personal project to step all over her friends...and anybody who got in her way... to get what she wanted. She has not changed in adulthood.
Posted by morgan, Saturday, 6 January 2007 7:54:35 AM
| |
Did not know she was acting at 12 as you say. HMN ? Hmn? HMNNN?
Food for thought. Uh-oh. You people aren't with the P.O.D Experiments, are you ? I am feeling a convertion coming on. Afraid to sleep. Must stay awake. Say No to POD People.Say No to POD People. POD People bad. Must stay awake. I like Nic. I like Nic.I like... Must repeat, not fall asleep. Posted by tonyintoronto, Saturday, 6 January 2007 11:21:39 AM
| |
So, I notice that the botoxoholic has signed on to another movie to throw onto her redundant heap of cinematic attempts. Something called, Rabbit Hole...from chud.com,(cinematic happenings under construction.com) a classic quote, "Kidman is seen onscreen in no fewer than five films before Rabbit Hole, her latest project. Rabbit Hole is based on a Broadway play about a couple living in…yawn…wedded bliss who must… yaaaaaawn… confront a tragedy and struggle to regaaaaaaaaaaawn redemption and… happinesszzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz…"
... the burial continues... Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 6 January 2007 4:59:28 PM
| |
She must be doing something right to be getting all these roles for herself. A female actor almost 40,and the Hollywood Machine still signs her up for more roles in the future.
Usually by now we would be wondering "what ever happened to..." Like the Energizer Bunny, she just keeps going, and going, .. It's not like she's CHER. The Come-back Queen. This Nicole never drops out for any reason. Wouldn't you love to have a life like that?So smooth. Hmn. Posted by tonyintoronto, Saturday, 6 January 2007 10:52:59 PM
| |
Rabbit hole you say? Or did you mean plug hole?
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 7 January 2007 5:30:31 AM
| |
Hey, dont I wish, nothing would make me happier than to have that hole cemented over, to keep it from churning out those ridiculous films of hers. But no one ever said the hollywood corporate dead heads had any taste, or a great sense of business judgment. Otherwise they'd never would have given the green light to films like stepford and bewitched. Not many people find her interesting enough to care to watch these movies, or any other that are due to drizzle out, let alone watch her attempt to get emotional therapy performed through a film role, for her dreary and illusory life.
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 7 January 2007 6:23:55 AM
| |
I see the asinine story wondering if she is pregnant are back once again. You can tell the journalistic integrity this strory has, after being copied and pasted, and repasted... it starts out stating that she herself was spotted buying baby supplies, and the at the end of the same paragraph, it then states that she sent an aide to go buy them. Of course since she is unable to have a kid, the only logical answer if this story is true, is that she got them for a friend or relative who is having a baby. But then on the other hand, it ocurred to me that if this story is true, perhaps she may be signaling her next PR move... since the New Year reunion ended so spectacularly, what with being chased out of Aus., and Urban headed back into rehad ... (for who knows how long!) Maybe she's planning a trip to Africa, to pick herself up a baby? Well only time will tell.
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 9 January 2007 4:35:32 PM
| |
"happened to bump (pardon the pun) into Angus Hawley, who was delighted to tell me that he and his wife, Antonia Kidman, are expecting their fourth baby.
www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/private-sydney/2006/10/06/1159641528390.html - she may have been buying lovely presents for her sisters' baby? She has plenty of money to spend, we all know. Posted by Brownie, Tuesday, 9 January 2007 4:57:07 PM
| |
Maybe she's building up a big story about being pregnant in the hope of generating motherly coo-coos from everyone as PART 1 of an attempt for public sympathy.
PART 2 of course,will be the tragic loss of said fictional baby. A double-whammy sure-fire strategy for success. Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 9 January 2007 5:39:56 PM
| |
Bean , bean , jellie - bean.
Tony loves his Ice cream. Posted by tonyintoronto, Tuesday, 9 January 2007 8:13:34 PM
| |
Two years on and yes, I still hate Nicole Kidman. Kidman has a hard clawed ambition that she deliberately masks from the public by careful manipulation of the vunerable. Everything she does is carefully stage-managed to elict maximum personal gain. This is not endearing. Exposing this hypocrisy is what drives anyone who has ever seen this woman drop her guard.
Two years on and maybe I have softened my view of Kidman a little because as she ages we can all see that her kingdom is crumbling. As she struggles desperately to maintain her position and status, the simple pleasures of life remain forever out of reach. Sad really. Money can't buy you love. Posted by AM, Wednesday, 10 January 2007 9:43:55 AM
| |
oh wow! AM drops by.
Are you thrilled that your essay has had the longest running commentary of all the Online Opinions? I cannot wait until that hairdresser writes his book ... and I would love to know how much money he gets for taming the curly red hair. Not 'Our' Nic is just the new Joan Crawford. Posted by Brownie, Wednesday, 10 January 2007 10:24:14 AM
| |
Yes AM, it is that which drives me. I don't want to elaborate but I have been around when the guard has been dropped, and I have seen people confused and deeply hurt as a result. She lives in a mirage of her own making. She is not what she seems. I am waiting for something similar to what I have witnessed(more than once or twice I might add),to occur in the public arena. People will be shocked.I am actually very surprised it hasn't already happened. But she is extremely careful and chillingly manipulative.
Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 10 January 2007 11:54:12 AM
| |
Returning to the scene huh, AM,? You really touched a nerve with a few of us, anyways. I know i like to rant on this thread, when the mood strikes. What I truly resent about kidman is the double standard in which she is regarded, simply because she was divorced by Cruise. Any other actor who has had as many box office and critical failures would be toast, yet she still presses on in the industry. Still acclaimed as courageous, or a risk taker, and for what? Because she makes unwatchable movies. Well, at least the award Noms. have stopped going her way, otherwise we'd still be hearing about how great she is by the entertainment shills to the end and beginning of each year.
Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 10 January 2007 11:57:22 AM
| |
Sounds like you guys are talking badly about my sister.
Again ? Nothing was ever given to her. She is where she is because she worked hard and many people tried to ride her coat-tails .People who only wanted the limelight, but would not work for it. I know her well enough to tell you, she made many people much money and helped them in their careers. Where were you ? Standing aside spewing negativity. And so what if she yells F-off out of a car window. It was n't meant for you. You have no real idea of whom you are speaking badly of. She doesn't care what you say or think. She is her own woman. Posted by tonyintoronto, Wednesday, 10 January 2007 12:35:46 PM
| |
Yes it has been a tough couple of years - what with having to sleep with one eye open and all. This forum has been most illuminating and it is particularly interesting to read the comments from people who have actually worked with her - I too have witnessed her behaviour close-up and frankly - it ain't pretty.
The fact this forum has become the most popular one on On-Line Opinion is not through some sort of dumbing down of public debate but rather because the Kidman type of media manipulation is what is currently driving social and therefore political trends around the world. Shelley Gare's recent book "The Triumph of the Airheads" is case in point. De-constructing the Kidman is necessary if we are to properly arm ourselves for the battle ahead. Keep up the good work! Posted by AM, Wednesday, 10 January 2007 1:20:06 PM
| |
Eanie-Meanie, Jellie-Beenie.The spirits are about to speak. "Speaketh, O'thy Spirits."
Posted by tonyintoronto, Wednesday, 10 January 2007 8:46:08 PM
| |
De-constructing the Kidman. Interesting. The 'thing' that I don't get about her is the collective attitude by Australians to the construction labelled "Our Nic". It's as if Australians, especially journalists, are mesmerised by her and are unable to exercise any thought or reason or individual opinion of her. The latest blanketing coverage in the news has been a collective outpouring of how good she is to stick by her man. What about her children? And how she is going to accompany him on his Australian tour. What about her childen? How she spent Christmas with him in Australia. What about her children back in the US? Are Australians so easily brainwashed that they can't think for themselves? Or is it the journos at fault here? I think it's the latter. Australians, if questioned, would surely by now be raising questions re the neglect of her children. So what is it with the journalists? I simply cannot understand this blind worship of something that is merely a construction without a live, beating heart, who has no time or maternal feelings for her kids.
Posted by morgan, Thursday, 11 January 2007 7:01:51 AM
| |
I did a little looking into that book AM suggested, "The Triumph of the Airheads" and I think it describes perfectly what happens in society. Especially in the fantasy based world of hollywood. Here in the states were suffering from a delussional president who is about to send more troops into a disasterous situation in Irag, despite the overwelming opinion of the american people. As for Kidman, she is in a industry of shallow, simplistic, group think hacks who simply perpetuate the party line. In the fairy tale world of hollywood, it helps if you have a compelling story, in her case, she married one of the biggest actors around, and then when he dumped her, she played it for all the sympathy she could. So it became compelling for her to succeed, and excel so they simply write that she overcome the "horror" of divorce... shallow , but its a happy ending, for a make believe world like hollywood, so it doesnt matter if she ignores her kids, her movies stink., as long as she plays the game.
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 11 January 2007 8:55:23 AM
| |
Still don't understand why you hate Nicole Kidman.
She was nothing but sweet and giving to me when I was in the worst of my life. She had nothing to gain personally or career wise from helping me at all. Have you all worked with her ? Morgan ? The others ? Anyone on this blog. Who has worked with Nicole and why are you so extremely angery with her ? Aside from her maybe snubbing you if you were working with her, what harm has she done you ? Keep her children out of it. That's just low and cheapens you as a person(s). Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 12 January 2007 2:11:06 PM
| |
"She was nothing but sweet and giving to me when I was in the worst of my life."
Convince us Tony. List the things she did for you. How much cash and time and personal effort did this help involve? Did any Canadian paparazzi photograph her helping you? Convince us Tony. Posted by Brownie, Friday, 12 January 2007 2:24:37 PM
| |
After a screening of my last film, when Kidman, Cruise and Spielberg showed up to see it, I invited them to the wrap party.
My cab was hit by a racing car and slammed the cab onto a corner building. Kidman rode in the ambulance with me to the hospital. She took my hand, caresed my face gently. Tom had his Limo driver get in front of the ambulance, stopping it and tried to get Nicole out. She would not leave my side. When he tried to take her out by physical force she insisted she ride with me. In those dark days in Ontario, our then Premier had cut funding to hospitals. I was in emerg. for 3 hours . The entire time Nic. was beside me. Holding my hand and caressing my head lightly .She asked the station nurse why it was taking so long to be seen by a doctor. The station nurse told her I would not be seen for at least 10 hours. Nicole took her Visa and donated $20,000. to the hospital. Within two minutes, I had a doctor all over me.She gave me her cell number to be reached anytime.Asked the doctor a slew of questions about my well being . Thanked her for her $20,000. donation to get a doctor for me. For holding my hand in the ambulance and for putting up with my mothers and Toms ranting about her attention to me, as they thought I was not that hurt. I was supposed to be dead, let alone walking.She was told this by the police, ambulance drivers, para-medics and the doctor she paid $20,000. to see me . There were no photographers anywhere. I was the only patient in emerg. besides Tom and my mom at the front desk quibbling, and the station nurse. I have no pictures which I am sure you need in order to believe me about Nicole.NO photogs were called in. Hence, No pics. Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 12 January 2007 6:00:16 PM
| |
You should write movie scripts mate. (science fiction.)
Posted by morgan, Friday, 12 January 2007 6:05:11 PM
| |
Well Tony if there were no photos then I doubt it happened.Because if Kidman were to do something nice for some one besides herself she would make sure there were pictures.She pretty much doesn't ever do anything unless it will benefit her in some way.And as for leaving her kids out of it maybe you're right, because she sure manages to leave her kids out of her life.
Posted by CRICKET, Saturday, 13 January 2007 1:11:56 PM
| |
Hey Cricket, good to hear from you. It's probably a good thing her kids have hardly any exposure to her, otherwise they'd grow to be as pretensious, self-centered, self consiously calculating, and shallow as she is. They've lucked out that she obviously has no desire to even try to portray herself as an outwardly devoted mother in her public life, but simply the gracelessly aging, cosmetic procedure grasping, eternal starlet wantabe. I certainly wouldn't be surprised if she auditioned for the lead role in "The Dakota Fanning story"!
Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 13 January 2007 2:10:36 PM
| |
You asked me for proof of Nicoles generousity as a human being. I swear on GOD and my personal Savior, Cristos, all I have stated is true.
Now you want pictures to prove Kidman was there , but no-one called the photogs. If there were photogs there you would scorn her. Either way I cannot get you off the wrong track.You will get cancer if you keep on like this. Negativity will back up and destroy you. You are impossible, embittered people and I should feel sorry for you, but I learned a long time ago not to feel sorry for evil. Your lives must be crap,you feel you have to dump on a woman you really do not know anything of. "I heard this and that "and "Did you read about so and so ?" Truly pathetic. Makes me feel like vomoting. Hope I never meet any of you. Perhaps if you people took your head out of your asses where you insist on living, and have some positive re-inforcement in your lives, you would not feel the need to hurt others b-c of your low self-esteem and endless negativity you are constantly feeding each other. That being said, I am horribly disgusted with you all, and anyone who believes they can dump on another Human being , using the argument that it is OK to do so b-c they are in the spotlight, is just human waste. Do something good for the world for a change, you selfish little farts. You are all vile, low, bottom feeding and cruel people who need to get in touch with your inner selves and be introspective about the faults in your lives,and fix it. Fix yourselves. You are all very broken and feel inadequate, am sure. It is so much easier to point fingers at someone else, isn't it ?!The fingers are actually pointed at you,and by yourselves and you have no clue you are doing it. TONY IN TORONTO. Posted by tonyintoronto, Saturday, 13 January 2007 2:43:33 PM
| |
(I mean Horror films)
Posted by morgan, Saturday, 13 January 2007 2:55:21 PM
| |
...or do you mean "snuff films" Morgan? I love it when a plan comes together! He he ...
Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 13 January 2007 3:17:52 PM
| |
"After a screening of my last film, when Kidman, Cruise and Spielberg showed up to see it"
wow. what did Steven think? Have you got anything going on at Dreamworks? Posted by Brownie, Saturday, 13 January 2007 7:10:32 PM
| |
The recent stage-managed story about NK and KU attending the bush fair has been proved to be just that. A stage-managed attempt at pretending all is well. The truth is that Kidman stayed at her home alone throughout their time in Sydney while he stayed alone at the Intercontinental Hotel.
Posted by morgan, Saturday, 13 January 2007 8:25:38 PM
| |
Yes, Brownie. I do work with and for Spielberg.I write for FOX too. So what ? I have written 4 films for him and he produced them all, along with my friend Tom. Nic was in all of them, as I did write for only my family back then.
Don't quite understand what your problen is though. Am trying to help. Bye the Bye. I have been inter-acting on the telephone and via e-mail with an Iraqi "friend" in Central Baghdad. I was told early today by my Sargeant Marx at the R.C.M.P that the C.I.A has been monitoring all my calls and e-mails. Typical of Toronto . C.I.A every where.I used to walk in there on University Ave. and drink their beer, with the C.I.A but those days are gone since 9/11. Sorry. Did not know that my crews secret filming in Iraq would get every one in my data base into interrogation. Every one. Yes. That means you guys. OOps. There goes my hard drive, again . Good bye. See ya in Hell. Posted by tonyintoronto, Sunday, 14 January 2007 12:02:13 PM
| |
It doesn't surprise me at all that urban would stay in a hotel during the "reunion". Its also very obvious he'd rather stay in rehab a few months longer, rather than to get back into the monotony of their suffocating life together. Between his addictions, and her vanity, I doubt they have much to talk about, and I doubt this so called marriage will last out the year.
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 14 January 2007 3:25:00 PM
| |
Bitch. bitch,bitch,bitch,bitch,alls I gotta says. !'Bout you all white trash.
Posted by tonyintoronto, Sunday, 14 January 2007 3:30:35 PM
| |
You'll enjoy this T.I.T......
At a private dinner at NK's mother's house the night before KU was to arrive, NK was so bad tempered and sulky that the family and friends present didn't try to talk to her, or jolly her out of it. Everyone just let her be. Yes, it was a small, private dinner and yes I have the facts right T.I.T. Sorry that I am unable to divulge further...... And the trip to the family/children oriented bush fair was just the same as acting out a scene in a movie. No wonder she lost it at the photographer, telling him to f. off. It must have been a terrible strain on the poor dear. Yet not as big a strain as it must be all year round on her two children who live their lives without their mother. Posted by morgan, Sunday, 14 January 2007 3:59:46 PM
| |
Hey Tony why not do everyone a favor and send Nicold over to Iraq to do some secret filming for you?Since no one ever goes to see her crap all her films could be secret anyway.
Posted by CRICKET, Sunday, 14 January 2007 6:04:13 PM
| |
Perhaps Tony in Toronto could tell us exactly which hospital emergency room (anywhere in the world) has a ten hour waiting time for a doctor coupled with exactly NO OTHER PATIENTS?
Are you sure you weren't on a film set? Posted by SKE, Monday, 15 January 2007 11:23:47 AM
| |
Seems I am talking to brick walls. Like children eating dinner, you pick and chose what you think you will like to eat, and discard what you think may taste bad. Lying your way out of any situation until you get caught and get a good slap.
You all taste qiute sick, I am sure. I should noe. I have chefs papers amongst other disciplines. You are all so pathetic. Gossips. Quik! Run the the supermarket ! New gossip on the Tabloids for retards to consume. Posted by tonyintoronto, Monday, 15 January 2007 1:43:07 PM
| |
There is no other way of explaining this whole "botoxic" phenomenon. A life so pathetically starved... (to skeletal results) for attention, that they become so shrill and irrelevant, that if they weren't filming a movie, or PR-ing a movie, or appearing on a talk show to speak about nothing, or walking a red carpet, they would most certainly cease to exist. It's as if , if they weren't the center of attention they would have no other purpose on the planet, so they cling to their worthless thoughts and ideas, and hold on for dear life, and just hope that there next action doesn't condemn then to certain stupidity and ridicule... That, I think,
would explain it. Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 15 January 2007 5:19:14 PM
| |
They are all so bloody Safe and Squeekie - clean , aren't they ?
Never once do they stick out their neck and try to make a film with some contreversy or real meaning to life. Posted by tonyintoronto, Monday, 15 January 2007 10:18:39 PM
| |
Maclen, the basic law of the universe is "What you put out is what you get back" in life. She has been 100% 'on the take' up until now. She hasn't even given out to her children. The balancing-out is overdue. Karmic comeuppance is inevitable.
Posted by morgan, Saturday, 20 January 2007 7:31:26 AM
| |
Much like all before her, EGO ( the I )will hang itself.Sad.
She was a real sweat-heart when I first met her. Pains me to hear about this "New Nicole". Can't say I did not warn her. I gave her a thorough spychic reading for 20 years of her life.It's all come true. Too bad. Perhaps a waste of effort on my part to save her from herself.Do love her though. Life is painfull for us all. That was 1989. I knew when she had her nose done, it was over in so many ways. Shame that. Do wish people would listen to the Cosmos . Gods' Timing is always ON Time. Never ours. Peace. - Posted by tonyintoronto, Saturday, 20 January 2007 8:01:55 AM
| |
Well I find it pretty ironic, but not surprising, Morgan, that someone whos trying to portray themselves as emotionally complex and charitably generous will probably end up coldly distant from her own children. Instant Karma doesn't come about in one afternoon of strolling through a war torn or famine plagued city of the country. It doesn't give that area of the world that much of a "higher visibility" they claim to try to give it, it only accomplishes getting THEIR picture in the news and mags. And it might be taken more seriously, if its not sceduled a day in between appearances of trying to shill your next movie. Mark my words, her next big charitable event wont come until her next movie, (which seems now to be in August sometime) where it can simply be penciled in, seeing as she'll be traveling around anyways, between going on Oprah and The Tonight show with Jay Leno.
Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 22 January 2007 11:30:27 AM
| |
and then Toronto to see me. HA-ha-ha ha ha ha!
Posted by tonyintoronto, Monday, 22 January 2007 1:23:36 PM
| |
Where the heck is the SUN ? Did you Aussies steal our Sun ?
It's always dark here. Lights on all the time. One feels like they have to go to bed but I just woke up and had a coffee. First you steal our Nic. Now the Sun. Com'mon people. It ain't fair. Hope ya'll get burned ! Keeping all the Sun to yourselves. I thought Assuies were "Nice" people. I guess we will have to invade your part of the world and get Sun. We are not going through the United Nations and we are coming at night ! We also want OUR NIC. back. She was kidnapped from her Homeland of Canada , you know, EH ? Posted by tonyintoronto, Monday, 22 January 2007 11:27:43 PM
| |
I just caught on a movie website, MCN.com, of the contraversy Dakoda Fanning is having with her new movie just shown at the Sundance film festival . I joked on an earlier post that kidman would audition for the lead in the Dakota Fanning story... well it seems Fanning has just pulled a "kidman" move. The fanning movie contraversy centers on her being raped, and thats all everyone seems to be going on about. Well the movie was premiered and it's said to be such a terrible movie, it's not even worthy of all the fuss. Well, kidman failed similarly with Birth, Dogville, and most recently with Fur. You have to be shrewed enough not to simply try and court contraversy, especiallly if you dont have a coherant and clear story that makes some sense. and you need to know what type of contraversial material is going to intrigued people the most... (something like Gibson's Passion of the Christ, with its built in audience.) kidman seems to be more concerned with her acting out her own emotional insecurities and her mass of neurosis, than what a movie go-er might be interested in paying 10 bucks to watch. Which I think points to her obvious narcisism and self centered tendency, she'd be better off trying to be natural and engaging, rather than to try and be so provocative.
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 25 January 2007 6:29:29 PM
| |
Just love Nicole for being so charming and engaging.
Great business accumen. Posted by tonyintoronto, Thursday, 25 January 2007 8:31:52 PM
| |
Great business acumen, yes. Called Greed, actually.
You are so right Maclen. She would have thought that donning a false nose was 'serious acting'. And her other ridiculous choices such as you mentioned were also probably taken on believing that they would portray her as a serious and complex actress. But she's not.She is incapable. And that's why all projects failed. She is a simple-minded girl and doesn't have the depth of character to even understand, let alone portray, deep and meaningful issues. There is a difference between her and Dakota Fanning though. Dakota has talent. Botoxia doesn't. She will stand out like a sore toe in the film Australia, measured against the likes of Bryan Brown, Jack Thompson and the like. She will stand out as the egotistical, self-absorbed, botoxed Hollywood celebrity amongst down to earth Australian actors who can really act and who don't have Hollywood egos. You know what, she will be all simpering and coy and in awe of the likes of Bryan Brown and Jack Thompson, because while growing up, these are the Australian actors she admired and wanted to become. Being in their company will reflect back to her, the truth of where she came from, who she REALLY is and all her falseness and hypocrisy. Posted by morgan, Friday, 26 January 2007 4:22:50 AM
| |
I cant disagree with you, Morgan. Well it seems she was rushed to the hospital after a car accident on the set for reshoots of Invasion... shes fine it seems and was back filming. So it seems the film did bomb with a test audience, hence the reshoots. This movie was filmed last year, I guess they are trying to punch up the movie with chase scenes and the like... sounds like a sub-par production.. probably rushing the reshoots because she has to hurry back to finish the other 4 or 5 movies she'll probably finish in the next 6 months. And I don't doubt that she will drag down this Aussie movie... havent really heard or read up on the strory line for that movie... no doubt it involves another deep loss to her character, in which she must struggle to overcome the grief..and etc and etc... Does that sound familiar?
Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 26 January 2007 10:06:06 AM
| |
Yea. Sounds like Life.
Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 26 January 2007 11:22:24 AM
| |
TMZ.com has the video of the accident on the set of Invasion, it seems the car was being pulled on a rig, with a couple of "zombies" on top of the car, when the rig turned too sharply and banged the car on the side of a railing... anyways.. Zombies? isnt this supposed to be sci-fi? Well they must be hungry for brains... well, sorry dudes, they'll be none of those in this movie, I'm sure.
...and i saw this at aint it cool news about the epic" Australia"... " ..."he's telling an epic story that follows, "an English aristocrat (Kidman) who inherits a sprawling ranch and reluctantly pacts with a cattle driver (Jackman) to protect her new property from a takeover plot. As the pair drive 2,000 head of cattle over unforgiving landscape, they experience the bombing of Darwin by Japanese forces."... ...Didnt audience already ignore this kidman movie when it was set in the U.S. Civil war, and was called Cold Mountain? Well, Its Deja vu... all over again... Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 27 January 2007 5:46:56 PM
| |
It was called BROKEBACK MONTAIN, silly twits.
Posted by tonyintoronto, Saturday, 27 January 2007 6:09:06 PM
| |
You're right Maclen. Spot on.
You're wrong Tony.As usual. Posted by morgan, Saturday, 27 January 2007 6:24:42 PM
| |
What do Zombies have to do with the Epic 'Austria '?
I Don't understand. Posted by tonyintoronto, Sunday, 28 January 2007 12:43:38 AM
| |
You ask what zombies have to do with the epic 'Austria'.
Let me explain. In Austria, on top of a mountain covered with snow and bluebells in the Spring, there lives a family of extremely old people. They were the original Trapp family members and are now so frail and aged, they walk around like zombies. I hope this answers your question. On the other hand, the epic 'Australia' will only have one zombie...Nicole Kidman, who will phone her performance through from her ranch in Tennessee on the Bush Telegraph, which is a contraption comprising two tin cans and a length of string. Posted by morgan, Sunday, 28 January 2007 6:29:36 AM
| |
Having read the description of this Aussie movie, morgan, I'm reminded of another blatant attempt by kidman to show what a real "thespian" she is. And that is her copping of foreign accents in movies, which she no doubt copped from Meryl Streep. Streep is reknown for them. So, in the past few years, you'll notice, shes used an english accent, a russian accent, a southern accent, twice, (maybe even three times?) and a South African accent. And again she plays an "English" aristocrat, which might make you wonder, why not Austalian, if the movie is named Australia? No doubt it was at her insistance that it be anything other than Aussie...and no doubt if you look into her upcoming 20 movies, youll find some more.
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 28 January 2007 10:09:31 AM
| |
Canadian Tony Morales
Lives far from the land of tamale. He just loves Our Nic, So we think he's a Dick And instead should admire Chris Farley. Posted by Brownie, Sunday, 28 January 2007 4:40:04 PM
| |
Congratulations BROWNIE;
You managed to insult my Country, my Castillian Heritage and my sexuality. I know Australia was once the dumping ground of thieves ,rapists and buggers, but never did I think their spawn where as ignorant as the English made them to be. Shame on you, filthy c&u^n%t! You may want to move to Bangladesh and drink some of their water, Please ! PS. - I was with Penelope Cruz at a concert tonight. Where where you? A-hole IGNORANT Ill-iterate be-ache.AUGH !Sick ! I have called the RCMP and they consider this IN-ternational Terrorism. The CIA is all over Toronto, and you are on the watch list. Posted by tonyintoronto, Sunday, 28 January 2007 8:18:23 PM
| |
Be afraid, Brownie. Be very afraid.
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 28 January 2007 8:33:31 PM
| |
Chris Farley is more deserving of your adulation than 'Our Nic';
in Australia, to call someone a dick is a friendly jibe, nothing more. After your claim to have co-produced with Steven Speilberg, I went to imdb.com to search which ones. I am astounded that you could fraternise with the Homewrecking Spanish Slag when you love Nicole so much? Was Penelope sent by the CIA to inveigle out of you how much you know, or is she as impressed as I am by a teacher who is a qualified chef, and colleague of Speilberg? Get ya hand off it Tones. Posted by Brownie, Monday, 29 January 2007 9:31:34 AM
| |
Well its pretty obvious this dude has some serious mental and emotional problems...What with the ranting from all extremes, sounding very delusional, high risk stalker material, I'd bet. Thats why its so important to stay regular on the Meds. Its just too easy to dispute his ramblings and I just quit long ago and ignore it. But it would explain the kidman fanbase mentality though, and why she will never attain a truly lasting and dedicated following... shes just too unstable. She attained her celebrity by hooking up with Cruise, and now its dwinding away with mediocre movies, a truly false and grateing personality, and the warmth of a cadaver... which her career will soon become.
Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 29 January 2007 1:41:33 PM
| |
Oh! I thought this was the "I ATE NICOLE FAN CLUB".
Did manage to have ME as the focus of this blog .Bored now. Am moving on. It's not even MY site. HA ! My mission accomplished. Too easy. You may all go back to your cages now. Thankyou for your time. The experiament now is over.You have all passed the re-tard test. Posted by tonyintoronto, Monday, 29 January 2007 3:38:41 PM
| |
Well, I was flipping through the channels the other night when i caught a glimpse of kidman in Stepford wives...haven' t watched it, not even a full clip of it.. boy does she look horrific in it. What with that ill fitting short black wig which reveals her large forehead, and at the height,or should i say lowest, point of her weight loss. And her bulging eyes and sickenly pale complexion.. she looked absolutely mal-nourished. Already proving that she cant do comedy, light and definaltely not romantic comedy, having dropped out action adventure films in the past, and even another musical, (no doubt for fear she may break a hip!) What else can there be left for her to flail in... well theres still commericials.
Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 31 January 2007 9:16:33 AM
| |
Speaking of Botoxia working in the film Australia with its location being in the bush reminds me of a long time ago when I worked on the crew of a film set in a bush location(could have been Deep Ceek in Narrabeen, not sure) and she had a role.It was called Five Mile Creek. We were all sitting round one day eating lunch (it was back in those days when she lowered herself to mix with the hoi poloi)and she started talking about the fencing lessons she was taking. She said she loved to joust with the fencing sword. Another actor, Tony Blackman/Backman/Blackett (? not sure of surname)remarked under his breath, "Who needs swords when you've got claws like hers?" She must have only been 19 or 20 at the time but she'd already rubbed a lot of people up the wrong way so although it wasn't the wittiest of remarks, a lot of people laughed.It makes me wonder how she'll get on working back here in the bush with Australian actors who continued to rise in stature but chose to continue calling Australia home. Ms Queen of Hollywood will be a bit like a fish out of water methinks.
Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 31 January 2007 10:29:33 AM
| |
Well Morgan, from the description of the movie ive read, doesnt she play an English aristrocrat? A blue blood outsider coming in to the aussie outback to rule over the local peasants? Sounds about her usual role. Now that you mention it, she does seem to be pretty distant in the industry. Sure theres the lip service about best pals naomi watts and russell crowe, (Crowe, obviously wise enough to bail in not just one, but two films with box office poison Botoxia! ) but since being dumped by Cruise, shes usually alone at premieres or awards, and probably back to solo-ing it with urban rehabbing it. Again, absolutely no seeming comeraderie with any one else in the world! Another sign of her one dimensional personality.
Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 31 January 2007 11:52:32 AM
| |
Maclen, I have heard that her friendship with Naomi Watts has gone down the drain, following the way of her other Aussie friends she dumped and offended. She's a loner allright. Even from her kids. A right alien.
Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 31 January 2007 12:14:48 PM
| |
It is possible that the Kidman/Watts friendship melted under the heat of Ms.Watts very solid success.
Posted by Brownie, Wednesday, 31 January 2007 1:32:43 PM
| |
Well, brownie, I would think Watts was getting annoyed of being asked about kidman being her bff at every appearance. Well if it is true the friendship is over, no doubt its due to neglect. Ive always thought of them as being rather similar... only that watts didnt seem as neurotic or uptight. Trying to claw and climb your way to the top of the starlet hill, can cost these women a price in their personal lives, which they seem very willing to pay, yet it seems Watts isnt willing to use every fortunate, or unfortunate occasion to try to reach that level in a superficial grab for self glorification.
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 1 February 2007 11:02:18 AM
| |
just have a couple of late night musings... was doing a news search and saw a aussie article by an interviewer who was recalling an interview with botoxia, and how she was bummed because she wanted to be out on the beach with her "kids" and how as a kid she loved and was always on the beach. And this interviewer was making a point on how pale kidman was, and how could she remain so if she was in fact such an outdoors and beach go-er. Well that answer is pretty obvious! Another thing ive noticed is how she's destroyed her hair. I once commented how awful she looked in those paparrazzi photos of she and urban out walking around the neighborhood, and how they resembled homeless people. Well her hair in these candid shots is very mousy and frizzy, not even shoulder length, and completely bleached out, (wasnt she a redhead?) And then I noticed in a few premieres, at the rome film festival, for instance, her hair is very straight and full, a vivid yellow colored and it's length is down to the middle of her back.... obviously a wig... Well it seems her cosmetic obsession has also claimed the integrity of her hair! She cannot even remain authentic on the red carpet, as shallow as it remains to be...
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 4 February 2007 6:11:25 PM
| |
Maclen you are spot on. She is naturally a redhead...curly hair....very pale and never, ever, EVER was a "beach girl"...and face very freckled.That is the 'real' Botaxia.
Here in Austalia, especially Sydney, you're either a 'surfie' which means you live the outdoor life on a beach. Or you are the 'indoor type': scholars, actors, poets, writers... who SCORN being on the beach-worshipper and 'having the mentality of a surfie'. Botaxia was the latter to the nth degree. She was absolutely never ever a beach person. She tries to build a 'persona' of an 'Aussie" by talking this way, to suit certain interviews, but in truth, she has become the botoxed boring Hollywood Celebrity. She even lied once in an interview, whilst trying to pretend an allegiance with Australia, that she had a relative who worked on the building of the Sydney Harbour Bridge. This was proved to be a lie.She is Hawaiian by birth. Posted by morgan, Sunday, 4 February 2007 7:12:17 PM
| |
oh yeah, there's a long list of contradictions and falsehoods in what she claims in interviews and her actual life, I'm not surprised about what you've said Morgan. Along with others I've noted before.. claiming to desperately want to have a kid, when it's now obvious she can"t, and saying she would give up her movie career if and when she was remarried, because she doesn't believe she can have both... those pretty much have fallen by the wayside. She just moves on to the next set of image cultivating claims. Well what else is there, besides the whole UN charity "appearances", she can try and cultivate? Didnt she once claim on a talk show that she gave up her "daredevil activities', like swimming with sharks, or some nonsense, as a promise to her family... if all she has left to talk about is Urbans rehab and her movies, well her personal and professional life have completly joined in mediocre synchronicity.
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 6 February 2007 11:00:27 AM
| |
So, I'm reading that Botixica has signed up to present at the Oscars... and just threw a "Aussie' Oscar party for the director of Happy Feet...yeah, it figures, whatever it takes to stay in the limelight, even when its someone elses. Well I wonder if she'll share the limelight with Urban, when, or if he appears at the Grammys? Since in the Aussie oscar party, it seems he was a no show, despite being expected to be there. Although I havent found any alternate confirming story on that, it would only be natural to see the cracks already reappearing in that "happy' union.
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 11 February 2007 3:53:22 PM
| |
... well it seems Urban is on the road again, making a surprise visit at a gig up in canada, it seems on valentines day. I'm sure that was preferable to being with kidman on that day. And then looking strangely kind of "puffy' around the face at a appearance on The Today Show the next day in New York , praising kidman along the way for being such a sport about the whole drug and booze thing. Meanwhile kidman's in LA, herself faithfully praising........ the UN? and from a video feed no less... no reason to drag herself all the way to New York to be there in person I suppose? Well, no movie opening in sight for her to put in the effort, or any need to be anywhere near her puffy husband, I also suppose.... as the clock continues to tick...
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 18 February 2007 1:20:31 PM
| |
I saw a revolting picture of her nude in a bubble bath. Sexy she is not.Looked like a grasshopper painted pink.
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 18 February 2007 3:28:20 PM
| |
The poor woman is reaping what she has sown.
I am intrigued to see what effect the friendship between Katie Cruise and Victoria Beckham is going to have on Isabella Cruise; who is at a delicate stage in teen development and has a loony father. I sort of hope The Proximity Of Posh helps her come out of her rather plain shell. No daughter wants to ape her mother, but I suspect Posh Beckham has quite a different personality from Nicole and could be very good for Isabella. Possibly not good for Katie's relationship with Tom though. Of course there is no way the Beckham Zillion$ are going to fall under the Scientology spell that Tom Cruise is hoping for as he allows Katie this alignment of the 2 couples. Posted by Brownie, Sunday, 18 February 2007 11:35:37 PM
| |
In a newspaper article it mentioned NK had a reunion with her kids after 6 months. It said she'd been away from her children for six months to be by her husband's side. What a lot of rubbish. I can't understand why the newspaper and magazine journalists are all so stupid and dim-witted as to write 'touching' stories like this instead of begging the question why she chooses to spend a half a year at a time away from her young and impressionable children. He wasn't even in rehab for 6 months. She just seems to choose not to be around her kids. What sort of person/parent is that?
Posted by morgan, Monday, 19 February 2007 6:15:25 AM
| |
Well, I dont know that much about Posh Beckham, so i dont know what kind of influence she may be on Cruise's daughter, but you would hope she doesnt adopt her rail thin diet, which kidman also seems to suffer from...As for the hollywood press, they suffer from a superficial group think, and herd mentality. All they seem to care about regarding kidman was who she may have been dating and what dress she wore on a red carpet. This article about reuniting with the kids after 6 months would seem to confirm the statements from a "hollywood nanny" who wrote a book a while back, where she said that kidman didnt seem to have much to do with the kids she adopted with cruise. Being a mother was something she seemed to talk about, especially right after the split with cruise, when it was helpful for her image, now it doesnt seem to come up anymore now that she's got this house of cards marriage she has to deal with.
Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 19 February 2007 8:24:28 AM
| |
From the opinions of both Morgan and Maclen,
is it possible that Adriana Maxwell may not actually "hate Nicole Kidman" but simply 'loathe the PR and media image of NK created by the mindless magazines aided and abetted by Wendy Day and her ilk' ? The real enemy here, may be the tabloid press. Anyone game to argue in favour of them? Is it possible, I wonder, to revoke the voting rights of anybody who buys them and believes them? Publicity representatives and spin doctors are ruling our world (for this week's example, merely check how hard the PR flack of Ralph Fiennes is working). Posted by Brownie, Monday, 19 February 2007 11:52:29 AM
| |
No doubt that the tabloids are seeping into every nook and cranny of all cultural and political coverage not just here in the US, but all over the world. What with all the newer internet gossip sites, along with the established fluff entertainment shows, we'll be buried with stories like the ana nicole freak show, britney breakdown,etc etc... pretty much 24/7 from now on. You just have to take each strory and decide what you believe with just simple common sense... but no, I do Hate nicole kidman. I saw a promo this morning of the Oprah Oscar special where among others, kidman will interview russell crowe and i just cringed at the few seconds they previewed of kidmans interview. Yes she giggles, and stammers her questions in her annoying and coy awkward manner. and I 'm especially anoyed by her desperate attempt to remain the youthful, naive, wide eyed ingenue, despite actually being this side of 40 already. All other evidence in my opinion point to a shallow and calculating person who is only concerned with remaining in the spotlight, and taking any advantage she can to retain the attention she so obsessively craves.
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 20 February 2007 3:24:24 PM
| |
That coy, shy giggly girl stuff is not 'her manner', Maclen. It's her 'acting a role'. I'm sure you meant that, anyway.
But since she can't act, it is obvious to anyone except herself apparently, that it's transparent and insincere and makes her appear half-witted. But mostly it is blatantly obvious that it's an act and only confirms her lack of talent in that area. The real Nicole Kidman is hard as steel. As unfeeling as rusty nails. And speaking of "Rusty", he puts on an act too. His natural speaking voice is high. He has learned how to speak like Richard Burton and does so when the camera is on him. Catch him unawares and he chirps like a budgerigar. It will be an interview that will have people reaching for the vomit bags. Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 20 February 2007 5:06:14 PM
| |
Thats a very amusing fact about Crowe, but it is classic... you know this really highlights kidman's taste in men in her life, or lack thereof. Is it any wonder she was horrified when cruise filed for divorce? She seems to have a stunted and adolescent view of relationships with men. I remember a quote from a magazine interview a couple of years ago, when asked what is her type of man, she replied the judd nelson character in the movie The Breakfast Club. nelson played the "criminal".. a vandalizing, bullying pot head lowlife. And then shes linked to steve bing, the dude who was involved with elizabeth hurly, and when she became pregnant, he denied being the father, and claimed they had a "open" relationship, and so any one could have been the father... yeah this would have made a great "father figure" to the kids she was claiming were the most important things in her life... then there was lenny kravitz, wild rocker, flower power regurgitator, who i guess wasn't self destructive enough, so she upgraded to hardcore alchoholic/ addict urban, who I wonder is even going to bother to be around to take her to the prom... i mean the oscars. But then again, she really loves the kids....
Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 21 February 2007 2:53:37 PM
| |
What happened to Morgan and Maclen? I hope the two of you keep posting about Nicole, I enjoyed reading your insights.
Posted by geena, Sunday, 4 March 2007 1:54:10 PM
| |
She looked like a red-back spider at the Oscars.
I wanted a can of Mortein. "One flick and they're gone!" (I wish.) Posted by morgan, Sunday, 4 March 2007 7:33:20 PM
| |
Hey Geena, I'd be very interested in what your opinion on all this was? Well Morgan, what do you make of contrasting developements this week... kidman's snapped on a boating vacation somewhere overseas with urban, all alone it seems.., while cruise, holmes and even baby suri are snapped attending a basketball game of one of their kids... does kidman even take vacation time with the kids? She must have to force herself to put it in the movie contracts to scedule in time to see them...
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 5:43:45 PM
| |
Yes Maclen, when I saw the footage of them holidaying on the boat, my first thought was, as usual, her children are not with her. I can only say for the 100th time...shaking my head...why is it that reporters and journalists never ever write a story about this? It's always "Our Nic" etc. etc. So much froth and bubble. It's called 'child neglect'. What about her mothering skills? Her maternal instincts? Oh yes, I forgot. They never even existed. It was Tom who wanted to do the adopting, not her. So they're his responsibilty, nothing to do with her.. Connor who?
Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 6:02:22 PM
| |
Well I've been seeing stories claiming kidman will be appearing on an american tv show called Nip'Tuck... its about a couple of plastic surgeons, and it says she'll be on to get a nose job. Well. it would appear she's addressing all the apparent comments about the botox and procedures she may have had... and this looks like the first step in an attempt to come out in the open, and i soon expect her to come out and admit to a few procedures, hoping to capitilize on the "sensational" news to help her fading movie career. Also, being on a tv show would seem to confirm some of my earlier comments, how she'll be reduced to doing tv spots... first comes the commercials, then the guest shots on tv shows. Then her own series, and then all thats left will be the "stage", which they all say is what they wanted to do all along... sure it is!
Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 10 March 2007 5:26:01 PM
| |
Maclen, what's the bet she'll be so desperate soon that she'll be on Celebrity Survivor along with Ossie Osbourne, Skippy the Kangaroo and David Hasselhoff?
Then she'll do The Bold and the Beautiful. She will be written into the storyline as Eric's future wife, after having done away with Stephanie with a poisoned gin and tonic actually meant for Brooke. Brooke will find out the gin and tonic was meant for her and will trap Nicole Kidman's character, Bettina Botoxia, into confessing her foul deed 'live' on the Oprah Winfrey show,thereby sentencing her character to a life behind bars and herself to cope with the real- life series of court cases in which she'll be suing her daughter for her daughter's autobiography "Mommie Dearest Two". Posted by morgan, Saturday, 10 March 2007 8:28:47 PM
| |
Yes I do not know what all the fuss is about. Her popularity seemed to increase with her divorce from TC. I would much prefer to watch other actresses first before her any day.
There is more focus on the external NK than there is on what her opinions are about everyday issues.So I think the public never see the real NK. Posted by WAKINGS, Saturday, 10 March 2007 8:36:24 PM
| |
Wakings, I don't think she has opinions. Too difficult.
Posted by morgan, Saturday, 10 March 2007 8:42:19 PM
| |
For those that are interested I found a link to video footage of NK when she was 16:
http://www.waleg.com/videos/archives/004869.html Whats the going rate for a personal stylist these days? Posted by WAKINGS, Sunday, 11 March 2007 8:31:48 PM
| |
Hey Wakings, I completely agree with your assessment of kidman, she was getting pity votes for a couple of years there. But if you'll notice, since being given an oscar, everything she's done has been tanking big time, to complete irrelevency. That old video, she's far more articulate than she is today, after all the physical upgrades and procedures, all the networking, the hair straightening pressings and bleachings, she's seemingly become neurotic and stunted in her public persona. As you mentioned, and I've said before, she's as dull and as bland as her complexion.
Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 12 March 2007 4:08:27 PM
| |
I don't really watch alot of her movies because NK doesn't appeal to me. I did recently sit down to watch 'Cold Mountain'and found the first part very boring.It wasn't until Renee Zellwinger came into the picture did the story line imporove. My issue with this movie was the fact that NK and Jude Laws characters supposively found undying love with each other when they hardly said a word to each other.He goes of to war she writes a love letter begging him to return. Of course JL obliges.What a load of rubbish.
Now I can see why RZ won an oscar for best supporting actress she saved that movie from being a major flop. Posted by WAKINGS, Monday, 12 March 2007 7:24:27 PM
| |
well Wakings, I havent seen cold mountain, but I'm sure it was a bore until Zellweger shows up... if I recall, interestingly, kidman, of course, said at some point in PR for this movie, she used Cruise as "inspiration" for this character falling in love at first sight. Its typical of her to bring up her, not just marriage to Cruise, but the break up as well in every interview for every one of her movies, even after 6 years, and still does it, even while engaged and after getting married to urban. I'll tell you, it must not do urban's fragile state any good to read her saying publicly that she's still in love with cruise, and would still want to be married to him.
Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 14 March 2007 2:19:08 PM
| |
AW man I love Nip/Tuck.Please don't let her ruin that too,like she ruins everything else she's in.She's out to poisen everything I like.She's ruining Keith Urban,now she wants to screw up Nip/Tuck?Did you guys see her on that Oprah special? She sounded like a brain dead idiot as usual.They really shouldn't let her speak unless she has a script.Maybe all the hair dye and botox have eaten the few brain cells she had.I've seen mentally challenged people make much more sense when they speak.
Posted by CRICKET, Thursday, 15 March 2007 3:01:55 PM
| |
Cricket, she IS mentally challenged.
Posted by morgan, Thursday, 15 March 2007 3:19:17 PM
| |
So exactly what would make the Australian press turn on 'Our Nic' ? ... the way they have turned on poor Jason Donovan who hasn't done a thing yet, but who may describe his romance with Koilye, as part of his own life story. Consider that she has, since Jason, been on intimate terms with Quite A Few Damn Guys, what exactly is his crime?
Maybe Adrianna could turn her attention to exactly why Koilye is mother damn teresa ? Koilye's "battle with cancer" was mainly having her implants removed first. Posted by Brownie, Thursday, 15 March 2007 6:59:23 PM
| |
I have only just reslised that NK 'Fur' didn't even make it to the big screen it went straight to DVD.The reveiws were terrible peolpe couldn't watch it after the first 20 minutes.
It only reaffirms my opinion of her acting which is OVER RATED.I am never totally convinced with her acting. A good actor well take you into another world for a couple of hours she never does it for me. NK needs a good movie soon or her asking fee will drop. Posted by WAKINGS, Sunday, 18 March 2007 6:39:51 PM
| |
You know Wakings, I always did wonder where FUR ended up, as I never saw it advertised. Riddled with fleas.
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 18 March 2007 6:53:53 PM
| |
actually, I dont think its out on dvd yet... I think it was only released in about 200-250 theaters and grossed only about $200,000. With a campaign like that, I'm sure it was meant to be a "prestige film" you know, was supposed to garner Awards attention. Successful movies these days go out on dvd only 3 months after release, the shortest time so far... But i do remember her other movie, Human Stain came out on halloween, october, and wasnt released on dvd at least a good 6 to 8 months later.. I'm sure the studios would rather concentrate on their sucessful movies. I seriously doubt her movies, which clearly lose money on initial release, probably dont even sell enough dvds to make back the money spent stamping them out and packaging of the dvds.
Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 19 March 2007 4:52:56 AM
| |
I cannot help but notice that fellow Aussie actress Cate Blanchett appears to be making better choices without the full bells-and-whistle-kickstart Kidman was awarded by marrying Tom Cruise.
Trouble is. on receipt of the golden Willy Wonka wrapper, Kidman quickly turned it into a dead sardine. It is obvious she was intoxicated with her own delusions of grandeur (hotted up by the Hollywood Tom Cruise sycophants in their efforts to suck up to Tom 'Mr. Big' Cruise.) In short, she lost sight of the truth of her limitations and believed in her own publicity, thus leading her to think she could be another Meryl Streep/Katherine Hepburn. With these heady ideas in tow, she sought arty, deep and meaningful film scripts little realising there was no hope she could ever deliver. Wake up kidman and return to Aussie soaps where you belong. No, cancel that thought. It's an insult to Aussie soaps. Posted by morgan, Monday, 19 March 2007 7:10:51 AM
| |
Well actually for me, Morgan, she going back to aussie soaps would be the perfect solution. being from the states, I would not stumble onto any of her mediocre acting attempts. I also meant to comment on your Kylie post, I dont know too much about kylie, the only thing that strikes me is how much she resembles kidman.... the same thin malnourished body, with the usual grotesque facial impressions of too much plastic surgery.
Kidmans problem is they have elevated her to lead actress status, when she is so plainly a supporting actress. Although it would seem she would prefer to be a character actress, but not having any true character in real life to draw on, those attempts just end up looking ridiculous, and so she ends up with Fur and Birth. And when she tries to do lead, she ends up with Stepford and Bewitched, which she's not strong enough to lead to any profit or success. Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 19 March 2007 12:52:20 PM
| |
Somebody please confirm for me that these are samples from which to choose the latest addition to Madame Tussauds:
http://www.redbalcony.com/?gid=30&paged=3 Posted by nomad48au, Monday, 19 March 2007 4:06:42 PM
| |
It would appear that the movie 'Fur' grossed worldwide $926590 and was only released for a limited time and reached 39 theatres.How does this work ? Not sure on these arty films? Can anyone help me here?
Posted by WAKINGS, Tuesday, 20 March 2007 3:57:28 PM
| |
Nomad 48au...I checked out the samples for Tussauds...made a few enquiries...apparently they were rejected because they were too 'animated'....not in keeping with the life model. Apparently Tussauds are waiting on another shipload of pink celluloid to provide a more authentic representation.
Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 20 March 2007 4:17:46 PM
| |
YIKES! I'd swear that top row, center pic IS the wax figure... and that last pic, last row looks like she's having a bad reaction to the botox, but I wouldnt be shocked if it actually was from formaldihyde. Wow, Wakings, I was only quoting the US gross of 200 grand, but that worldwide number is pretty weak. But I do notice a trend with her and her movies though, I seem to remember Miramax hit hard times, and the wiensteins lost their studio, funny enough after kidman made two movies for them in that previous year.., that was the Human Stain and Cold mountain, a bomb and a disapointment at best...and Lansing at Paramount was canned as president after the summer Bewitched stunk it up. So it seems not just directors who work with her end up tarnished for the effort, but studios seem to fumble as well . And as for the actors? Notice how well jude law is doing lately! or how about that kid who was in Birth, once very promising, having just worked with Deniro, I think i barely noticed him in a very small bit in Xmen 3. Will they ever learn?
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 20 March 2007 5:33:58 PM
| |
...just watched Tim Mcgraw on a talk show this morning and I just wanted to add to my previous post about how actors/directors/studios are damaged by working on a kidman failed movie... Remember Faith Daniels, country singer, married to McGraw, a few years ago she was white hot, but she wanted to get into movies. Well I remember reading that she was desperate to get a role in the upcoming movie Stepford Wives, and she fought hard to get into that movie, Well the movie came out and flopped big time, and I really havent heard too much from her since... sad...
Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 24 March 2007 3:49:25 AM
| |
Maclen - Lady Bracknell would say to Our Nic
"to be in one crummy remake is unfortunate, but to be in TWO crummy re-makes is CARELESSNESS". 're-makes' are always crap - Bewitched the TV series had great charm, but the movie was rubbish, and Our Nic was pretty silly to be in Stepford Wives as well. Faith Hill sure was white-hot in 1998 and must be still counting all the money so I can't feel sorry for her suffering from Hollywood's 'allergy to everybody-associated-with flop-except-for-Our Nic'. I wish that the Urb-Kidm-ANS would both return to Australia to live full time, since they both have a great deal of American money already and couldn't possibly need any more. I don't understand why BIG STARS absolutely have to be World Citizens. Cate Blanchett got it right, why cant' Nicole? Posted by Brownie, Saturday, 24 March 2007 1:56:27 PM
| |
oh right, Faith HILL, and not faith daniel... (think shes an american tv actress...) thanks for the correction Brownie.
Well the problem I see in hollywoodland, is theres just so many enablers, from the shallow info-tainment shills telling her how great she is, to her personal lackeys giving her lousy career advice, no doubt in the ultimate goal of alot of $$$...so of course why not make 3 movies in one year... to a studio willing to pay her 17 mill a pop, to be in a movie that costs 80 mill. to make, which will gross only 60 mill, is it any wonder studios are in trouble right now? But of course, theres another studio right around the corner willing to pay out, or in the case of remakes, sell out. Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 24 March 2007 2:37:00 PM
| |
Brownie...no, no, no, no, no.Please don't wish the Kid-Urbans back to Australia. Please.
Posted by morgan, Saturday, 24 March 2007 3:12:54 PM
| |
I'd rather see her stuck on a deseretd island somewhere.Without her around Keith could get back to the talented,hot,nice guy he used to be before she came along and started turning him into a Tom Cruise clone. Keith is starting to look and dress more like Tom everyday.And Nicole is looking more and more like his grandmother.It's hard to beleive she's still 3 months shy of 40 she looks a good 10-12 years older.Keith looks like he's aged 10 years since he made the mistake of marrying her.Hopefully that will change after one of them dumps the other one.
Posted by CRICKET, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 10:12:31 AM
| |
In a newspaper here today, K.U. said that he was looking forward to becoming a father and that Botaxia was looking forward to 'having another child'. I am wondering exactly what she means by that? How could she be looking forward to having another child when she never sees the 2 she's already got? She said recently how good it was to see her children after a six month period of not seeing them. And she wants to put a third child through that? Huh?
Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 11:57:13 AM
| |
If Keith really wants to have a baby then I hope he has a girlfriend,because he'll never have one with that dried up old stick.Her eggs are as hard boiled as her heart.Even is she was able to get pregnant there is no way she would stretch out that cadaver like body she's so proud of to actually carry a child.And God forbid she might only be able to fit in 3 or 4 lousy movies a year instead of 5 or 6 if she were pregnant.That would never do. She better stick with her asnine idea of raising goats.though the poor goats would probably wind up like "her" kids.Once she buys them she will forget all about them.At least the kids had a nanny to take care of them,the goats won't be so lucky. Unless she buys a nanny goat.LOL
Posted by CRICKET, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 3:36:36 PM
| |
I find it remarkable that urban by simply saying that he's looking forward to being a dad, all of a sudden the tabs are now saying a " friend" says she pregnant. These tabloid morons have been obsessing over botoxics slight gut bump for over a year and a half now, and they just keep bringing it up, over and over again...
I dont believe for one moment that she can have a baby, if she could, she would of had one already... like in her 20s, and not now try at almost 40 yrs. But of course, theres always adoption, but shes too much of a narcissis, too self absorbed, and too unwilling to take a break from being in front of the cameras to do that. Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 3:46:37 AM
| |
Dagnabbit, Well ah'll be! I thought those were the dummies, not just photos of a dummy!
Posted by nomad48au, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 11:43:37 PM
| |
There is an article in the Irish Examiner with KU quoting he hardly spends time with the adopted kids.
Is this any surprise considering NK hardly sees them! Lets hope the pregnancy rumours are just that. Does anyone think out there that these two would be ready to procreate? Rehab, supposive affairs they appear to me to be both workaholics. I thought NK was one but KU certainly allowed his schedule to fill up quick after rehab. Shouldn't bitch to much about that though I am looking forward to seeing him in concert in May (Sydney). I think the chances of this union lasting is not great. What do all of you other folk think? Posted by WAKINGS, Thursday, 29 March 2007 9:07:26 PM
| |
well, Wakings, I believe it's just a question of time when the split comes... Their still in the early, "lets fight through the hardships, and lets keep up the charade going through calculated PR stunts", which this latest preg. rumor sounds like. You know, she has russell crowe tease her about a possible pregnancy a month ago, urban talks about how he'd love to be a father, and then, of course, magically, all the tabs. are wondering again.. Is she pregnant?... this time? I'm very sure she like people to believe she can become pregnant , but since i believe she cant, and if thats right, she knows she cant, its jsut looks like shes pathetically trying to keep up with tom cruise, publicity wise... he becomes engaged, she becomes engaged, hes having a kid with katie holmes, the rumors of her being preg ramp up, and will not stop, believe me, no matter what it seems.
Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 30 March 2007 3:25:04 AM
| |
Motivated by greed and the need to be in the limelight, forever putting her children last and now obviously Keith too, (since she's just signed up for 3 or 4 more movies), what hope does the alliance have? She is obsessed with herself, money and fame. The human beings in her life come last. Always have.
And the pathetic rose-coloured-glassy-eyed Australian media still cannot see this. All they will say is "Poor Nic, let down again, our brave Nic broken-hearted", leaving Keith Urban scratching his head saying 'What the ** happened?" Posted by morgan, Friday, 30 March 2007 7:14:29 AM
| |
I agree with you Morgan - it is the constant '3 films every year' thread of her life that irritates us.
The Little Sister just produces an annual sproglet to show parents she may not be 'Our Nic' "but look what I can do instead?" we need to look at the psych Dad I think. In her defence, can I remind readers that the Paparazzi lie in wait, bribing corrupt Australian Federal Immigration Officers to alert them to arrivals at Kingsford Smith; so she knows there will be no peace in this small celebrity pond. Controlled publicity (when one is dressed to go out) is one thing, and having every supermarket trip photographed and purchase revealed is another. Posted by Brownie, Friday, 30 March 2007 9:06:52 AM
| |
Brownie, your post is very interesting. First tho', re the paparazzi, I have no sympathies there because whenever she does her brief annual mini-visit to the childrens' hospital in Sydney, the entire paparazzi including all tv stations are all there to capture the brief moment of her pretending to warmly cuddle a child. She must pull out all stops to organise the paparazzi to get those newspaper, mag and tv shots. She does the same when she re-visits the Australian School of Theatre for Young People. But what you say about her father is interesting because everybody has always said it's been to get the attention and approval of her mother.But you think it's her Dad? You could be right. After all, 'little girls and their Daddies and all that....he was pre-occupied with his profession when she was a child. Hmmmmmmm.
Posted by morgan, Friday, 30 March 2007 9:52:52 AM
| |
So, I see its been, what, about 3 days now that the latest rounds of botoxic pregnancy rumors have been swirling around the nets? You have to believe if they were true, she would certainly have confirmed it publicly by now... unless of course it might endanger the 20 movies she must make before the end of the year! Well, the "daddy complex" might explain her completely neurotic need to strife to appear to acomplish something, in her failure to have a kid... as apposed to her sister who it seems just gave birth to an actual baby, and not just to another premiere, for another photo op, for a meaningless movie that will be here today and gone... by noon that same day. And then again maybe the tabs were actually talking about the kidman sister having a kid, and just set the botoxic rumor off by just pure reflex..
Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 31 March 2007 4:09:52 AM
| |
well... so I read that kidman will be presenting at the Nickelodeon Kids channel awards last week, so i checked for photos at Getty images, you know to check on her alleged "delicate" condition... well she looks even thinner than usual. And now I've read that cruise's kids were in the audience to watch her.. I guess Cruise got them tickets to the show, so they could see their "mother", in the flesh, because otherwise she wont be too available....
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 3 April 2007 10:08:57 AM
| |
What sort of father allows his 16 year old daughter to move in with a man more than ten years older than his daughter? At 16 Nicole moved in with up and coming actor Tom Burlinson who was then a big star because of the film "Man from Snowy River" - clearly not a peep from Mum and Dad Kidman who must have agreed that this would be a good career move for little Nic. Two years later (when his star had faded) she dumped him.
Now she is pushing 40 and by her own accounts desperate to have a baby (with the latest love of her life) yet she commits herself to six months out bush shooting (yet another) dreary film sans Keith. Having a baby at 40 requires a little thought and commitment - where is this woman's head at? It's now or never honey or does this latest film commitment just confirm that having a baby is just a cover for when she appears in public bloated prior to sticking her fingers down her throat after lunch. Posted by SKE, Tuesday, 3 April 2007 10:40:41 AM
| |
I attended a small party at a house in Mosman after the making of 'Vietnam', in which Botoxia acted. Botaxia was there with Tom Burlinson.As you say Skye, he was quite a big name then. She wasn't. She gawkily stood in a corner totally unable to converse with anyone. She seemed nervous and awkward and I felt sorry for her and tried to engage her in conversation but she turned away so I stopped bothering. I noticed others trying to do what I did also. But she was either unable to converse or was too shy. She also looked totally bored. Later, I wondered if maybe she was actually simply disinterested because people were not talking about her. The two more 'well known' actors there were Tom and an Australian actor called John Woods who was starring in a successful TV series here at that time called Rafferty's Rules. Because it was such a long time ago, I m trying to remember whether Five Mile Creek was filmed before Vietnam, or after. But during Five Mile Creek (I worked on the crew) she was also extremely rude and stand-offish to everyone. Nobody liked her. She had developed a name way back then for being an 'ice maiden' and totally self-consumed. Tom Burlinson is a nice guy. I wonder how they ever ended up together? I guess she was chasing fame but what was he doing?
Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 3 April 2007 12:39:41 PM
| |
using www.imdb.com/ as my reference, Our Nic has made 2 or 3 films every year since 1989. 18 films for release 2001-2008.
The only year she had a SINGLE film release was 1990 Days Of Thunder. prior to meeting The Cruiser, she worked EVEN HARDER ! 1983 was 4 films, 2 appearances on Young Talent Time and one in (now famous) Gillian Armstrong's directorial debut. The imdb.com message board on Our Nic, is a mirror of this one. One poster, who claims to be a student at Beverly Hills High where Conor goes, said that TomKat appear at every sport event and make demands about photographers showing them as a family. Another poster claims to know previously secret divorce details - apparently the trade-off Our Nic made to get the $800million settlement, was that Tom has the kids till they turn 16 so he can Scientologise them. Posted by Brownie, Tuesday, 3 April 2007 2:39:50 PM
| |
It has been pointed out in another forum that KU every chance he gets declares his love for her. But funny enough NK never returns the favour.
KU has said it so many times, it makes you wonder who he is trying to convince the public or himself? I also know someone who was an extra on a film that NK was doing (they said NK would have been 19/20 at the time)apparently she through a tantrum because she didn't get her own way. I think she is high maintenance and self absorbed. There is also a book writen by a hollywood nanny whop claims to have worked for the NK/TC and states that NK harldy ever saw the adopted children.Poor Isabells looks sad all the time and I have only seen the odd photo of Connor smiling. Goes to show money isn't everything. Posted by WAKINGS, Tuesday, 3 April 2007 4:12:12 PM
| |
Its obvious this marriage is only a PR stunt, and a sorry pr stunt at that, and will be as successful as her last movie. She will never seriously speak of it in interviews. She will never walk a red carpet with urban, because it's a loser to do it, there will be too many awkward questions to deal with. Getting married to a substance abuser will do that. There is nothing in the last 4 years that can be looked on as anything close to a success involving kidman.
Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 4 April 2007 10:17:55 AM
| |
It amazes me to read all the newspaper gushings today quoting how thrilled Botaxia is to be spending Easter with her family. Huh? I thought her two chidlren were her family. But no, they are on the other side of the world and she will be in Australia for seven months. We've got to get this straight, guys. Botaxia's 'real' family are her sister's children, not hers. This reeks of supporting something I heard about but could never accept years ago. I didn't like her but I refused to accept what I heard, despite the fact that the source was impeccable. It was when Botaxia and TC had adopted the children. She was out here in Australia. He was in the States with their children. My source was in a room adjacent to hers. She was having a screaming fight with TC about the children and she was yelling that adopting them had been all his idea etc.It was a conversation overheard by several(shocked) people who simply could not believe what they were hearing. It is cringe-making. But to read the newspaper reports today with NK calling her parents, and sister's children 'her family', reminded me of it.
Posted by morgan, Monday, 9 April 2007 7:17:28 AM
| |
Well Morgan, we can't really blame her for not feeling she belonged with Nutty Tom. They both have 2 screwed-up parents though.
recently I flipped through a Nic Biog (remaindered)at A&R shop and saw a para about her dad being asked by a student in one of his Psych lectures "are you related to nicole kidman" and saying that it infuriated him. She is also quoted as saying her parents "were cool with' her backpacking across europe at 17 years old and comig back to a boyfriend (not named, and after Burlinson) 17 years older than her. Adriana's initial opinion re the fawning Aussie Press still stands - now we have the lot of them watching Nics abdomen from anywhere they can. What an unbearable trade-off for fame and wealth. Skinny+40+substance abusing partner, does not =Mummy. Posted by Brownie, Monday, 9 April 2007 9:18:22 AM
| |
You are so right, Brownie.
I did forget to mention in my previous post that she was obviously on the telephone screaming at TC. Does anybody 'out there' have an answer to my interminable question....why do the journalists of newspapers, magazines and television do nothing but gush and swoon over 'our Nic'(correction: Hawaii's Nic) when she couldn't be setting a worse example of mothering and motherhood to all Australian young people? Are they frightened of their mogul bosses who may be friends of the TC/NK machine, as was once suggested to me? Are they just lazy and copy verbatim what her lying PR lady Wendy Day serves up ad nauseum? Or what? Wouldn't you think that there would be one honest or adventurous journalist out there who would dare to suggest that she is a neglectful, uncaring mother? Or that the facade she puts up about her "Mummy never told me she loved me" mother and "stone-hearted" father from whom she appears to have inherited her lack of feeling for others. Especially her own children. If she were to have a baby naturally, you can imagine the hoo hah and sadly you can imagine the effect it would have on the 2 children she already has but doesn't wish to share her life with. It is all so sad, really. And another point...it places the whole area of adoption into a very unsavoury and pitiful light. Posted by morgan, Monday, 9 April 2007 10:01:09 AM
| |
Well they showed Botoxia and KU going to visit her parents in Sydney on Saturday news. They both looked like scruffs and Botoxia lips have been juiced up. No adopted kids in sight how could you not be with your own kids at Easter especially since she didn't see them at Christmas as well. If I hear her talk about wanting baby again I will puke take note of the children you already have NK!
The joker is apparently here to live for seven months god help our papers hope I don't see her ugly scone everyday. Posted by WAKINGS, Monday, 9 April 2007 8:51:05 PM
| |
Ah, their regular Aussie road show and photo Op. huh? Yeah, whats best for me is being from the states, I can pretty much bypass the aussie saturation coverage... but I did check out the stories in a google news search though. And your right wakings, her lips are juiced again... saw a very hilarious photo of them both at some show, with her nephew. Urbans sitting to her right, the nephews sitting on his lap looking bored, and botoxic in the back, wearing huge sunglasses, a cap, over the obvious looking wig, looking pretty embarrassed by the whole situation. Obviously the photo Op only required the one kid... or just the one who would agree to go along, and besides, that way she can consign him to urban, while she can contemplate ... on herself.
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 4:33:48 AM
| |
Just to let you all know Botox and KU were at the Royal Easter Show in Sydney yesterday with her nephew. Its certainly not the place for privacy, I smell the PR machine turning here.Does she realise she has two adopted children in this world as well?
Posted by WAKINGS, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 8:07:17 AM
| |
thanks for the info wakings... obviously cruises adoptive kids werent available for her PR stunt...
Well, heres some more proof that whatever botoxic touches, turns out to really suck... when Warner Bros. got a look at the final version of The Invasion, botixics next movie, they thought it was so "dull and talky" they ordered reshoots. (That does sound like the usual kidman drivel doesnt it?) Now, remember, the shooting for this film began in 2005! The director ,Oliver Hirshbiegel was unavailable, so the studio brought in the Wachowski Bros. to punch up the movies action... hence the aforementioned car stunt, with zombies on board accident a month ago. Looks like the studio was keeping an eye out for another kidman pretentious crash and burn film... now only if they will be smart enough to keep her face off the movie poster... Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 9:40:26 AM
| |
Thats interesting Maclean
Is it usual for a director not to want to return and fix up what the big wigs want? I think if you worked on a project you would want to be involved with it to the end. Do you know why the director was unavailable and where to you get your information?Maybe his leading actress was too much hard work? he he he If I remember correctly it took 2 years for 'Eyes Wide Shut' to complete and the the director said it ws because his two leading actors were to interfering. So 'The Invasion' another NK movie to avoid thanks fo the tip I don't think I was planning to watch it anyway. Posted by WAKINGS, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 9:12:57 PM
| |
Well, Wakings, when i read your post about kidman and urban being spotted on Australia, i just did a google news search , and i saw this story...http://www.collider.com/entertainment/news/article.asp?aid=4017&tcid=1
...its not known why the director was unavailable, but naturally I would just suspect that he refused to do the reshoots. Yes, Eyes wide Shut was a mess, but also recall that Stepford Wives also had a troubled shooting as well. This is not at all surprising to me, seeing that kidman seems to be a very bland and robotic actress, i can just imagine that she simply has her people and agents lining up these scripts, and she just learns the lines, shows up on the set, does what the director tells her and then moves on to the next script. It also seems noticable that these days she seems to be doing alot less PR for her movies.. for Fur, for instance, all she did was appear at the Rome film festival, with not one talk show, or magazine interviews... she seems to have come to the realization that it is futile in the case of her movies... Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 5:51:00 AM
| |
It is very possible that the original director doesn't want his name attached to a flop. This has happened before. The director having nothing but trouble either with the company or the actors throwing tantrums etc and insisting on doing it their way (Russell CRowe does this constantly.) In the end, after working for months on a film being dictated to by egotistical 'stars', not allowing him/her to do the job he was hired to do...that is, directing...the director, totally disheartened, just gives up. It can happen out of disillusionment or out of anger, and they just walk away and don't want their name attached to the film. It would be interesting to find out if this was the case. Having worked on films/television series with Kidman, admittedly many years ago when she was much younger, I witnessed extreme frustration from director and crew over her demands and snooty behaviour. Behaviour like this impacts on crew, as well as the other actors. It's hard on everyone involved.
Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 8:00:09 AM
| |
Well, Morgan, along with noticing she seems to be slacking off in the PR of her films, I get the feeling she fell into a lull, or a complacency after she became an instant "media darling" after being dumped by cruise, where everything she did was praised and nominated right and left. Although she seemed to take on film after film, I wouldn't doubt that her behavior and demands only got worse, I would say by the choice of roles, she seems to not have given it much thought. If the script was talky, and dreary, and slighty off kilter, she was in. The films she did seem to be at the mercy and whims of the directors she chose to work with, almost like they had a concept, threw together a script, and despite being incoherant and meandering, it didn't seem to matter to her, one way or the other. In fact, she seems to be a masocist for the mundane in her movies.
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 12 April 2007 10:42:30 AM
| |
Morgan you really need to dust off the camoflague pants and re-stock your utility belt and go out and get work on the film "Australia". Infiltration into this project is the only way we can keep stock of the latest machinations of the Kidman. Being stuck in the back of nowhere with the heat and flies and a preening Baz Lurhmann is sure to trigger a series of vitriolic spac attacks and we (and the coroner) will need all the details.
Posted by SKE, Thursday, 12 April 2007 11:05:00 AM
| |
Skye, I'm way too old and way, way too intolerant these days. I bowed and scraped along with everyone else back in those days to the stars like Kidman but I would lose my job immediately if ever I returned to that work now, because I have lost my inclination to brown-nose. (which I had to do...there were always plenty of others who wanted my job, no matter how lowly-ranked on the crew ladder it was. I was not what you would call an 'important crew member'. Quite the opposite. I could be easily replaced.). Back in those days of the eighties the film industry boomed here. Very exciting time and an opportunity, once you were signed up on a job, to literally see the world. Not everything was shot in Australia. Fantastic memories.But to return to a situation of pandering to the likes of Botaxia would make me throw up all over the make-up trailer ! And hopefully, all over her.
Posted by morgan, Thursday, 12 April 2007 11:20:31 AM
| |
Not 'Our Nic' was excellent in 'To Die For', possibly because of typecasting.
She was pretty good in 'The Interpretor' as a duplicitous liar. 'Bewitched' was dreadful. Can she play 'nice' ? Can anyone remind me of a successful film where she has played a positive character? (not 'Days Of Thunder' because that succeeded on the Tom factor) Posted by Brownie, Thursday, 12 April 2007 11:26:55 AM
| |
Brownie, I can think of a few positive characters but it was a long time ago and for anyone in the States, they'd posibly be unknown. She was just a (big-headed, self-delusional) kid but they were roles in Bush Christmas, BMX Bandits and Five Mile Creek. I didn't see Dead Calm on principle. What was her character like in that? I also didn't see Portrait of a Lady on principle. Don't know what her character was like in that either although at the time I saw her interviewed on TV about the role and the people I was with at the time all roared with laughter when the interviewer asked her if it had been her idea or the director's, to hit her head against a wall in frustration in the film. Naturally she took credit for it and they showed a quick glimpse of the scene referred to and it was quite hilarious. Looked more like something Mr. Bean would do. Or Basil Fawlty.
Posted by morgan, Thursday, 12 April 2007 12:10:55 PM
| |
SKE your last post made me laugh but it sounds like a plan. Unfortunately Morgan won't come out of retirement(it sounds like you need to protect your well being and go nowhere near Botoxia I don't blame you!)Well do we know anyone else who can get inside information?he he he
Posted by WAKINGS, Thursday, 12 April 2007 9:49:53 PM
| |
"Kidman receives Order of Australia, Friday Apr 13
Nicole Kidman received her Order of Australia in a ceremony at Government House in Canberra. Accompanied by husband and country singer Keith Urban, Kidman lined up with other recipients to receive her 2006 Australia Day honour, after turning down the offer of a private investiture. The actor was appointed a Companion in the General Division of the Order of Australia (AC) last year but international commitments prevented her heading home to receive the award in person. Wearing a demure shell-pink frock with a burgundy velvet ribbon in her hair, Kidman received her award from Governor-General Michael Jeffery in front of a crowd which included her parents Janelle MacNeille and Antony Kidman. The Oscar winner won the prestigious gong for her contribution to the arts, as well as her charity work, including efforts to improve medical treatment for women and children and advocacy for cancer research. Urban nodded encouragingly as Major-General Jeffery recounted the contribution his wife had made to the arts and to charity. "I think the great thing about you, Ms Kidman, is what have you have done to better the human condition," the Governor-General said. "You have become an honorary ambassador to UNICEF and UNIFEM (the United Nations Development Fund for Women), you're looking after children and women's issues. "You've been a great support for children at Sydney hospital and a great supporter of research for cancer. "Not only are you a tremendous actress but you are ... a great attribute to the nation." CHOKE ON THAT everybody. then Google search "Les Twentyman" and read about a man in Melbourne who has slaved his guts out everyday for decades helping homeless teens. He is completely broke, but a GENUINE selfless charity worker. NotOurNic could sling him $100,000 in a heartbeat without altering her life one whit, and do more good than all that waffle described above. Posted by Brownie, Saturday, 14 April 2007 8:30:35 AM
| |
I had to walk out of the room when I saw the tv footage. WHAT charity work? She does a once-a-year flash visit to the hospital, phones in an interview and spends her entire time making movies and promoting them. In her speech, she kept giggling, as if she was saying something tremendously entertaining and yet again mentioned doing her parents proud and also yet again, kept referring to herself when she was 'a little girl'. And yes, what about Les Twentyman? What an amazing guy. But have we ever seen him invested with anything by the governor general? It's a sad, sad comment on the pathetic society in which we live.
Posted by morgan, Saturday, 14 April 2007 8:50:33 AM
| |
Well, what fading, washed up, attention starving celebs crave the most is the constant fawning and compliments. So when they no longer recieve it for their movies, or they're stuck in a image tarnishing marriage, they get their PR firms to set up these types of "awards and presentations", which i have no doubt this is... a I'll scratch your back...etc etc. It keeps them in the spotlight. Again I'm glad it's relegated to Australia, no coverage that I had to be subjected to. Now i only wonder when her Australia movie comes out and tanks, will these same people still hang around to throw her these accolades?
Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 14 April 2007 11:05:13 AM
| |
Well, the other Kidman spouse has bit the dust and been admitted to rehab. Botaxia's sister's husband, Angus has entered a clinic for alcohol and drug addiction here in Sydney. I feel sorry for the Kidman parents. Both daughters having their husbands end up in rehab. Could be a tad embarrassing for the father since he's a psychologist.
Posted by morgan, Saturday, 14 April 2007 4:16:51 PM
| |
Really, is that so, morgan? You have to start wondering how these sisters were raised, to make such terrible choices in husbands. It must make celebrating the holidays, New Years for instance, a real challenge, like say, putting a gun to your head and playing russian roulette. Yes, I'm sure pappa, the psych, is very proud of his daughters. Just makes you remember that having all the money you may need is convenient in buying a new townhouse, or a fleet of limos, it cannot give you the moral soundness to make ludid decisions, whether its your personal relationships, your charitable work, and it most certainly cannot buy you a hit movie if your taste is as shallow as kidman's.
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 15 April 2007 4:29:26 AM
| |
To further my past thought on botoxia lack of PR backing for her last movie, it now seems pretty clear she just can't catch a break any longer... after her minimalist promotion for Fur, and it's immediate failure, and her quick jaunt to Kosovo, to walk throught a local field, she was met with a hung over urban, and then subsequent stint in rehab. And then when they tried to have their aussie happy reunion at the end of last year, they were chased out of Austalia by the same papparatzis they hoped would just regurgitate their phoney pr stunt. and just now, on the same day of some cooked up medal of "aggrandizement", the story of her sisters husbands rehab stint is attached also. Looks like that little stunt accident on the reshoots of her next movie is a pretty accurate metaphor for a career careening out of control, like a wagon whos wheels are beginning to fall off. It would probably be wise to jump off, but I doubt if she is capable of making any other decision. If she didnt make movies, what could she do?
Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 16 April 2007 4:20:56 PM
| |
She could create her own perfume... "Narcissus", lingerie... "Skeletal" and make-up... "Death Mask".
Posted by morgan, Monday, 16 April 2007 4:48:07 PM
| |
I too was amazed about the order of australia. I started to wonder how the whole thing worked and was told that all that is involved is someone nominating you. I think it suxs Botoxia hasn't even completed that many oz movies. I think Cate Blanchett does more for the oz entertainment industry.
Yes what about all those volunteers who put endless hours in helping disadvantaged people. Posted by WAKINGS, Monday, 16 April 2007 6:48:12 PM
| |
Well, it would be interesting to learn just who did nominate her... I wouldn't be too surprised if it turned out to be her personal assistant, or a PR agent. But in the world of entertainment and corporate business as i mentioned before,it is a question of you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours. Celebs want the publicity of course, government and organizational heads want the attention it draws, so they give the awards to someone rich or famous. The real people, who are out there working harder for humanitarian needs, 24/7, wont get as recognized, wont get the headlines, do that bubble headed and frivilous actors get the photo ops., because shallow sychophants throw designer clothes at them and donate thousand dollar jewelry, so they can get them advertised... and on and on, they all just feed off each other in their make believe fantasy world of decadent over indulgence. Kidman fit right in that world... or at least she did.
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 11:56:28 AM
| |
Maclen, the interesting thing is that it did actually say in the Sydney Morning Herald report that she had been offered to have the award presented privately but she wanted to receive it publicly 'so that she could hear other peoples' stories.'Yeah. Right.
Her publicist would have set it al up. And BTW, her publicist goes to a tarot reader for advice. Fact. Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 12:14:13 PM
| |
Today's "The Australian" newspaper has printed a letter in response to Kidman's OA.
If Nicole Kidman is worthy of an Order of Australia then Bananas in Pyjamas must be staring down knighthoods. Adriana Maxwell Jervis Bay, NSW Posted by SKE, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 1:40:42 PM
| |
SKE LOL! Good on AM for writing that letter. From one photo I saw she was dressed like a girl with a ponytail and red ribbon, her top appeared to be have little puffy sleeves. YUCK I thought she was a fashion icon. But then again her speech was all about when she was a little girl so she had to play up to that- giggling and performing, trying to win a few more public votes.
Wake up your nearly 40 years old, act your age! PUKE Posted by WAKINGS, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 3:17:08 PM
| |
Wakings - the 'Fashion Icon' that is NotOurNic, only appears after the stylistS have done their work.
Left to her OWN devices, the scrappy hair and clothes are the same standard as the rest of us. and Adriana - BRAVO on the letter - "arise Sir B1 and Sir B2?" - Haha haaa Posted by Brownie, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 5:12:20 PM
| |
So, i take it that these Bananas in Pyjamas is some Shakespeare theatre group? Well the whole skeletal look in hollywood is an extreme attempt to remain youthful looking. Trying to keep your body looking like a teenager... even a boyish look, is preferable to having a normal mature look in their mid years. And 'Tarot card reader? Well that explains botoxica's career choices, and dismal results.
Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 3:53:35 AM
| |
I'm not suggesting that Botaxia's agent, Wendy Day, goes to a tarot reader for career choices for Botaxia or Grunter (Russell Crowe) but she does consult a tarot reader. The only reason I know is because the tarot reader in question is a neighbour. Botaxia and Grunter's agent is married to Mark Day, an old sleazy man who used to be the editor of Truth newspaper for many years. Which says it all.The Truth was a newspaper that focused on sensational stories of sex and crime. I don't know what the equivalent rag in the States would be, Maclen but 'sleazy' or even 'dirty' are the best words to describe it. So his wife would have all the clues as far as sensational story-concocting would go. And all the clues to avoid it also, obviously, which would be needed to cover up phone throwing, affairs,drug and alcohol problems, the negelectful mother image etc.
Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 7:16:44 AM
| |
Hi Everyone,
How interesting that NK and RC have the same publicist! Did they not interveiw each other for Oprah, what a joke! so I guess the whole interveiw was rehearsed. Weak Weak Weak. Here are some interesting websites to read over: http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/letters/index.php/theaustralian/comments/our_nic_has_had_enough/ http://umyths.blogspot.com/ http://wkvn.com/node/77734#top Let me knnow what you think Posted by WAKINGS, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 9:09:27 AM
| |
Sorry Guys, only one out of the three websites is working now, the one that is working is very interesting.(ie the second website)
The Australian was full of Aussies stressing their disapproval of NK receiving the Order of Australia. If your keen you should be able to gotto the home page and find it that way. For the life of me I can't remember what the third was about-sorry. My research late last night on NK and KU did bring some interesting views that KU is neglecting his fans and that the Nashville community is not very happy with him either. Could marrying Botoxia be the biggest mistake of his life? only time will tell. Posted by WAKINGS, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 7:04:06 PM
| |
yeah wakings,I noticed yesterday the first and third links werent werent working.. but that second link to Urban Myths is right on the mark. In fact, when i first read it, i almost got the feeling that maybe I had written it, and had just forgot! I'm beginning to believe that the this whole "marriage" is a concious effort by botoxic to re-establish her Aussie homebase. Once the hollywood scripts stop coming, she'll need someplace to work. and definately, urban is not getting any positive effect from being married to kidman, in fact, i think being associated with her will start to drag him down as well. and morgan, anyone who associates with people you've mentioned kidman is associated with, cant be too grounded in reality.
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 19 April 2007 3:35:08 AM
| |
The Australian Newspaper page can still be accessed if you do this....
Click the website address. You'll get the blank page saying"The page you requested could not be found". Click the 'back' arrow at top left hand side of page. You'll get The Australian newspaper page but it will be blank and say the same thing "The page you rquested could not be found." However, at the left hand side of the page is a column of pages listed. Press LETTERS. The page will come up. On the Letters Page, you'll have to go backwards a few pages until you finally hit it. Title...Our Nic Has Had Enough with 13 comments. Posted by morgan, Thursday, 19 April 2007 6:50:05 AM
| |
thanks morgan, I was able to find the page of comments... all negative, no postive comments, Not one in support . But of course I understand the annoyance at botoxic, of all the aggrandizement, and the passion it produces in sheer frustation at all the celebratory phoniness. If theres on word that describes her it's passionless.
Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 20 April 2007 2:16:06 PM
| |
Hello All! Thanks for posting to link to my blog, Urban Myths. It's actually a collaboration of a number of talented comrades. I posted the link to this blog awhile back, so I'm glad you found us too! Let's spread the skepticism worldwide, shall we? Cheers!
Posted by Urban Myths, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 8:50:00 AM
| |
hey Urban Myths, ive been checking out your site since seeing the link on this thread. Great site. Your posts have been pretty dead on, in my opinion. ive noted a few of kidmans contradictory statements here , mainly about quiting movies for love, etc... but you had quite a few I'd never seen before. Urban has entered onto a ride thats definately grinding to a halt with kidman. The only question is when.
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 10:30:08 AM
| |
Hi Urban Myths. Just wanted to say that I enjoyed reading your site also. It's great. Keep up the good work !
Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 3:19:19 PM
| |
Thank you for the welcome, mates! We have posted the second part of the NK lies blog, just in case you are interested!
Posted by Urban Myths, Wednesday, 25 April 2007 9:51:20 AM
| |
Wow, Urban Myths ! What a blast! Well done.
Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 25 April 2007 10:48:44 AM
| |
Yes, Urban Myths, her "I'd give up everything to find love again" schtick is most annoying. And I'd include her statements on wanting to give birth her other most annoying trait. It should be obvious to everyone by now, including the tabloid braindead, that she is incapable at this point to give birth. But i'm sure they'll still write whether she is or isnt pregnant. Its so utterly disingenuous of her to keep fanning those rumors, for the tabloid headlines, and to keep doing it just makes her look desperate, or dillusional, to people who obviously see right through the PR manipulations.
Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 25 April 2007 12:02:15 PM
| |
Hi Maclen,Isn't Urban Myths great?I sometimes think they are reading my mind.The frozen one really needs to come up with something new besides her "longing for a baby schtick,even the tabloids are catching on now she's done it so often.Did you see the story where she gushed about how being in love makes her beautiful. After seeing her recent pictures I guess she must hate poor Keith's guts cause she is looking fuglier by the day.Lucky he escaped her cluthes for a few days to do some concerts in Germany I hope he has some fun,I'm sure he won't when he come back for his next scheduled photo-op.
Posted by CRICKET, Thursday, 26 April 2007 11:14:42 AM
| |
Hi Cricket, hows everything? yeah, "fugly" is a perfect description, I'd say. Urban myths is right on, nothing I'd disagree with. Again another disengenuous statement, love makes her beautiful? Then why all the botox, lip injections and who knows what else? I'm willing to bet all the hair chemical fumes thats fried her real hair are affecting her mind...shes settled on a marriage that has exactly the same situations as her previous one, which ended in divorce. She'll be off for months on a film shoot, urban will be off for months on tour, they'll meet up ocassionally for those photo ops. That really sounds like a winning coupling doesnt it?
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 26 April 2007 3:53:56 PM
| |
It's really too bad because Keith is a really nice guy and super talented.He could have done so much better for himself.I think she must be telling him what to say when he's interviewed because he is starting to sound as stupid as her when he talks now.He says one thing one week then says something complety different the next week and nothing makes sense.Just like her.At least he hasn't started using a fake,breathy voice yet.I hope that's not next. I wish they would just divorce already so he could get back to the music he used to do so well.And maybe she could just dissapear for a while.A long long while.
Posted by CRICKET, Friday, 27 April 2007 8:15:01 AM
| |
All I can say is "God help Australia !" (The movie she's currently shooting, that is.)
And when will everyone out there in journoland get it straight? I saw again, in an article yesterday, Botaxia being called "Our Nic". She's not. She's 'Hawaii's Nic.' I wish she'd return to the country of her birth and stop spouting lies and promises about giving up her career for her 2 children who are lucky to see her twice a year and for the man she loves and has married. It would be interesting to count on one's hand, just how many days/nights she and her new hubby have actually spent together since their comical nuptials. Posted by morgan, Friday, 27 April 2007 8:43:40 AM
| |
No offense, Morgan, but we don't want her back in the US either! Sorry, mate, but she's claiming Oz as her pearl right now, so you are stuck with her for the moment!
And yes, Cheyenne, his script does tend to wiffle/waffle and not jive with the wife's script... maybe that's why the movie deal fell through? Just a side note... We've had some ugliness on the Urban Myths blog, so it is now necessary to register before posting. Sorry for the inconvenience, but the riff raff can get rather tedious... Posted by Urban Myths, Friday, 27 April 2007 1:38:36 PM
| |
I also feel fortunate to be in the states, and she seems to be trying to re-plant her roots in australia again, i can miss alot of the local aussie press stories. In fact, that may be a piece to the whole marriage question concerning these two. Urban being australian, and her movies tanking here in the states, she can transplant herself in Auss. and still have a future base for work.
well as for urban utterances... I was flipping through tv channels today, when i caught the beginning of an entertainment show, and they previewed and urban story, about... you quessed it.. are they secretly expecting a baby? Unbelieveable. well i did a google search, and it seems urban is reading from their talking points, from his gig in the UK, in an interview he talks up botoxic's devotion to him through all the stuff, and that hes really looking forward to fatherhood. So you can expect another round of is she pregnant again. Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 27 April 2007 4:03:05 PM
| |
Maclen, I have been meaning to ask you. Where did you read that she had backpacked round Europe and returned to be in a relationship with an older man?Maybe the 'older man' is Tom Burlinson. But she never did a backpacking tour round Europe. Another bit of P.R.hype to make her sound more interesting?
Posted by morgan, Friday, 27 April 2007 4:12:24 PM
| |
Hello Everyone,
I don't know if you have seen this link but it is the divorce papers for Nicold and TC: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/nkresponse2.html It clearly states that Nicold has joint custody of her two adoptive children. What is getting my goat is there is a new tabloid story stating that Nicold and KU have asked to spend more time with the kids, but hang on we can only fit them in during the fall. Nicold has no idea what it is to be a real mother. Oh I keep forgetting making movies is much more important than your own kids. KU has apparently said he is looking forward to fatherhood. Is Nicold putting words into his mouth or what. I am a fan of KU but he is coming out with stupid statements of late. We all know Nicold needs medical intervention to fall pregnant, unfortuanately she is here to make the movie Australia when is she supposed to fit this pregnancy in!She can't even find the time to see her existing kids. I didn't take much notice of her till she married KU. KU is sounding more like her everyday so I am losing respect for him too. I am going to his concert in Sydney next month, I hope she isn't there and I hope he hasn't changed from his previous performances or I won't bother going to anymore of his concerts either. Glad to get this of my chest! Wakings Posted by WAKINGS, Saturday, 28 April 2007 4:26:37 PM
| |
Morgan, i dont know that much about that backpacking trip... maybe it was from someone else on the thread? It does sound to me like it might be some kind of pr info on her early acting bio? My distaste for kidman came only after about a year after she was dumped by cruise, hardly even noticed her before that. and of course she hasn't stopped talking about it for the past 4 years! What besides the split with cruise would have made her a media darling and tabloid target? Her movies? Her acting?
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 29 April 2007 4:50:11 AM
| |
Reply for Morgan & MacLen:
At Easter I noticed a Nicole biography on a remainders table at the A&R bookshop chain. I only flipped it, but I specifically recall reading Her Own Remarks Quoted, in summary: *that after giving a lecture at Uni of QLD her father was asked "are you related to Nicole Kidman?" *at 16 she lived with a man 10 years older, not named. *at 17 she backpacked Europe ALONE. *after that trip she lived with a man 17 years older, not named. *that she had parental support and encouragement. So, Treat Your Children Well. She is weird because she was brought up weird. Poor Nic. Posted by Brownie, Sunday, 29 April 2007 7:42:28 AM
| |
Well Brownie, that is so interesting. The biog must have been written by someone who hadn't a clue.She never backpacked around Europe alone or with anyone else. And she never lived with older men. Her 'steadies' were Tom Burlinson, then Marcus Graham, then TC. Those few suitors in between were fly-by-night affairs and certainly nobody 10 or more years older than her.Have just had a thought....she played a backpacker when she was in her late teens, in 'Bangkok Hilton'. Maybe that created confusion for the poor guy trying to collate 'facts' for his book. There's no way she'd backpack alone anywhere. Although she's as hard and icy as a glacier with regard to herself and her career, not only does she have no feeling for anyone else, underneath she's terrified of living in the real world or facing real people or being real/honest herself. Note how she fearfully clutched her sister's and ex-girlfriend's (Rebecca Rigg) hand when she trod the red carpet after the marriage break-up. She was probably terrified someone had found out about her 'Moulin Rouge' on-set affair and was going to surprise her with it.
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 29 April 2007 11:38:47 AM
| |
I have just heard that KU cancelled his concert in Manchester at the last minute. He has flown back to Australia apparently. It must have been a last minute decision because his band didn't even have a clue and were ready to play. KU supposively has voice problems.
Does anyone know more? Posted by WAKINGS, Sunday, 29 April 2007 2:49:53 PM
| |
Haven't heard about that one Wakings, but just heard that she is going to do a re-make of How To Marry a Millionaire (or whatever it's called) playing the Marilyn Monroe role.How many hundreds of times did she tell anyone who would listen that once she got married to Mr. Right, her career would take a back place to the marriage? Apparently K.U. is not the love of her life.
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 29 April 2007 8:17:30 PM
| |
I actually got onto the UK ticketmaster and they labelled the event cancelled.Be interesting to see what comes of all this.
Nicold doing a Marily Mnroe movie what a laugh, lets clink our glasses to another flop. She annoys the crap out of me. Wonder if KU has been a naughty boy again and has come home to save the marriage and get his bottom smacked. Have a Good Week Everyone! Posted by WAKINGS, Sunday, 29 April 2007 9:21:49 PM
| |
KU's concert in Manchester was indeed cancelled around noon the day of the show. No official word yet from his camp, and it was reported that the band was surprised. The reviews from the previous UK shows were that his voice was great, strong and clear. Rumor has it that he flew straight to Oz... but why, if his voice doctor is in Nashville? Things that make you go hmmmmm.... His next scheduled show is May 11th in Oz. I'll keep you posted.
Posted by Urban Myths, Monday, 30 April 2007 2:36:19 AM
| |
Watching the events of this so called "marriage" is like watching a chimpanzee drive a car through an obstacle course, driven at the top of a mountain, surrounded all round by thousand foot drop cliffs... not surprised at every misstep, and so sure of the ultimate outcome.
At a movie blog I read about the remake of How to marry a millionare, and the guy at this blog said he thought she was too old to play the lead. But thats been the biggest flaw in her movie choices lately, she believes she's still a youthful starlet, playing naive, wide-eyed innocents looking for mr right. Well i read in a review that she used a dreadful and annoying Monroe breathy voice in Bewitched, cant even begin to imagine what a full on Marylyn Monroe impression she'll butcher for this movie. Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 30 April 2007 4:09:12 AM
| |
Maclen, I believe she also used a breathy Marilyn Monroe voice in Happy Feet. Guess she knew the MM movie was coming up and got in a bit of practice.
KU doesn't stand for Keith Urban anymore. It stands for Kidman's (e)Unoch. He was in rehab for drink and drugs. He had just had his extra-marital affair exposed to the Texan model. He only spent 3 months, if that, in rehab then went straight back to work. Recovery and Rehabilitation doesn't work like that. It usually needs at least 12 months' ongoing treatment and support to help the addict continue with their recovery. He's certainly not getting support from her, since she scuttled off to the other side of the world for 5 months. He's not allowing himself to rehabilitate and recover by plunging straight into a heavy work schedule.He has set himself up for a relapse.Cancelling his concerts at the last minute could be the start of this. I feel sorry for him. He's turned into 'Mr. Kidman' and doesn't know what to do with it. I bet he relapses big-time in the next couple of months. And on the subject of Botaxia, the line-up of Australian actors in the support cast is awesome. Although she has the starring role, she will be shown up by the supporting cast for the non-actress she is, in the same manner she was shown up by Renee Zellweger in Cold Mountain. Posted by morgan, Monday, 30 April 2007 2:49:30 PM
| |
What movie or interview have you ever seen her in that she doesn't use that breathless "Marilyn" voice? It does not become her. She comes off as the inane, uneducated, role player that she is.
Keith was photographed coming out of a grocer in Darling Point today (or yesterday), wearing a t-shirt and jeans, but also a stocking cap. For someone with a "throat infection" shouldn't he be a bit more covered up, or are you Aussies experiencing a warm spurt of weather. It was interesting that the pic was taken by none other than F-U Jamie Fawcett. Posted by Urban Myths, Tuesday, 1 May 2007 1:48:01 PM
| |
All hail Jamie Fawcett ! Come on Peter Carette! Why weren't you there? You're a great photographer and I can't imagine you are any more taken in by the Kidburns than Jamie!
Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 1 May 2007 2:03:06 PM
| |
I believe if this remake is made she will really talk up her affinity with MM...monroe actually lived a life that kidman loves to play on film, confused, troubled and ultimately tragic. As for Australia, morgan, she will not stand out in that movie, for sure. At this point she is a hindrence to the movies she's in. Just as sure as her next movie, The Invasion... or Visiting, whatever, its going to be another summer flop, despite what the showbiz media conglamerate says in their fluff pieces on her stuff. After years of her acumulating mediocre films, less and less people are getting exciting about her next one.
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 1 May 2007 2:08:13 PM
| |
Hi everyone! If you goto the justjared site you will see Isabella is in Sydney and is sporting a new haircut. Mommy dearest is nowhere in site of course Isabella has minders. Glad to see she is playing with her individualtiy don't look like she is interested in the snotty look her mother possesses.
Posted by WAKINGS, Sunday, 6 May 2007 10:36:37 AM
| |
For those of us in the GLDU (Great Land Down Under), have you noticed that dear old Auntie (ABC to foreigners) is replaying “Grass Roots” late on sunday nights. For an example of class ensemble acting from a top notch cast (how they managed to get a collection of actresses and actors of this calibre available at the one time was remarkable in itself), you couldn't do better. Quite apart from the outstanding script.
The roles may all be caricatures, but they are played with such understated hyperbole (if that's not an oxymoron), and with such aplomb, that they are full of conviction - even to the background bit part of a Council street sweeper sloooooowly and repeatedly brushing the same patch of car park. This series is truly a study in group acting. And why am I posting this here? Because, would NK ever be seen in something like this? Nah, firstly, as a TV series, it'd be beneath her, and secondly, there's no main “starring” role for her, yet she couldn't find a better vehicle to learn the art of acting with all that talent around her. But then, why ruin a superb production to benefit someone who wouldn't know how to take advantage of it!! If it should ever travel OS, you non-Ozzies should do your darndest to catch it, and see what talent Australia really has, rather than judge us by the wax dummy. (Or by the hot-panted budgie). Posted by nomad48au, Monday, 7 May 2007 1:09:15 PM
| |
Hey nomad, I have no doubt that kidman would be completely out classed in acting by most aussie television actors. If you remember that scene from Eyes Wide Shut, where cruise's character comes home late, and he's sitting on the bed and kidman, his wife is in her underwear, whining about how he just doesnt get jealous over anything....just horrific acting, she stamps her feet and flails her arms to show frustration. And this was back in 1999! .And just two years later she's the most acclaimed actress of her time? She's an oscar nominee two years in a row? You see, theres a reason she does either small indies, not much expectations, or moody, confused roles, where she can just be moody or confused, and not have to stretch too much. Well I dont buy the sudden diefycation, and notice her abject failure the years since she was given an oscar,... or since her phoney nose was given an oscar
Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 9 May 2007 4:08:16 PM
| |
Just found this early review by someone who's seen kidmans next movie, The Invasion:
http://www.podcasts.cinematical.com/2007/05/09/first-test-review-of-kidmans-the-invasion-and-its-a-doozy/ ... and, big surprise its not good. It seems its still as bad as the studio execs originally thought. These are the usual steps that lead up to her films, changing release dates, bad buzz, pathetic opening, and early fizzle. Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 11 May 2007 1:21:14 PM
| |
Thanks for that, Maclen. Much appreciated. I've been wondering what the reviewers will say. No doubt the idiotic Australian reviewers who still think she's an Australian will rave on in their usual moronic fashion when their eyes glaze over at the mention of her name.It'll be interesting to see what the more intelligent, 'thinking' reviewers have to say.Thanks again.
Posted by morgan, Saturday, 12 May 2007 6:43:42 PM
| |
your welcome morgan. Yeah, just exactly what I expected from this movie... here's another, earlier review , the first at Rottentomatoes.com:
http://www.dreadcentral.com/index.php?name=Reviews&req=showcontent&id=1453 I expect another slow bleed before this movie comes out, and it will be curious to see if she gives it the minimal pr, as she did with Fur, and also if you remember, she blew off the premiere of Stepford wives to go present at the Tony awards, of all places. I can understand her obssession to pile on the future roles, being at how dreadful looking back on her recent movie past must be. Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 13 May 2007 9:37:05 AM
| |
Well thats two reviews that both state Botoxia uses three different accents. That is terrible acting this one will probably go straight to DVD.
It seems Antonio Kidman has separated from her husband Angus. How sad! Wonder who called it off. This would explain the family yacht outing without Angus and the older children. Maybe this is the real reason for KU cancelling the Manchester concert as well. Posted by WAKINGS, Sunday, 13 May 2007 3:51:01 PM
| |
Well, that seems to be the latest drama of botoxica's latest Aussie compound brood... explains the latest photo op at the urban concert. Ive read that it was nauseating. It seems urban was groveling to botoxica, who was in the crowd, that just went on and on and on... Also it seems it chased Isabella away, who I read flew back home to LA last friday, two whole days before mothers day! I guess she'd rather spend mothers day with her real family, and, presumably, an actual mom, katie holmes.
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 17 May 2007 3:40:43 AM
| |
Morgan maybe you can answer this question seems you have worked with NK. Is she a smoker?
On another forum they claiming this is so. I myself have never seen photos of her with a ciggie in the hand. Posted by WAKINGS, Friday, 18 May 2007 7:24:20 PM
| |
Yes, she is definitely a smoker.Beer and wine are her drinks of choice. Off set, whilst filming Moulin Rouge, she indulged heavily in absinthe, as did many of the cast and crew at that time.
Seems none of the Kidman family have taken her daughter Isabella into their hearts. Antonia Kidman has called her new baby Sybella. Strange name to give her when her first cousin is Isabella. It's as if Isabella doesn't actually exist. Posted by morgan, Saturday, 19 May 2007 7:50:03 AM
| |
That reminds me of an incident that happened a few years ago when kidman had gone to the Cannes film festival. The director of the film, Dogville, i think, and a few other actors in the movie, were at a press conference. Director Von trier, was at the podium answering questions, and kidman, who was sitting just behind asked one of the actors for a cigarette, and Von trier had noticed and asked her to please not do that... he pleaded, begged her not to start smoking, but she just popped the cig in her mouth, lit it and started to puff away furiously, you know, like some defiant spoiled brat not letting a grown up tell her what to do. I remember, because anti smoking groups had protested it because the press conference was being telecast live on local TV. I seriously doubt that it mattered to her what she did in front of a foreign audience. Also another thing intesting, if you ever watch her acceptance speech when she was given an oscar, if you look closely, her lipstick in the middle of her lips looks lighter, or even completly removed, no doubt of her running off to the ladies room to take a drag off her cigs... it looked slightly bizzare.
Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 19 May 2007 1:41:09 PM
| |
Well I didn't have a clue on the smoking thing thanks guys. I even went a step furhter and googled 'Nicole Kidman smoking'. Not only did I come across a photo her lighting up at the Cannes Film Festival 2003 but there were other quotes of her saying she smoked pot all day while doing a scene for 'Eyes Wide Shut'.
So my next question is: 'Is she into party drugs?' The more I learn about her the more I think she is disgusting. OMG she comes across as so perfect and better than everyone else it makes me sick. Posted by WAKINGS, Sunday, 20 May 2007 8:01:37 AM
| |
At the party T.C. put on, aboard a party boat in Sydney harbour at the end of filming of Moulin Rouge...in December of that year....the time he went up on to the bow of the boat and called out "I am the king of the world".....there was plenty of cocaine present. He probably didn't indulge. I don't think he smokes or drinks or anything. But I do know there was cocaine a-plenty and I do know that a doctor was employed to be at the party, who was on duty throughout the entire time. I'm not suggesting he was there to help out any victims of cocaine using...he was just employed to 'be there'. Fact.
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 20 May 2007 1:37:29 PM
| |
Thanks Morgan!
These celebrities think they are above the law don't they? look at Paris Hilton- "Go directly to jail, do not pass go, do not collect hair extensions". LOL Posted by WAKINGS, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 4:37:24 PM
| |
Hey wakings, the news coverage on botoxia is just as shallow and as bland as the paris coverage, because in reality she is as shallow and as bland as paris. And you'll never guess what the latest news on the gossip wires is? you'll never quess... Is she Pregnant? Seems urban is talking it up again, only this time he says it may be next year. Watch it urban, by next year you may be dumped back in Nashville, where it seems he is prohibited from going back to right now. Botoxia is too busy right now in Australia, and so she had urban report in, and has him performing in her aussie PR road show.
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 24 May 2007 2:39:46 AM
| |
I have recently read a book called 'But He Says He Loves Me' by Dina L.McMillan. It is all about manipulative relationships and how to avoid being trapped.
Lets see the similarities in this so called fairy tale marriage of NK and KU and the quotes in the book: The abuser says: "I am looking for a relationship that will last a lifetime". KU lyrics from a song dedicated to NK ....we got a Once In a Lifetime Love ....." Indicators that the abuser is using the 'push-pull' strategy: "Does he flatter you to an excess sometimes? Does he go on about how fantastic you are and how rare you are, even if you know you have not done anything exceptional?" KU has an obssession with telling his concert audiences how wonderful his wife is. What does NK do, acts all coy and bashful, like a teenager. It is quite evident her self-esteem is low and she just loves being glorified at anytime, especially in the public arena so she can be in the papers. KU is using this weakness to his advantage. This is not a healthy relationship at all. NK was once quoted as saying, around the time of his rehab "you don't choose the people you fall in love with" well you are playing right into his hands. This is one sick fairytale marriage! I think they both got married for the wrong reasons, they are both narcisstic and this is a great model of a marriage for 'what not to do'. Posted by WAKINGS, Sunday, 27 May 2007 6:22:41 PM
| |
yeah wakings, that book does describe that marriage to a tee. All that you mention. I once commented here of a quote botoxic made in a magazine interview a few years ago, stating that her idea of an ideal man was the Judd nelson character in the movie The Breakfast Club, you know the high school
stoner/ criminal/ malcontent. The reason she was so devastated when cruise dumped her is she was fortunate to have hooked up with cruise, right, the BMOC, early on, I think she was in her early 20s. And that lasted for 10 yrs. so when she was dumped by him, she still had an adolescent and immature reaction to relationships. She always became flustered when asked about her personal relationships, denied everytime if she was linked to anyone, was reluctant to talk about it, and when she did she only spoke of it in a childish fairly tale manner, you know, someday my prince charming will show up and we can live happily ever after in our castle. Well, and so now, she's found her stoner/addict, dysfuntional alcholholic she has to drive to rehab, and has to keep from falling off the wagon... or more precisly, her traveling PR bandwagon. Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 28 May 2007 2:59:04 PM
| |
KU was being interviewd on radio here the other day. He had his mobile on him and said that if it rang, it would be her (she was about to board a plane)and he would have to stop the interview briefly to speak to her. Everyone agreed that could be done. Sure enough the mobile rang and he walked away from the radio jock to have his conversation with his princess. But the naughty radio jock didn't turn the mike off and the entire conversation, though faint, was recorded.KU just spent the whole time assuring her that she would be okay and that he loved her and was using stupid lovey dovey words that were ridiculous. It was as if she was too scared to board the plane without the big bombardment of a 'love brief' from him first.Interesting for all the thousands of listeners waiting for him to return to the business at hand.
Posted by morgan, Monday, 28 May 2007 3:22:09 PM
| |
The latest is that NK and HJ had a VERY private party for the cast and crew of 'Australia'. Is it me or are they putting things in the papers just for the hell of it. Do we need to know about their little shin dig? They are obviously worried the movie won't be that good if we have to hear every little detail about what they are upto. Did we hear this much crap about Moulin Rouge? I just don't recall.
Posted by WAKINGS, Monday, 28 May 2007 6:47:49 PM
| |
The true blue 'real' Australian actors on this film will balk at all the rubbish and trivia. They won't be one scrap impressed by Botaxia. Yet Botaxia will be intimidated by them. They were the actors who were highly respected in the Australian film industry when she was just starting out with stars in her eyes and looking up to them as if they were gods.
Posted by morgan, Monday, 28 May 2007 7:05:02 PM
| |
Can I just say, Eric Bana has just started promoting his next movie "Romulus, My Father" which is released tomorrow. This is the first I Have heard about his movie and so far the reports have been favourable.
This is a perfect example of $$$ buying the media. We hear everything that is about themovie "Australia" butnothing for Eric Bana new flick until now. I guess Botoxia not only is getting money for a set amount of money but maybe a percentage of the gross? If they kept things more quiet maybe there would be more mystery about the whole project. Posted by WAKINGS, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 1:53:32 PM
| |
There is no way kidman would ever accept a percentage of movie gross... its basically one or the other. either take a certain fee up front or take a %. I cant recall any of her movies that grossed more than it cost to make. Otherwise she would not be paid for the flops shes in. Also i dont see how this Australia movie is going to do anything outside of Aus. Again, its another payday, but I dont expect it to take the rest of the world by storm. and up next, i forsee another flop in the waiting with The Invasion, which I've commented on before, and from what i hear of this dark compass? film...its a lord of the rings/chronicles of narnia wannabe, so either way, I dont see it doing anything for her faltering career, she'll just be another shadow in the tidel wave of special effects.
Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 5:08:33 PM
| |
I thought you guys might like to hear about KU being denied entry to the set of the film Australia yesterday. The security guard wouldn't let him in and when he persisted, she told him to 'go away and get a life'. She didn't know she was talking to Mr. Kidman. I guess she must be so busy guarding movie sets that she doesn't have time to read magazines and newspapers so she can recognise the actual 'stars'.
Posted by morgan, Friday, 1 June 2007 7:54:05 AM
| |
Morgan, well it sounds to me this guard did actually know who urban was, hence the "get a life" quote... perhaps she was trying to give him some sound advice? Urban would be wise to take it and STAY AWAY! Or wait, could this be the first signs of discontent from botoxic? Perhaps she made it known on set to keep urban out, perhaps she wasn't ready for another photo op and had urban cooling it outside of the "target" area? With this calculated marriage, all the different scenarios may be quite plausible.
Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 1 June 2007 9:25:50 AM
| |
Maclen you always make me laugh. You have a great wit. Yes, maybe you're right.
Oh and by the way, I was reminded by someone the other day that the 'leak' outside of any leaks originating from the crew and cast of Moulin Rouge about Botaxia's affair with the runner to whom she became pregnant/which was the cause for TC finishing the marriage, was actually her sister's husband, Angus. At the time, he and his wife Antonia were going through a bumpy period and he has never really got on with his sister-in-law, the Botaxia Barbie Doll, so family loyalties went right out the window with a few drinks. This is how the majority of film people not involved with Moulin Rouge found out. Angus was 'the mouth'. The person who reminded me of this said that she wondered if he may speak about it again, now that they have split, if things don't remain hunky dory with the family. Interesting point upon which to ponder. Posted by morgan, Friday, 1 June 2007 9:53:23 AM
| |
I hope Angus does talk, that would be quite interesting. This keeping up appearances scenario really pisses me off. It is probably why I don't particularly like NK.
Posted by WAKINGS, Friday, 1 June 2007 7:25:08 PM
| |
Hey thanks Morgan, but with kidman its just so easy...she has become such a bizzare characture of herself, with the botox, lip injections, anorexia, the chemically fried hair.. and that doesnt even begin to describe her pretensious platitudes, noxious neuroticism, and cinematic catastrophies...
... and yes it would be so hilarious if anghus was to dish a little trash on botoxia, and it would only take one offer to him from some magazine to get him to talk, I'd figure. Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 2 June 2007 4:10:22 AM
| |
Early opinions on Invasion that I grabbed off IMDb:
"So yeah, tonight I went to a free screening of this movie around here in Woodland Hills, CA. I really wanted to like this movie, I truly did. I love Daniel Craig, and Nicole Kidman isn't so bad usually (yeah, right Leroy!). But man, did this movie stink. I sort of got the feeling from everyone's reaction after the movie that they felt the same way. Not that it was confusing at all, but while you are watching the movie the scenes kept jumping from the past to the future then back to the past only to skip back to the present. And the acting. Oh God. It was like Daniel just didn't give a crap. Like he just wanted to go home or maybe go get something to eat. And I've seen Nicole cry in other movies before, but she never sounded like a dying giraffe like she did in this. Now that I think of it, she pretty much cries in every scene that I saw. For good reason of course. The ending was crap." "This is like the Stepford Wives all over again. What is it with Nicole Kidman and terrible remakes of classic films that are made even worse by last minute reshoots and studio tampering? This film and Nicole's shifting accent are guaranteed to sweep the razzies this year. (There's another 17 million dollars + down the crapper!)" And here's just a random comment about Botoxia herself: "Whoever said she has extreme chemistry with her costars is crazy. She has zero chemistry. Sean Penn? Nothing. Will Ferrell? Nada. The last movie she made in which she had chemistry with a man was Moulin Rouge. That was 6 years ago! I was a fan but I have given up on her. All her movies suck total ass anymore. She needs to retire with all that money she got from Tom." Snoggett Posted by snoggett, Sunday, 3 June 2007 1:35:46 AM
| |
Hey snogget, excellent finds... Ive only been able to see only a few early reviews of this pic, both bad, of course. Why is it that just normal people who see her films can see right off what crap they are, how horrific they are.Yet movie studios, who supposedly are expert on the art, and business of the industry , will still hire her to be in their 40-60 million dollar movies, only to have them crash and burn, time and time again. Do they not read the reviews of her, what, past 8 movies to know what insignificant losers they are going to be. Are these studio execs. and directors totally oblivious to the obvious conventional wisdom that she adds not one shred of quality, value, or success to the movies she wanders through? Are they all just going through the motions of the industry, following the present trend of hyping the phoney PR and media whoring likes of lohan, hilton and ritchie? Cause ive just heard that lohan still has another job!
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 3 June 2007 5:07:57 AM
| |
Conditions of the location for the film Australia are extreme. I'm willing to make a bet there will be big trouble stemming from her inability to cope at some stage. This film might do okay because of the other actors in it, unless her part is so big that it ruins every scene in which she is present.
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 3 June 2007 7:54:53 AM
| |
If you recall, morgan, russell crowe was to co-star in this movie, and i also remember he had dropped out of another movie he was to have made with botoxia. And didnt the director of this movie, Australia, and that other previous movie that was scrapped.... didnt he direct kidman in moulin rouge? oh yes and that "grand epic commercial with kidman, Chanel #5 or something? It seems likely that crowe had serious problems with the scripts, which can only mean that kidman gets major screen time on this movie. I can also imagine his disgust at the kidman star treatment she'll probably get, this being her present to her "native royal subjects"... Yet dont be too surprised if there isnt news coming out about delays and breaks in production, because she needs to rehydrate in her air condioned trailer or portable mansion...
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 5 June 2007 5:07:07 AM
| |
Maclen, she has a temper.... something else that is never written about in the media, yet must surely be known. She screams her head off when she is really ruffled. If she does that often enough amongst the blowies, mossies, heat and long hours, new friends will drop like flies.
Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 5 June 2007 8:21:09 AM
| |
I actually think there are issues between RC and NK. When RC got married his bride to be didn't want NK at the ceremony apparently.
With regards to RC link with Australia. I just read that he was going to star in the movie but he pulled out along with the other director and they are now doing a project together. The other director pulled out just before production. I should say I think they pulled out of this project at different times. RC was earlier but then the co-director pulled out late last year. Posted by WAKINGS, Tuesday, 5 June 2007 8:27:55 PM
| |
Danielle (RC's wife) is a great actress, a great musician and singer), is not deluded by publicity (nor by RC's publicity) and is nothing like NK in any way at all. She is not jealous of her, as has been insinuated by press in the past. She just isn't like her. NK used to have strong friends amongst her peers and colleagues many years ago. The only one left is Naomi Watts and even then there's a bit of a quesion mark over how long that one will last. All the dropped girlfriends place their children before their career. Complete opposite to Botaxia. Therefore there'd have to be a gradual widening of the gap in friendships.
Wakings, I think you're Australian?Those in the US may not know these names butsome of NK's close actress friends who have fallen by the wayside over time due to diffeent priorities and ethics are Rebecca Rigg, Mouche Phillips and Kym Wilson. Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 6:14:10 AM
| |
Hi Morgan,
Yes I am an Aussie, and am embarassed NK calls herself one. She is far from a female aussie model. With regards to Naomi Watts I read somewhere that NW partner doesn't like NK. What do you know about this? Come to think of it has she had the baby? Must due anyday now. Posted by WAKINGS, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 11:07:12 AM
| |
Actually I was a little surprised to hear that hugh jackman and botoxia were old friends, going way back... so what is it with aussie celebs? Once they hit the big time their all old friends going way back? I"m wondering, morgan and wakings, being your australian, do you have any info on that? Was just wondering, if that was in fact true, or is it just a case of hollywood revisionism simply for the fact of PR for their movies?
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 7 June 2007 2:58:50 AM
| |
I don't think Botaxia and H.J. go back a long way at all.Not as 'close friends'.Her 'close friends'...the few she had.... have always been female. I also know that any friendship with H.J.'s wife is only relatively recent also. (the last few years). But like R.C.'s wife, Danielle, Deborah Lee is a very, very different type of peson to Botaxia. She too, puts family first, career second. That is the difference between Botaxia and all her'friends'. The others prefer to spend as much time as possible with both husbands and children and will temporarily or permanently if need be, sacrifice their own career opportunities to do this. Also Maclen, another small point but relevant. Years ago everyone was in the same boat. They supported each other. NK went off on her own like a bee to honey where career opportunity beckoned, often treading on others , even her friends, to get what she wanted. Some friends stuck with her after she went to the US. Some shifted there also. Rebecca Rigg, Kym Wilson, Naomi Watts. But with marriage and children these friends made very different choices to Botaxia. I think Naomi will make the choices of the old group of friends, putting children first. Remains to be seen, I guess.
Posted by morgan, Thursday, 7 June 2007 7:15:10 AM
| |
Well you are aware of my special annoyance of the "Is she pregnant stories"... perhaps the fact that she cant have one is the reason she concentrates on her career. And judging by her seemingly lackluster role as mother to adopted kids, I seriously doubt if she is gonna take time to devote any effirt to adopt another kid with Urban next year as he is quoted as saying. That is probably the strongest knock against her, in my opinion, is her complete disengenuousness. While you see more and more of her contemporaries, as you mentioned, taking time off to have children, and being real moms...Julia Roberts and Gwyneth Paltrow come to mind, she talks the talk, but definately doesnt walk the walk. But I'm afraid it is inevitable that she will continue to be a scourge on the people who revile her every lousy movie that polutes the movie and entertainment screens, even as less and less significant they are..
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 7 June 2007 10:04:59 AM
| |
Hi. Tony in Toronto here.
Oy, Que Surpresa, non ? OK.I got it. Ya . she's a has-bean that never was. I can see that now. What a Cu&t! I really thought I had afriend for a while in Beautiful Australiasmszismnisismstititszzszmns, but no. She really turned out to be a SLAG. She's done. Over the hill and a JUNKIE -WHORE. I do not say that lightly since I witnessed her shooting up in my Mamas home. What a Cnt to do that to my familly who has taken her in when she was just a peice of sperm and fried egg. Fk her all to hell. My Mama is no joke. and she won't fall for Kidmans crap. Mama has been around the world and back to keep such trash around,I guess that NIC. is my Bad Sister ?Mama even took care of her bastard child at Ontario Place , b-c NIC was fkng the waiter,. Toms cousin . OUCHIES !Bad NIC. FK u NIC. You made my Mama cry, be-ach. Posted by tonyintoronto, Sunday, 10 June 2007 12:23:53 PM
| |
Hello ??
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 10 June 2007 1:10:20 PM
| |
I managed to sneak a look at some new songs Keith Urban has been working on for his as yet unamed upcoming album (he releases about 6 a year!) and managed to get a copy of a song he has penned about Our Nic (now His Nic)and here it is:
My (um - Coff! Coff!) Angel Nicole By Keith U (married to Nicole K) She emerged from the clouds At a time that was dark And I’ve quickly learnt that her bite's A lot worse than her bark I stepped outta rehab And saw my new wife I looked around for a bar Fuc#, I knew I was in strife What was I thinking? My mind was a mess She's that thin She can't wear a dress! My Angel Nicole I should ‘ave listen too my mates Who said she was a mole My dear Angel, My Angel Nicole Two weeks after the wedding I was back in the clinic Nicole wasn’t happy I called her a cynic She got in a huff and said Enough Keith! Enough! My dear Angel, My Angel Nicole Now I’m clean n' sober And I have my dear wife So why ain’t I happy With my new life? And as I again reach for the booze And as I again reach for the powder I keep hearing that bitch getting’ louder and louder And I think to myself; Christ! Didn't I married a bowl of clam chowder! Snoggett Posted by snoggett, Sunday, 10 June 2007 2:33:11 PM
| |
THAT . IS . BRILLIANT ! I have just laughed and laughed. Very clever. Congratulations.Now all we have to do is somehow get these goddamed lyrics some international airplay.
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 10 June 2007 2:50:59 PM
| |
Yes, very good snoggett. It catches the spirit of that union, I'm sure. So what is the song urban wrote for botoxia anyways. Not being a fan of the music, and having no interest in hearing it, Ive never bothered to check. As i recall, lenny kravitz reportedly wrote her a song, on a cd he released, and i read tanked, big time. Obviously the hook up with botoxic was no help to his career, he hasnt done a thing, and I havent heard much from him since then. I do remember he lent it out for a commercial for the Gapp, which just shows how special that hook up was... but I doubt their songs were as inspired as your tune, snogg...
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 10 June 2007 3:46:13 PM
| |
Hi Tony,
Botoxia has two faces does she. I think that is what everyone has been trying to say here. Hope your feeling alot better then your last post now. Posted by WAKINGS, Monday, 11 June 2007 3:41:41 PM
| |
We all know Betrayal is the worst feeling in the world but coming from someone I trusted 100% ,like a blood sister and no remorse of any kind on her side ,really seperated me from her completely.
Nothing more to say.Sad. Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 15 June 2007 7:40:24 AM
| |
So Tony, would you say NK is very good a playing the charmer to win you over.
You say she shows no remorse for what she has done, so she probably thinks she is not in the wrong. no compassion etc. It confirms she possesses NARCISSTIC behaviours. Posted by WAKINGS, Saturday, 16 June 2007 5:55:38 PM
| |
So, the latest on this wretched couple is Urban flew down for botoxics b-day... it will be interesting to note if botoxia also has urban fly in to what ever movie set she's in when it is his birthday? urban had it scheduled for him to be off his tour for hers, the next question is will she be able to be off the job for his? I'm willing to bet she wont make an effort to be.
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 21 June 2007 10:33:02 AM
| |
So Maclen, you think the marriage will last that long?
Posted by morgan, Thursday, 21 June 2007 11:39:05 AM
| |
Just saw some photos of NK on JustJared for her 40th celebration. I really wish she would give up on the school girl look - is it suppose to make her younger with ribbon in her hair ? God she is so overrated.
Posted by WAKINGS, Thursday, 21 June 2007 4:49:14 PM
| |
I haven't seen those photos yet but dread doing so. There is an old black and white movie called 'Whatever Happened To Baby Jane?' starring Bette Davis. I think Botaxia may be a good contender for a remake.
Posted by morgan, Thursday, 21 June 2007 9:21:11 PM
| |
Amazing. I tell you one stupid and lame lie about Nik, and you all jump on it as if it were the gods honest truth!
I tell you the truth, and you dismiss it. You are all so disgusting!! Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 22 June 2007 12:00:46 AM
| |
Morgan, I wasnt aware of when urbans b-date was, so i looked it up and its only 4 months away.. it seems they have an arrangement of how long it is to last. But again, botoxia has a pathelogical dread of turning the big 4-0, so her pathetic attempts to remain "youthful" are, no doubt, going to have a horrific outcome. Again I'll predict she'll end up a burt reynolds/farrah fawcett/mickey rourke montrosity.
Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 22 June 2007 3:26:06 AM
| |
It seems to me, Adrianna that your intelligence is lacking or is therefore non-existent at this point in time. Your writing is cruel and possesses a clear and pathetic reason for your writing such an article: envy. You say there is not an ounce of jealousy within you towards the wonderful woman, and yet to me it is rather clear how green you've become with each word I read. You can throw fancy words around here and there to pretty up your insults, but it does not make you sound anymore brilliant then a door knob. I can not fathom how any person would actually take the time to write a meaningless article, full of ridiculous and begrudging hatred. You and your short sided friends may feel far different about Nicole than I do, of course. But, that does not mean any of you have the right nor the license to bash such an extraordinary human being.
Nicole Kidman is Australia's finest actress, and you'll do well to remember that after realizing what a complete ass you've made of yourself, I'm sure. Posted by Melinda, Tuesday, 26 June 2007 2:47:12 PM
| |
Melinda, who is this 'wonderful woman'/'extraordinary human being' you have suddenly introduced to this thread? I think you have mistakenly logged on to the wrong one.
Also, I can't speak for the other contributers to this thread, (which happens to be about Nicole Kidman by the way), but I am not one-sided at all. I am an alive, three dimensional breathing person; not an Egyptian papyrus painting. Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 26 June 2007 3:56:52 PM
| |
Oh boy.... it seems another "space cadet" has stumbled onto this blog, what with their rather serious indignation and utter adulation for the heavily botoxed and collogen injected plastic mannequin...
...and speaking of plastic, just saw a rather hilarious story title, "Plastic nicole kidman to shill plastic nintendo ds" In the progession of hollywood careers, this reaks of absolute desperation. kidman is the new face of a european ad for nintendo gameboys. I'm so sure it'll make the prissy and pretensious kidman "really really cool with the kids" and they will soon line up around the corners to see her films... like the one where she plays a prissy and bored housewife who develops a thing for a very hairy dude, or the one where she plays a bored and prissy runaway who gets taken in by an entire town, only to be abused and treated like a dog... come to think of it, are her films even offered on psp or playstation? Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 26 June 2007 4:16:32 PM
| |
Melinda,
'Australia's finest actress' - surely your referring to Toni Collette, Rachel Griffiths or Cate Blanchett here. Posted by WAKINGS, Tuesday, 26 June 2007 7:47:45 PM
| |
Oh please, save your pathetic attempts to once again drag, yes, I said it, AUSTRALIA'S FINEST ACTRESS through the mud! No matter what any of you, the media, or anyone else has to say about her being 'a botox addict', Nicole has always been able to overcome ruthless and MOST DEFINITELY ENVIOUS blows such as yours. You lot are wasting your time if you seriously think someone besides your pitiful selves are actually considering posting on a forum how much they hate Nicole Kidman? It's very doubtful, very doubtful indeed. I can tell that sooner or later, you're puny little brains wont be able to come up with anything quips for much longer. So, I suggest you shut your traps before you run out of steam on this one. Trust me, you'll soon realize that you are nothing but a bunch of pathetic, envious, dried up up hags who can't stand to see someone as WONDERFUL as Nicole continue to rise in star status.
Wasn't it Nicole that was dubbed 'Highest Paid Actress in Hollywood'? And wasn't it Nicole who was considered one of the youngest actresses to earn an American Cinematique Tribute? NOT YOU? It's funny how much jealously another person's flourishing success will bring out in a bunch of idiots like yourselves. It's not like what you say is going to make Nicole a 'has been' as you all seem to think. She is more famous in so many ways than your supposed 'Australia's Finest', Toni Collette, and Rachel Griffiths. I love Cate Blanchett, so I will not insult her. But, haven't you noticed it yet?? NICOLE KIDMAN IS AUSTRALIA'S' MOST FAMOUS ACTRESS!! HELLO! EVERYONE KNOWS IT! SHE'S FAR MORE KNOWN AND A FAR BETTER ACTRESS THEN TONI AND RACHEL...I ACTUALLY HAVE NOT A CLUE WHO RACHEL IS, REALLY! SO, IT PROVES MY POINT, THEY ARE COMPLETELY AND ENTIRELY....HAS BEENS THAT NEVER WERE, THAT BARELY MADE IT AND THEY ALREADY STARING TO PRUNE, MUCH LIKE YOU OLD BATS!! So, get over yourselves and yank that 9 foot pool outta your asses along with your heads!! Posted by Melinda, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 8:45:25 AM
| |
...like I said, a real space cadet... this "melinda" wouldn't happen to be a "Zoloft popper"?... if you get my drift?
Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 8:57:50 AM
| |
Your lack of knowledge re Rachel Griffiths proves a point indeed. You have no idea of what you are talking about.
Of course Nicole Kidman is more well known than everyone else. That is because she married Tom Cruise and everything that happened to her acting-wise after that was due to that fact. Nothing to do with her acting ability. No doubt you've never heard of Gia Carides, Zoe Carides, Justine Clarke, Simone Buchanan, Kerry Armstrong, Judy Davis and I could name heaps more, either. You only know about Miss Botaxia because of her fame and fortune. Not because of her acting ability. Why don't you see some decent movies and visit the theatre once in a while? Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 9:05:46 AM
| |
NK is a 'hollywood star' not an actress like the names mentioned in previous posts
Posted by WAKINGS, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 11:53:58 AM
| |
Melinda, do you happen to be related to a guy called Tony who lives in Toronto?
Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 27 June 2007 5:31:19 PM
| |
You're all pathetic. Nicole is a far better actress than Tom Cruise will ever be as an actor. By the time they met, Nicole had a much larger list of films under her belt compared to Tom. I will tell you how HE got famous...his looks...back then, that is. Now he's just an ugly, psychotic, out-of-his-friggin-mind, nobody likes him as much anymore, out-of-date, I've lost all respect for him, imbecile!
So, technically, he was never a really good actor in the first place, Nicole always had a far broader ability than he ever had or ever will. So, don't you dare say she got famous because of him. You all need to seriously get a life. How many hours do you spend bashing Nicole while I'm at work, hum? Oh, I'm sorry, WORK is too foreign a word for you to even comprehend because you lot spend every waking hour on here, whining about how much it sucks because Nicole's beautiful, wonderful, funny, noticed for her hard work and amazing talent, and she'll always be a FAR better person than any of you will ever be. I suggest you admit yourselves to Obsessive Nicole Kidman Haters Who Have Absolutely No Life, Anonymous. Seriously, it's getting old, you're insults are the same time and time again. I wonder what's behind the meaning of those words...oh, that's right, I will remind you...J-E-A-L-O-U-S-Y! Posted by Melinda, Thursday, 28 June 2007 5:55:04 AM
| |
Hi everyone,
I wanted to check out your discussion. Maclen is an great poster on our UM blog and so I thought I'd come on over and say Hello. I see that you've been visited by a worshiper. Pleasant folks aren't they? Same old song and dance with them <insert yawns here> I've found your posts to be very interesting and they explain a lot about redzilla's (one of our pet names for her) behavior. Thanks for your insight. Posted by banbotox, Thursday, 28 June 2007 10:36:42 AM
| |
there once was this dude from toronto
who wished he could wear dresses, but pronto. so he went to a doc, who cut off his cock but now when he speaks, cant stop all the leaks cause he always spoke right through his sock. Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 28 June 2007 11:18:15 AM
| |
Hey! banbotox, good to see you over her, I was just composing a little ditty, when i noticed your comment... you see, we've been infested by a sock-puppet... yeah this is where i come to just rant about kidman. Alot more rational, really, than turning psycho, like this melinda/toronto... whats the word? Hermaphodite. Anyways, would be interested in reading your expanded thoughts of botoxia...
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 28 June 2007 11:29:03 AM
| |
Melinda, why don't you get some facts straight? You talk rubbish. Just google and you'll get the truth. Tom Cruise made plenty of successful award-winning films before he met Australia's answer to Morticia Adams. Then check what she did before she met Tom. I can tell you for a fact because it was at that time I worked in the industry, that she was way down on the ladder of Australian actresses when she happened to meet Tom. She'd done some kids' shows, commercials, a couple of mini series and a couple of movies. Nothing outstanding. Other Australian actresses at that time were getting all the good roles in the good films. She was way down on the list of priorities. It was her marriage to Tom that turned her into a Hollywood Star but her acting did not improve. She just got gigs because she was Mrs. Tom Cruise. If she'd never met him, she'd probably be making commercials for chewing gum and dogs' worming tablets right now.
Posted by morgan, Thursday, 28 June 2007 2:33:41 PM
| |
If your google box office results for TC and NK, TC is way ahead as well so there is no comparison.
Posted by WAKINGS, Thursday, 28 June 2007 2:38:58 PM
| |
Well, its a couple of months till botoxias next movie comes out, the Invasion. Remember, a movie that was made 2 years ago, but delayed because the movie stunk big time. a couple of reshoots with zombies and stuff... I predict, as I did with her last movie, fur, that this one will also tank it at the box office, and also tank with the critics. I've just read she then has another movie coming out just a few months later, margot at the wedding. Its supposed to be one of her "prestige" films, you know, with award potential... just as fur was to be, and Birth, and Dogville, but werent! again I predict this movie will also bite it big time... Her time in the sun is long over, she will continue to be in one dog after another, her award potential has faded... along with her hair... her fake marriage will not survive the photo ops and empty gestures of birthday fireworks and pre arrainged "surprise" visits.
Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 29 June 2007 11:42:37 AM
| |
I agree with you Maclean. I just watched Julia Roberts in the 'Mona Lisa Smile' what a fabulous movie ! The closest movie NK has ever done which would have similiar depth would be The Hours but even in that movie her acting came across disjointed as usual.
Posted by WAKINGS, Saturday, 30 June 2007 7:37:46 AM
| |
You know wakings, an amusing thing happened today, I saw this preview of a movie, which stars meryl streep, glenn close, claire danes... and a few other actesses, i cant rememeber, but a line in this movies preview proclaimed..." starring the greatest actresses in this generation" and I immediatley was so relieved that kidman wasnt in this movie, I would have lost my lunch otherwise...
Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 30 June 2007 4:30:54 PM
| |
LOL, Maclean that would have made my stomach churn as well. Notice how these actresses don't need to do 4 movies a year to keep their profile going.
Posted by WAKINGS, Saturday, 30 June 2007 9:15:45 PM
| |
Well, the fact is, kidman is a terrible liablity to movie releasing schedules... She has no box office appeal at all they can draw on, the release dates are then even more difficult, and they just become glutted. She is in 3 movies this year, one coming out in Aug., the 2nd one in Nov. and the 3rd only a month later in Dec, all 3 within 5 months apart. The same thing happened a few years ago... when Human Stain and Cold Mountain came out, the first came out in oct, and the 2nd in Dec. Because human stain bombed when it was shown at the venice and toronto film festivals earlier in the year, they postponed the release a couple of times, and eventually dumped it on halloween day, the worst day of the year!... it only made 4 million dollars. Its like they just decide to throw her movies out together and just move on.
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 1 July 2007 4:39:55 AM
| |
What I don't understand is why she continues to make movie after movie. Her box office appeal-at least here in the states-is horrible. If you ask around most people don't even consider her a decent actress. She can't carry a film all on her own. Yet...she makes a ridiculous amount of money and continues to work full time. You would think that by now, studios would stop offering her any scripts, even the poor ones.
Posted by banbotox, Sunday, 1 July 2007 9:30:26 AM
| |
I have been puzzling over this too. And I know I'm harping on again about the children, but it is the other thing that really puzzles me. She is a hopeless mother, rarely sees her kids, commits transparent acts like the half- a -minute blow-in visit to the childrens' hospital the day before her wedding followed by the notified media, yet no journalist seems to be able to see through her. Nobody is game enough to write an article on just how bad an example she sets for young girls re motherhood, caring etc. If it were anybody else, it would be constantly written about. I am truly puzzled by this. And by the way, did any of you see that photographer Jamie Fawcett was this week cleared of all charges of placing a bugging device outside her Sydney house? He has been proved innocent but hasn't been given any large reportage space written about his innocence, yet the incident was front page and headline news when charged with it.
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 1 July 2007 9:51:33 AM
| |
Well this is were I think that she accepts movies that are turned down by others first. Accept off course 'Australia' but even this movie was a nightmare to organise. Russell Crowe was going to be the leading actor then he decided the script was weak, they then offered it to Heath Ledger who didn't take it and so we have Hugh Jackman to play the part.(who I don't mind by the way )Interesting how they approached the more rugged Aussie males first. I would consider HJ more chiselled, clean cut then rugged.
Lets not forget NK is getting a supposively reduced salary to do this movie. Did she not do this for Birth as well? So I think she just accepts anything that comes her way and hopes it will do well and ultimately keep her in the limelight. Posted by WAKINGS, Sunday, 1 July 2007 9:58:42 AM
| |
Well, I'd look to see when her next "big summer blockbuster" Invasion comes out and fails, it would be interesting to see what she gets. As for her recent independant films, shes 0 for 3, and shes 0 for 2 on the blockbusters... soon to be 3. Must be why she's now getting into producing... she "produced" something called In the Cut, with meg ryan. it came out on the same day as kidmans human stain, it grossed only 4 million itself, and Ive read she has something in development now. I'd say she has meg ryans future in store for her very soon, as lip collagen injections didn't help ryan very much with her career either.
Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 2 July 2007 12:38:23 PM
| |
Have y'all seen this. I have to scratch my head and wonder why? I swear that woman gives me a rash....
Nicole Kidman holds the honour of Hollywood's best-paid actress, commanding $18 million per role and moving from third into second place in the list after her earnings increased from $22.3 million in 2005 to $35 million. Her country crooner husband Keith Urban also had a bumper year. His earnings increased from $20 million to $26 million. After disappointing earnings in 2005 Russell Crowe's income dropped from $27 million to $5 million in last year's list, but the Cinderella Man has climbed back into the top 10 this year, making an estimated $15 million. But Hugh Jackman remains Australia's highest-paid male star at $30 million, a $10 million jump on the previous year. TOP ENTERTAINERS 1. The Wiggles $50 million (I still get a perverted pleasure knowing that NK can't beat the wiggles.) 2. Nicole Kidman $35 million 3. Hugh Jackman $30 million 4. Kylie Minogue $27 million 5. Keith Urban $26 million 6. AC/DC $18 million 7. Cate Blanchett $18 million 8. Hi-5 $16 million 9. James Wan and Leigh Whannell (Creators of the Saw franchise) $15 million 10. Russell Crowe $15 million (Gross income 2006-07) http://www.smh.com.au/news/people/a-wobble...4559786837.html Posted by banbotox, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 11:08:38 AM
| |
Well banbotox, there's no way shes worth that much, whether its true or not.
banbotox, you'll love this!...go here: http://mizshowbiz.com/2007/07/18/nicole-kidman-and-hubby-feeling-a-chill/ ...this is what begins to happen when you start over doing the botox and collogen injections... you do start to look like melanie griffith... or like these specific photos, your face becomes frozen in a "Joker from gotham city" grin. I cant believe heath ledger beat her out for the next Batman movie.. Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 19 July 2007 10:42:15 AM
| |
Ewww maclen! I can't believe that she looks into a mirror and likes what she sees in her reflection. It's freakish. I wonder if she scares small animals and children when they look at her?
Posted by banbotox, Thursday, 19 July 2007 11:37:04 AM
| |
You may have gathered from my past postings that I have never found her attractive as a woman, but those photos are fugly. What is she thinking?? Who is telling her she needs to do it?? Does KU really like what he sees?? Those puffy eyelids! Those bloated cheek bones! Those inflated lips! The arched eyebrows! (And I wont even go near the hair and forehead). It is all truly macabre.
At least I don't have to wake up with her beside me!! Posted by nomad48au, Thursday, 19 July 2007 2:04:12 PM
| |
Well, at least the producer of her next movie, The Return of Frankenstein's Mother In Law, will save plenty of dollars on special-effects-make-up.
Posted by morgan, Thursday, 19 July 2007 10:31:04 PM
| |
Well, i wouldnt doubt that morgan, some of those bizarre photos are pretty freaky...
but I'm still sticking with Batman... if you look at this recent official photo shoot: http://joblo.com/moviehotties/index.php?id=1914 ... she could just as easily play Two Face... do doubt she just demanded that they digitally retouch the pics until she looked 20 yrs old again! Which is just idiotic of course, because of her narcissistic vanity, it only makes her actual face look like a far more horrific sight in comparison to the plastic mannequined blow up doll look. Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 20 July 2007 8:10:29 AM
| |
Good Lord Those are some scary pictures.Keith looks like he's out with his great grandmother instead of his wife.Does she really think she looks attractive like this.Hopefully she doesn't ever wind up getting pregnant.Can you imagine a poor defenseless baby coming out and seeing that face leering at it.It would have nightmares for the rest of it's life if it didn't just crawl back in and refuse to ever come out again. Which she might actually like since she loves to have people speculating if she's pregnant or not.
Posted by CRICKET, Saturday, 21 July 2007 9:03:11 AM
| |
Cricket, you are very funny. Why don't you try your hand at writing her next movie script? It could be called "Back To The Womb" (or "Womb Raiders").
If Botaxia refused to play herself, you could ask Ossie Osbourne if he'd consider the challenge of playing her in drag.Or maybe Marge Simpson wouldn't mind having her hair dyed to play the role. Posted by morgan, Saturday, 21 July 2007 9:22:04 AM
| |
oh, morgan you missed remakes of "A Womb with a View", "Panic Womb" and "Make Womb for Daddy... any more?
Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 21 July 2007 5:35:49 PM
| |
Great movie titles Morgan and Maclen. I think she would excel in remakes of Tales From The Crypt,Whaterever Happened To Baby Jane,or The Corpse Bride. She is perfect for any one of those parts.She wouldn't even need to audition for Baby Jane they could just look at those hideous pictures of her from Christmas with the pigtails and bows and her frozen shiny forehead.She wouldn't even need makeup.
Posted by CRICKET, Monday, 23 July 2007 8:21:10 AM
| |
Hi MACLEAN,
Can I say I read Urban Myths a couple of times a week but unfortunately have constant trouble adding comments, so here is my question to you. Your quote "back to Urban, he is in serious trouble" is this a general comment or do you have other information to share. I must say that NK shows great lack of support for his sobriety when she drinks and parties in front of him ( re Antonio Kidmans birthday ). Love reading all your contributions on this forum and the urban blog. Posted by WAKINGS, Tuesday, 24 July 2007 11:25:50 AM
| |
Hi wakings... no, thats just my own personal observation. Kidman doesnt strike me as being a person of substance, she's basically a typical superficial, ageing hollywood actress. She'll transform her body to the rail thin norm hollywood calls for, she'll perform any cosmetic procedure to remain young looking, and I have no doubt she'd dump urban if the marriage doesnt help with the success or box office of her movies, because thats basically what shes all about. I dont see her giving that up to adopt children and raising them with urban next year, as he was claiming a few months ago. She's not going to give it all up to live on a farm and raise goats, or did she say a goat? It really doesnt take an "insider" to realize just that, all you have to do is remember what they've claimed in the past, and what they actually do.
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 24 July 2007 1:29:49 PM
| |
Last night on Today Tonight, there was a story on the Simpsons TV series being made into a movie. It also mentioned other successful TV series' transitions to the big screen. The overall biggest flop of all time was claimed to be Bewitched, with Botaxia trying to play the role of suburban witch. It showed the original witch doing her nose thing, then showed Botaxia labouring over an attempt at emulating it. The result was that the original actor's nose twitched naturally like a wary rabbit that was quite appealing, but Botaxia laboured terribly with trying to lug her nose from one side of her face to the other. She couldn't do it and settled for making her mouth move instead, looking like a grimacing gibbon. I suppose the frozen efects of botox may have been a hindrance but nevertheless, the result was pathetic and embarrassing when compared to the original actor's nose magic.What is Botaxia's obsession with noses anyway? Who nose?
Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 5:43:50 AM
| |
Great movie titles! I think they fashioned the Crypt Keeper after her.
Cricket-that is too funny. You are so right about those pictures of her in the pigtails. What EVER gave her the idea she looked good like that? Yep, Keith likes them young but a 40 year old trying to look like a 5 year old is too bizarre even for her. On a side note-Keith has been doing phone interviews for radio stations in the states and Nicky has been in the background of some of the calls. Clanking plates, doing dishes, eating banana bread--just a normal, happily married couple sitting in the kitchen of their rented mansion. It made me laugh out loud to think she even could find the kitchen since she doesn't eat and probably can't cook. Doesn't she have chefs and maids to do that work? -oh maybe she's trying to relate to the commoners! Posted by banbotox, Wednesday, 25 July 2007 10:58:02 PM
| |
I agree that once Keith outlives his usefulness, NK will move on. I'm sure her PR machine will find lots of reasons why the marriage didn't work, and every one will be Keith's fault. I hope he's strong enough to withstand it.
Note to Wakings... sorry about the trouble on the Urban Myths blog. Your sign-in name is simply your email address that you signed up with. Let me know if you have further problems. Thanks for reading! Posted by Urban Myths, Thursday, 26 July 2007 1:47:27 AM
| |
Banbotox, what's the bet that the domestic sounds in the kitchen background were supplied by a sound effects man. How would she know how to convincingly create those mundane sounds herself? I can only guess there was breathless giggling inserted here and there too.
Posted by morgan, Thursday, 26 July 2007 8:41:41 AM
| |
Re the life span of the marriage....it would actually be miraculous (and this is no exaggeration as it's based on hard fact) if KU doesn't have another relapse. It is a part of the nature of the recovery process. Very rare if someone who used as much as KU would simply stop after one stint in rehab. Takes a lot of patience from loved ones to endure this period. Often the second relapse doesn't occur until something like 12 months later, but it can also occur within days or weeks. Takes a lot of resilience and patience and determination for both the addicted person and his/her loved ones. My point being, I doubt she has the ability to survive the process without staging tantrums and ultimatums...which are the worst things a supportive loved one can do.
Posted by morgan, Thursday, 26 July 2007 8:52:29 AM
| |
The fact that urban is now claiming that she is responsible for basically healing him, is not a good sign. And I agree with you morgan, the prognosis does not look good. It may be almost sounding like a ultra positive or cliched saying, but it is true. Addicts and alchololics have to do it for themselves... not for their wives or kids, or because they promise someone they'll do it. I'm sure in the whole "courtship" and the runup to the marriage, urban probably claimed he had it all under control, only to end up in rehab 4 months later. People should read what he's claiming now and believe it?....Why?
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 26 July 2007 9:42:01 AM
| |
So, get a gander at this... do you think kidman noticed all of the recent pictures of Cruise and katie holmes with baby suri plastered all over the place?
http://www.hollywoodrag.com/index.php?/forums/viewthread/5326/#When:17:11:55Z Notice the 3 picture series of pictures where she slyly turns and glances out the front window... (with that deathly stare of botox induced unemotion)... making sure the photogs get a clear shot of her face? No doubt she was just a hankering to counter the ex... Urban was not needed obviously, this is just about her... Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 26 July 2007 3:16:01 PM
| |
There is definitely some truth to "keeping up the papparazzi photos"
something sick about involving your little niece as well. Question: Why do so many other famous stars have the ability to avoid the tabloids most of the time ? Answer: Because they trually want some privacy in their life and so never give the papparazzi any tip offs to the whereabouts. Thanks Urban Myths for the tip - your blog is very entertaining! Thanks Maclean for the photo link. Posted by WAKINGS, Thursday, 26 July 2007 4:33:52 PM
| |
OK - here is the gossip fresh from the sets of "Australia". Everyone working on the film has to sign a confidentiality agreement so getting info is like getting blood from a stone. Everyone is terrified Ms Kidman will get them sacked or sued so Mum is the word.
True to form Ms Kidman is no friend of the crew. Word is she is extremely demanding and volatile and also quite unhinged. Generally she is regarded as a total nightmare. She shared two bedroom accomodation with her publicist and insisted on the pass door between their rooms being left permanently open. This means Ms Day (who is apparently a good sort who also thinks Kidman is a nutter) had to cope with the endlessly needy Kidman wondering in an inopportune times (like when she had people over) to give her instructions on things La Kidman needed done. Did I say a needy power freak? Everyone on the crew is in total agreement that Botoxia is indeed a total botox junkie. At a screening of rushes for the film, Kidman dictated notes to Ms Day detailing everything she was unhappy with with her appearence. Notes for Baz to fix. She is apparently totally paranoid - clearly she must be reading this forum so -hello there! Kidman comes across to everyone as tremendously insecure. Very hard work particularly for wardrobe people who have to dress her. Needless to say Hugh Jackman is a dream although apparently his male PA is an asshole. Posted by Corianda, Thursday, 26 July 2007 7:55:35 PM
| |
Very interesting and insightful info, corianda. That would explain why she doesnt seem to have any close friends, beyond the usual naomi watts and russell crowe... oh yea, and now hugh jackman. Although I believe that only came about because she wanted to blow off the premiere of stepford wives, so she found an excuse in saying she wanted to present "old friend" jackman with an award at the Tony awards that same night. It seems her only friends are her sister and fam. and urban, who seems to be basically a permanent escort. Does she do anything else beside make a movie, publicize a movie, and then travel again to make another movie?
Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 27 July 2007 10:54:31 AM
| |
Thanks Corianda. Verrrrry interesting. But Maclen, I'd place a question mark over Russell Crowe these days as a close friend. His wife does not like her.
Posted by morgan, Friday, 27 July 2007 11:21:14 AM
| |
oh, wakings your welcome.... just stumbled on them when i was amusing myself looking at some of her horendous plastic surgury before and after pics!
Morgan, that must also be why there are no pictures of them out socializing, ever. She's only ever pictured alone, with her sis, or just urban. That's the reason she has such a one dimensional personality. Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 28 July 2007 3:10:27 AM
| |
Is it just me, or are these recent appearences by kidman and kyle minogue, where kidman looks especially shiney and waxen looking...and all "brand new" plastic smooth...
http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/celebrity_gallery/image_full/15098/ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/showbiz/showbiznews.html?in_article_id=473008&in_page_id=1773 do they have a facial structure similarity? It makes me wonder if they go to the same facial proceduralist in Oz? It does seems botoxia has had a recent tune up... Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 4 August 2007 1:50:55 PM
| |
Unfortunately like NK, KM is scared of growing old too. I believe they are products of their own environment, an environment they yearned for before they were famous.
Posted by WAKINGS, Sunday, 5 August 2007 7:27:59 PM
| |
yeah, I find that her willingness to indulge in every typical tinsel town technigue... extreme weight loss, botox, lip injections, and whatever cosmetic procedure on her face shes had done... just reveals she is as superficial and calculating as they'll get in hollywood. And I cant really recall any aging actress who has tried plastic surgery, has had it work for her, and is making serious movies these days... think about it, how is meg ryan doing? Melanie griffith? farrah fawcett?
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 7 August 2007 11:39:34 AM
| |
Headline to newspaper article today...."Nicole Kidman Makes West Wild." She and Keith Kidman and Hugh Jackman arrived in an outback bush town for filming. Hugh stopped to mingle with waiting fans, signing autographs and talking to them while Mr. and Mrs. Kidman were met by a police escort and whisked away in a limo with tinted windows so they wouldn't have to be tainted by their fans. Who does she think she is kidding? A police escort plus a limo with tinted windows in Outback Australia? It is ridiculous.
Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 7 August 2007 12:07:05 PM
| |
As it is no surprise to me, morgan, she is no doubt absolutely clueless as to why no one would want to go see her movies, she also doesnt seem to have a clue on how to build a fan base. As it seems her whole life is one pre-arrainged appointment after another, I'd bet a spontanious act as that would be inconceivable, being in that a crowd of fans was probably not included in her script. And being that urban was on his leash, she didnt want him tempted to stray too much. But seeing that she's basically exiled herself in Oz, skipping Canne with golden compass, and simply sending a lame video to comiccon for visiting, stopping for a few moments to show just a modicum of warmth and friendliness to the locals seems to be just too much of a burden to her.
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 7 August 2007 4:10:47 PM
| |
Please don't forget that NK is way above the rest of us. She doesn't want to mingle with the common folk she may get germs.
Police escort in the country, crikey, she is so out of touch with the real world it is ridiculous - what a sad sad sad existence. Posted by WAKINGS, Tuesday, 7 August 2007 9:11:11 PM
| |
Of that I have no doubt, wakings... also, I forgot to mention in my last post last night, that the reason for the quick getaway, is that it would go off script... no doubt that she and urban have some scheduled "outing" already planned out, you know, to mingle with the locals, and also make sure "all" the media will be out to record it. Its the one thing she seems incapable of... spontaneity.
Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 8 August 2007 12:36:05 PM
| |
Maclen, you're probably right.I bet within the next week or so, there will be a 'scripted' 'performance'involving a 'spontaneous' outing to a sheep-shearing competition or a rattlesnake corroboree that involves Mr. and Mrs. Kid-Me-Not hugging a koala or snipping some wool off the back of a sheep..... a spontaneous outing that involves Ms Kidman's publicity slave Wendy Day notifying the international press two days prior to the 'event' so that the whole world can share the Kid-Me-Nots' spontaneous "warm and fuzzy outback experience."
Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 8 August 2007 1:05:51 PM
| |
In todays Daily Telegraph (Aussie) they have the returns for hollywood actors. NK and Russell Crowe compared poorly to others.
For every dollar NK is paid she returns 8 million at the box office, sadly RC was worse he only returned 5 million for every dollar he is paid. Matt Damon was the best return with 24 million. Jennifer Aniston topped the females with 17 million (which surprised me). Posted by WAKINGS, Wednesday, 8 August 2007 8:59:17 PM
| |
And no doubt, morgan, that you can be sure that People mag. will have those pics for this weekend... she's reality tone deaf to actually do all those type of things!
yeah i read that article wakings... the reality does not match the perception the reality deprived tinseltown braindead have of her... although I thought reading the article again this morining, doesnt it say for every dollar paid to her she earned 8 dollars, and not 8 million dollars? maybe I missed something? I got the impression when I first read it as being especially bad... Also on the news ticker this morning, another movie shes doing was announced... how many does that make now? 4, 5? this ones about a nuerotic shut in who begins to see ghosts... and as a few of these articles are pointing out, didnt she already make this movie, called The Others?? I cant wait for these wrecks of films to come out and go unnoticed or mocked. Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 9 August 2007 3:17:58 AM
| |
Yes Maclen, you're right. It was for every $1 she took home, she earned $8 at the box office. Have you read any reviews of The Golden Compass yet?
Posted by morgan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 7:31:41 AM
| |
Ah Thank you for correcting me, I actually read the article in a busy cafe with some disruptions and was using my memory when typing up the post but yes this is much worse.
I can remember when 'Peacemaker' came out I was actually excited about the fact she did a movie with George Clooney ( the big spunk that he is) but in the end the movie was terrible and this is when I came to the realisation that her so called talent was questionable. Every movie I have seen since then with her in it has not altered my opinion. Movies for me are about taking the viewer to another place for a couple of hours, she has never successfully done that for me. As for her PR persona she comes across as a diva who thinks her s**t doesn't stink. There is one problem with all of this though HER SMELL GIVES HER AWAY and her smell is PUTRID. Posted by WAKINGS, Thursday, 9 August 2007 9:32:07 AM
| |
Well, wakings, the announcement today of another... of the countless she has lined up!... movie, another remake, of another similar story line, her repetitiveness, is absolutely ridiculous. The main theme of her movies is the lack of creativity. The Peacemaker, for instance, is basically The Interpreter... replace clooney with Penn. Birth is basically Fur, just replace the kid with robert downy jrs chewbacca. The musical moulin rouge is remade into the "epic" Cold Mountain, tragic lovestory, just replace magreggar with jude law...and now we have this new remake, a shut in woman who starts to see ghosts, The Others redone, I guess they just get rid of the kids. Unbelievable.
And morgan, I havent seen any reviews of golden compass, just that they showed a 10 min clip at Canne a few months ago. There isnt even any new reviews of the Invasion, which comes out only a week and an a half from now. the silence is deafening, the studio certainly smells bomb and is sitting on it till the last minute... makes me wonder now if kidman will stay away, using filming in Oz an excuse again. Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 9 August 2007 2:23:44 PM
| |
Wakings, can you please describe the smell? I asume it does not resemble Chanel No. 5?
When I worked with her years ago, the only smell she emitted was the scent of one who was on the trail of hunting down and disposing of any other young actress who got in her way. Posted by morgan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 2:39:21 PM
| |
Well, I would gather that the smell eminating from botoxia is the whiff of desperation, with an overwhelming stench of failure... and I cant imagine her exodus into the wild and dusty outback is helping any with the odor of endless and needless overindulgance and glutinous self engrandeurment... meaning I think this movie is also gonna suck...
Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 10 August 2007 2:54:58 PM
| |
So, finally, a new review of kidman's latest debacle... the first of many, I'm sure...
http://emanuellevy.com/article.php?articleID=6683 ...does this sound familar? What I want to know, who are the morons that are gonna have her "produce" a movie for them? Which idiot is gonna pay her 10s of millions for this? Predicting her failures is easier than shooting fish in a barrel...oh yes, a side note, notice the pics of botoxia on the left side of the page, her face seems to she "shifting"... (her eyes are moving closer together!) under the unblinking eye of the camera... shes melting.... shes melting! Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 12 August 2007 8:23:22 AM
| |
"Kidman movie bombs at box office
Nicole Kidman's new science fiction thriller, The Invasion, has had a bad opening weekend at the North American box office. It finished fifth, taking just $US6 million ($7.53 million). The re-make of the 1956 horror classic Invasion of the Body Snatchers has been savaged by critics." From dear old Aunty's front-page web-page http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/08/20/2009269.htm?section=entertainment Posted by nomad48au, Monday, 20 August 2007 7:42:20 PM
| |
Nobody has a good word to say about it and Botaxia is criticised by one and all for her lack of emotion and celluloidal, non- expressive face. It is obviously a bomb of the worst kind and Botaxia's worst performance to date. BUT what's the bet our anally- retentive, sycophantic Australian movie critics will still purr and stroke the ego of the Hawaiian born woman they continue to call "Our Nic"?
In one article from America it states that she has taken over Julia Roberts' position on some poll because Julia Roberts has chosen to take time out from making movies to spend more time with her family. Now that she's constantly bombing in every movie she makes, Kidman will probably want a bolthole to flee to. But in order to save face, what's the bet she'll get her puppet Wendy Day to release a bulletin that she too, is taking a rest from movie-making in order to spend more time with family? Recently Jackman flew from the set of Australia to attend a charity function organised by his wife but Botaxia didn't bother to accompany him.She is going to need her puppet Wendy Day to pull some very ingenious strings in the near future. Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 7:14:47 AM
| |
She might have Wendy make a statement that she is taking time off to be with family,but she won't ever actually do it.She is already signed up to film 5 more flops not counting the epic bomb Australia.She can't take time off.If she doesn't have a script she doesn't know what to do or say.She doesn't have a personality of her own.And she is even worse at trying to act like a wife and mother than she is at acting on screen.Why do they keep giving her roles when it's pretty clear that she can not bring in moviegoers.How much money are studios willing to lose on her becfore they cut her loose.They lost 11 million on her salary alone not counting everyone else's and prodution costs and everything else.HOw do they even stay in business with stupid desisions like this?
Posted by CRICKET, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 10:39:53 AM
| |
I am amazed at the absolute unawareness she possesses at how grotesque her movie career and her facial expressions, or lack thereof, now appear. The bubble she seems to live in is on par with W. Bush's administration. I don't beleive, Morgan, that she can take a break from the "fame game"...for her kids, her husband or anything else. There's a story and a new video out now about how her lips seem to be even more swollen looking... i can see her pic, but i cant see the video... (comp. incapatability...) but it does look excessively overdone. She has about 5 more movies lined up, 2 just announced in the past 2 weeks! Can you imagine any interviewer, anywhere, asking her why she keeps making worthless movies? Why not take a break from the mediocity? No, she seems too preoccupied with botox, collogen, movie deals, movie sets and movie fantasy.
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 10:54:19 AM
| |
If you take away all that stuff maclen, she has absolutely nothing and she is absolutely no one of any significance. Hard realities to face and she is completely unable to face any type of reality. Makes me wonder what developmental stages she missed when she was growing up. I for one am glad she is bombing. The only PR that the movie received was to watch for the mistakes in all the shots filmed on the streets of D.C. and there were a lot of them.
Posted by banbotox, Thursday, 23 August 2007 1:55:38 AM
| |
Banbotox, I was checking out the message board at nicolekidmanunited...which i had heard about for the Urban Myths site...and of course they were hopeful for the movie. One commenter even made a prediction that it would gross 20 mill that first weeknd. OF course, when it bombed, they blamed the studio, it wasnt kidmans fault. Right now there predicting that the newly announced movie she'll do, The Reader, will win her another Oscar, but my thinking is, what about the upcoming movie Margot at the wedding? That's coming out in only two months, it seems they arent as enthusiastic about it as the Reader. But thats how the kidman apologists are... they seem to convince themselves that her glory and acclaim is just around the corner... Well i can predict how this indie Margot movie will do...a film festival, limited release, so so reviews, anemic box office, and no oscar nom. Exactly like her other recent indie flicks...dogville, birth, Fur...
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 23 August 2007 9:41:47 AM
| |
Maclen when you go over to NKU make sure you wear protection. That is a scary place.
Botoxia certainly seems to have the formula for movie failure down to a science. She pays her minions enough money to keep those excuses for her flops flowing like a river. I saw this today and had to share it with you. It's Been Nice Knowing You Nicole Kidman http://www.film.com/movies/story/itsbeenniceknowingyounicolekidman/11597472/15949715 Posted by banbotox, Thursday, 23 August 2007 11:11:14 AM
| |
What is The Reader about? Does anyone know?
LOVED the article Nice Knowing You Nicole, Banbotox. Thanks. Posted by morgan, Thursday, 23 August 2007 2:27:33 PM
| |
Yeah, banbotox, that article is hilarious, my favorite is " I dont speak australian, and i dont like subtitles! Though truthfully, her movies do seem like plodding foreign language films in another language...'' also, i only read the message board at NKU, wouldnt want to register there and crush their dilusional beliefs.
Morgan, The Reader is an german novel written in '95 and is about a 15 yr old boy who has an affair with a 30ish german woman, and years later when hes in college, learns she is a former nazi war criminal when she is put on trial. It seems she's just gonna combine her roles from Human stain and Birth, and redo them for this movie. Something hilarious i read about this movie is that its for the Weinsteins new movie company, they used to run Miramax, and their new studio has a dismal record of movie flops so far... they released Grindhouse, hostel 2, and just recently released The Last Legion, which believe it or not, did worse last weekend than The Invasion! So actually I wouldnt be surprised before this nazi movie comes out, the wienstein company will be out of business. And speaking of Nazis, guess who is suspiciously filming a movie as a nazi right now? yeah, tom cruise...theres a tabloid story going around about how they will both be filming in Berlin at the same time! Imagine that! If thats true and she does start filming this movie next month, how much do you want to bet botoxia will lobby to have it come out at about the same time as cruises nazi movie? In any case, I see she's still trying desperately to piggy back off his fame. Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 23 August 2007 4:37:19 PM
| |
Well, well, well, Australia will not be screening The Invasion in theatres. If there's anyone who actually wants to see it in this country, they will have to wait until it comes out on DVD. This must come as a blow to Botaxia because although she lives in the States and speaks with an American accent, whenever she pays her annual Christmas -time visit to Australia she re-adopts her Aussie accent and tells all and sundry that she still calls Australia home.
Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 8:30:42 AM
| |
Well, I dont believe for one moment she has any remorse or sadness over her "royal subjects" not getting the chance to watch her latest act of love... considering shes simply hiding out in Australia, to get away from the absolute and utter failures of Fur...and stepford wives... and bewitched.... and Birth... and... well you get the point. It was pretty convient to use this film shooting, that never ends, as an excuse to stay away from the Invasion fiasco. The fact that it wont be shown in Australia, or be premiered in any other country, I'm sure, doesnt bode well for her "international" appeal regarding this epic Australia.
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 1:41:10 PM
| |
Nk has been interviewed in the Australian OK MAGAZINE.....
Re living arrangements in the outback: "We'll be camping in tents. I think we're sharing toilets and showers and everything. Yeah, we're roughing it." Who doe she think she is kidding? On becoming pregnant:"If I had my own baby, I would have bigger boobs. That's one of the many good things I can think of that would come out of it." Nice maternal touch there! On describing what it's like to walk down the red carpet: "It's like getting dressed for the prom". When would she have ever attended a "prom"? And to really take the cake, cop this on The Invasion: "It has a theme you see running through a number of my movies-the love a mother has for her children and to what lengths she will go to protect them...The most important thing for me is to protect my son and daughter and their wellbeing." How can she do that when she never sees them? Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 2:59:29 PM
| |
A loving mother, huh? I went back and checked, in her past 10 movies, excluding Happy Feet of course, going back to 2002, she's played a mother in 3 movies... the recent Invasion, and Fur (wherein she leaves her husband and kids to hook up with chewbacca) and human stain...not exactly a record to proudly try and brag about. Even by hollywood standards, her completely two faced disingenuous exaggeration is laughable.
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 30 August 2007 8:09:41 AM
| |
She really said that about her kids, Morgan? And with a straight face and no giggling?
Wait..I get it now. She's protecting them from HER and her pretend life and abnormal thinking. How pathetic that living in a cult is a better way of life than living with her, her employee and her paid for friends. Posted by banbotox, Friday, 31 August 2007 10:15:20 AM
| |
Well, it seems the film festival season has begun... kidmans latest "award craving" indie flick, Margot at the Wedding, is making the rounds. So far, ive been able to find about 3 new reviews, one good and two negative, and of course, kidman herself it looks like, is staying away from the showings. I also just read a couple of days ago the release date of it was delayed from Oct. to Nov... not a good sign, no matter what the studio's offical excuse is, as you also consider that she has another movie coming out in Dec. I guess the idea is to kill em all at once, huh? Just make it quick and painless...
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 2 September 2007 12:35:52 PM
| |
NEWSFLASH!....KIDMAN REVEALS ALL IN NEW VANITY FAIRE ISSUE!
she reveals....she lost TOMS baby at 23! she lost TOMS baby right after divorce!.... so she desperately yearns to have baby! She has no regrets about marriage to TOM! She met a guy who rides motorcyles and just happened to be the biggest movie star in the world!...(Thats TOM!) but shes in love....with TOM!...so she doesnt care what that will do to her career... and she really really yearns to have a baby... (Uh, Im assuing TOMS baby?) ....and just what will all this sensationally revealed news do for the box office of her next movie?..... ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! ...I've got a feeling botoxia is feeling desperate for some positive attention, what do you think? Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 3:18:58 AM
| |
Maclen, I think it's high time it was leaked that the man she was pregnant to was the runner on Moulin Rouge. Anyone with any brains at all who reads papers and magazines and watches TV would know how TC had longed for a baby of his own for decades and there'd be no way in the world he'd divorce her while she was pregnant with his baby. No matter how much the marriage had broken down, he'd stay in it. Even with the idea in mind that once his flesh and blood baby was born, he might consider ending the marriage. At least he'd have his longed-for child. The paternity of the unborn child was the reason Tom said at the time "Nic knows why I filed for divorce." As if he'd file for a divorce while she was pregnant with his much desired, own flesh and blood baby which he could share custody over if he ended the marriage at a later date. How can the reading public be so taken in by her lies? And TC will never leak the truth either....for the same reason he didn't in the first place. To protect Isabelle and Connor from the fact that their mother slept with another guy whilst married to him.
Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 6:56:26 AM
| |
Well, you now morgan, I am becoming a firm believer in Instant Karma, as just last night I read about this media blitz, this "confessional" of botoxia's, and so I braced myself for the onslaught of publicity pieces flying today, I just read that Halle Berry has confirmed that she is actually pregnant, I think about 3 months now? I mean, you have to figure, what are the chances the media beasts are going to be content to cover this interview of kidmans yearn to have a baby, when you know now the papparazzi's are going to be on a stampede to get the first "Halle baby bump? Boy, talk about raining on kidmans parade.
Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 8:37:19 AM
| |
I hate Nichole Kidman. I've been trying to get through Mulin Rouge for what must be five years now. The film has an interesting concept, speaking dialog through singing select lyrics from various and terrific popular songs, like 'Your song' by Elton John. And I like Ewan McGregor enough. But, each time I try to revisit this DVD I can only get a few more minutes through it, why? Because I hate Nichole Kidman.
It's like she's some poseur who's Dad owned the theater company so she gets in without an audition. And I can't help but wonder if her then husband T. Cruise broke up during the filming of Mulin Rouge because she got so full of herself. You can hear her saying to him, "But you don't know what we're doing over here! I'm being really appreciated, and for once it's all about me! They really like me, they do! You're just jealous. It's all about meeeeeeeee......!" All the while she's so stupid looking, her acting sub-par, forced. Her singing, her stupid dancing. Kareoke at best, local church theater. I hate Nicole Kidman. Like the guy in Fight Club said so eloquently, "You don't belong here, I'm on to you..... you TOURIST!" If only Mulin Rouge casted Audrey Tautou from Amelie instead, can you imagine? That beautiful sweet nymph singing her heart out about love? Mmmmm. Oh well, no one will read this post anyway. I just hate Nichole Kidman and wanted to see if anyone else did. I guess they do. This many people can't be wrong. Has anyone ever looked up, "I hate Jack Nicholson? It's like she's some chain smoking poor white trash mom who screams at her kids in public cause she thought some cute man was looking at her, possibly, and right when the kids were saying something lame, like, "Mommy, how long until I'll get to go pee? I really have to go now." I hate Nicole Kidman. Mark, 36 Long Beach, CALIF. USA Posted by Thriller, Friday, 7 September 2007 10:16:55 AM
| |
Canadian Tony Morales
Lives far from the land of tamale. He just loves Our Nic, So we think he's a Dick And instead should admire Chris Farley. Posted by Brownie, Sunday, 28 January 2007 4:40:04 PM Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 7 September 2007 12:24:51 PM
| |
The mystery around who her fiance was is no mystery at all. She brought Steve Bing home to not only meet her parents,but they all went on a holiday together here in Australia.
Posted by morgan, Friday, 7 September 2007 12:39:15 PM
| |
Morgan, is that so? Well i kind of missed the whole bing thing...I only remember noticing a few pics and thats it. I assumed it was kravitz, because of the rumors, and the whole game she played with that huge diamond right back in Nov 03. But Bing, huh. How emotionally screwed up is she to consider that, huh? He impregnates elizabeth Hurly, and then claims it's not his, because, by his own admission he claims they were both sleeping around? Add to that, I recently heard bing impregnated another women, and wasnt even financially supporting the baby? Boy, she certainly has a serious case of self destructiveness, ...which dude could possibly treat her the shabbiest? The womanizing rock star, the deadbeat billionaire, or the drunk/addict country singer... no wonder she regrets that cruise let her go. She has the romantic judgment of a high school troubled teen looking for tawdry thrills.
Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 7 September 2007 1:11:23 PM
| |
Maclen, actually I have only guessed that it was the bounder Bing simply because he was the only one of her in-between-husbands' lovers who flew all the way to Australia to meet the parents and go on a family holiday with them. I could obviously be wrong. But if she'd become engaged, you can be sure she'd be wanting her fiance to meet the folks and he's the only one who did.I just used my little grey cells but my little grey cells could well be letting me down here.
Posted by morgan, Friday, 7 September 2007 1:55:24 PM
| |
From what I've read in the past she was engaged to both Kravitz and Bing. Both rather short lived. I'm sure as soon as her "It's all about ME 24/7" personality appeared-they dumped her.
As far as the cover of VF-she should be ashamed, being the good Catholic woman that she is. She is an embarrassment not only to her kids but to UNIFEM. Posted by banbotox, Saturday, 8 September 2007 7:34:05 AM
| |
Banbotox, morgan, I'm sure she can just as easily claim either one was this "mystery engagement". As you say, both being short lived and both those dudes pretty much long out of the celeb scene, is anyone really going to try very hard to get their side of the story for any much longer? Well, about that copycat "suri in the jacket" photo she took with the sis's kid, not much buzz generated, I only noticed one place, TMZ I think, that even mentioned the similarity. So realistically, this does not even come close to the suri cruise Vanity Fair issue for attention, considering that that issue was how many months in anticipation? From her birth, to all the questions of "Where's suri?" "When will we see Suri?" Kidmans issue is already pretty much dead in a few days of news cycles.
Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 8 September 2007 2:42:07 PM
| |
Hello all. I thought you might enjoy these three articles about the Washed Up Washed Out One. I sure did! It seems like the media isn't liking her so much :-)
http://mhutch.blogspot.com/2007/09/keith-urbans-wife-nicole-secret-past.html http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22383778-5000117,00.html http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22380098-5001031,00.html Cheers! Posted by Urban Myths, Sunday, 9 September 2007 7:35:58 AM
| |
Ahhh yet another one:
http://www.hecklerspray.com/nicole-kidman-dresses-like-a-sailor-discusses-miscarriage/20079936.php#more-9936 Posted by Urban Myths, Sunday, 9 September 2007 1:31:02 PM
| |
Those are hilarious, Urban Myths... not everyone is impressed with these so call revelations. Well, it seems pretty clear doesnt it? She would like it to be very clear to the public that she truly, really, desperately wants to have a baby... but since urban is in no hurry, but... its only because of romance, he wants her all to himself, for years and years... (people, please try not to hurl!) So she will be forced to suffer and wait... good point, until shes about 44 or 45?
And, boy, imagine what she'd do if the tomkat decided to have another kid? Should we next expect a nude spread in Playboy, and the revelation that she was molested as a child? Stay tuned.... hilarity expected! Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 9 September 2007 1:59:50 PM
| |
Thanks Urban Myths. I had already read Robin Riley's article and taken my hat off to her. At least one Australian journalist not bedazzled by the spin doctor who has been conning Australian journalists for years with her ridiculous facade.
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 9 September 2007 2:15:08 PM
| |
This is introducing another line of thought, but what do you think about the fact that her next movie involves her being involved with a 15 year old boy...on top of the subject matter of older woman seduces children/young teenagers of her other recent movies, e.g.Birth?
Why is she gravitating toward paedophilia in her movie choices? No wonder Deborah Lee Furness, Rebecca Rigg and Naomi Watts, all dedicated mothers, are creating polite distances from their former Aussie mate. (And just out of curiosity, where ARE you Tony-In-Toronto?) Posted by morgan, Sunday, 9 September 2007 2:30:39 PM
| |
Well morgan, you would have to look at the mindset of anyone with those tendacies. On the one hand, it could just be that they are so emotionally handicapped, that they feel more comfortable with children. To them adults are more demanding, have expectations, expect responsibliity, etc...or more in kidmans case, it could just be that she 's so preoccupied with getting older, just like older men dump their older wives, and remarry younger women, she believes making these movies will give a more youthful image? Well, personally, i believe she took this movie, about the older womens affair with the younger boy, simply because she'll be playing a Nazi. Cruise is now filming a movie as a Nazi, so... weeks before it was officially announced she was making this movie, there was an internet story about how she and cruise would both be in Berlin filming at the same time, this month, september I think, with tongues wagging at maybe a possible "meeting? I hadnt even heard or seen any info online that she was even considered for this movie, The Reader. I even checked at wikipedia, and it only said that some other actress was considered for it, no mention of kidman. So when it was confirmed she had signed onto this movie, I thought, aha, was that another patented Kidman leak to the gossip sites? She signed on to the flop Invasion remake when cruise was PR-ing his war of the worlds remake. Is there anything she says or does anymore that does not seem to involve cruise? thats what I want to know.
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 9 September 2007 3:47:06 PM
| |
What is not surprising about this VF article is the fact that all these personal and private details involve other people.
Firstly TC who I am sure would have been devastated with the miscarriage. Secondly Isabella and her adoption. Thirdly Keith Urban who is 'trying real hard' in his recovering how very patronising!!. Fourthly the mystery fiance who is I am sure breathing a sigh of relief he didn't marry her. No consideration what so ever is given for their feelings, just the fact that this very narcisstic (actress) sorry typo hollywood star has movies coming out in the next few months. Posted by WAKINGS, Sunday, 9 September 2007 4:14:39 PM
| |
Those are very good points, wakings. That really is what has annoyed me about her for at least 4 yrs now. Is there anything in this issue, or for the past 6 yrs for that matter, that she recalls fondly? Everything seems to be about regret, loss, sadness. Even Urban has been nothing but "painful" to her. Even getting the Oscar is not joyful for her, all she recalls is the loneliness in the cold desolate hotel alone, although, as Morgan has pointed out here, wasnt her mother and daughter sitting with her at the awards? Did they immediately jump on airplanes to go home immediately after the awards were over? She even seems to change the facts of the events to be a bummer. Well i just read that shooting in Australia ended this past week, it will be interesting to see if she takes a little time for her family or urban, or will she just jump right into her next movie... I'd bet on the latter.
Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 10 September 2007 3:54:23 PM
| |
Dr.Adriananstein - this MONSTER Forum you have created, just will not die.
Dear MACLEN - what do you think you are doing? That Man drove me away from this place - do not provoke his return, please! hopefully he is Somewhere Quiet receiving treatment. I truly wish that Mrs Urban would slow down and spend time with Mr.Urban. I also thought of that slimeball Steve Bing - after the dreadful way he treated Liz Hurley, I thought NK was MAD to go near him. Mad. getting your client onto a VF cover is every publicists wetdream, and that's what this whole NK thing is about - The Evil Publicist - no better than a Pimp. Posted by Brownie, Monday, 10 September 2007 5:10:21 PM
| |
Can I just say in the national gossip rag Womans Day NK is proclaiming that she has lost her children to Scientology. The children have decided to spend time in Portland at a scientology camp than fly over to see their mother.
Surprise surprise - would even hurt her to actually goto her own children then have them fly to Auatralia and see her? Posted by WAKINGS, Monday, 10 September 2007 5:30:11 PM
| |
She talks about children a lot but isn't interested in mothering them. She has done a couple of films in paedophilic roles, bathing naked with a fifteen year old boy and kissing him etc. And now she's just signed up to do a movie along similar themes with another fifteen year old youth. Are these choices of hers beginning to reveal a hidden personal quirky/sick trait about this strange woman?
And she is 40 years old, mother of 2 teenagers yet her cover photo on V. is of her opening up her clothes to reveal her bra and body. Is this normal for a self-confessed wanna-be Mum? Incidentally, it must be annoying her intensely that Crowe's new film has topped the box office just days after her new film has flopped and been rejected by Australian cinemas. Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 7:21:17 AM
| |
Dont worry brownie, i only used your hilarious poem to scare the dude away again. the idiot believes hes inconspicuous posting under different names... you know that Ed wood movie..."Glenn or Glenda"? Well, we now have "Mark and Melinda"....
Morgan, actually the kid in Birth was only 10 yrs old, yeah pretty creepy. Yes the movies just keep coming, today theres another story rumor of a possible movie she's considering. But of late, I doubt most of them will even come to fruition. I recalled a few days ago she was to produce some nonsense 2 years ago, never happend. Its jsut a PR attempt to appear to be even busier than usual. Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 8:26:19 AM
| |
Not only did RC do well at the box office.
Cate Blanchett did very well in a movie called 'Ange Lee' I believe. Poor poor NK Posted by WAKINGS, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 8:51:52 AM
| |
OK Maclen - found it. he does have a distinctive style.
Above, Corianda claims that publicist WendyDay 'is a nice sort'. If this were true, she would quit promoting 'Our Nic' as Mrs. Effing Wonderful. On another Forum at this site, frequent contributor Daniel Donahoo claimed that people like us were TRAGIC shut-ins "searching for validation by Google-result". TinT appears to be proof that Donahoo has a point. And he hasn't heard (see 'Melinda' comment June above) of Rachel Griffiths despite multiple Emmy awards for Six feet Under? TinT often tells us to "get a life", and the length of time it takes to get to the end of this thread is too long for me to come back, so I will heed his WISE advice. So long everybody and please keep on topic and make it constructive criticism. Posted by Brownie, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 10:20:40 AM
| |
Well, sorry to see you go, brownie, but I certainly wouldnt take anything that dude says very serious...as for this claim by a forum "contributor", those kind of statements always make me laugh whatever message board, thread or forum I happen to see them. He's trying to convince people that people who post on this message forum are "Tragic shut-in"...by posting it on this message forum? This Donahoo sounds really too shrewd by half for this room! What other pearls of wisdom has he come up with? That parapalegics use wheelchairs because they're too lazy?
Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 12 September 2007 5:36:08 AM
| |
The forum's subject matter is irrelevant in this argument because his statement re people contributing to threads on forums as 'shut-ins' etc. must also include every single living soul who reads any forum and/or contributes to it, including politicians, film stars, students, writers, uni professors, political and religious activists etc. In fact, every human being on this planet who is connected to the internet, including Whatsisname himself. He is merely transferring his own suppressed personal frustrations and anger on to others to make him feel good. Pity him.
Some people jog two a miles a day to release a bit of energy, others eat a box of chocolates in front of Bold and the Beautiful, others knit,pray, play golf or join an archery club forever aiming for a bullseye. In the olden days, men would go outside to see who could spit the furthest distance.What thread does Whatsisname contribute to? I'd like to read what his particular passion is all about. Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 12 September 2007 8:00:26 AM
| |
He is a regular writer of essays for this online opinion site.
This 'sad bloggers' thing he wrote turned into a huge fight at the time. His wife threatened ME - and none of YOU lot came to help. put his name into Guugle or go to article #3375 HERE Daniel Donahoo - On Line Opinion Author Daniel Donahoo is fellow with OzProspect, a non-partisan, public policy think tank. He writes for Australia's daily papers and consults on ... "Influential bloggers and those who are just sad" - On Line Opinion ... Daniel Donahoo argues that blogging and bloggers are not as influential as they ... Daniel Donahoo is .. www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=3375 - 36k Posted by Brownie, Wednesday, 12 September 2007 9:26:30 AM
| |
Brownie I'm sorry you didn't receive support. Why didn't you ask for it at the time? I'd have been more than happy to have supported you.Thanks for the address. I'll check it out.
Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 12 September 2007 9:44:59 AM
| |
Thats goes ditto for me as well, brownie. If I'd even been aware of it, or made aware of it, i certainly would have given my two cents in on it. Morgan if you go to the top of this page, upper left corner, youll see a list of options. Click on "users", and youll get a list of the registered members.Click on any member to see a list of their commments. I checked and read the blog you mention brownie, and the comments...all 15 of them, I dont seem to see on the comments of threat you mention. So maybe theres a disconnect somewhere? It just seems to me that this donahoo character has a problem with tim dunlops blog "The Road to Surfdom". It seems donahoo probably believes dunlop is dissing his blog influence? Judging by donahoos paltry 19 entries, he probably has a point.
Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 12 September 2007 11:40:19 AM
| |
So, just to review the past year of the "urman" merger. Just a few months after the happy union, urban lands back in rehab, around the same time his next cd comes out. The cd only sells about a mill copies, well below his last cd totals. Cancels a couple of european gigs, then cancels an entire month off the tour, as I think of it, at a loss for the entire tour potential, and not to mention the loss of goodwill to the fans left out,(a big loss in my opinion). Meanwhile, kidman has spent the entire time on film sets, her last 2 movie flopping big time, with it seems resigned apathy on her part, as she dedicates very minimal PR to both movies, seeming to stay as far away from them as possible. Sensing the decline of her career, she desperately agrees to do a so called "tell all" for vantity fair, trying to rehash old news, and speaking of subjects she has stated in the past were too personal to discuss publicly. She just got off a movie set in Oz, just as urban is back to finish the last of his tour dates, and according to reports, she is set to report to her next movie set next month... as urban is set to....? Again, when do they schedule in a few hours, days, of real life together again?
Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 14 September 2007 1:44:27 PM
| |
Thank you Maclen. Very succinct and insightful.
As Maxwell Smart would have said, "Verrrrrrry interesting Number 99 !" Posted by morgan, Friday, 14 September 2007 6:21:09 PM
| |
I think you may enjoy the newest Urban Myths blog... along with the photos accompanying it.
Keith said in a recent radio intereview that his beautiful, beautiful princess was to have accompanied him to Canada, but alas her shooting has run over. Yet, Hugh Jackman was spotted in LA a few days ago. But Mr. Urban mentioned that his "best friend" would be accompanying him on tour in the US in November. Needless to say, those who have already bought tickets are reconsidering, and those who were considering it, will not be. Good move, Mr. Kidman. Posted by Urban Myths, Monday, 17 September 2007 5:07:01 AM
| |
Your welcome, Morgan. Didnt maxwell also say, Missed it...by that much! That could be kidmans new catchphrase. I just saw the before/after pics, Urban Myths... boy, not only botox/collogen, she needs severe photoshop, airbrush, and soft focus lens, judging by those pics! I thought I saw a farewell photo of kidman and jackmans goodbye hug at an airport, for the wrap of Australia... kidmans back shooting? Well again, bad sign for the flick, reshoots already? I wonder which is it? More zombies or projectile vomit? As I jsut wrote at Urban Myths, the question is how many dates will she actually be at? Urban can claim in an interview she'll be "on tour" with him... you see, they know it will be picked up, copied and pasted all across the blogosphere, so it must be the a fact, right, but what will the reality truly be? I predict a few gigs, a few photo ops, and she'll be off to her next film set. And over at the delusional NKU, their posting info that she starts the nazi film in Oct, and urban canceled his tour for that month... she may be in germany filming, and urban may be in nashville "recording" maybe.... you see where this might be going?
Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 17 September 2007 6:04:26 AM
| |
Another line item in the Urban merger...Keith's house is for sale.
Not "their" house as so many have reported but HIS house. And I'm sure that makes her very happy-getting rid of his stuff. Guess she doesn't feel earthed there. Maybe she can't have goats in that neighborhood? Posted by banbotox, Sunday, 23 September 2007 11:03:30 AM
| |
Well, that was the initial story, banbotox, but just as imahick pointed out over at Urban Myths, Urban is in contention for a award at the CMA's. He wouldn't want the country voters to believe he's bailing on Nashville, so just a few days later another story was leaked, no doubt, that they are NOT, repeat, NOT moving out of Nashville, but in fact have bought land "just outside" of Nashville and are going to build a "ranch" to live on and give up the big lights of hollywood and raising that goat... i mean child in a country setting. The PR wheels keep spinning...
Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 24 September 2007 4:55:31 AM
| |
It wasn't very smart of Keith to announce The Sea Hag was going to be with him on tour in November.I know a lot of people who would have gone to see him in Chicago and Nashville but have now decided not to bother since The Killjoy will be along to spoil the show. I was looking forward to going too,but have decided to not waste the money or the time to drive 5 hours to see a sub standard show.I saw him in June when The Hag was luckily still in Australia working on The Epic Flop,so he was great seemed pretty much back to normal before he had the misfortune to come across her radar.If he wants to sell out any shows he better make an announcment that due to film commitments the witch won't be able to travel with him after all.
Posted by CRICKET, Saturday, 29 September 2007 8:06:37 AM
| |
I wouldn't be surprised, Cricket, what with news that she may be busy with shooting overtime with this aussie film, by the time Nov. comes around, she'll be too busy with the next film to go babysit urban on tour. Urban will realize what comes first for her, and that's her career. But then again I believe she was just going to put in a few appearences anyways, just to have a few pics and stories to spread around. Do you honestly think she will ride around through a couple of states on a bus? Is she going to rub shoulders with roadies and band members? If anything, she'd probably just assume have wheels put on one of her movie trailers... you know, all ten thousand feet or so... and just meet him at every gig, with her press agent, her accountant, make-up artists, assistants, lawyers....
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 30 September 2007 3:31:10 PM
| |
Well, at last, a totally cohesive, lucid and completely common-sense article of the absolutely and undeniably obvious!...
Down under and out If only ... Nicole Kidman would retire. John Patterson breaks the news to the Australian diva that she's no longer a commercial proposition... http://film.guardian.co.uk/patterson/story/0,,2183626,00.html ...She's obviously struck out again with Margot... Compass is a mere "fantasy" indulgence which will help her out about as much as Happy Feet did... she's as irrelevent to it success or failure as the recording mikes... Australia will be about as interesting to the US market today as much as Crocodile Dundee or Yahoo Serious no longer are. But not as ridiculous as her couple of recent US appearences have her looking... padded bra and "masking tape attempted cleavage"... Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 6 October 2007 12:46:20 PM
| |
Thanks for that article, Maclen. She really is hideous, isn't she?
Here's a link to pics from the Film Festival in New York yesterday... http://justjared.buzznet.com/2007/10/05/nicole-kidman-margot-at-the-wedding-screening/#more-21287 http://www.hotcelebshome.com/nicole-kidman-new-line-cinema-40th-anniversary-gala-in-new-york/ Looks like her "broken ribs" aren't quite healed properly, eh? Posted by Urban Myths, Sunday, 7 October 2007 3:55:28 AM
| |
Why does she always smile with her mouth closed these days? Is there something wrong with her teeth?
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 7 October 2007 10:04:16 AM
| |
I think that's the "grin and bear it" approach - or should that be "grin and BARE it"??
Posted by nomad48au, Sunday, 7 October 2007 4:30:36 PM
| |
Yeah Urban Myths, perhaps her "rib injury" gave her the opportunity to get a breast "augentation"?... is is just me, or does there seem to be a suspicious looking darkened mark in her right armpit in those pics in the black dress? Well in a comment online somewhere, someone made a crack that her left breast failed to inflate! She does look lopsided, perhaps her duct tape was slipping. and Morgan and nomad48au, she can only "grind and bare it" grind the teeth and bare the chest...
Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 8 October 2007 3:38:36 AM
| |
NK has the cover of October Vanity Fair magazine which I get by subscription. The photo by Patrick Demarchelier has a nautical theme of yacht club cap and tied shirt held open to reveal white bra.
The banner says NK BARES ALL. Not really. She says "cryptically" that there is a complicated background to the adoption of her 2 children, but the interview does not live up to the banner claim by telling us, and the rest has nothing we did not already know. she loves her sister, she wants to 'have' a baby. at 40. with a recovering alcoholic. The cover shot has her skin snow-white, but the swimsuit shot within shows a golden tan. This photo-fiddling lie is what we ordinary women have to compete with. My favourite line of the 'interview' is "she does not want to be defined by her looks". Ya gotta laugh. She's no Helena Bonham Carter! I will probably see her current film - because it has JACK BLACK in it. He isn't defined by his looks! Maybe she noticed and will give her poor follicles a break from now on - what her hair has been through so that she isn't defined by 'looks'! Posted by Brownie, Monday, 8 October 2007 12:29:16 PM
| |
Oh yes, Vanity Fair's "sailor", came out, not with a bang but a whimper.
Revelations that were in truth just old news, brought up old questions that were pondered... for all but one news cycle and then forgotten... another miscarriage 17 long years ago... "secret" engagement...written about on every gossip site back in late 2003... a suri cruise take off photo, mentioned in maybe just one internet site... it was to be soooo scandilous, juicy fodder for the mass media...but not one peep in response from cruise, pretty much allowing it to fade after a few days. Pretty much everything she says is the antithesis of everything she does, another actress who mindlessly says her looks is not what defines her, yet spends thousands on plastic surgury, yet allows, or probably demands that magazines photoshop their photos to make them look like teenagers again...at 40, 50 yrs of age. And now her latest batch of photo ops has her strangling her boob...and no, I dont mean Urban, but her right boob, while her left one seems to have deflated a bit. and not to mention the grey hair blaring out from her subpar dye job.. Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 8 October 2007 3:47:31 PM
| |
So according to this story...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/showbiz/showbiznews.html?in_article_id=489267&in_page_id=1773 ...she tells US magazine she's in love, but not happy? And you never know which direction a marriage will go so you dont know if it will last? Boy, that's a pretty solid and confident attitude toward life with urban huh? (I wont even bother to wonder how urban feels about these statements, he basically irrelevent to this union.) Sounds like to me this is the start of the PR campaign signaling the end to this union. Her career is in the dumps...her movies are tanking...people are beginning to plead that she retire...studio heads no longer want her to head a movie of theirs... but really, who wouldnt have believed that marrying a drunk/addict wouldn't have brought her emotional and career stability? Well, not kidman, thats for sure. Well its on to the next PR campaign, maybe her own addiction/DUI problems? Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 9:25:37 AM
| |
Sounds like she is setting up for the divorce. She can officially go back and say hey I wasn't happy.
I actually think she has not trually forgiven him for whatever indiscretions took place earlier or he still is having his indiscretions but it not being published in the tabs. Anyway I thnk it is a hell of a birthday present for Keith to read that his own wife is not happy in their relationship, but hey she is only confirming what most of their photos are telling us anyway. Posted by WAKINGS, Friday, 26 October 2007 9:45:59 AM
| |
In today's Melbourne SUN there's a damning report on her failure in The Golden Compass. A total dud apparently.
Posted by morgan, Friday, 26 October 2007 9:55:08 AM
| |
Yes, I've been reading those rumors and stories as well. The director put out some statement that the ending was redone, and of course reshoots galore! Well its about time the industry pinheads started to open their eyes to her dull and uninteresting personality. And of course she's brought out of mothballs the years old tale of how she longs to get out of the business... she should do everyone a favor already and just leave, how anyone can be so starved for attention they're willing to become so blatently pathetic and irrelevent, they'd be willing to settle for scraps and negative reviews?
Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 26 October 2007 2:20:03 PM
| |
"I heard a Rumour that "......Blah, blah, !
Did you really? Well I heard a rumour that...........blah,blah,blah! ...and did you also read on the Star Weekly while at the check-out counter that Nicole apparently......... , and I heard this from a reliable source that heard it from my plumbers wifes second cousin thrice removed once heard that Nicole............Blah, Blah .Blah. Get a Life ! Losers. Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 26 October 2007 2:36:24 PM
| |
Hello Tony. Nice to hear from you.
Posted by morgan, Friday, 26 October 2007 2:46:25 PM
| |
Morgan, you took the words right out of my mouth. (Now there's a good theme for a song!)
Posted by nomad48au, Friday, 26 October 2007 5:00:29 PM
| |
...ha ha ha ha!
So according to the aussie Melbourne Herald Sun, kidman plans to steal urban's thunder by actually walking the red carpet, his red carpet, at the ARIA awards, after not ever allowing him onto hers. Smells of desperation, she needs all the photo ops she can get, what with movie flop after movie flop... I wonder if she'll be packing all that weight shes gained recently, you know to explain the breast implants? Also will her breasts be even this time, or will she have another malfunction? And what about those fishy lips... will they be trouty pouty... or will they just be red herrings? I wonder what wig she'll wear this time, a brand spanking new one or a moldy oldy? "Enquiring" minds want to know.. Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 27 October 2007 3:15:43 PM
| |
Did you know the North American Grey Owel is not a nocturnal bird, but
does hybernate for seven weeks in mid Winter? Yes, that is right. Most Grey Owels in North America live both day and night, though most do their hunting in the morning when the fawna is moist with dew as it is their only water supply. Amazingly the North American Grey Owel is not Grey at all, but rather a dull, obtress colour, making it the skilled hunter it is. The Cree people of the plains have worshipped this stunning creature since before the Europeans came to Canada to get away from the fops and dandies of britain, but I digress. Seen in it's natural habitat, the Grey Owel has a rather larger beak, allowing it to pick vermine from deeper in the thick wilderness of Northern Ontario, giving it a head start on the rest of the hunting birds because of the food supply chains lack of soil and its verosity, with little else than a few fallen leaves, miraculously builds it's nest in late Autumn .For more information about the North American Grey Owel , the Canadian Broadcasting Company will be airing a three part prime time mini series beginning this saturday at 8:00 pm eastern standard time, immediately after the saturday night live hockey game on C.B.C Sports.(Cable 4 in Sudbury). If you are an educator and wish to have more information in text for your students, please do not hesitate to write the North Ontario Government Wildlife Preserve at 111 Queen Victoria Way, Thunder Bay. m5F 8J2 and please allow a minimum of 5 weeks for post.Thankyou for sharing with us our national treasures. Next week the C.B.C is proud to present the Nova Scotian jagged tail trout, as it migrates from the baffin island straights to the Grand Banks.Now we return you to the regularly schedueled Australian 2007 series,Rampant Homosexuality in Perth , Australia, and why it has become a social phenomenon. Posted by tonyintoronto, Saturday, 27 October 2007 9:38:32 PM
| |
What is Zoloft?
Zoloft is an antidepressant in a group of drugs called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Zoloft affects chemicals in the brain that may become unbalanced and cause depression, panic, anxiety, or obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Zoloft is used to treat depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). Zoloft may also be used for purposes other than those listed in this medication guide. Zoloft side effects: Get emergency medical help if you have any of these signs of an allergic reaction: skin rash or hives; difficulty breathing; swelling of your face, lips, tongue, or throat. Call your doctor at once if you have any new or worsening symptoms such as: mood or behavior changes, anxiety, panic attacks, trouble sleeping, or if you feel impulsive, irritable, agitated, hostile, aggressive, restless, hyperactive (mentally or physically), more depressed. *THE PRECEEDING HAS BEEN A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT* Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 28 October 2007 4:02:13 AM
| |
Thank you Tony for the update analysis of Nicole Kidman, although it is common knowledge that her natural plumage is grey.
Yes, she DOES have "a rather large beak" but as you say, she needs this for "picking vermin". (Which she utilises as her PR staff.) Were you aware that the trout you mention have now reached their destination and are currently enjoying their new incarnation as her lips? Posted by morgan, Sunday, 28 October 2007 7:28:49 AM
| |
My this thread goes to a different level of entertaiment when it is hit with TNT. Just love a good chuckle.
Nice responses Maclean and Morgan! Posted by WAKINGS, Sunday, 28 October 2007 10:33:41 AM
| |
Maclean..............please do stay on the Zoloft. Thankyou.
Posted by tonyintoronto, Monday, 29 October 2007 2:37:16 AM
| |
So kidman made her "first" red carpet appearence with urban, of course it was on his red carpet. Nothing like publicity whoring when your career is in the dumps...and at a local aussie award show too, is that the best urban can do?...(but nothing to blow your brains out over, eh Dude?) Of course her lips were "blown to be shown"...(they came out to here!) And the leaked story about her gaining weight to cover the lame boob job can now be put to rest as she looked as anorexic as ever...and wearing that black longshoremens coat...what is she copping from TomKats recent look?...she looked like she forgot to put on pants... but then again... "How many people want to be "discovered " to be film stars? but never got discovered?
Even though you knew at 5 years old you were"...but kidman knew what it took, but unfortunely, that was 17 yrs ago, when she was young...but now she's old, like you, dude... Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 29 October 2007 3:27:43 AM
| |
Isn't it enough y'all have an entire Continent to yourselves? You can't make room for one actress? Or is it like California. You know..............A STATE of Mind?
We all die. life is short. Why spend it talking badly about others is beyond me. I am going to Baker Lake for a few months so i will not be available to comment on your comments which you all comment on commenting on incessantly. Why is Nic. not replying or taking part in your conversations? Think about it. When you speak badly and so persistantly about one person, don't you think it gets around, especially in this business, and you never do know who you are speaking to!Food for thought. LOL-Be well. -Tony. Posted by tonyintoronto, Monday, 29 October 2007 3:49:00 AM
| |
Tony, that is the excellent part about it !
By the way, in the few seconds Urban was on camera on the red carpet with Morticia Adams by his side, instead of focussing on her husband and the interviewer and the content of the brief interview , (Keith's music), Morticia kept looking round, away from the interview, to wave to fans. She couldn't let it be about Urban even for a few seconds. Posted by morgan, Monday, 29 October 2007 6:34:06 AM
| |
You never know Morgan, the ridiculous manifestations of the "melinda" and "mark" may be the translucent one, who may yet be amoung us. Yelping and screeching in a baying of unfulfiled, self unrealized nihilism... for she did seem to arrive to the Aria's in a costume... she seemed to have gone dressed as her character of the stepford wife. And the revealing light of day did nothing for all that wasted money gone into botox, skin peels, lip injections...she looked like the walking dead itself.... so in the season, Ill leave you with a orson wells quote... "that grinning, glowing globular sitting in the middle of your living room is only a member of the pumkin patch... and if your doorbell rings and nobody's there, that was not botoxia, it's Halloween.
BoooooOOOOoOOOOOO Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 29 October 2007 4:03:57 PM
| |
maclen that was a great quote!
Who knew Nic would make Halloween such a funny holiday? In the wonderful world of Nicole there are no mirrors that speak the truth. Only the magic mirror that tells her she is the fairest one of all! Her display is a pathetic attempt to look young and she looks absolutely awful next to Delta (I think that is her name). Thank heavens Wendy gave her a coat to put on-she would have blinded the fans if they had seen too much more of that skank white skin. Posted by banbotox, Wednesday, 31 October 2007 10:47:25 PM
| |
REALITIES IS YOU PEOPLES IS MAKING SO INSANITY WHAT YOU ARE TALK!Hear, in Sao Paulo is you are what we talk to say you have situation for people you jelous!For you to know I am a very big actor in Sao Paulo and evrey body is loving my culo so es very much, they can not kiss enough. I leaf you two discussing! How you can be so allow your selfs so low? Chame on goospis bad talking.Is simple no good came from these.
Posted by tonyintoronto, Thursday, 1 November 2007 1:25:45 AM
| |
To telling please is what is es "SKANK?".What this means ? Is food you eat in Australia ?You know they are so very many Homosesuals in Australia. Is Why you like to eat ass? I thinking perhaps you no espell skunk , or is a word I do no not before I cames to you are blog. Ok. Thankyou.
Posted by tonyintoronto, Thursday, 1 November 2007 1:33:41 AM
| |
Banbotox, kidman is such a attention junkie, she would warp her face trying to stay looking "young", but just as meth addicts are so oblivious to how it actually makes them look, she truly believes she looks good. And the torturous thing about it is it will only get worse... kidman's future, look to farrah, melanie griffith...joan rivers! Yes that last minute coat made that wreck of a dress look even more of an embarrassment...but then her movies are embarrassements arent they, and urbans behavior is an embarrasment....and on and on...
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 1 November 2007 5:17:38 AM
| |
Tony haven't you gone to Bakers Lake yet??
Don't like the line of conversation here don't join in, this thread always seems to upset you. Posted by WAKINGS, Thursday, 1 November 2007 5:54:50 PM
| |
Wakings, this dude is not taking his prescribed meds, you know, ZOLOFT... and just as kidman is no doubt frying her brains out with direct injections of botox into her forehead, this dude is also letting his mind turn to mush... must be from spending all that time at yahoo answers, asking asinine questions like "what is the best soup" and "who can smell his rank body odor", and such rubish... and his answers are about as incoherant as they are on this thread...
Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 2 November 2007 8:41:24 AM
| |
WOW ! The hate , slander and maliscious talk on this site about one actress is beyond me. She is only doing what all other actresses do. Nothing less or more. I don't understand the personal grievance you have against her.So extremely personal! Has she done you wrong ? What's really all this about ? It is not about Nicole. It is about you and your hate.Really, I wish to know why so much hate on one actress.Why are you so obsessed with her?
As for Zoloft and my answers on Yahoo Q and A, that alone tells me you know Zolft as part of your life, and spend your life at Yahoo Answers.com as if you have no life of your own.You live in Darkness and Shame.Don't bother replying. I will leave you disgusting little devils to yourselves as I sadly just realiezed how full of real hate and loneliness you must be sufferring. I am sorry for you. Really, I am. Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 2 November 2007 12:25:02 PM
| |
Thanks Tony. I feel much better now.
Posted by morgan, Friday, 2 November 2007 12:32:14 PM
| |
yo dude, just take your meds and step away from the keyboard already... dont be a liability to the people in your life... if there's anybody left, that is. Quit embarrassing yourself and annoying us on this thread...or I'll link to that photo you posted on a certain online dating service, and we can really have a laugh...
...so over at Urban Myths they're wondering if kidman will walk the carpet with urban at the CMAs, since she did at the ARIAs... some believe she will just for the exposure, I think she'll be too busy with her own thing. Seeing that the Aria's were conviently in Oz, where presumeably she's still shooting the movie that will never end, she's doing tv promo that same week. So we'll see. Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 2 November 2007 1:06:49 PM
| |
That's correct, Maclen. The CMA's are on the 7th. She is scheduled for Letterman on the 8th, and Conan O'Brien on the 9th. Plus there is a rumor about Good Morning America. Certainly it would be beneath her to walk the red carpet at a "country music" show, though, wouldn't it?
Posted by Urban Myths, Saturday, 3 November 2007 6:30:56 AM
| |
That's very true, Urban Myths. It looks like urban himself isnt sure what shes going to do. As I mentioned before, in a interview a few months ago, didnt he announce that she would be touring with him in Nov? and now recently, hes said she will be too busy filming, and will not tour with him. But I'm sure she'll make sure hes ready to escort her to her next movie premiere, thats if there is a premiere for the next one.
Posted by MACLEN, Saturday, 3 November 2007 11:17:59 AM
| |
I just found out about this site that is pretty hilarious....
http://nicolekidmansforehead.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2007-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&updated-max=2008-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&max-results=18 ...for anyone intested in up to the minute ridiculous comments and statements by kidman, as they are coming so frequently, with two movies that will bomb at the box office with in one month, and the photos are out of this world... boy can she be anymore patently phoney and deluded about pretty much everything she does? Her stories dont even match up from interview to interview. So now, her paranoia has landed her in court for defamation. She is just so terrified of a pap.... he must have taken a hideous photo of her on a bad hair day. It must be true, because her daddy says so! Next i predict she will have her new nephew take the stand and proclaim what a great mother she is.... Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 5:41:18 PM
| |
Maclen this is legendary ! Thank you for bringing it to my attention. The author/blogger deserves a medal..
Posted by morgan, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 6:27:31 PM
| |
I am a Big Marshmallow today.
Posted by tonyintoronto, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 11:54:21 PM
| |
Everything I have been reading lately, from her, are denials that she has ever had plastic surgery or used botox. Methinks thou dost protest too much
Posted by morgan, Thursday, 15 November 2007 6:17:01 AM
| |
Thank you very much for the advert. I will be putting my money into this Assie bank now that the Canuk Buck is $1.10 USD.
Cheers Mate ! Ps. Ya...........went to the site you advertised . Who-ah ! Hello ! I have never seen skin like that before. At least not since the Brits land at Pearson. We run to them , offering them food and Oxygen!. They are so pink or transluscent. Makes us Canuks quiver. Seriously.We do what we can to help those in need . Oi! Posted by tonyintoronto, Thursday, 15 November 2007 10:07:10 AM
| |
Morgan, as for the plastic surgery... funny how it went from no plastic surgery and no needles touching her face, to now simply plastic surgery. So what Im wondering is when are these brain dead interviewers going to simply ask about those balloning lips? And I find those photos at Kidmans Forehead of her before and after boob job very convincing. Yeah so kidmans desperate, but no amount of botox, collegen or silicon implants is going to buy he another hit movie.
Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 16 November 2007 5:17:37 AM
| |
I'm still a Big MarshMallow and I don't know why.
Posted by tonyintoronto, Friday, 16 November 2007 7:27:56 AM
| |
So, Margot finally comes out...in two whopping theaters. Why even bother making the flick? This film was made as oscar bait, not profit. And after making the festival rounds, its already played out. Noms for kidman unlikely is the consensus, (unless the golden globes brownnosers throw her a bone...seems they go for the actresses with a little bone to their bodies...) Basically all this PR overkill and personal angst tour, was for the bloated golden compass, crippling along to its release in just a few weeks...boy I wonder if all the reshoots and redone ending helped any!? And of course, surprise, surprise... no ones seen it yet, and wont see it until just a week before its release. You dont have to be bloody Criswell to predict why not.
Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 19 November 2007 5:45:24 AM
| |
Maclen, in one of the papers here in Oz yesterday, there was a "shame,shame!" outcry article about The Golden Compass. It's still apparently very anti- Christian even tho' they have cut out a lot of the more obvious anti propaganda. This will do her 'image' no good as she claims to be religious. (Pretending to worship God when we all know it is herself she adoreth.)
I agree about the trout lips. They are so obvious that even Blind Freddie can see it. As I've said before, the journalists here all seem to worship her, for some reason. I don't get it.It seems that not one Oz columnist or journo is brave enough to do a truthful article on her. What are they afraid of? Posted by morgan, Monday, 19 November 2007 6:48:22 AM
| |
Oh my God, I've just seen today's SUN (Melbourne Sun) where Botaxia is raving on about losing two babies, not one, to Cruise. Who cares? It was years ago, both parties are happily re-married and hundreds of women a day have miscarriages but get on with their lives.Still ramming it down the media's throats years later Botaxia? You have to be kidding! Even more revealing, in the interview she keeps referring to God, including "It's in God's hands" etc. etc. An obvious ploy to distance herself from the publicity of The Golden Compass. Is the public really so naive to fall for this?
Posted by morgan, Monday, 19 November 2007 7:11:32 AM
| |
Well Morgan, its pretty obvious that if she didnt rehash all this past personal trauma, she wouldnt have anything to say really. So she flogs it ad nauseum, and doesnt she know this... so she over does all this rather stale hyperbole, until she sounds like a fluttering teenager. Its like if she says it enough times, it just might come true. And now hasnt her little delusional tales landed her in court, there to defend the newspaper ruled to have defamed a pap. (with help, no doubt by team kidman!) Its true justice for her to be hauled into a courtroom to answer for her overdramatic fantasy world. And as for compass, sounds like a car wreck... just like the literal one on the set of Invasion...reshoots and re-edits, I predict it will take an act of god to save this unholy mess! But then isnt the author of the book a well known atheist? oh well, good luck with all of that.
Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 19 November 2007 5:31:11 PM
| |
I saw pictures of her walking into the court house in her beige school marm costume. She's such a victim...so fragile and all. What a joke!
I've really never seen a person who can talk out of both sides of her mouth with the ease and skill that botoxia displays. Over here she is on yet another magazine cover...babbling about how she is not happy in her marriage but deeply in love. Oh boo hoo, poor Nic. Whatever... Doesn't she have more re-shoots to do for her epic? She really should be focused on that and keep her scary face out of the grocery store check-out lines. Posted by banbotox, Saturday, 24 November 2007 7:11:31 AM
| |
All she could say in court was...and I quote directly...."I was really, really scared". Which sounds like something a little girl who got a fright in the school yard would say. "I was really, really scared." She must have learned that line whilst picking out her court costume.
Posted by morgan, Saturday, 24 November 2007 8:01:28 AM
| |
Just got this from the IMDb. Apparently Invasion didn't even gross enough to pay for Botoxia's pay packet. This really is one hell of a mixed up world we live in when this freak can still command top dollar and still get work! I totally agree with John Patterson of the Guadian Unlimited and pray she will retire and give us all a break. Pity she didn't before a fine director like Stanley kubrick made such an ass of himself. I saw an interview with her the other day - just a snippet mind - before I was struck with bad stomach cramps and vomiting - where she said she picks her projects by the director. Well the way things are going I hope she finds working with Uwi Boll a rewarding experience.
Snoggett AND THE GOLDEN TURKEY GOES TO... By LOU LUMENICK Post Movie Critic Put on a napkin and get ready to feast on The Post's ninth annual Turkey Awards, honoring Hollywood's most dubious achievements of the year. Last year, top honors went to Scarlett Johansson, who certainly got off to a feathers-flying 2007 with her inept work in “The Nanny Diaries," one of countless gobblers from the Weinstein farm. But Sony robbed Scarlett of the chance to repeat by bumping her no-doubt-immortal performance as “The Other Boleyn Girl" into the wasteland of next February, giving a turkey leg up to Oscar winner (and multiple past Turkey Award honoree) Nicole Kidman. The ex-Mrs. Cruise was the year's highest-paid actress, reportedly receiving $17 million to play a woman pretending to be a pod person (an autobiographical role?) in “The Invasion," which grossed a total of $15 million in the United States. Her apparently permanently frozen face didn't register much in the way of expression in this or “Margot at the Wedding," an even scarier movie. We can hardly wait for next month's “His Dark Materials: The Golden Compass," reuniting Kidman with Daniel Craig, the same actor she showed no chemistry with in “Invasion." Hazel Posted by snoggett, Saturday, 24 November 2007 9:35:09 PM
| |
Who said the Aussie press don't knock her? I had to post this in two parts due to word limit!
www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22807892-5007146,00.html Kidman acting out the celeb dilemma Part 1 By Brendan Shanahan November 23, 2007 07:48am ALONG with cardigans and bad acting, privacy has been one of the great themes of Nicole Kidman's life. Until this week, that is, when she was finally forced out of her cloister, blinking into the sunlight, to give evidence against a paparazzi photographer accused of stalking her. This can't have been easy for a person as private as Nicole. I mean how would you feel if only days after you appeared in the media talking about your miscarriages you had to appear in court, reliving the terrifying ordeal of being photographed in your car? Just thinking about it makes me feel violated. Privacy has not always come easily to Nicole Kidman. Her struggle began when she innocently married a Hollywood megastar who thinks that there are dead aliens in volcanos and psychiatry is evil. Doing their best to keep the passionate affair a secret, the newlyweds embarked on almost 10 years of worldwide publicity before finally calling it quits. Tired of spending almost a decade ignoring the fact her husband was barking mad and repulsed by the empty celebrity life, "our Nic" decided to get serious. So she made The Hours and won an Academy Award by wearing a rubber nose and a straw hat - in Hollywood this is called "acting". Yet, despite outward appearances, there was still something missing, a hole in her heart that no percentage of her $200 million-dollar fortune could fill Posted by snoggett, Saturday, 24 November 2007 9:37:51 PM
| |
I have to agree with you on that, snogget. It really does look like the Aussies are becoming just a annoyed with her, her movies, and her pathetic public displays, in just the few years she's tried to re-establish herself as the "aussie queen" bringing along the dead weight as a suposedly "aussie king". I wouldnt be surpised that by the time this bloated and overwraught Australia movie comes out, they will had enough of her manufacured personal trauma, and not be interested in her manufactured celluloid trauma. She truly is overdoing the angst.
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 25 November 2007 4:07:50 AM
| |
Thanks Snoggett. That was great. At least there appears to be one Aussie journalist out there who is not mesmerised by La Kidman. The beige cardie etc. she wore to court was a vast contrast to the recent mag. cover photo of her leaning towards the camera pulling out her false boobs
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 25 November 2007 7:11:37 AM
| |
Well so heres an early review of golden compass...pretty much what was expected.... doubtful if it'll be Lord of the rings, for sure, and no doubt a poor mans Narnia...
The Golden Compass Review Samson Dangerfield Christopher, aged ten, will never forgive me for two things: a) his birth certificate, and b) the sheer disappointment he felt after watching the first leg of Chris Weitz’s cinematic adaptation of Philip Pullman’s trilogy, "His Dark Materials". I can understand his grievance concerning a). But I’m not sure why I should take the blame for Weitz’s spectacular shambles. The books weave a magic that the film simply cannot match. rest of review: http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/film_reviews/article2956068.ece Posted by MACLEN, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 6:42:37 AM
| |
Thanks maclean for this link. Interesting the comments 'John, London' makes.
I am actually interested in this film because I like fantasy but I won't rush out and see it on the big screen unless I hear more positive reviews, this could be one for a raining Sunday afternoon at home using the DVD player. Posted by WAKINGS, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 9:25:30 AM
| |
Yes, wakings, it just premiered in London, and random reviews are trickling out... no consensus yet. Well, as for Margot, it came out a couple of weeks ago... with so so reviews, limited release, it will fade of course now with focus on Compass.... and with it losing the few noms at the indie Gotham awards, I proclaim its over. As for Golden Compass, with its 180 mill price tag, it will have to do at least as well as Narnia to be considered a success... and Narnia grossed $291,710,957 in the US, and $744,783,957 worldwide. And i dont seriously see that much appeal for compass, whereas Lord of the Rings had an immense generational appeal as the three novels were written 50 years ago, and Harry Potter is a recent phenomenon that equals Tolkien in appeal. Chronicles of Narnia also had that generational appeal as they were written over 50 yrs ago as well, and The Golden Compass was written in 1995. Id say that's a pretty pale comparison in time to build a meaningful fanbase. I would be willing to bet that compass will be more in step with something like Bridge to Terabithia, which came out earlier this year, and was also very "Narniaesque" and grossed only $82,272,442 in the US and $133,279,576 world wide. Just because it has alot of expensive CGI sequences doesnt nessasarily mean it will be huge, i mean, look at the recent Beowulf...
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 29 November 2007 4:06:04 PM
| |
Yes my gut instinct tells me it won't do as well as the movies you have mentioned. I think her star status is slowly fading and she is desperately trying to cling onto it. Her whole identity is based on her public image IMHO. She has two adopted children she could focus on more but it is quite evident her career is more important.
Posted by WAKINGS, Friday, 30 November 2007 4:44:08 PM
| |
Yeah, i think your right wakings. also I think the fact that this summers big francise movies, spiderman 3, Pirates ofthe carribean 3 and the latest Harry potter film.... were either disapointing criticly, box office wise or just played out, unless there is a major following for the source material, I dont see compass doing extraordinarily well at all. And then not to mention the whole religion contraversary, how many will skip this movie? and how many will go to see it because of it? And there again, how much interest is there? I think not as much as they hope.
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 2 December 2007 7:30:32 AM
| |
...so i see theres going to be about 800+ theaters showing sneak peaks of Compass today... and it seems the premieres are out of the way, strangly a whole week before the release date. Dont they usually have the premieres within days of the release date? I think its because kidman has to either finish up filming in Oz, or report for the already in production on the Reader, which is filming around her. Its kidmans tortured filming shoots and over delayed wrecks that now seem to interfere when her films are released, as in The Invasion, and now its interfereing with her PR for this compass film. I guess the sneak peaks are supposed to sustain the buzz in place of any pr by kidman for the upcoming week. What I think it will actually do is prematurely snuff the buzz and make it appear that it's come out a week earlier and already start to fade in interest with audiences, who are always looking to the next movie.
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 2 December 2007 11:54:36 AM
| |
Snuffing the buzz is the go, I think Maclen. Good way to put it.
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 2 December 2007 4:54:22 PM
| |
Yes, Morgan, the New York premiere for Compass was last night, and sure enough, no kidman. But no daniel craig, either. So that makes me re- think the reason she couldnt make it. Perhaps kidman and Craig both heard from New Line that the sneak peeks only sold out 50% of theaters, and they decided to bail on the movie, just as they did for the Invasion. If so, the compass has a long and tedious week long trek to it's release, which may be headed to only half the audience anyone expects , or New Line hopes.
Posted by MACLEN, Monday, 3 December 2007 11:55:49 AM
| |
Oh dear, I wonder what will happen, so much bad press for NK, ah well we do make our own beds now don't we, lets sit back and watch this unfold. This Christmas may sux this year as well for her.
Posted by WAKINGS, Tuesday, 4 December 2007 7:05:17 PM
| |
Well just imagine wakings, if Golden Compass tanks that will be two major movies in one year. If you noticed another one of those meaningless top earning actresses lists came out, and kidman fell to #4, surprisingly only a few months after being declared #1... her rep after this might cause her to fall off the radar...if only!
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 6 December 2007 12:08:40 PM
| |
Hilton Perez went to town on her this week, aided and abetted by The Daily Tele ...
apparently her model at Madam Tussaud's is The Most Realistic One because she looks like a wax dummy in actual life. HaHa haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Posted by Brownie, Saturday, 22 December 2007 10:13:43 AM
| |
Ah yes, we are treated to YET AGAIN, another Nic is preggers story. Happy Holidays!
Mission Accomplished Nic! Take the focus off of your movies and your "adopted" kids not calling you Mommy. Whatever. Posted by banbotox, Monday, 31 December 2007 5:15:29 AM
| |
Yes. Whatever. Including "I don't smoke" and "I haven't had any work done on my face". Yawn. Whatever.
Meanwhile her kids, luckily, HAVE got a life. And two parents who actually give a damn. Posted by morgan, Monday, 31 December 2007 6:35:01 AM
| |
Morgan, you forgot she intends to retire to the ranch...or go on the road with urban. And banbotox, you are right, this is so predictable as to be a blatant attempt to change the subject of her horrible press. The uber failure of not just Compass... but Invasion as well. The impotency of Margot... or is that the infertile Margot? Of off handedly admitting that her adoptive kids sometimes call her by her first name, only to be clipped by katie holmes who says they call her mom... the obvious leak by some kidman flunkie will only cememt her true title of the girl who cried wolf.
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 4:41:14 AM
| |
So, this latest monotonous pregnant story, started by the Daily Mail, denied by kidman's shill, the new york post reasoning its true,now pictures of kidman out wearing a pink floral muummu, purposely loose fitting in the front, after having worn skin tight dresses and suits, to give the gossip sites another reason to keep the story going. I'd say if this one turns out to be another dud, she will be recognized as a desperate rumor monger, who's career is finished and trying to stay in the tabloids.
Posted by MACLEN, Thursday, 3 January 2008 10:46:23 AM
| |
maclen-she has worn that dress before, not with the purple sweater but she's been photographed in that frock. I believe it was during the summer last year. I'll try to find out exactly when.
Rumor monger-that's a good name. My choice is pathological narcissist. Posted by banbotox, Friday, 4 January 2008 2:12:52 AM
| |
The personality disorder involving narcissism also covers Delusions of Grandeur so I think that would be about right.
One thing's for sure, since her son Connor never sees her, he won't have to worry about ever suffering an Oedipus complex. Posted by morgan, Friday, 4 January 2008 4:52:07 AM
| |
Banbotox, Urban myths has both pics on the home page of her wearing this dress. And certainly the older pic, the dress of course doesnt look maternal in any way. There seems to be another set of new pics of the "glowing" couple entering a restraunt for dinner this time...
http://www.hollywoodgrind.com/nicole-kidman-eats-for-one-or-two/ Two days of new pics in a row? She certainly doesnt look to have any bump here... so I guess they've decided to just get as much photo ops in as possible before the buzz dissapates. Will it get people into theatres for compass? Laughingly not, its DOA, but as you say Morgan, I guess she didnt have bella or connor over for xmas, so this baby dribble was all she had left to flog for the paps Posted by MACLEN, Friday, 4 January 2008 10:48:05 AM
| |
Thanks Maclean for the photo link - is it me or does KU look really unkept in these photos.
Posted by WAKINGS, Sunday, 6 January 2008 10:44:23 AM
| |
Yes KU does look unkempt. There are homeless people who look neater. And NK is no 'style-icon' when she has to dress herself and do her own hair. This thread is THREE years old and we have seen no improvement in her whatsoever.
has she done anything at all for those UN Children she is a spokesperson for? Posted by Brownie, Sunday, 6 January 2008 10:53:14 AM
| |
Faark, this many posts discussing NK!??
Posted by Rainier, Monday, 7 January 2008 3:35:41 AM
| |
702 posts so far.
Posted by Rainier, Monday, 7 January 2008 3:36:59 AM
| |
Probably get busier now NK has confirmed her pregnancy. Even though I am not fond of her or her acting I hope all is well and it brings them everything they wish for.
Posted by WAKINGS, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 1:25:48 PM
| |
I just hope that she will be a better mother to her third child than she has been to first two.
Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 2:22:33 PM
| |
Well, wakings and morgan, your better persons than I, obviously, because until she actually has a kid and is displaying he/she on the cover of magazines... (of course, Vanity Fair...) I wouldnt be too surprised to hear she lost this baby also. I really do think she is pathelogically in need of sympathy or popularity to try and pull this off again. Of course only time will tell, but her history, whether actual or manipulative, is she will not carry to term. We'll see. But she definately does not strike me as the motherly or nurturing type.
Posted by MACLEN, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 2:39:13 PM
| |
I do hope their happy news leads the happy couple to slow-down their superfluous money-making efforts to live in one place and raise this child.
Australia would be nice. Then I would hope that the effing media just leave them alone. I would also hope that the child is not adversely affected by all the damn chemicals in the parents - how much of them in her endless hair-processing seeps into her head I wonder. and while we are on hair - I would hope that he could wash and comb his one day before going out to throw away all those bogan shirts he lives in (considering how wealthy he is). Now let's start criticising their baby names: we know for sure it won't be a Tom or a Kate ... Posted by Brownie, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 3:29:23 PM
| |
What I can't wait to see is how her face will be now she can't have botox injections. I actually think she wouldn't have that many in the first place its just her vanity getting in the way.
Do the lip injections have to stop too?? Not sure on their effect on the unborn fetus. Posted by WAKINGS, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 7:25:00 PM
| |
Without the injections, her lips will shrink inwards and the face will collapse and give way to natural lines and wrinkles but the body will balloon. And balloon. And balloon.The mind boggles to think of the end result. I predict that she will stop being seen in public before too long and not reappear uintil after the baby is born and she's caught up with her normal regime of botox et al.
Re names, what about Kid Cole? Posted by morgan, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 7:49:33 PM
| |
To answer your question Brownie about the two UN programs she's
involved with, I believe she has done nothing, nada, zip. I guess she's just been too darn busy-ignoring her children, acting in block-buster movies, keeping her husband happy. Oh and that pregnancy thing probably took up a good deal of her time too. Posted by banbotox, Saturday, 12 January 2008 12:11:36 PM
| |
Well, well, well. I thought Tom was meant to be the weird one in his relationship with Kidman. Nothing could be more weird than her decision to have her father deliver her baby! He is a doctor of the mind, not the body. He's only a psychologist, not a psychiatrist. (at least psychiatrists have to do their medical training before going on to become a psychiatrist.) Next thing we know we'll have dentists delivering their daughters' babies. Then drug and alcohol counsellors.Since Mr. Kidman is not a doctor, let alone a gynocologist, he wouldn't be immune to peering up women's'insides'. It could be quite a shock, not to mention a yukky sight, not to mention that she is his DAUGHTER for crying out loud! Scientology suddenly pales into insignificance when you imagine what it must be like behind closed doors at the Kidman (Adams) Family home.
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 13 January 2008 12:53:13 PM
| |
Well actually in that so obviously leaked news story by teamkidman, morgan, i found the most hilarious part was when it was explained that kidman concieved around urban's birthday, when they "got together. When it is probably more likely if she is "with child"... its more likely it was concieved in a test tube, and the donor egg was planted in her womb. But Id hazzard to quess trying to grow a baby in that body, it would be better to try and succeed by planting it in a barren desert, or more likely the frigid north pole.
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 13 January 2008 5:44:22 PM
| |
... and on the day the big announcement was made, they went out and had dinner in a public restaurant and were photographed.
She is too skinny and too old, to be risking her birth to amateurs, especially since the father has a system full of drugs. Posted by Brownie, Sunday, 13 January 2008 6:07:04 PM
| |
Brownie what do you mean about her father having a system full of drugs? I am intrigued.
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 13 January 2008 6:09:13 PM
| |
So now we hear that she is worried about all the paps following her around and telling every detail of her alleged pregnancy. Now she may go away to keep things private. This is unbelievable...
Let's review...she leaks to the press they are expecting. She is out and about everywhere in town. Next she is fearful of the paps needing her husband to protect her from the flashing cameras. Then details of how she wants things to be at hospital leak out...now the possible hiding for privacy. I can only hope that when she is "off to see the wizard" she stays G.O.N.E. Posted by banbotox, Sunday, 20 January 2008 2:49:41 AM
| |
Banbotox, there's no way she'll be off to see the wizard now, because he's too tied up coping with all the hype and scientology-suing being generated by his biography by Andrew Moreton.And there's no way she can consult the wicked witch of the west because she IS the wicked witch of the west. And she can't consult her best friend and mentor Tony-in-Toronto because he's flat out writing the scripts for her press releases. What's a girl to do?
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 20 January 2008 5:59:16 AM
| |
Morgan - I said "THE father has a system full of drugs"
meaning Keith Urban whose substance use is well-documented, and implying that this is one of several factors which should make them have a hospital birth. Those DISGUSTING photographers will already be bribing witless nurses right across Sydney, so it will be a nightmare anyhow. Maybe Angelina & Brad have given the Urbans the address of that Namibian one? Has everybody been over to TonyMoralesInToronto on Farcebook? Posted by Brownie, Sunday, 20 January 2008 8:59:27 AM
| |
Ooops, of course, Brownie! Didn't register as I had 'her' father in mind when I read your post.Sorry.
Posted by morgan, Sunday, 20 January 2008 9:39:49 AM
| |
Morgan, no offence taken at all.
back in April 2007 we were talking about a biog of her, and I assume Andrew Morton referenced the same one because he has regurgitated (WITHOUT NAMING which means he couldn't find out) the 'older man' story ... "Morton, who spent two years researching the book, reports that when Kidman was 17 the "rebellious and impetuous" teen flew to Amsterdam with a 37-year-old boyfriend for a holiday. Morton further claims that when that relationship foundered, she lived on and off for three years with fellow actor Tom Burlinson - leaving him after turning down his marriage proposal" Posted by Brownie, Sunday, 20 January 2008 3:31:43 PM
| |
banbotox, the stories of her being frightened by the scary papparatz... of course after weeks of getting in her photo ops... seems like an obvious and convienent excuse to hide out in Oz. Even read a rumor she may even bolt Oz. It certainly opens up the opportunities for whatever way this thing is going to play out. At what point, if it happens, does she disappear from the scene? As for the Morton book... my opinion of the bio is basically set by a story I just read today... Morton claims the divorce came about because kidman was becoming bored with cruise and the marriage, as she was beginning to come out from under his shadow, and that cruise desperately tried to woo her back! Which, for someone who spent years researching for it, shows a total ignorance of the timeline of the split. At the time cruise filed for divorce, her previous film was Practical Magic with sandra bullock,. which was an insignificant piece of fluff that went nowhere... when she recieved the divorce papers, she was barely in the middle of filming moulin rouge... and a few months later, her film the Others came out... and certainly after the divorce, moulin rouge came out and she recieved her very first Oscar nom. So the idea that her career success caused the split is ridiculous. She only recieved critical aclaim after the split and divorce. As for cruise being so desperate to woo her back? Obviously Morton is also ignorant of the divorce proceedings as well.
Posted by MACLEN, Sunday, 20 January 2008 4:37:00 PM
|
I can't say I "hate" nicole, but I am increasingly pissed off at the acolation these film stars get just for being extremely lucky in their lives. They do nothing but be beautiful and encourage anorexia. They have nothing profound to say to the public. they don't do enough good with the millions they earn for making movies. I would have preferred to hear that nicole was taking two million with her to asia's tsunami victims than simply "doing a tour " of the devastation. Lucky victims and survivors they get to meet a movie star instead of getting medical supplies and food and counselling.
Kylie is just as bad, promoting sex as if there's nothing else in life. She's done everything in her videos bar ripping her clothes right off. That's great for the guys and girls growing up thinking that's all there is isn't it? Instead of pouting into the camera , Kylie should be encouraging self confidence and self love to teenagers. and maybe dishing out some of her millions to several charities too. That should be in the papers instead of how great her arse is. Whcih b y the way is only great because you get to see it so much you are brainwashed.
gggrrr