The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Why is the United Nations so ineffective? > Comments

Why is the United Nations so ineffective? : Comments

By Peter Bowden, published 3/1/2023

What this article attempts is to develop a peaceful world, a world without war. And to identify the reasons why the United Nations has failed to do that.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All
"What this article attempts is to develop a peaceful world, a world without war". Very ambitious indeed to think that an article by an old lefty academic can 'develop a peaceful world' when the UN, set up for that purpose, cannot.

Peter's list of UN failures is far from exhaustive. The circus is a total failure, a total waste of money, with some totally awful countries as members.

Given that this rotten organisation continually nags Australia about everything it deems to be wrong, while foul countries like China do as they please, Australia should show some self-respect and withdraw from it.
Posted by ttbn, Tuesday, 3 January 2023 9:14:43 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I see a glaring error in that list: it's West Papua, rather than Papua New Guinea, where local indigenous people clamour for independence from Indonesia.

____________________________________________________________________________

ttbn,
Do you really want Australia to be a nation of such pathetic snowflakes that we go off in a permanent huff just because others dare to criticise us?
Posted by Aidan, Tuesday, 3 January 2023 9:37:57 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
We wouldn't expect a boxer to engage an opponent with both hands tied behind his or her back! Yet we expect more or less the same of UN peacekeepers. Then criticize them when they fail to prevent genocide or worse.

Those on the ground have no mandate to use initiative but need to go through so much red tape and official BS, before they can use their weapons to defend the helpless and the innocent.

As for the UN broadly, they are hampered by division and a security council where a minority can veto righteous actions or reprisals.

Our international policeman is so hamstrung by red tape, BS and maniacal vetoes that all righteous action even the most defendable, is verboten. That's why.
Alan B.
Posted by Alan B., Tuesday, 3 January 2023 10:18:46 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
What Aiden says.
Alan B.
Posted by Alan B., Tuesday, 3 January 2023 10:21:35 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Problem will always remain, who polices the police?
Posted by diver dan, Tuesday, 3 January 2023 1:20:31 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Not just ineffective, but an outright menace, for world peace. A whole generation has been sucked into UN net zero emissions. Which means we are further than ever, from dealing with over-population.

Labor front bench is stacked with ministers, working for UN interests, and against Australian interests. Hi, Clare, Andrew, and Andrew.
Posted by Steve S, Tuesday, 3 January 2023 4:58:31 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy