The carbon dioxide hoax will prove to be among all the other hoaxes perpetrated by lunatics throughout previous centuries, and accepted by really dumb people.

A few warm days in Spring, and the scare mongers are already predicting catastrophe and 'climate emergency'. And, the same drongos will believe it all.

Not surprisingly more people generate more CO2. To accommodate them we build houses on flood plains, next to forests and on the coastline. We are putting ourselves in harms way as well as changing the atmosphere. If world population was say 2bn not 8bn these problems would be more manageable.

You can argue til you are blue in the face that global warming is not happening but I think deep down Joe Public has accepted it. Now the problem is paying for it. Current economic woes such as energy costs and housing affordability are aggravated by the need for climate adaptation measures. As a result some countries are reducing their birth rate. The pro-life message will be overwhelmed.

I agree with family planning with the use of a good contraception plan/product.

Abortion as a last resort and better than bringing an unwanted child into the world.

As for climate change only fools, idiots and the moribund deny the reality that's happening before our very eyes!

All well and good for labor to agree that climate change is real while they continue to back the world's most expensive carbon loaded energy options, coal and gas.

If they were fair dinkum, we would be already transitioning to carbon free nuclear energy, i.e., Home grown, MS thorium as well as MSR nuclear waste burners, burning nuclear waste we are paid annual millions to take. And in the process providing the world's cheapest industrial energy! 1 cent PKWH and still earning a nice profit margin.

I'm not saying labor couldn't lay straight in bed and BS artists of the first water but, leave the known facts and the own words speak for themselves.
Alan B.

Idiots like Tom Harris are getting played by someone – and I'm guessing it's the abortion lobby, as they have most to gain from associating the pro-life cause with climate denialism.

The centre this article refers to is funded by ExxonMobil
Even a superficial search shows this is not evidence