The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Debunking 'disinformation' > Comments

Debunking 'disinformation' : Comments

By Laurence Maher, published 3/11/2022

Why is it that any Australian Government feels the need to justify the Big Tech NEWSPEAK/Groupthink euphemism, 'interventions' to stifle 'disinformation'? Why not use the unambiguous word 'censorship'?

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All
The Left calls anything it disagrees with 'misinformation'.

It is good to see someone else call out the "self-absorption" and "narcissism" of "angry young folks" who feel that virtue-signalling and emotions are the truth. These useful idiots for Marxism are toddlers, mentally, with not much of a future.

The WEF is more dangerous than the UN, with many Western left-wing leaders under its influence, including the anti-democratic Ardern and Trudeau. Ardern's terrible speech in the UN recently showed her up to be a real left-wing lunatic, deserving the #justgoJacinta sentiment doing the rounds.
Posted by ttbn, Thursday, 3 November 2022 8:31:54 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I love a good conspiracy theory, because there is always someone at the helm and in charge who knows exactly what he she wants and exactly how to get it. And who to engage/employ to facilitate that outcome.

That said, (official) misinformation is rife in Australia particularly in the field of medicine, energy applications and price structures.

We see hundreds if not thousands of doctors prescribing statins. Even though a double-blind test conducted in the UK under the auspice of two renowned professors of medicine, showed that only those on the placebo did not suffer some degree of cognitive impermeant.

Statins being big pharma's largest money spinner, and the reason for its acceptance as standard if, harm causing medication. (See the case against statins)

Big pharma demanded a double blind on the other cholesterol treatment once very popular and successful, i.e., EDTA chelation therapy.
That is administered with accompanying complimentary supplements as Chelation therapy also claws out some of the good guy as well as a plethora of toxic minerals and cholesterol plague from the arteries, heart valves and veins.

Big pharma implied that it was the supplements that did the good work and not the EDTA. And demanded that the double blind was done without the supplements. The practitioners stupidly complied. When instead they should have challenged and accepted a double blind on the supplements alone, which would have ended the farce there and then.

The medical profession has form in misinformation at the behest of big pharma. One recalls how they to a virtual generic man belittled two west Australian researchers who claimed the prove stomach ulcers were caused by bacteria not acids overload. Antacids at the time, big pharma's biggest most profitable money spinner. TBC.
Alan B.
Posted by Alan B., Thursday, 3 November 2022 8:37:06 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
People who come up with "conspiracy theory" when they see or hear anything they don't like are also totalitarian anti-democrats of the cancel culture persuasion.
Posted by ttbn, Thursday, 3 November 2022 9:21:10 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The Left calls anything it disagrees with 'misinformation'.
ttbn,
The Left is the cradle of misinformation !
Posted by Indyvidual, Thursday, 3 November 2022 10:33:18 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
On the radio this morning, a "doctor" claiming success for extending the life expectancy of a cancer patient by an additional 12 months.

On ABC's press club luncheon, a stage 4 ovarian cancer victim described in tears, how chemotherapy had first sent her into remission then when the cancer reappeared around five years later, the doctors and her "doctor" husband, sent her home to die.

This in spite of the fact that in 2006 in some European cancer clinics had employed in day clinics the miracle cancer cure, the alpha particle, bismuth 213, to stop ovarian cancer dead in its tracks with little if any discernable damage to surrounding healthy tissue! This treatment does not come with hair loss or weeks spent recovering from sublethal doses of toxic chemotherapy.

We don't have the alpha particle, bismuth 213 because we don't have by choice/official antinuclear embargo, MSR thorium/nuclear energy. Where it's a virtually free wase product of nuclear decay in the MSR thorium reactor.

Bismuth 213 has cured or sent into long term remission some very nasty death sentence cancers. And it can be repeated years later with success, even when the patient is on deaths door.

We talk of pandemics that take out more folk than two world wars. Yet cancer takes around two million folk a every year on year out. Meaning in the last thirty or so years, we've lost some 60 million people, moms, dads, sons, sisters, uncles, cousins, best mates, wives, husbands to cancer, most of who would have been saved if we deployed bismuth 213. Pandemic shamdemic!

Yes, I know you can create bismuth 213 by bombarding radium in a collider. But the expense of that method means the aforementioned therapy is reserved for millionaires or out of reach of joe average. Why, because of an official nuclear (blood on their hands) embargo sustained on the back of mountainous misinformation!
Alan B.
Posted by Alan B., Thursday, 3 November 2022 10:50:45 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
More misinformation is doing the rounds via various labor luminaries (!)s who keep repeating the pork pie, that renewables are cheaper. Cheaper than what? Current coal gas oil and current conventional solid fueled nuclear reactors, where the price at virtual cost, cannot get under 6 cents PKWH. And retails I'm informed for around 18 cents PKWH. The lowest renewables have ever done at cost alone, was 6 cents PKWH. And that was very broad scale, acres and acres of solar voltaic panels.

But renewables are not by any stretch, the cheapest. To claim this is true is mostly as claimed by ttbn and others, left wing BS. Simply put, 1.98 cents are the median price for MSR thorium.

Moreover, when MSR technology is fueled with nuclear waste, where it is mostly unspent and free fuel. The end price can even be virtually free. Using this reduces the half-life to just 300 years and the waste then far less toxic and oft times suitable as long-life space batteries for our new space industry!

Greens, lefties and other assorted nut jobs (!)s have for years promulgated mountains of mischievous, vexatious, fearmongering, misinformation about nuclear energy. And needs to be debunked without any official delay. So, we can as we should get started transitioning to carbon free, nuclear energy and power prices as low as 1.98 cents PKWH or even lower.

Those (!)s who won't help need to get out of the way of our very survival our future, prosperity, jobs and wealth building opportunities. And let those who want that get on with it and a transition to nuclear.

In the meantime, we can crack on building reactors and shipping them to an energy starved world. So, we have all the skills and the reactors we need when we get the nuclear antagonists (!)s out of the way, along with their shoveled by the shipload (vested financial interest) BS!
Alan B.
Posted by Alan B., Thursday, 3 November 2022 11:26:40 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy